Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Meiothermus silvanus type strain (VI-R2T)

  • Johannes Sikorski1,
  • Brian J. Tindall1,
  • Stephen Lowry2,
  • Susan Lucas2,
  • Matt Nolan2,
  • Alex Copeland2,
  • Tijana Glavina Del Rio2,
  • Hope Tice2,
  • Jan-Fang Cheng2,
  • Cliff Han2, 3,
  • Sam Pitluck2,
  • Konstantinos Liolios2,
  • Natalia Ivanova2,
  • Konstantinos Mavromatis2,
  • Natalia Mikhailova2,
  • Amrita Pati2,
  • Lynne Goodwin2, 3,
  • Amy Chen4,
  • Krishna Palaniappan4,
  • Miriam Land2, 5,
  • Loren Hauser2, 5,
  • Yun-Juan Chang2, 5,
  • Cynthia D. Jeffries2, 5,
  • Manfred Rohde6,
  • Markus Göker1,
  • Tanja Woyke2,
  • James Bristow2,
  • Jonathan A. Eisen2, 7,
  • Victor Markowitz4,
  • Philip Hugenholtz2,
  • Nikos C. Kyrpides2,
  • Hans-Peter Klenk1 and
  • Alla Lapidus2
Standards in Genomic Sciences20103:3010037

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1042812

Published: 30 August 2010

Abstract

Meiothermus silvanus (Tenreiro et al. 1995) Nobre et al. 1996 belongs to a thermophilic genus whose members share relatively low degrees of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. Meiothermus constitutes an evolutionary lineage separate from members of the genus Thermus, from which they can generally be distinguished by their slightly lower temperature optima. M. silvanus is of special interest as it causes colored biofilms in the paper making industry and may thus be of economic importance as a biofouler. This is the second completed genome sequence of a member of the genus Meiothermus and only the third genome sequence to be published from a member of the family Thermaceae. The 3,721,669 bp long genome with its 3,667 protein-coding and 55 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Keywords

thermophilic aerobic biofouler colored biofilm in paper industry Gram-negative Thermales Deinococci GEBA

Introduction

Strain VI-R2T (= DSM 9946) was first described as ‘Thermus silvanus’ by Tenreiro et al. in 1995 [1]. One year later it was formally named and transferred from the genus Thermus into the then novel genus Meiothermus by Nobre et al. [2]. Currently, there are nine species within the genus Meiothermus [3,4]. The genus name derives from the Greek words ‘meion’ and ‘thermos’ meaning ‘lesser’ and ‘hot’ to indicate an organism in a less hot place [2,3]. The species name was given in honor of Manuel T. Silva, a Portuguese microbiologist and immunologist [1]. Strain VI-R2T was isolated from the hot spring (vent temperature, 56°C; pH 8.9) located at the end of a 450 m tunnel and from thermal water (temperature 33°C; pH 8.8) piped to a spa at Vizela in northern Portugal [1].

Members of the genus Meiothermus have been isolated from natural hot springs and artificial thermal environments [2,5] in Russia [6], Central France [7], Northern and Central Portugal [1,8], North-Eastern China [9], Northern Taiwan [10], Iceland [11] and the Azores [4]. Interestingly, the genus Meiothermus is heterogeneous with respect to pigmentation. The yellow pigmented species also form a distinct group on the basis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, whereas the red/orange pigmented strains form two groups, one comprising M. silvanus and the other the remaining species [8,9]. Like all members of the class Deinococci, the lipid composition of the cell membrane of members of the genus Meiothermus contains unusual and characteristic structures.

M. silvanus is well known to form colored biofilms in the paper industry, which makes this species an economic threat [12,13]. M. silvanus uses thread-like organelles for adhesion and biofilm formation to grow on stainless steel [14]. However, coating of stainless steel with diamond-like carbon or certain fluoropolymers reduced or almost eliminated adhesion and biofilm growth of M. silvanus [14]. Other strategies to combat M. silvanus in the paper industry include electrochemical inactivation (oxidation) using different levels of chloride concentration [15]. Here, the inactivation was mainly due to the electrochemically generated chlorine/hypochlorite [15]. A patent based on different natural plant extracts inhibiting biofilm formation of thermophilic species in paper or board machines, amongst them M. silvanus, has been recently issued [16].

The 16S rRNA genes of the seven other type strains in the genus Meiothermus share between 88.5% (Meiothermus chliarophilus [1]) and 89.8% (Meiothermus cerbereus [11]) sequence identity with strain VI-R2T, whereas the other type strains from the family Thermaceae share 85.8 to 87.8% sequence identity [17]. In addition to being found on paper and board machines [12] uncultured clone 16S rRNA gene sequences very similar to M. silvanus RI-V2T (X84211) have also been detected in the gut of an invasive wood-boring beetle (98% identity, EU148672) [18] and in seawater adjacent to a Pacillopora meandrina coral colony at Palmyra Atoll (99% identity, EU249942). Environmental samples and metagenomic surveys do not surpass 84% sequence similarity to the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain RI-V2T (status May 2010). Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for M. silvanus RI-V2T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A physiological description based on five strains of the species is given by Tenreiro et al. [1]. The cells are described as Gram-negative nonmotile rods with variable lengths and 0.5 to 0.8 µm in width (Table 1 and Figure 1). On Thermus medium colonies are orange-red pigmented and 0.5 to 1.2 µm in diameter after 72 h of growth [1]. The optimum pH is between 8.0 and 8.5; growth does not occur at pH 5.0 or 10.0. Yeast extract is required for growth [1]. All strains are oxidase positive and catalase negative. Nitrate is reduced to nitrite. Strain VI-R2T is negative for the enzyme α-galactosidase but positive for β-galactosidase. Casein, elastin, gelatin, hide powder azure, and starch are degraded. The hydrolysis of fibrin is weak or negative. Strain VI-R2T utilizes d-glucose, d-fructose, d-mannose, d-galactose, d-xylose, maltose, lactose, d-melibiose, glycerol, d-mannitol, d-sorbitol, ribitol, pyruvate, l-glutamate, l-asparagine, l-serine, l-glutamine, and l-proline [1]. Strain VI-R2T does not utilize l-arabinose, l-rhamnose, sucrose, d-cellobiose, d-trehalose, d-raffinose, meso-erythritol, galactitol, myo-inositol, acetate, succinate, citrate, salicin, or acetamide [1]. Further metabolic traits are listed elsewhere [7]. Also, strain VI-R2T produces polysaccharide inclusions [1].
Figure 1.

Scanning electron micrograph of M. silvanus VI-R2T.

Table 1.

Classification and general features of M. silvanus VI-R2T according to the MIGS recommendations [19]

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence code

 

Current classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS [20]

 

Phylum ‘Deinococcus-Thermus

TAS [21,22]

 

Class Deinococci

TAS [2325]

 

Order Thermales

TAS [26,27]

 

Family Thermaceae

TAS [24,27]

 

Genus Meiothermus

TAS [2,7]

 

Species Meiothermus silvanus

TAS [1,6]

 

Type strain RI-V2

TAS [6]

 

Gram stain

negative

TAS [1]

 

Cell shape

rod

TAS [1]

 

Motility

nonmotile

TAS [1]

 

Sporulation

no

TAS [1]

 

Temperature range

40°C-65°C

TAS [1]

 

Optimum temperature

55°C

TAS [1]

 

Salinity

does not grow with 1% or more NaCl

TAS [1]

MIGS-22

Oxygen requirement

aerobic

TAS [1]

 

Carbon source

a diverse set of sugars

TAS [1]

 

Energy source

carbohydrates

TAS [1]

MIGS-6

Habitat

hot springs

TAS [1]

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

free-living

TAS [1]

MIGS-14

Pathogenicity

not reported

 
 

Biosafety level

1

TAS [28]

 

Isolation

hot spring

TAS [1]

MIGS-4

Geographic location

Vizela, Portugal

TAS [1]

MIGS-5

Sample collection time

1995 or before

TAS [1]

MIGS-4.1

Latitude

41.38

NAS

MIGS-4.2

Longitude

8.32

 

MIGS-4.3

Depth

unknown

 

MIGS-4.4

Altitude

157 m

NAS

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [29]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of M. silvanus VI-R2T in a 16S rRNA-based tree. The sequences of the two 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome of M. silvanus VI-R2T do not differ from each other, but differ by six nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence from DSM 9946 (X84211).
Figure 2.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of M. silvanus VI-R2T relative to the type strains of the other species within the genus and to the other type strains within the family Thermaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,442 aligned characters [30,31] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [32] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy [33]. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 900 bootstrap replicates [34] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [35] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold, i.e. Thermus thermophilus (AP008226) and the type species of the genus, M. ruber [36].

Chemotaxonomy

Thin-layer chromatography of the polar lipids from M. silvanus revealed a single phospholipid (PL-2) and two prominent glycolipids GL-la and GL-lb [37]. Although the structure of the major phospholipid has not been investigated from M. silvanus it has the same Rf value as the 2’-O-(1, 2-diacyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho)-3’-O-(α-N-acetyl-glucosaminyl)-N-glyceroyl alkylamine from M. ruber [38]. The glycolipids are derivatives of a Glcp-> Galp-> GalNAcyl-> Glcp-> diacyl glycerol [37].

Based on mass spectral data it appears that there may be three distinct derivatives, differing in the fatty acid amide linked to the galactosamine [37]. These may be divided into one compound containing exclusively 2-hydroxylated fatty acids (mainly 2-OH iso-17:0) and a mixture of two compounds that cannot be fully resolved by thin layer chromatography, carrying either 3-hydroxylated fatty acids or unsubstituted fatty acids. The basic glycolipid structure dihexosyl - N-acyl-hexosaminyl - hexosyl - diacylglycerol is a feature common to all members of the genera Thermus and Meiothermus examined to date. There is currently no evidence that members of the family Thermaceae (as currently defined) produce significant amounts of polar lipids containing only two aliphatic side chains. The consequences of having polar lipids containing three aliphatic side chains on membrane structure has yet to be examined. Such peculiarities also indicate the value of membrane composition in helping to unravel evolution at a cellular level [36]. The major fatty acids of the total polar lipids are anteiso-C15:0 (22.4%), iso-C15:0 (16.8%) and iso-C18:0 (12.2%), followed by iso-C17:0-2OH (10.5%) and iso-C17:0 and anteiso-C17:0 (each 8.5%) [37]. The glycolipid GL-la is characterized by a large amount of the fatty acid iso-C17:0-2OH (19.2%), which is nearly completely absent from GL-lb and the phospholipid PL-2 [37]. Menaquinone 8 was the only respiratory lipoquinone detected in all strains [1]. The structure of the red pigment has not been characterized in contrast to that of M. ruber [39].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [40], and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [41]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [35] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2.

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS-31

Finishing quality

Finished

MIGS-28

Libraries used

Three genomic libraries: Sanger 8 kb pMCL200 and fosmid libraries, one 454 pyrosequence standard library

MIGS-29

Sequencing platforms

ABI3730, 454 Titanium, Illumina GAii

MIGS-31.2

Sequencing coverage

8.3× Sanger; 16.6× pyrosequence

MIGS-30

Assemblers

Newbler version 1.1.02.15, Arachne

MIGS-32

Gene calling method

Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP

  

CP002042 chromosome

 

INSDC ID

CP002043 plasmid pMESIL01

  

CP002044 plasmid pMESIL02

 

Genbank Date of Release

June 4, 2010

 

GOLD ID

Gc01327

 

NCBI project ID

29551

 

Database: IMG-GEBA

2502790002

MIGS-13

Source material identifier

DSM 9946

 

Project relevance

Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

M. silvanus VI-R2T, DSM 9946, was grown in DSMZ medium 86 (Castenholz Medium) [42] at 50°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5–1 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, with modification st/LALMP as described in Wu et al. [41].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/). Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 1.1.02.15 (Roche). Large Newbler contigs were broken into 3,908 overlapping fragments of 1,000 bp and entered into assembly as pseudo-reads. The sequences were assigned quality scores based on Newbler consensus q-scores with modifications to account for overlap redundancy and adjust inflated q-scores. A hybrid 454/Sanger assembly was made using the Arachne assembler. Possible misassemblies were corrected and gaps between contigs were closed editing in Consed, custom primer walks from sub-clones or PCR products. A total of 323 Sanger finishing reads were produced to close gaps, to resolve repetitive regions, and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. 9,068,515 Illumina reads were used to improve the final consensus quality using an in-house developed tool (the Polisher) [43]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Sanger and 454 sequencing platforms provided 26.9× coverage of the genome. The final assembly contains 42,181 Sanger reads and 335,557 pyrosequencing reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [44] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [45]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [46].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 3,249,394 bp long chromosome, and two plasmids of 347,854 bp and 124,421 bp lengths, respectively, with a total G+C content of 62.7% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,722 genes predicted, 3,667 were protein-coding genes, and 55 RNAs; 158 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (64.5%) were assigned a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Figure 3.

Graphical circular map of the genome and the larger of the two plasmids (not drawn to scale). From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 3.

Genome Statistics

Attribute

Value

% of Total

Genome size (bp)

3,721,669

100.00%

DNA Coding region (bp)

3,283,226

88.22%

DNA G+C content (bp)

2,334,056

62.72%

Number of replicons

3

 

Extrachromosomal elements

2

 

Total genes

3,722

100.00%

RNA genes

55

1.48%

rRNA operons

2

 

Protein-coding genes

3,667

98.52%

Pseudo genes

158

4.25%

Genes with function prediction

2,400

64.48%

Genes in paralog clusters

740

19.89%

Genes assigned to COGs

2,530

67.97%

Genes assigned Pfam domains

2,797

75.15%

Genes with signal peptides

1,249

33.56%

Genes with transmembrane helices

796

21.39%

CRISPR repeats

16

 
Table 4.

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code

value

%age

Description

J

151

5.4

Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

0

0.0

RNA processing and modification

K

166

6.0

Transcription

L

195

7.0

Replication, recombination and repair

B

2

0.1

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

33

1.2

Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning

Y

0

0.0

Nuclear structure

V

43

1.6

Defense mechanisms

T

120

4.3

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

128

4.6

Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis

N

26

0.9

Cell motility

Z

0

0.0

Cytoskeleton

W

0

0.0

Extracellular structures

U

53

1.9

Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport

O

107

5.5

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

168

6.1

Energy production and conversion

G

218

7.9

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

292

10.5

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

85

3.1

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

110

4.0

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

88

3.2

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

152

5.5

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

52

1.9

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

362

13.0

General function prediction only

S

227

8.2

Function unknown

-

1,192

32.0

Not in COGs

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Helga Pomrenke for growing M. silvanus cultures and Susanne Schneider for DNA extraction and quality analysis (both at DSMZ). This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, UT-Battelle and Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-2 and SI 1352/1-2.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH
(2)
DOE Joint Genome Institute
(3)
Bioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
(4)
Biological Data Management and Technology Center, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
(5)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(6)
HZI - Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
(7)
University of California Davis Genome Center

References

  1. Tenreiro S, Nobre MF, da Costa MS. Thermus silvanus sp. nov. and Thermus chliarophilus sp. nov., two new species related to Thermus ruber but with lower growth temperatures. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995; 45:633–639. PubMed doi:10.1099/00207713-45-4-633View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Nobre MF, Trüper HG, Da Costa MS. Transfer of Thermus ruber (Loginova et al. 1984), Thermus silvanus (Tenreiro et al. 1995), and Thermus chliarophilus (Tenreiro et al. 1995) to Meiothermus gen. nov. as Meiothermus ruber comb. nov., Meiothermus silvanus comb. nov., and Meiothermus chliarophilus comb. nov., respectively, and emendation of the genus Thermus. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46:604–606. doi:10.1099/00207713-46-2-604View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Euzéby JP. List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: A folder available on the Internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:590–592. PubMed doi:10.1099/00207713-47-2-590View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Albuquerque L, Rainey FA, Nobre MF, da Costa MS. Meiothermus granaticius sp. nov., a new slightly thermophilic red-pigmented species from the Azores. System Appl Microbiol 2010; Epub ahead of print May 6, 2010
  5. Masurat P, Fru EC, Pedersen K. Identification of Meiothermus as the dominant genus in a storage system for spent nuclear fuel. J Appl Microbiol 2005; 98:727–740. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02519.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Loginova LG, Egorova LA, Golovacheva RS, Seregina LM. Thermus ruber sp. nov., nom. rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984; 34:498–499. doi:10.1099/00207713-34-4-498View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Albuquerque L, Ferreira C, Tomaz D, Tiago I, Veríssimo A, da Costa MS, Nobre MF. Meiothermus rufus sp. nov., a new slightly thermophilic red-pigmented species and emended description of the genus Meiothermus. Syst Appl Microbiol 2009; 32:306–313. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2009.05.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pires AL, Albuquerque L, Tiago I, Nobre MF, Empadinhas N, Veríssimo A, da Costa MS. Meiothermus timidus sp. nov., a new slightly thermophilic yellow-pigmented species. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2005; 245:39–45. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2005.02.011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang XQ, Zhang WJ, Wei BP, Xu XW, Zhu XF, Wu M. Meiothermus cateniformans sp. nov., a slightly thermophilic species from north-eastern China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:840–844. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.007914-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen MY, Lin GH, Lin YT, Tsay SS. Meiothermus taiwanensis sp. nov., a novel filamentous, thermophilic species isolated in Taiwan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1647–1654. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02189-0PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chung AP, Rainey F, Nobre MF, Burghardt J, Costa MSD. Meiothermus cerbereus sp. nov., a new slightly thermophilic species with high levels of 3-hydroxy fatty acids. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:1225–1230. PubMed doi:10.1099/00207713-47-4-1225View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ekman J, Kosonen M, Jokela S, Kolari M. Korhonen Pi, Salkinoja-Salonen M. Detection and quantitation of colored deposit-forming Meiothermus spp. in paper industry processes and end products. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2007; 34:203–211. PubMed doi:10.1007/s10295-006-0187-zView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolari M, Nuutinen J, Rainey FA, Salkinoja-Salonen MS. Colored moderately thermophilic bacteria in paper-machine biofilms. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2003; 30:225–238. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Raulio M, Järn M, Ahola J, Peltonen J, Rosenholm J, Tervakangas S, Kolehmainen J, Ruokolainen T, Narko P, Salkinoja-Salonen M. Microbe repelling coated stainless steel analysed by field emission scanning electron microscopy and physicochemical methods. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2008; 35:751–760. PubMed doi:10.1007/s10295-008-0343-8View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Särkkä H, Vepsäläinen M, Pulliainen M, Sillanpää M. Electrochemical inactivation of paper mill bacteria with mixed metal oxide electrode. J Hazard Mater 2008; 156:208–213. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.12.011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolari M, Salkinoja-Salonen M, Laatikainen H, Tammela P, Vuorela P, Vaatnen P, Hatunen TJ. 2006. Inhibiting biofilm formation by thermophilic microbes in paper and board machines. United States Patent.
  17. Chun J, Lee JH, Jung Y, Kim M, Kim S, Kim BK, Lim YW. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2259–2261. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64915-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vasanthakumar A, Handelsman J, Schloss PD, Bauer LS, Raffa KF. Gut microbiota of an invasive subcortical beetle, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, across various life stages. Environ Entomol 2008; 37:1344–1353. PubMed doi:10.1603/0046-225X(2008)37[1344:GMOAIS12.0.CO;2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed doi:10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Garrity GM, Lilburn TG, Cole JR, Harrison SH, Euzéby J, Tindall BJ. Taxonomic outline of the Bacteria and Archaea, Release 7.7 March 6, 2007. Part 2 — The Bacteria: Phyla “Aquificae”, “Thermotogae”, “Thermodesulfobacteria”, “Deinococcus-Thermus”, “Chrysiogenetes”, “Chloroflexi”, “Thermomicrobia”, “Nitrospira”, “Deferribacteres”, “Cyanobacteria”, and “Chlorobi”. http://www.taxonomicoutline.org/
  22. Weisburg WG, Giovannoni SJ, Woese CR. The Deinococcus-Thermus phylum and the effect of rRNA composition on phylogenetic tree construction. Syst Appl Microbiol 1989; 11:128–134. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Garrity GM, Holt JG. Class I. Deinococci class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 395.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. List Editor. Validation List no. 85. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:685–690. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02358-0
  25. Garrity GM, Holt JG. Class I. Deinococci class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer New York, 2001, p.395.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Rainey FA, da Costa MS. Order II. Thermales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 403.Google Scholar
  27. daCosta MS, Rainey FA. Family I. Thermaceae fam. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematics Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 403–404.Google Scholar
  28. Classification of. Bacteria and Archaea in risk groups. http://www.baua.de TRBA 466.
  29. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed doi:10.1038/75556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540–552. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:452–464. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.452View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web Servers. Syst Biol 2008; 57:758–771. PubMed doi:10.1080/10635150802429642View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yarza P, Richter M, Peplies J, Euzeby J, Amann R, Schleifer KH, Ludwig W, Glöckner FO, Rosselló-Móra R. The All-Species Living Tree project: A 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol 2008; 31:241–250. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2008.07.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci 2009; 5541:184–200. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02008-713View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markovitzz VM, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:D346–D354. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gkp848PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Lucas S, Goltsman E, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Tica H, Cheng JF, Han C, et al. Complete genome sequence of Meiothermus ruber type strain (21T). Stand Genomic Sci 2010; (this issue).
  37. Ferreira AM, Wait R, Nobre MF, da Costa MS. Characterization of glycolipids from Meiothermus spp. Microbiology 1999; 145:1191–1199. PubMed doi:10.1099/13500872-145-5-1191View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang YL, Yang FL, Jao SC, Chen MY, Tsay SS, Zou W, Wu SH. Structural elucidation of phosphogly-colipids from strains of the bacterial thermophiles Thermus and Meiothermus. J Lipid Res 2006; 47:1823–1832. PubMed doi:10.1194/jlr.M600034-ILR200View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Burgess ML, Barrow KD, Gao C, Heard GM, Glenn D. Carotenoid glycoside esters from the thermophilic bacterium Meiothermus ruber. J Nat Prod 1999; 62:859–863. PubMed doi:10.1021/np980573dView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Klenk HP, Göker M. En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol 2010; 33:175–182. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2010.03.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 2009; 462:1056–1060. PubMed doi:10.1038/nature08656PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. List of growth media used at DSMZ: http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/media_list.php.
  43. Lapidus A, LaButti K, Foster B, Lowry S, Trong S, Goltsman E. POLISHER: an effective tool for using ultra short reads in microbial genome assembly and finishing. AGBT, Marco Island, FL, 2008.Google Scholar
  44. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal Prokaryotic Dynamic Programming Genefinding Algorithm. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119. PubMed doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-119PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Pati A, Ivanova N, Mikhailova N, Ovchinikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: A gene prediction improvement pipeline for microbial genomes. Nat Methods 2010; 7:455–457. PubMed doi:10.1038/nmeth.1457View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:2271–2278. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2010