Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas brassicacearum strain L13-6-12, a biological control agent from the rhizosphere of potato
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 24 May 2016
Accepted: 5 December 2016
Published: 9 January 2017
Pseudomonas brassicacearum strain L13-6-12 is a rhizosphere colonizer of potato, lettuce and sugar beet. Previous studies have shown that this motile, Gram-negative, non-sporulating bacterium is an effective biocontrol agent against different phytopathogens. Here, we announce and describe the complete genome sequence of P. brassicacearum L13-6-12 consisting of a single 6.7 Mb circular chromosome that consists of 5773 protein coding genes and 85 RNA-only encoding genes. Genome analysis revealed genes encoding specialized functions for pathogen suppression, thriving in the rhizosphere and interacting with eukaryotic organisms.
KeywordsShort genome report Pseudomonadaceae Pseudomonas brassicacearum L13-6-12 Potato rhizosphere Volatile organic compounds Biocontrol Plant growth promotion Secretion systems
Pseudomonas brassicacearum strain L13-6-12 was isolated from the rhizosphere of a field grown potato plant . L13-6-12 was selected as effective biological control agent with disease-suppressing effects against Rhizoctonia solani Kühn in treated lettuce and potato plants in greenhouse and field trials . It has additional antifungal activity against the phytopathogenic fungi Alternaria alternata , Botrytis cinerea Pers. DSM5145 , Penicillium italicum , Phoma betae , Sclerotinia sclerotiorum , Verticillium dahliae Kleb. V25 (all Ascomycota) and Rhizoctonia solani AG2-2IIIB and AG4 and Sclerotium rolfsii (Basidiomycota). This biocontrol activity is linked to the production of secondary metabolites, including 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol and hydrogen cyanide. For various strains of plant-associated pseudomonads the production of antifungal metabolites like DAPG and recombinase genes were identified as the major trait for biological control of soilborne pathogens and plant root colonization . Genes in L13-6-12 predicting functions for biocontrol include factors such as secreted proteases and comprehensive secretion systems. It also supports plant growth by nutrient delivery by phosphate solubilization, production of indole-3-acetic acid as well as by aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase activity. Additionally, L13-6-12 copes with abiotic stresses such as desiccation and high salt concentrations. To gain insight into ecological relevant traits and to improve its biotechnological applications we sequenced the complete genome of this bacterium.
Classification and features
Even though the optimal growth temperature is 30 °C, L13-6-12 can also slowly replicate at 5 °C in liquid Luria Bertani medium. Growth was observed at 37 °C and slightly at 40 °C in this culturing medium as well as on solidified medium after 24 h. The strain grows in complex media, but not in Standard Succinate Medium (pH 7.0). Optimum pH for growth in LB is pH 7.0. The bacterium is an efficient colonizer of lettuce, potato [2, 3] and sugar beet plants, where microcolonies consisted of tens to hundreds of bacterial cells, forming an interconnected network between epidermal cells in the rhizoplane . It does not cause any deleterious effect on its original host plant potato or lettuce [1, 2] and sugar beet  or on the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans . Strain L13-6-12 has natural resistance to gentamycin (10 μg mL−1), trimethoprim (50 μg mL−1) and is able to develop spontaneous rifampicin-resistance.
Classification and general features of P. brassicacearum strain L13-6-12 according to the MIGS recommendation 
Species Pseudomonas brassicacearum
IDA, TAS 
IDA, TAS 
5 °C–40 °C
pH range; Optimum
1.0–9.0% NaCl (w/v)
IDA, TAS 
Gross Luesewitz, Germany
Genome sequencing information
Genome project history
PacBio RS libraries with inserts of 8 to 20 kb
PacBio RS II sequencer
Hierarchical Genome Assembly Process algorithm implemented in the PacBio SMRT Analysis software
Gene calling method
Glimmer gene prediction, NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline
GenBank Date of Release
September 20, 2016
Source Material Identifier
Plant-bacteria interaction, agricultural, environmental
Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation
P. brassicacearum strain L13-6-12 was grown in 50 mL of NBII (Sifin, Berlin, Germany) medium and incubated for 20 h at 30 °C. 1.0 mL was centrifuged at 2500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C and genomic DNA was extracted using the MasterPure DNA purification kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI, USA). DNA quality and quantity were validated by agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000c, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA). In total, 54 μg genomic DNA (1.8 μg μL−1) was sent on dry ice to the sequencing service. PacBio RS libraries with inserts of 8 to 20 kb were constructed and sequenced at GATC Biotech (Konstanz, Germany).
