Genome sequence of a dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacterium Geobacter soli type strain GSS01T
© Yang et al. 2015
Received: 22 February 2015
Accepted: 26 November 2015
Published: 2 December 2015
Strain GSS01T (=KCTC 4545=MCCC 1 K00269) is the type strain of the species Geobacter soli. G. soli strain GSS01T is of interest due to its ability to reduce insoluble Fe(III) oxides with a wide range of electron donors. Here we describe some key features of this strain, together with the whole genome sequence and annotation. The genome of size 3,657,100 bp contains 3229 protein-coding and 54 RNA genes, including 2 16S rRNA genes. The genome of strain GSS01Tcontains 76 predicted cytochrome genes, 24 pilus assembly protein genes and several other genes, which were proposed to be related to the reduction of insoluble Fe(III) oxides. The genes associated with the electron donors and acceptors of strain GSS01T were predicted in the genome. Information gained from its sequence will be relevant to the future elucidation of extracellular electron transfer mechanism during the reduction of Fe(III) oxides.
KeywordsGeobacter soli Extracellular electron transfer Insoluble Fe(III) oxides reduction Cytochrome Pilin protein
Geobacter is the type genus of the family Geobacteraceae in the order Desulfuromonadales within the class Deltaproteobacteria . It currently contains 19 validly named species and 2 subspecies isolated from various environments, mostly subsurface anoxic environments. Members of the genus Geobacter are anaerobic, Gram-negative and rod-shaped bacteria. The Geobacter species have the ability to effectively transfer electrons directly onto insoluble extracellular metal (iron) oxides, and thus commonly, are the most abundant microorganisms in anaerobic soils and sediments where metal reduction is an important process .
Geobacter soli strain GSS01T (=KCTC 4545=MCCC 1 K00269), is the type strain of the species Geobacter soli . It was originally isolated from soil of an underground ancient forest in Longfu Town, Sihui City, Guangdong Province, China (23o 22′ N 112o 42′ E). Within the genus Geobacter , G. soli has been proposed to form a subclade together with G. sulfurreducens PCA, demonstrating 98.3 % similarity between the 16S rRNA gene sequences . Here, we summarize the physiological features together with the whole genome sequence, annotation and data analysis of G. soli strain GSS01T.
Classification and features
Classification and general features of G. soli GSS01T according to the MIGS recommendations 
Species Geobacter soli
Type strain GSS01=KCTC 4545=MCCC 1 K00269
pH range; Optimum
Acetate, ethanol, glucose, lactate, butyrate, pyruvate, benzoate, benzaldehyde, m-cresol and phenol
Terminal electron acceptor
Ferrihydrite, Fe(III) citrate, Mn(IV), sulfur, and AQDS
0–1.5 % NaCl (w/v)
Longfu Town, Sihui City, Guangdong Province, China
Mar 14, 2013
Genome sequencing information
Genome project history
Two libraries 463 bp PCR-free library, 6712 bp index library
Illumina Hiseq 2000
SOAPdenovo 2.04 
Gene calling method
Glimmer 3.02 
Genbank Date of Release
Jan 8, 2015
Source Material Identifier
Type strain, environmental, insoluble Fe(III) oxides reduction
Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation
Geobacter soli strain GSS01T was anaerobically cultivated in a mineral salts medium [MSM, containing (L−1) 0.6 g NaH2PO4, 0.25 g NH4Cl, 0.1 g KCl, 2.5 g NaHCO3, 10.0 ml vitamin stock solution and 10.0 ml mineral stock solution , pH 7.2] supplemented with 50 mM Fe(III) citrate and 10 mM acetate as the electron acceptor and donor, respectively. Total genomic DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction kit (Aidlab). The quality and quantity of the genomic DNA was determined by 0.6 % agarose gel electrophoresis with λ-Hind III digest DNA marker and by a Qubit fluorometer (Invitrogen, CA, USA) with Qubit dsDNA BR Assay kit. About 50.22 μg DNA with a concentration of 91.3 ng/μl was obtained.
Genome sequencing and assembly
The genome of strain GSS01T was sequenced at the BGI in Shenzhen using the HiSeq2000 system (Illumina, USA). Two libraries with insert size 463 bp and 6712 bp were constructed and a total of 461 Mb and 232 Mb raw data were produced before filtering, respectively. After removing the adapter, duplicated reads and short inserts from the data of large library, there remained 401 Mb and 202 Mb clean data for assembling, respectively. Then these sequences were assembled into 15 contigs using the SOAPdenovo 2.04  with K setting at 83.
Whole genomic tRNA were identified using tRNAscan (version 1.23)  with the bacterial model, rRNAs were found by rRNAmmer (version 1.2) , and sRNA were predicted using Infernal software and the Rfam database (version 10.1) . The genes in the assembled genome were identified using Glimmer (version 3.02) . The predicted ORFs were translated and used to search KEGG (version: 59), COG (version: 20090331), SwissPort (version: 201206), NR (version: 20121005) and GO (version: 1.419) databases. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Genes with signal peptides and transmembrane helices were predicted using SignalP server v.4.1  and TMHMM server v.2.0 , respectively.
Genome statistics of G. soli strain GSS01T
% of totala
Genome size (bp)
DNA coding (bp)
DNA G + C (bp)
Protein coding genes
Genes in internal clusters
Genes with function prediction
Genes assigned to COGs
Genes with Pfam domains
Genes with signal peptides
Genes with transmembrane helices (≥3)
Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories
% of totala
RNA processing and modification
Replication, recombination and repair
Chromatin structure and dynamics
Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Signal transduction mechanisms
Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
Intracellular trafficking and secretion
Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
Energy production and conversion
Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
Amino acid transport and metabolism
Nucleotide transport and metabolism
Coenzyme transport and metabolism
Lipid transport and metabolism
Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
General function prediction only
Not in COGs
Genome statistics comparison among characterized Geobacter speciesa
Genome size (Mb)
G + C content (%)
Insights from the genome sequence
Genes associated with insoluble Fe(III) oxide reduction
The ability of Geobacter to reduce insoluble Fe(III) oxides is presumably due to the presence of a vast network of c-type cytochromes that transfer the electrons out of the inner membrane, through the periplasm and outer membrane to Fe(III) oxides [13, 14]. Previous reports revealed that 38 % of the c-type cytochrome proteins encoded in the genome of G. sulfurreducens were predicted to involve in the extracellular electron transfer during the reduction of insoluble Fe(III) oxides, which emphasized the importance of the c-type chrochromes for extracellular electron transfer . Since the c-type cytochromes are not well conserved among Geobacter species , it is valuable to investigate the cytochrome content of different Geobacter species.
Description of the predicted cytochrome C proteins
Description of pillus assembly protein
Pilus assembly protein PilB
Pilus assembly protein PilB
Pilus assembly protein PilM
Pilus assembly protein PilO
Pilus assembly protein PilP
Pilus assembly protein PilQ
Pilus assembly protein PilB
Pilus assembly protein PilM
Pilus assembly protein PilO
Pilus assembly protein PilA
Pilus assembly protein PilC
Pilus assembly protein PilZ
Pilus assembly protein PilZ
Pilus assembly protein PilY
Pilus assembly protein PilX
Pilus assembly protein PilW
Pilus assembly protein PilV
Pilus assembly protein PilZ
Pilus assembly protein PilZ
Pilus assembly protein PilZ
Pilus assembly protein PilZ
Pilus assembly protein PilZ
Pilus assembly protein pilZ
Pilus assembly protein PilE
Another gene encoding putative menaquinol oxidoreductase (SE37_00765) that might be involved in the reduction of Fe(III) oxides revealed 86 % similarity to the menaquinol oxidoreducatase complex Cbc5 of G. sulfurreducens . The putative complex Cbc5 was an essential protein for reduction of insoluble Fe(III) oxides in both G. sulfurreducens and G. uraniireducens . In addition, the existence of a number of chemotaxis proteins (count 85) and flagella proteins (count 42) in the genome of strain GSS01T indicated the possibility of accessing insoluble Fe(III) oxides by chemotaxis which was only reported in G. metallireducens . Chemotaxis, mainly depends on motility by flagella, is beneficial for Fe(III) oxide reduction , and deletion of the flagellin protein-encoding gene fliC resulted in the loss of ability to reduce insoluble Fe(III) oxides in a G. metallireducens strain .
Reduction of other electron acceptors
G. sulfurreducens is capable of oxygen respiration  using a cytochrome caa 3 oxidase complex (coxACDB genes) , which is also found in G. soli GSS01T (SE37_15290, SE37_15295, SE37_15300, SE37_15305, SE37_15310 and SE37_15315). In addition, the G. soli genome contains a pair of genes encoding cytochrome bd quinol oxidases (SE37_06965 and SE37_06970), which is closely related to its counterparts in G. sulfurreducens . The presence of these proteins indicates that strain GSS01T may grow with oxygen as a terminal electron acceptor. To detoxify reactive oxygen species (ROS) that produced from the oxygen respiration, G. soli possesses a desulfoferrodoxin (SE37_01515), a superoxide dismutase (SE37_09185), a catalase (SE37_11355), 2 peroxiredoxins (SE37_10345 and SE37_14390), 3 rubrerythrins (SE37_02245, SE37_11375 and SE37_11415), and 5 peroxidases (SE37_00200, SE37_10685, SE37_11370, SE37_13285 and SE37_16060), which were also present in G. sulfurreducens . Overall, the genome annotation indicates that, strain GSS01T has evolved to cope with many kinds of ROS to survive oxidative stress, which can ensure cells survive in oxic environments.
Sulfate and nitrate are common electron acceptors in the anaerobic bacteria. G. soli possesses the essential proteins in complete pathway of assimilatory sulfate reduction, including sulfate transporter (SE37_02365, SE37_04150, SE37_08380, SE37_08385 and SE37_08390 and SE37_08640), sulfate adenylyltransferase (SE37_06140), adenylylsulfate reductase (SE37_06145) and sulfite reductase (SE37_08370, SE37_13370 and SE37_15590). Nitrate can be reduced by G. metallireducens but cannot be utilized by G. sulfurreducens . Like G. sulfurreducens , G. soli contains two putative copies of periplasmic nitrite reductases: the first, NfrA (SE37_12935=GSU3154; SE37_16085 = GSU0357), is responsible for the reduction of nitrite to ammonia; the second, NrfH (SE37_12940 = GSU3155), is the small subunit whose likely role is to mediate between the quinone pool and the nitrite reductase. The nitrite reductase (NADH) small subunit, NirD (SE37_02720 = GSU2527) is also found. The presence of these ORFs and the absence of the nitrate reductase indicate the possibility that nitrite can be utilized as an electron acceptor but nitrate can be not. In addition, the putative nitric-oxide reductase NorB (SE37_00345) and NorC (SE37_00350) in G. soli genome, which may participate in reducing nitric oxide to nitrous oxide, are absent in G. sulfurreducens . This foundation indicates that the nitrite metabolism in G. soli may be more complex than that in G. sulfurreducens .
Metabolism of electron donors
Glucose cannot be utilized by most members in the genus Geobacter . Although a complete pathway for glycolysis could be reconstructed, G. sulfurreducens cannot grow with glucose as an electron donor due to the absence of valid sugar transporter in the genome of G. sulfurreducens . To the best of our knowledge, G. bemidjiensis was the first Geobacter species which can utilize glucose as it possessed a unique glucose/galactose transporter (gluP Gbem_3671) belonging to the MFS superfamily . The MFS superfamily is one of the two largest families of membrane transporters, which has a diversity of substrates including simple sugars . In the genome of strain GSS01T, besides a complete glycolysis pathway, 8 MFS transporters were found, 7 of which have orthologs in G. sulfurreducens and 1 is unique in G. soli (SE37_04190, 76 % similarity to that of Thauera aminoaromatica ). Strain GSS01T was able to grow with glucose as electron donor using Fe(III) citrate as the terminal electron acceptor, and this ability may be attributed to the presence of the unique MFS transporter in G. soli genome.
Acetate is expected to be the key electron donor supporting Fe(III) reduction in the Geobacter species. Like G. sulfurreducens , G. soli utilize acetate by two reversible pathways, indicating that acetate may be inefficiently utilized at low concentrations . The first pathway of acetate activation occurs through succinyl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferases (SE37_13685, SE37_00360, and SE37_11235) that convert succinyl-CoA to succinate during oxidation of acetate by the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle . Among the three enzymes, SE37_13685 and SE37_00360 have orthologs in G. sulfurreducens , and SE37_11235 is 83 % identical to Gbem_2843 in G. bemidjiensis . The second pathway consists of two steps: acetate kinases (SE37_01820 and SE37_14395) convert acetate to acetyl-phosphate, and phosphate acetyltransferase (SE37_01825) converts acetyl-phosphte to acetyl-CoA .
Strain GSS01T can grow with pyruvate as an electron donor. The interconvert pyruvate and acetyl-CoA is the central reaction during the pyruvate metabolism. Like other Geobacteraceae [25, 30], G. soli possesses two sets of genes encoding pyruvate dehydrogenase complexes (SE37_03080, SE37_02045, SE37_02040, and SE37_03100; SE37_03105 and SE37_02035) to irreversibly convert pyruvate to acetyl-CoA. The reverse reaction in G. soli from acetyl-CoA is attributed to a homodimeric pyruvate-ferredoxin/flavodoxin oxidoreductase (SE37_14040). In addition to pyruvate, ethanol is another electron donor that strain GSS01T can use but G. sulfurreducens cannot. There are two alcohol dehydrogenases (SE37_00690 and SE37_01915) predicted in G. soli genome, in which only SE37_00690 has homolog in G. sulfurreducens (GSU0573) and SE37_01915 that unique for G. soli has 76 % similarity to that in Vibrio parahaemolyticus .
Hydrogen is an electron donor utilized by some Geobacter such as G. sulfurreducens . In the G. soli genome, there are 27 ORFs for hydrogenases, including the orthologs of three large and small subunit [NiFe] hydrogenases (SE37_13920=GSU0122, SE37_13915=GSU0123, SE37_10910=GSU0785, SE37_10925=GSU0782, SE37_03185=GSU2419, and SE37_03190=GSU2418) and two hydrogenase complexes (first complex: SE37_01595 = GSU0739, SE37_01600=GSU0740, SE37_01605=GSU0741, SE37_01610=GSU0742, SE37_01615=GSU0743, SE37_01620 = GSU0745 and possibly SE37_01575=GSU0734; second complex: SE37_01780=GSU2718, SE37_01775=GSU2719, SE37_01770=GSU2720, SE37_01765=GSU2721, SE37_01760=GSU2722) that predicted to participate the hydrogen cycling . In addition, at least two hydrogenases (SE37_02470 and SE37_02475) in G. soli genome have no orthologs in G. sulfurreducens . This result indicates that G. soli may utilize hydrogen as sole electron donor.
Aromatic compounds represent the second most abundant class of natural carbon compounds and many aromatic compounds are major environmental pollutants . Some Geobacter species especially G. metallireducens have the ability to degrade aromatic compounds [33, 34]. Although there is no complete aromatic compound pathway in the genome of G. soli , some genes that may be involved in aromatic compounds degradation are found. For example, 3-hydroxybutyrul-CoA dehydrogenase (SE37_11190, 86 % similarity to Gmet_1717 in G. metallireducens ), acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase (SE37_11195, 83 % similarity to Gmet_1719 in G. metallireducens ) , thiolase (SE37_13640), and tautomerase (SE37_07305) are predicted to be involved in the benzoate degradation; one 4Fe-4S ferredoxin (SE37_08830) and six hydrogenase (SE37_10910, SE37_13915, SE37_13920, SE37_10925, SE37_02470 and SE37_02475) are predicted to be involved in nitrotoluene degradation, among which SE37_02470 and SE37_02475 have no ortholog in G. sulfurreducens ; CoA-transferase (SE37_11150, 85 % similarity to that of G. metallireducens ) and glutaconate CoA-transferase (SE37_11145, 90 % similarity to Gmet_1708 in G. metallireducens ) may be involved in styrene degradation, and these enzymes have no orthologs in G. sulfurreducens . In addition, other enzymes of acyl-CoA metabolism are predicted from the genome of G. soli : acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (SE37_11155, 80 % similarity to Gmet_1710 in G. metallireducens ; SE37_11180, 86 % similarity to that of Geoalkalibacter subterraneus ), succinyl-CoA:acetate CoA-transferases (SE37_00360; SE37_11235, 83 % similarity to Gbem_2843 in G. bemidjiensis ; SE37_13685), acyl-CoA thioesterases (SE37_09325, SE37_09950, SE37_10860, SE37_14445 and SE37_15385), enoyl-CoA hydratases (SE37_15375; SE37_11185, 81 % similarity to Gmet_1716 in G. metallireducens ), phenylacetate-CoA ligase (SE37_04405, SE37_06045 and SE37_06085) and acyl-CoA synthetase (SE37_06810). The ability to utilize aromatic compounds and other carbon sources may be due to stepwise breakdown of multicarbon organic acids to simpler compounds by these enzymes .
Geobacter soli type strain GSS01T, isolated from China, can reduce insoluble Fe(III) oxides, such as ferrihydrite, with a variety of electron donors under anaerobic conditions . The insight to the whole genome sequence of strain GSS01T was made based on its ability to reduce electron acceptors with various electron donors. The investigation, especially analysis of the electron transport genes, will be helpful for revealing the mechanism of the extracellular electron transfer of strain GSS01T, and further study of the gene-coding sequence may consequently enhance the understanding of the Fe(III) oxides reduction of Geobacter genus and even microbial community in anaerobic soils and sediments.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41203078 and 41301257), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2013B060400042), and the Industry-University-Research Project of Guangdong Ministry of Education, China (2013B090500017).
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Lovley DR, Giovannoni SJ, White DC, Champine JE, Phillips EJP, Gorby YA, et al. Geobacter metallireducens gen. nov., sp. nov., a microorganism capable of coupling the complete oxidation of organic compounds to the reduction of iron and other metals. Arch Microbiol. 1993;159:336–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lovley DR, Ueki T, Zhang T, Malvankar NS, Shrestha PM, Flanagan KA, et al. Geobacter: the microbe electric’s physiology, ecology, and practical applications. Adv Microb Physiol. 2011;59:1–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou SG, Yang GQ, Lu Q, Wu M. Geobacter soli sp. nov., a dissimilatory Fe(III)-reducing bacterium isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:3786–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun D, Wang A, Cheng S, Yates M, Logan BE. Geobacter anodireducens sp. nov., a novel exoelectrogenic microbe in bioelectrochemical systems. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64(10):3485–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li X, Zhou S, Li F, Wu C, Zhuang L, Xu W, et al. Fe (III) oxide reduction and carbon tetrachloride dechlorination by a newly isolated Klebsiella pneumoniae strain L17. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;106:130–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J, Qian W, Fang X, Shi Z, et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res. 2010;20(2):265–72.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucl Acids Res. 1997;25(5):955–64.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Stærfeldt H, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucl Acids Res. 2007;35(9):3100–8.
- Gardner PP, Daub J, Tate JG, Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Lindgreen S, et al. Rfam: updates to the RNA families database. Nucl Acids Res. 2009;37(1):D136–40.
- Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Power EC, Salzberg SL. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(6):673–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. Signal 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8:785–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer ELL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305(3):567–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aklujkar M, Coppi MV, Leang C, Kim BC, Chavan MA, Perpetua LA, et al. Proteins involved in electron transfer to Fe(III) and Mn(IV) oxides by Geobacter sulfurreducens and Geobacter uraniireducens. Microbiology. 2013;159:515–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smith JA, Lovley DR, Tremblay P-L. Outer cell surface components essential for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter metallireducens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;79(3):901–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Butler JE, Young ND, Lovley DR. Evolution of electron transfer out of the cell: comparative genomics of six Geobacter genomes. BMC Gemonics. 2010;11:40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Allen JW, Daltrop O, Stevens JM, Ferguson SJ. C-type cytochromes: diverse structures and biogenesis systems pose evolutionary problems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003;358:255–66.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reguera G, McCarthy KD, Mehta T, Nicoll JS, Tuominen MT, Lovley DR. Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires. Nature. 2005;435:1098–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strom MS, Lory S. Structure-function and biogenesis of the type IV pili. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1993;47:565–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Craig L, Pique ME, Tainer JA. Type IV pilus structure and bacterial pathogenicity. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:363–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vargas M, Malvankar NS, Tremblay P-L, Leang C, Smith JA, Patel P, et al. Aromatic amino acids required for pili conductivity and long-range extracellular electron transport in Geobacter sulfurreducens. mBio. 2013;4(2):e00105–13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Childers SE, Ciufo S, Lovley DR. Geobacter metallireducens accesses insoluble Fe(III) oxide by chemotaxis. Nature. 2002;416:767–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ueki T, Leang C, Inoue K, Lovley DR. Identification of multicomponent histidine-aspartate phosphorelay system controlling flagellar and motility gene expression in Geobacter species. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:10958–66.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tremblay P-L, Aklujkar M, Leang C, Nevin KP, Lovley DR. A genetic system for Geobacter metallireducens: role of the flagellin and pilin in the reduction of Fe(III) oxide. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2012;4(1):82–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin WC, Coppi MV, Lovley DR. Geobacter sulfrreducens can grow with oxygen as a terminal electron acceptor. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(4):2525–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aklujkar M, Young ND, Holmes D, Chavan M, Risso C, Kiss HE, et al. The genome of Geobacter bemidjiensis, exemplar for the subsurface clade of Geobacter species that predominate in Fe(III)-reducing subsurface environments. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:490.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caccavo Jr F, Lonergan DJ, Lovley DR, Davis M, Stolz JF, McInerney MJ. Geobacter sulfurreducens sp. nov., a hydrogen- and acetate-oxidizing dissimilatory metal-reducing microorganism. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994;60(10):3752–9.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mahadevan R, Bond DR, Butler JE, Esteve-Nuñez A, Coppi MV, Palsson BO, et al. Characterization of metabolism in the Fe(III)-reducing organism Geobacter sulfurreducens by constraint-based modeling. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(2):1558–68.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Araki N, Suzuki T, Miyauchi K, Kasai D, Masai E, Fukuda M. Identification and characterization of uptake systems for glucose and fructose in Rhodococcus jostii RHA1. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;20(3):125–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aklujkar M, Krushkal J, DiBartolo G, Lapidus A, Land ML, Lovley DR. The genome sequence of Geobacter metallireducens: features of metabolism, physiology and regulation common and dissimilar to Geobacter sulfurreducens. BMC Microbiol. 2009;9:109.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Segura D, Mahadevan R, Juarez K, Lovley DR. Computational and experimental analysis of redundancy in the central metabolism of Geobacter sulfurreducens. Plos Comput Biol. 2008;4:e36.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Methé BA, Nelson KE, Eisen JA, Paulsen IT, Nelson W, Heidelberg JF, et al. Genome of Geobacter sulfurreducens: metal reduction in subsurface environments. Science. 2003;30(12):1967–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Díaz E. Bacterial degradation of aromatic pollutants: a paradigm of metabolic versatility. Int Microbiol. 2004;7:173–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wischgoll S, Heintz D, Peters F, Erxleben A, Sarnighausen E, Reski R, et al. Gene clusters involved in anaerobic benzoate degradation of Geobacter metallireducens. Mol Microbiol. 2005;58(5):1238–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peters F, Heintz D, Johannes J, van Dorsselaer A, Boll M. Genes, enzymes, and regulation of para-cresol metabolism in Geobacter metallireducens. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(13):4729–38.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(5):541–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Arcteria, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87(12):4576–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garrity GM, Bell JA, Liburn T. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Volume2, Part B. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Euzéby J. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56(1):1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuever J, Rainey FA, Widdel F. Class IV. Deltaproteobacteria class. nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Volume2, Part C. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 922.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuever J, Rainey FA, Widdel F, Order V. Desulfuromonales ord. nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Volume2, Part C. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 1005–6.Google Scholar
- Holmes DE, Nevin KP, Lovley DR. Comparison of 16S rRNA, nifD, recA, gyrB, rpoB and fusA genes within the family Geobacteraceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:1591–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garrity GM, Bell JA, Liburn T. Family II. Geobacteraceae fam. nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Volume2, Part C. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 1017.Google Scholar
- Efobacterium T. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1995;45(3):1–6.Google Scholar
- Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar