Open Access

Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus massiliosenegalensis sp. nov.

  • Dhamodharan Ramasamy1,
  • Jean-Christophe Lagier1,
  • Aurore Gorlas1,
  • Didier Raoult1 and
  • Pierre-Edouard Fournier1Email author
Standards in Genomic Sciences20138:8020264

https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3496989

Published: 15 June 2013

Abstract

Bacillus massiliosenegalensis strain JC6T sp. nov. is the type strain of Bacillus massiliosenegalensis sp. nov., a new species within the genus Bacillus. This strain was isolated from the fecal flora of a healthy Senegalese patient. B. massiliosenegalensis is an aerobic Gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 4,981,278-bp long genome comprises a 4,957,301-bp chromosome and a 23,977-bp plasmid. The chromosome contains 4,925 protein-coding and 72 RNA genes, including 4 rRNA genes. The plasmid contains 29 protein-coding genes.

Keywords

Bacillus massiliosenegalensis genome culturomics taxono-genomics

Introduction

Bacillus massiliosenegalensis strain JC6T (= CSUR P151 = DSM 25957) is the type strain of B. massiliosenegalensis sp. nov., a new species within the genus Bacillus. This bacterium is a Gram-positive, aerobic, catalase-positive and indole-negative bacillus that was isolated from the stool of a healthy Senegalese patient as part of a study aimed at individually cultivating all human enteric bacterial species [1,2].

Currently, bacterial taxonomy relies on a combination of various genetic and phenotypic criteria. However, the three main genetic criteria that are used, including 16S rRNA gene-based phylogeny and nucleotide similarity [3,4], DNA-DNA hybridization [5] and G+C content suffer significant drawbacks and their cutoffs are not applicable to all genera and species. Over recent years, the introduction of high-throughput genome sequencing and proteomic analyses [6] provided a source of exhaustive information about characterized bacterial isolates. Such data may now be included among the criteria used for taxonomic identification. We recently proposed to use a polyphasic approach to describe new bacterial taxa that is based on their genome sequence, MALDI-TOF spectrum and main phenotypic characteristics [725].

Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for B. massiliosenegalensis sp. nov. strain JC6T together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation. These characteristics support the creation of the species B. massiliosenegalensis.

The genus Bacillus (Cohn 1872) was created in 1872 [26] and currently consists of mainly Gram-positive, motile, and spore-forming bacilli. Currently, 173 Bacillus species and 4 subspecies are validly published [27]. Members of the genus Bacillus are ubiquitous bacteria, mostly isolated from environmental sources. However, several species are associated with humans, either as pathogens or commensals [28].

Classification and features

A stool sample was collected from a healthy 16-year-old male Senegalese volunteer patient living in Dielmo (rural village in the Guinean-Sudanian zone in Senegal), who was included in a research protocol. Written assent was obtained from this individual. No written consent was needed from his guardians for this study because he was older than 15 years old (in accordance with the previous project approved by the Ministry of Health of Senegal and the assembled village population and as published elsewhere [29].)

Both this study and the assent procedure were approved by the National Ethics Committee of Senegal (CNERS) and the Ethics Committee of the Institut Fédératif de Recherche IFR48, Faculty of Medicine, Marseille, France (agreement numbers 09-022 and 11-017). Several other new bacterial species were isolated from this specimen using various culture conditions, including the recently described Alistipes senegalensis, Alistipes timonensis, Anaerococcus senegalensis, Bacillus timonensis, Clostridium senegalense, Peptoniphilus timonensis and Paenibacillus senegalensis, Herbaspirillum massiliense, Kurthia massiliensis, Brevibacterium senegalense, Aeromicrobium massilense, Cellulomonas massiliensis, Senegalemassilia anaerobia, Peptoniphilus obesi, Peptoniphilus senegalensis, Enterobacter massiliensis, Alistipes obesi, Peptoniphilus grossensis, Brevibacillus massiliensis [725].

The fecal specimen was conserved at −80°C after collection. Strain JC6T was (Table 1) was isolated in January 2011 by cultivation on 5% sheep blood-enriched Brain Heart infusion (BHI) agar (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). The strain exhibited a 97.3% nucleotide sequence similarity with B. siralis (Pettersson et al. 2000), the phylogenetically closest Bacillus species (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree showing the position of Bacillus massiliosenegalensis strain JC6T relative to other type strains within the Bacillus genus. GenBank accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW, and phylogenetic inferences obtained using the maximum-likelihood method within the MEGA software. Numbers at the nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating the analysis 500 times to generate a majority consensus tree. Clostridium butyricum was used as outgroup. The scale bar represents a 2% nucleotide sequence divergence.

Table 1.

Classification and general features of Bacillus massiliosenegalensis strain JC6T according to the MIGS recommendations [30]

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence codea

 

Current classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS [31]

 

Phylum Firmicutes

TAS [3235]

 

Class Bacilli

TAS [36,37]

 

Order Bacillales

TAS [32,38]

 

Family Bacillaceae

TAS [32,39]

 

Genus Bacillus

TAS [32,40,41]

 

Species Bacillus massiliosenegalensis

IDA

 

Type strain JC6T

IDA

 

Gram stain

Positive

IDA

 

Cell shape

Rod

IDA

 

Motility

Motile

IDA

 

Sporulation

Sporulating

IDA

 

Temperature range

Mesophile

IDA

 

Optimum temperature

30°C

IDA

MIGS-6.3

Salinity

Growth in BHI medium + 5% NaCl

IDA

MIGS-22

Oxygen requirement

Aerobic

IDA

 

Carbon source

Unknown

NAS

 

Energy source

Unknown

NAS

MIGS-6

Habitat

Human gut

IDA

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

Free living

IDA

 

Pathogenicity

Unknown

 
 

Biosafety level

2

 

MIGS-14

Isolation

Human feces

NAS

MIGS-4

Geographic location

Senegal

IDA

MIGS-5

Sample collection time

September 2010

IDA

MIGS-4.1

Latitude

13.7167

IDA

MIGS-4.1

Longitude

-16.4167

IDA

MIGS-4.3

Depth

Surface

IDA

MIGS-4.4

Altitude

51 m above sea level

IDA

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [42]. If the evidence is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Different growth temperatures (25, 30, 37, 45°C) were tested. Growth occurred between 25°C and 45°C, and the optimal growth was observed at 30°C. Colonies were translucent and 2 mm in diameter on blood-enriched Columbia agar. Growth of the strain was tested under anaerobic and microaerophilic conditions using GENbag anaer and GENbag microaer systems respectively (BioMérieux) in the presence of air with or without 5% CO2. Growth was achieved in aerobic condition (with or without CO2), and weak growth was observed in microaerophilic and anaerobic conditions. Gram staining showed a rod-shaped Gram-positive bacterium (Figure 2). The motility test was positive by means of peritrichous flagella. Cells have a mean diameter of 0.65 µm and a mean length of 3.076 µm in electron microscopy (Figure 3).
Figure 2.

Gram staining of B. massiliosenegalensis strain JC6T

Strain JC6T exhibited catalase activity but not oxidase activity. Using the API 50CH system, we observed positive reactions for aesculin, D-cellobiose, D-glucose, D-maltose, N-acetyl-glucosamine and D-trehalose. Using the API ZYM system, a positive reaction was observed for α-glucosidase and weak reactions were observed for alkaline phosphatase, esterase lipase, valine arylamidase and trypsin. Using the API 20E system, a positive reaction was observed for nitrate reduction and negative reactions were observed for indole production and urease. B. massiliosenegalensis is susceptible to amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, imipenem, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin and vancomycin, but resistant to metronidazole and erythromycin. The differential phenotypic characteristics with other Bacillus species are summarized in Table 2.
Figure 3.

Transmission electron microscopy of B. massiliosenegalensis strain JC6T, using a Morgani 268D (Philips) at an operating voltage of 60kV. The scale bar represents 500 nm.

Table 2.

Differential characteristics of B. massiliosenegalensis strain JC6T, B. timonensis strain MM10403188T, B. amyloliquefaciens strain FZB42, B. siralis strain 171544 T and B. thuringiensis strain BMB171

Properties

B. massiliosenegalensis

B. timonensis

B. amyloliquefaciens

B. siralis

B. thuringiensis

Cell diameter (µm)

0.65

0.66

0.8

0.5 to 0.8

1.0

Oxygen requirement

aerobic

aerobic

aerobic

aerobic

facultative anaerobic

Pigment production

+

Gram stain

+

+

+

+

Salt requirement

+

+

+

+

 

Motility

+

+

+

 

Endospore formation

+

+

+

+

+

Production of

     

Acid phosphatase

w

na

+

na

+

Catalase

+

+

+

Oxidase

+

+

+

+

Nitrate reductase

+

na

+

+

+

Urease

na

na

+

β-galactosidase

na

+

v

na

N-acetyl-glucosamine

+

+

+

na

+

Acid from

     

L-Arabinose

+

+

na

Ribose

+

+

Mannose

+

+

Mannitol

+

+

Sucrose

+

v

D-glucose

+

+

+

D-fructose

+

+

D-maltose

+

+

+

D-lactose

+

+

+

Hydrolysis of

     

Gelatin

+

+

+

G+C content (mol%)

37.6

37.3

46.48

na

35.18

Habitat

human gut

human gut

Soil

silage

soil

na = data not available; w = weak, v = variable reaction

Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS protein analysis was carried out as previously described [8,43] using a Microflex spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). Spectra were compared with the Bruker database that contained the main spectra from 3,769 bacteria including 129 spectra from 98 validly named Bacillus species. No significant score was obtained, thus suggesting that our isolate was not a member of a known species. We incremented our database with spectrum from strain JC6T (Figure 4). Finally, the gel view allows us to highlight the spectra differences with other Bacillus genera members Figure 5.
Figure 4.

Reference mass spectrum from B. massiliosenegalensis strain JC6T. Spectra from 12 individual colonies were compared and a reference spectrum was generated.

Figure 5.

Gel view comparing B. massiliosenegalensis sp. nov strain JC6T and other Bacillus species. The gel view displays the raw spectra of loaded spectrum files arranged in a pseudo-gel like look. The x-axis records the m/z value. The left y-axis displays the running spectrum number originating from subsequent spectra loading. The peak intensity is expressed by a Gray scale scheme code. The color bar and the right y-axis indicate the relation between the color withwhich a peak is displayed and the peak intensity in arbitrary units. Displayed species are indicated on the left.

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position and 16S rRNA similarity to other members of the genus Bacillus, and is part of a study of the human digestive flora aiming at isolating all bacterial species within human feces [1,2]. It was the 268th genome of a Bacillus species, and the first genome of B. massiliosenegalensis sp. nov. The Genbank accession number is CAHJ00000000 and consists of 102 contigs. Table 3 shows the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [44].
Table 3.

Project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS-31

Finishing quality

High-quality draft

MIGS-28

Libraries used

454 GS shotgun and paired-end 3-kb libraries

MIGS-29

Sequencing platform

454 GS FLX Titanium

MIGS-31.2

Sequencing coverage

54.25×

MIGS-30

Assemblers

Newbler version 2.5.3

MIGS-32

Gene calling method

PRODIGAL

 

Genbank Date of Release

June 1, 2012

 

Gold ID

Gi18838

 

NCBI project ID

CAHJ00000000

MIGS-13

Project relevance

Study of the human gut microbiome

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

B. massiliosenegalensis sp. nov. strain JC6T, CSUR P151, DSM 25957, was grown aerobically on 5% sheep blood-enriched BHI agar at 37°C. Five petri dishes were spread and cultivated bacteria were resuspended in 3×100µl of G2 buffer (EZ1 DNA Tissue kit, Qiagen). A first mechanical lysis was performed by glass powder on the Fastprep-24 device (MP Biomedicals, USA) using 2×20 seconds cycles. DNA was then treated with 2.5 µg/µL lysozyme for 30 minutes at 37°C, and extracted using a BioRobot EZ 1 Advanced XL (Qiagen). The DNA was then concentrated and purified using a Qiamp kit (Qiagen). The yield and the concentration was measured by the Quant-it Picogreen kit (Invitrogen) on the Genios_Tecan fluorometer at 36.8 ng/µl.

Genome sequencing and assembly

Both a shotgun and a 3kb paired-end libraries were constructed. The shotgun library was constructed with 500 ng of DNA as described by the manufacturer with the GS Rapid library Prep kit (Roche). For the paired-end library, 5µg of DNA was mechanically fragmented on the Hydroshear device (Digilab, Holliston, MA, USA) with an enrichment size at 3–4kb. The DNA fragmentation was visualized using an Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer on a DNA labchip 7500 with an optimal size of 3.2kb. The library was constructed according to the 454 GS FLX Titanium paired-end protocol (Roche). Circularization and nebulization were performed and generated a pattern with an optimal at 555 bp. After PCR amplification through 17 cycles followed by double size selection, the single stranded paired-end library was then quantified on the Quant-it Ribogreen kit (Invitrogen) on the Genios Tecan fluorometer at 21pg/µL. The library concentration equivalence was calculated at 6.94E+07 molecules/µL. Libraries were stored at −20°C until further use.

The shotgun library was clonally amplified with 2 cpb in 4 emPCR reactions, whereas the 3kb paired-end library was amplified with 1cpb in 9 emPCR reactions and 0.5 cpb in 2 emPCR with the GS Titanium SV emPCR Kit (Lib-L) v2 (Roche). The yield of the shotgun emPCR reaction was 8.12%, and those of the 2 kinds of paired-end emPCR reactions were 7.8% and 11.2%, respectively. Such results were in the 5–20% quality range expected from the Roche procedure. For sequencing, the shotgun and paired-end libraries were loaded onto the 1/2 region and 4 1/4 regions of a PTP Picotiterplate 70×75 (Roche), respectively. The sequencing reactions were performed using a GS FLX Titanium sequencing kit XLR70 (Roche). The run was performed overnight and then analyzed on the cluster through the gsRunBrowser and Newbler assembler (Roche).

A total of 969,014 passed filter wells were obtained and generated 274 Mb of sequences with a length average of 286 bp. These sequences were assembled using Newbler with 90% identity and 40 bp as overlap. The final assembly identified 31 scaffolds and 129 large contigs (>1,500 bp), generating a genome size of 5.05 Mb, which corresponds to a 54.25-fold coverage.

Genome annotation

Open Reading Frames (ORFs) were predicted using Prodigal [45] with default parameters. However, the predicted ORFs were excluded if they spanned a sequencing gap region. The predicted bacterial protein sequences were searched against the GenBank [46] and Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) databases using BLASTP. tRNAs and ribosomal RNAs were predicted using the tRNAScanSE [47] and RNAmmer [48] tools, respectively. Lipoprotein signal peptides and numbers of transmembrane helices were predicted using SignalP [49] and TMHMM [50], respectively. ORFans were identified if their BLASTP E-value was lower than 1e-03 for alignment length greater than 80 amino acids. If alignment lengths were smaller than 80 amino acids, we used an E-value of 1e-05. Such parameter thresholds have already been used in previous works to define ORFans. Artemis [51] was used for data management and DNA Plotter [52] was used for visualization of genomic features. The alignment tool, Mauve, was used for multiple genomic sequence alignment [53]. To estimate the mean level of nucleotide sequence similarity at the genome level between B. massiliosenegalensis and 5 other Bacillus genomes (Table 4), orthologous proteins were detected using the Proteinortho [54] and we compared genomes two by two and determined the mean percentage of nucleotide sequence identity among orthologous ORFs using BLASTn.
Table 4.

List of Bacillus species genomes used for genomic comparison

Species

Strain

Genome accession number

Genome Size (Mb)

G+C content %

B. massiliosenegalensis

JC6T

CAHJ00000000

4,981,278

37.60

B. timonensis

MM10403188T

CAET00000000

4,632,049

37.30

B. cereus

03BB102

NC_012472

5,269,628

35.40

B. licheniformis

ATCC 14580

NC_006270

4,222,597

46.20

B. subtilis

168

NC_000964

4,215,606

43.50

B. thuringiensis

BMB171

NC_014171

5,330,088

35.30

Genome properties

The genome is 4,981,278 bp long (chromosome: 4,957,301 bp, plasmid: 23,977 bp) with a GC content of 37.60% (Figure 6 and Table 5). Of the 4,997 predicted chromosomal genes, 4,925 were protein-coding genes and 72 were RNAs. A total of 3,554 genes (72.16%) were assigned a putative function. ORFans accounted for 338 (6.86%) of the genes identified. The remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The properties and statistics of the genome are summarized in Tables 5 and 6. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 6. The 23,977 bp-long plasmid contains 29 protein-coding genes.
Figure 6.

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on the forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on the reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red), GC content, and GC skew.

Table 5.

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the chromosome

Attribute

Value

% of totala

Genome size (bp)

4,957,301

 

DNA coding region (bp)

4,222,509

85.17

DNA G+C content (bp)

1,863,945

37.6

Total genes

4,997

100

RNA genes

72

1.44

Protein-coding genes

4,925

98.55

Genes with function prediction

3,554

72.16

Genes assigned to COGs

3,142

63.79

Genes with peptide signals

223

4.52

Genes with transmembrane helices

1,329

26.59

aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Table 6.

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code

Value

% of totala

Description

J

167

3.39

Translation

A

0

0

RNA processing and modification

K

252

5.11

Transcription

L

171

3.47

Replication, recombination and repair

B

0

0

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

37

0.75

Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis

Y

0

0

Nuclear structure

V

82

1.66

Defense mechanisms

T

146

2.96

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

162

3.28

Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

23

0.46

Cell motility

Z

0

0

Cytoskeleton

W

0

0

Extracellular structures

U

32

0.64

Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

105

2.13

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

238

4.83

Energy production and conversion

G

186

3.77

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

262

5.31

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

72

1.46

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

112

2.27

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

85

1.72

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

227

4.61

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

29

0.58

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

407

8.26

General function prediction only

S

347

7.04

Function unknown

-

412

8.36

Not in COGs

a The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Comparison with the genomes from other Bacillus species

Currently, more than 50 complete genome sequences are available for Bacillus species. Here, we compared the genome sequence of B. massiliosenegalensis strain JC6T with those of another 5 Bacillus species (Table 3). The genome sequence of B. massiliosenegalensis (4.98 Mb) is larger than those from B. cereus, B. licheniformis, B. subtilis, and B. timonensis (4.89, 4.22, 4.21, and 4.63 Mb, respectively) but smaller than B. thuringiensis (5.33 Mb). The G+C content of B. massiliosenegalensis is higher than B. cereus, B. thuringiensis and B. timonensis (37.6, 35.4, 35.3 and 37.3%, respectively) but lower than B. licheniformis and B. subtilis (46.2 and 43.5%, respectively). B. massiliosenegalensis has more predicted genes than B. licheniformis, B. subtilis, and B. timonensis (4,895, 4,295, 4,226, 4,610, respectively) but fewer genes than B. thuringiensis and B. cereus (5,341 and 5,331, respectively). However, the distribution of genes into COG categories was similar in all 6 compared genomes (Figure 7). In addition, B. massiliosenegalensis shared 2,022, 2,052, 2,009, 1,968 and 2,036 orthologous genes with B. timonensis, B. cereus, B. licheniformis, B. subtilis and B. thuringiensis respectively. The average nucleotide sequence identity ranged from 66.27 to 92.71% among the 6 Bacillus species, and from 67.05 to 70.42% between B. massiliosenegalensis and other Bacillus compared, thus confirming its new species status (Table 7). Finally, the plasmid genome of B. massiliosenegalensis is closely matching the Bacillus cereus Q1 plasmid (GenBank accession number CP000228).
Figure 7.

Distribution of functional classes of predicted genes on B. massiliosenegalensis (dark blue), B. cereus (green), B. licheniformis (red), B. thuringiensis (yellow) B. timonensis (brown) and B. subtilis (light blue) chromosomes according to the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins.

Table 7.

Genomic comparison of B. massiliosenegalensis with five other Bacillus species.

Species

B. massiliosenegalensis

B. timonensis

B. cereus

B. licheniformis

B. subtilis

B. thuringiensis

B. massiliosenegalensis

4,895

2,022

2,052

2,009

1,968

2,036

B. timonensis

70.42

4,610

2,038

1,976

1,962

2,028

B. cereus

68.94

69.35

5,331

2,116

2,111

2,779

B. licheniformis

67.05

67.19

66.29

4,295

2,350

2,095

B. subtilis

67.70

67.93

67.28

74.01

4,226

2,087

B. thuringiensis

68.91

69.32

92.71

66.27

67.30

5,341

The numbers of orthologous protein shared between genomes (above diagonal), average percentage similarity of nucleotides corresponding to orthologous protein shared between genomes (below diagonal) and the numbers of proteins per genome (bold).

Conclusion

On the basis of phenotypic, phylogenetic and genome analysis, we formally propose the creation of Bacillus massiliosenegalensis sp. nov. which contains the strain JC6T. This strain has been found in Senegal.

Description of Bacillus massiliosenegalensis sp. nov.

Bacillus massiliosenegalensis (mas.si.li.o.se.ne.gal.en′sis. L. gen. masc. n. massiliosenegalensis, contraction of the Latin names of Marseille and Senegal, where strain JC6T was cultivated and collected, respectively.) B. massiliosenegalensis is an aerobic Gram-positive bacterium. Optimal growth is achieved aerobically and weak growth is observed under microaerophilic or anaerobic conditions. Growth occurs on axenic media between 25 and 45°C, with optimal growth observed at 37°C. Cells stain Gram-positive, are rod-shaped, endospore-forming, motile and have a mean diameter of 0.65 µm and a mean length of 3.076 µm. Peritrichous flagellae were observed. Colonies are translucent and 2 mm in diameter on blood-enriched BHI agar.

No oxidase activity detected. Negative for indole. Presence of catalase activity. Using the API 50CH system, positive reactions are observed for aesculin, D-cellobiose, D-glucose, D-maltose, N-acetyl-glucosamine and D-trehalose. Using the API ZYM system, a positive reaction is observed for α-glucosidase and weak reactions are observed for alkaline phosphatase, esterase lipase, valine arylamidase and trypsin. Using the API 20E system, a positive reaction is observed for nitrate reduction and a negative reaction is observed for urease. B. massiliosenegalensis is susceptible to amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, imipenem, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, rifampicin and vancomycin, but resistant to metronidazole and erythromycin.

The G+C content of the genome is 37.60%. The 16S rRNA and genome sequences are deposited in Genbank and EMBL under accession numbers JF824800 and CAHJ00000000, respectively. The type strain is JC6T (= CSUR P151 = DSM 25957) was isolated from the fecal flora of a healthy Senegalese patient.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Xegen Company (www.xegen.fr) for automating the genomic annotation process. This study was funded by the Mediterranée Infection Foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
URMITE, Faculté de médecine, Aix-Marseille Université

References

  1. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Million M, Hugon P, Pagnier I, Robert C, Bittar F, Fournous G, Gimenez G, Maraninchi M, et al. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18:1185–1193. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dubourg G, Lagier JC, Armougom F, Robert C, Hamad I, Brouqui P. The gut microbiota of a patient with resistant tuberculosis is more comprehensively studied by culturomics than by metagenomics. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2013; 32:637–645. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1787-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tindall BJ, Rosselló-Móra R, Busse HJ, Ludwig W, Kämpfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:249–266. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.016949-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 2006; 33:152–155.Google Scholar
  5. Rossello-Mora R. DNA-DNA Reassociation Methods Applied to Microbial Taxonomy and Their Critical Evaluation. In: Stackebrandt E (ed), Molecular Identification, Systematics, and population Structure of Prokaryotes. Springer, Berlin, 2006, p. 23–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Welker M, Moore ER. Applications of whole-cell matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry in systematic microbiology. Syst Appl Microbiol 2011; 34:2–11. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2010.11.013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kokcha S, Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Million M, Leroy Q, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:346–355. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2776064PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lagier JC, El Karkouri K, Nguyen TT, Armougom F, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Anaerococcus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:116–125. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2415480PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mishra AK, Gimenez G, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:304–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2625821View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Mishra AK, Ngyuen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:315–324. PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Clostridium senegalense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:386–395. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus timonensis sp. nov. [epub.]. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:1–11. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2956294PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Rivet R, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Paenibacillus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:70–81. PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lagier JC, Gimenez G, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Herbaspirillum massiliense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:200–209. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Roux V, El Karkouri K, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Kurthia massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:221–232. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3206554PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kokcha S, Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Brevibacterium senegalense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:233–245. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3256677PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramasamy D, Kokcha S, Lagier JC, N’Guyen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Aeromicrobium massilense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:246–257. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3306717PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lagier JC, Ramasamy D, Rivet R, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Cellulomonas massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:258–270. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3316719PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lagier JC, El Karkouri K, Rivet R, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Senegalemassilia anaerobia sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:343–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3246665PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mishra AK, Hugon P, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Robert C, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus obesi sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:357–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.32766871PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:370–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3366764PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lagier JC, El Karkouri K, Mishra AK, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Enterobacter massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:399–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3396830PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hugon P, Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Rivet R, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes obesi sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:427–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3336746PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mishra AK, Hugon P, Robert C, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus grossensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:320–330. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hugon P, Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Brevibacillus massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3466975PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cohn F. Untersuchungen über Bakterien. Beitrage zur Biologie der Pflanzen Heft 1872; 1:127–224.Google Scholar
  27. Taxon Abstract for the genus Bacillus. NamesforLife, LLC. Retrieved March 10, 2013. doi:10.1601/nm.4857Google Scholar
  28. Didelot X, Barker M, Falush D, Priest FG. Evolution of pathogenicity in the Bacillus cereus group. Syst Appl Microbiol 2009; 32:81–90. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2009.01.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Trape JF, Tall A, Diagne N, Ndiath O, Ly AB, Faye J, Dieye-Ba F, Roucher C, Bouganali C, Badiane A, et al. Malaria morbidity and pyrethroid resistance after the introduction of insecticide-treated bednets and artemisinin-based combination therapies: a longitudinal study. Lancet Infect Dis 2011; 11:925–932. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70194-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archae, Bacteria, and Eukarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Skerman VBD, Sneath PHA. Approved list of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-225View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Murray RGE. The higher taxa, or, a place for everything…? In: Krieg NR, Holt JG (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, First edition, volume 1, The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1984, p. 31–34.Google Scholar
  34. Gibbons NE, Murray RGE. Proposals concerning the higher taxa of Bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1978; 28:1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-28-1-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Garrity GM, Holt J. The road map to the manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p.119–169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. List no. 132. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:469–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.022855-0
  37. Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB. Class I. Bacilli class nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009, p. 19–20.Google Scholar
  38. Prevot AR. Dictionnaire des bactéries pathogens. In: Hauduroy P, Ehringer G, Guillot G, Magrou J, Prevot AR, Rosset, Urbain A (eds). Paris, Masson, 1953, p.1–692.Google Scholar
  39. Fischer A. Untersuchungen über bakterien. Jahrbücher für Wissenschaftliche Botanik 1895; 27:1–163.Google Scholar
  40. Gibson T, Gordon RE. Genus I. Bacillus Cohn 1872, 174; Nom. gen. cons. Nomencl. Comm. Intern. Soc. Microbiol. 1937, 28; Opin. A. Jud. Comm. 1955, 39. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Eighth Edition, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1974, p. 529–550.Google Scholar
  41. Mathews WC, Caperna J, Toerner JG, Barber RE, Morgenstern H. Neutropenia is a risk factor for Gram-negative Bacillus bacteremia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: results of a nested case-control study. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148:1175–1183. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009606View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Rolain JM, Raoult D. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:543–551. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/600885View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Prodigal. http://prodigal.ornl.gov/
  46. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Clark K, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:D48–D53. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1202PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964. PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm160PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol 2004; 340:783–795. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 2001; 305:567–580. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, Barrell B. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 2000; 16:944–945. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Carver T, Thomson N, Bleasby A, Berriman M, Parkhill J. DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:119–120. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn578PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 2004; 14:1394–1403. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.2289704PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lechner M, Findeib S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ. Proteinortho: Detection of (Co-) orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:124. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-124PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2013