Genome sequencing and assembly
PacBio RS libraries with inserts of 8 to 20 kb were constructed and sequenced at GATC Biotech (Konstanz, Germany) using single molecule, real-time sequencing. Assembly was completed with the Hierarchical Genome Assembly Process algorithm implemented in the PacBio SMRT Analysis software (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). The assembly of L13-6-12 genome based on 130,283 quality reads with a mean length of 4995 bp resulting in a single circular chromosome consisting of 6,715,909 bp, with 84.9-fold overall coverage and a GC content of 60.7%.
Automatic annotation was conducted on the RAST Web server (version 36) using RAST gene calling based on FIGfam version Release70 [8, 9], and additional annotation for using the automated assignment of COG-functions to protein-coding genes was completed on the BASys web server using Glimmer gene prediction [10, 11]. Pseudogenes were predicted using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Signal peptides and transmembrane helices were predicted using SignalP [12, 13] and TMHMM [14, 15].
% of Total
Genome size (bp)
DNA coding (bp)
DNA G + C (bp)
Protein coding genes
Genes in internal clusters
Genes with function prediction
Genes assigned to COGs
Genes with Pfam domains
Genes with signal peptides
Genes with transmembrane helices
Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories
Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
RNA processing and modification
Replication, recombination and repair
Chromatin structure and dynamics
Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
Signal transduction mechanisms
Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
Intracellular trafficking and secretion
Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
Energy production and conversion
Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
Amino acid transport and metabolism
Nucleotide transport and metabolism
Coenzyme transport and metabolism
Lipid transport and metabolism
Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
General function prediction only
Not in COGs
Insights from the genome sequence
The genome-wide phylogenetic analysis on different Pseudomonas species with the L13-6-12 genome showed that strain L13-6-12 clusters closely to P. fluorescens Q8r1-96 (NCBI Accession no. PRJNA67537) (Fig. 2). Recently, Q8r1-96 was described as a biological control strain that produces the antibiotic DAPG and that exceptionally colonizes the roots of wheat and pea [18, 19]. The genome of L13-6-12 contains several genes, which are important contributors to biological control. They are related to the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites or antimicrobial products that are similar to those found in the genomes of other Pseudomonads . We detected genes for the biosynthesis of DAPG (Locus tags: A0U95_04640, A0U95_04655, A0U95_04660, A0U95_04665) and productions of exoproteases (A0U95_00125, A0U95_02755). The suppression of hyphal growth of S. rolfsii by volatile organic compounds produced by L13-6-12 was observed in a test system developed by Cernava et al. . Volatile components have been shown to act as antibiotics and to induce plant growth [22, 23]. Hydrogen cyanide (HCN) is an inorganic volatile compound with antagonistic effects against soil microbes . The production of HCN was observed in L13-6-12 (A0U95_28525) by applying an assay according to Blom et al. . Genes predicting biosynthesis of other volatile components such as 2,3-butanediol (A0U95_29290) and acetoin (A0U95_29285) were found as well.
We further identified genes most probably involved in the direct promotion of plant growth, such as biosynthesis or carrier gene clusters for spermidine (A0U95_07830), pyoverdine (e.g. A0U95_07605, A0U95_25745, A0U95_25750) and aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase (A0U95_06530). ACC deaminase is suggested to be a key in the modulation of ethylene levels in plants by bacteria .
For secretion of extracellular proteins in the surrounding environment genes putatively encoding general secretory pathway proteins (Gsp) belonging to the type two secretion systems were found in L13-6-12 (e.g. A0U95_29195, A0U95_29200, A0U95_29205). Type six secretion systems have evolved in Gram-negative bacteria enabling them to interact with their host and to adapt to various microenvironments and specialized functions [27, 28]. Genes encoding components of the type six secretion system were found in L13-6-12 (e.g. A0U95_16935, A0U95_28720, A0U95_28755) putatively for interaction with eukaryotic organisms.
In this report, we describe the complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas brassicacearum strain L13-6-12, a strain that was originally isolated from the rhizosphere of potato grown in Groß Lüsewitz, Germany and which was originally assigned as P. fluorescens . This strain was selected for sequencing based on its ability to protect plants from biotic stresses and to promote plant growth. It also has a collection of genes predicting volatile components and enzymes such as a protease, ACC deaminase and spermidine enabling L13-6-12 to protect and promote its host plant. Genes, encoding putative T2SS, T4SS and T6SS, allowing interactions with the host and the environment were detected, too. Further functional studies and comparative genomics with related isolates will provide insights into mechanisms useful for novel biotechnological processes for seed and root applications since the strain represent a promising candidate for improving of plant performance.
Coding DNA sequence
Confocal laser scanning microscopy
Clusters of Orthologous Groups
Hierarchical Genome Assembly Process
Nutrient Broth II agar
Nutrient Broth II
Rapid annotations using subsystems technology
Single molecule, real-time
Standard Succinate Medium
Type 2 secretion system
The Authors thank Barbara Fetz for valuable assistance in DNA preparation. We are thankful to Eveline Adam and John H. Allan for performing growth experiments at different temperatures and pH values.
This work has been supported by the Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy (BMWFW), the Federal Ministry of Traffic, Innovation and Technology, the Styrian Business Promotion Agency SFG, the Standortagentur Tirol, the Government of Lower Austria and ZIT – Technology Agency of the City of Vienna through the COMET-Funding Program managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG.
CZ, HM and GB conceived and designed the experiments. CZ and JM performed the phenotypic characterization. HM and CZ performed the annotation and sequence homology searches. CZ wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript before submission. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Lottmann J, Heuer H, Smalla K, Berg G. Influence of transgenic T4-lysozyme-producing plants on beneficial plant-associated bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1999;29:365–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grosch R, Faltin F, Lottmann J, Kofoet A, Berg G. Effectiveness of 3 antagonistic bacterial isolates to control Rhizoctonia solani Kühn on lettuce and potato. Can J Microbiol. 2005;51(4):345–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raaijmakers JM, Weller DM. Exploiting Genotypic Diversity of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas spp.: Characterization of superior root-colonizing P. fluorescens strain Q8r1-96. Appl Environ Microb. 2001;67(6):2545–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zachow C, Fatehi J, Cardinale M, Tilcher R, Berg G. Strain‐specific colonization pattern of Rhizoctonia antagonists in the root system of sugar beet. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010;74(1):124–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zachow C, Pirker H, Westendorf C, Tilcher R, Berg G. The Caenorhabditis elegans assay: a tool to evaluate the pathogenic potential of bacterial biocontrol agents. Europ Plant Pathol. 2009;125(3):367–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loper JE, Hassan KA, Mavrodi DV, Davis II EW, Lim CK, Shaffer BT, et al. Comparative genomics of plant-associated Pseudomonas spp.: insights into diversity and inheritance of traits involved in multitrophic interactions. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(7):e1002784.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Federhen S, Rossello-Mora R, Klenk HP, Tindall BJ, Konstantinidis KT, Whitman WB, et al. Meeting report: GenBank microbial genomic taxonomy workshop (12–13 May, 2015). Standards Genomic Sci. 2016;11(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, et al. The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D206–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Domselaar GH, Stothard P, Shrivastava S, Cruz JA, Guo A, Dong X, Lu P, Szafron D, Greiner R, Wishart DS. BASys: a web server for automated bacterial genome annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W455–59.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. Improved microbial gene identification with Glimmer. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:4636–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8:785–6.
- Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. Locating proteins in the cell using TargetP, SignalP and related tools. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:953–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:567–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- TMHMM Server v. 2.0. Prediction of transmembrane helices in proteins. Center for Biological Sequence Analysis. Technical University of Denmark DTU, Lyngby. 2015. www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/. Accessed Feb 2016.
- Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science. 1997;278:631–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galperin MY, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014. doi:10.1093/nar/gku1223.
- Mavrodi OV, Mavrodi DV, Park AA, Weller DM, Thomashow LS. The role of dsbA in colonization of the wheat rhizosphere by Pseudomonas fluorescens Q8r1-96. Microbiol. 2006;152(3):863–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mavrodi DV, Joe A, Mavrodi OV, Hassan KA, Weller DM, Paulsen IT, Loper JE, Alfano JR, Thomashow LS. Structural and functional analysis of the type III secretion system from Pseudomonas fluorescens Q8r1-96. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(1):177–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Der Voort M, Meijer HJ, Schmidt Y, Watrous J, Dekkers E, Mendes R, Dorestein PC, Gross H, Raaijmakers JM. Genome mining and metabolic profiling of the rhizosphere bacterium Pseudomonas sp. SH-C52 for antimicrobial compounds. Front Microbiol. 2015;6.
- Cernava T, Aschenbrenner IA, Grube M, Liebminger S, Berg G. A novel assay for the detection of bioactive volatiles evaluated by screening of lichen-associated bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2015;6. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00398.
- Ren Y, Strobel G, Sears J, Park M. Geobacillus sp., a thermophilic soil bacterium producing volatile antibiotics. Microb Ecol. 2010;60:130–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy MS, Wei HX, Paré PW, et al. Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:4927–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS. Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiol Res. 2008;163:173–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blom D, Fabbri C, Eberl L, Weisskopf L. Volatile-mediated killing of Arabidopsis thaliana by bacteria is mainly due to hydrogen cyanide. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(3):1000–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, van Elsas JD. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:463–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bleves S, Viarre V, Salacha R, Michel GP, Filloux A, Voulhoux R. Protein secretion systems in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a wealth of pathogenic weapons. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300(8):534–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyer F, Fichant G, Berthod J, Vandenbrouck Y, Attree I. Dissecting the bacterial type VI secretion system by a genome wide in silico analysis: what can be learned from available microbial genomic resources? BMC Gen. 2009;10(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:541–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Woese CR. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains archaea, bacteria and eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:4576–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T: Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner D, Krieg N, Staley J, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Volume 2, Part B. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005: p. 323.
- Garrity GM, Bell JA, Class LT. III. Gammaproteobacteria class. nov. In: Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York: Part B; 2015: p. 1. doi: 10.1002/9781118960608.cbm00045
- Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1980;30:225–420.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Orla-Jensen S. The main lines of the natural bacterial system. J Bacteriol. 1921;6:263–73.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Winslow CEA, Broadhurst J, Buchanan RE, Krumwiede C, Rogers LA, Smith GH. The families and genera of the bacteria. Preliminary report of the committee of the society of American Bacteriologists on characterization and classification of bacterial types. J Bacteriol. 1917;2:505–66.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Migula W. Über ein neues system der bakterien. Arb Bakteriol Inst Karlsruhe. 1894;1:235–8.Google Scholar
- Doudoroff M, Palleroni NJ. Genus Migula 1894, 237; Nom. cons. Opin. 5, Jud. Comm. 1952, 121. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE, editors. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. 8th ed. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co.; 1974. p. 217–43.Google Scholar
- Commission J. Opinion 5: conservation of the generic name Pseudomonas Migula 1894 and designation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Schroeter) Migula 1900 as type species. Int Bull Bacteriol Nomencl Taxon. 1952;2:121–2.Google Scholar
- Palleroni NJ. Pseudomonadaceae. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. In: Krieg NR, Holt JG, editors. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co; 1984: p. 141-99.
- Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar