Open Access

Genome sequence of the anaerobic bacterium Bacillus sp. strain ZYK, a selenite and nitrate reducer from paddy soil

  • Peng Bao1,
  • Jian-Qiang Su2,
  • Zheng-Yi Hu3,
  • Max M. Häggblom4 and
  • Yong-Guan Zhu1, 2Email author
Standards in Genomic Sciences20149:9030646

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.3817480

Published: 15 June 2014

Abstract

Bacillus sp. strain ZYK, a member of the phylum Firmicutes, is of interest for its ability to reduce nitrate and selenite and for its resistance to arsenic under anaerobic conditions. Here we describe some key features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 3,575,797 bp long chromosome with its 3,454 protein-coding and 70 RNA genes, and the information gained from its sequence will be relevant to the elucidation of microbially-mediated transformations of nitrogen, selenium and arsenic in paddy soil.

Keywords

anaerobic spore-forming Gram-positive nitrate-reduction selenite-reduction arsenic resistance paddy soil Bacillaceae

Introduction

Bacillus sp. ZYK (=DSM 26460 =CGMCC 1.5179) was isolated from a paddy soil in Dehong, Yunnan, China and is an anaerobic nitrate-reducing, Gram-positive bacterium [1]. Strain ZYK belongs to the genus Bacillus, and based on 16S rRNA phylogeny, is most closely related to Bacillus azotoformans isolated from garden soil, which is capable of reducing nitrate, nitrite, nitrous oxide, and nitric oxide under anaerobic conditions [24]. Strain ZYK is capable of nitrate-reduction under anaerobic conditions and, in addition, demonstrated selenite-reducing ability and arsenic resistance (unpublished data). Bacillus spp. are commonly found in paddy soil and may play important roles in elemental cycling during periodically changing redox conditions [58]. Therefore, strain ZYK is a suitable model for studying the properties of genes involved in denitrification, selenite-reduction and arsenic resistance pathways of paddy soil bacteria. Here we summarize the features of Bacillus sp. strain ZYK and provide a description of its sequenced genome, now available for detailed analysis.

Classification and features

Based on 16S rRNA gene phylogeny and genome information, strain ZYK was a member of the genus Bacillus, most closely related to Bacillus azotoformans (AB363732), with a sequence similarity of 96.3% based on a Blast analysis [9] of the most recent release of the Greengenes database [10]. A phylogenetic tree (Figure 1) was constructed using the Maximum likelihood method under the default settings for complete sequences of genes encoding 16S rRNA derived from sequenced genomes of Bacillus spp., along with the sequences of representative members of the genus.
Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Bacillus sp. ZYK relative to selected Bacillus species. The strains and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers of 16S rRNA genes are as indicated. The tree, based on 1,545 positions, was built with MEGA 5 [11] using the Maximum likelihood method. Bar: 0.01substitutions per nucleotide position.

Strain ZYK is an anaerobic, Gram-positive, spore-forming, motile, rod-shaped (0.2–0.3 µm wide and 1.5–2.0 µm long) (Figure 2). The strain grew optimally at pH 7.0–7.2 (range 6.0–7.6), 30–40°C (range 21–45°C) and at low salinity (NaCl range 0–1.1%) (Table 1) in freshwater anaerobic medium [24]. On anaerobic LB agar, strain ZYK forms small, white colonies with entire edges (data not shown). Carbon substrates utilized for growth by strain ZYK included D-glucose, maltose, lactose, and sucrose. Strain ZYK reduces nitrate and selenite under anaerobic conditions in freshwater medium.
Figure 2.

Transmission electron microscopy of strain ZYK. Scale bar corresponds to 1.0 µm.

Table 1.

Classification and general features of strain ZYK according to the MIGS recommendations [1]

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence codes

 

Classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS [12]

 

Phylum Firmicutes

TAS [1315]

 

Class Bacilli

TAS [16,17]

 

Order Bacillales

TAS [18,19]

 

Family Bacillaceae

TAS [18,20]

 

Genus Bacillus

TAS [18,21,22]

 

Strain ZYK

IDA

 

Gram stain

Positive

IDA

MIGS-37.1

Cell shape

Rod-shaped

NAS

MIGS-37.2

Motility

Motile

NAS

MIGS-37.3

Sporulation

Sporulating

NAS

MIGS-37.9

Cell arrangement

Single

NAS

MIGS-37.12

Optimum pH

7.0

NAS

MIGS-6

Optimum temperature

30°C

NAS

 

Salinity

0–1.1%

IDA

MIGS-22

Oxygen requirement

Strict

NAS

 

Carbon source

D-Glucose, Maltose, lactose, sucrose

IDA

MIGS-6

Habitat

Paddy soil

NAS

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

Free-living

NAS

 

Pathogenicity

None-pathogen

NAS

 

Biosafety level

1

NAS

MIGS-4

Geographic location

Dehong, Yunnan, China

NAS

MIGS-4.1

Latitude

24°64′70″N

NAS

MIGS-4.2

Longitude

98°53′45″E

NAS

MIGS-4.5

Isolation

Paddy soil

NAS

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [23]. If the evidence code is IDA, the property was directly observed by one of the authors.

Genome project history

Bacillus sp. ZYK was selected for sequencing because of its phylogenetic affiliation with a lineage of paddy soil bacteria that may influence elemental cycling in paddy fields. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) as project Gi22906, and the complete genome sequence is in GenBank under accession number ANOK00000000 (Table 2). A summary of the main project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2.

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS-31

Finishing quality

Complete

MIGS-28

Libraries used

Two libraries 500 bp PCR-free library, 2000 bp index library

MIGS-29

Sequencing platforms

Illumina

MIGS-31.2

Fold coverage

140×

MIGS-30

Assemblers

SOAPdenovo 1.05

MIGS-32

Gene calling method

Glimmer 3.0

 

Locus TAG

D612

 

Genbank ID

ANOK00000000

 

Genbank Date of Release

January 15, 2013

 

GOLD ID

Gi22906

 

NCBI taxon ID

1191699

MIGS-13

Source material identifier

DSMZ 26460, CGMCC 1.5179

MIGS-38.2

Project relevance

Agricultural, Bioremediation, Environmental

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

For the preparation of genomic DNA, one colony was picked from an anaerobic LB agar plate, and grown in anaerobic freshwater medium at 30°C [24]. A culture (1.0 ml) at 0.6 OD600nm was inoculated into 100 ml of anaerobic freshwater media. Cells were collected by centrifugation after growing to 0.6 OD600nm. Cells were suspended in TE buffer (10 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, 1.0 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), and treated with lysozyme to lyse the cell wall. SDS and proteinaseK were added to denature and degrade proteins. Cell lysates were extracted with phenol-chloroform and the nucleic acids were precipitated by addition of isoamylol. The nucleic acid pellet was washed with 100% ethanol, dissolved in double distilled water and then treated with RNase A [25].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of ZYK was sequenced at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) using Illumina paired-end sequencing. Draft assemblies were based on 4,233,334 reads totaling 380 Mb of 500 bp PCR-free library and 2,184,080 reads totaling 196 Mb of 2,000 bp index library. The SOAPdenovo software package independently developed by BGI (version 1.05 [26],) was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment. To achieve optimal assembly results, the key parameter K was set at 43 after several adjustments. Gaps between contigs were closed by KRSKGF software, version 1.2 (independently developed by BGI) and Gapcloser, version 1.10. The complete nucleotide sequence of Bacillus sp. strain ZYK and its annotation can be found online at the IMG (Integrated Microbial Genome) portal of JGI [27], as well at the genome resource site of NCBI [28].

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Glimmer, version 3.0 [29]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search KEGG, COG, SwissPort, TrEMBL, NR and GO databases. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Transposons were identified using RepeatMaster (with Repbase) and RepeatProteinMasker (with its own database) software. Tandem repeat sequences were predicted by TRF (Tandem Repeat Finder) software. The rRNA, tRNA and sRNA were predicted by using rRNAmmer [30], tRNAscan [31] and Rfam [32] software, respectively.

Genome properties

The genome consists of a circular chromosome of 3,575,797 bp in size with a GC content of 36.1% (Figure 3, Table 3). Of the 3,454 predicted genes, 70 are RNA genes, 136 are secreted protein coding genes, and 3,318 are non-secreted protein coding genes. Of the total predicted genes, 2,030 represent COG functional categories. The distribution of genes into COG functional categories is presented in Figure 3 and Table 4.
Figure 3.

Graphical representation of circular map of the chromosome of strain ZYK. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 3.

Genome statistics

Attribute

Value

% of total

Genome size (bp)

3,575,797

100.00

DNA coding region (bp)

3,002,982

83.98

DNA G+C content (bp)

1,290,862

36.10

Total genes

3454

100.00

RNA genes

70

2.03

Protein-coding genes (bp)

3,002,982

83.98

Genes with function prediction

3261

94.41

Genes assigned to COGs

2,030

58.77

Genes assigned to Pfam domains (bp)

617,696

17.27

Genes with signal peptides

169

4.89

Genes with transmembrane helices

132

3.82

CRISPR repeats

84

0.09

Table 4.

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code

Value

%agea

Description

J

149.0

6.5

Translation

A

0.0

0.0

RNA processing and modification

K

164.0

7.1

Transcription

L

119.0

5.2

Replication, recombination and repair

B

1.0

0.04

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

27.0

1.2

Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis

Y

0.0

0.0

Nuclear structure

V

24.0

1.0

Defense mechanisms

T

162.0

7.0

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

95.0

4.1

Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

75.0

3.3

Cell motility

Z

0.0

0.0

Cytoskeleton

W

0.0

0.0

Extracellular structures

U

44.0

1.9

Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

97.0

4.2

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

155

6.7

Energy production and conversion

G

79.0

3.4

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

239.0

10.4

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

61.0

2.7

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

93.0

4.0

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

97.0

4.2

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

127.0

5.5

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

38.0

1.7

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

261.0

11.3

General function prediction only

S

193.0

8.4

Function unknown

-

1424

41.2

Not in COGs

a) The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Insights into the genome sequence

Bacillus sp. ZYK can reduce nitrate and selenite under anaerobic conditions (unpublished data). The inspection of the genome of strain ZYK confirmed the presence of nitrate reductase coding genes, in support of the physiological data. Genes for a respiratory nitrate reductase corresponding to a heterotrimeric structure with four subunits, including narG, narH, narI and narJ present in the genome of strain ZYK. Genes encoding a second type of nitrate reductase, Nap (periplasmic nitrate reductase) including napA, napB, and napD were also found in the ZYK genome. We also identified in the genome a formate-dependent nitrite reductase coding gene (nrfA) and a copper-containing nitrite reductase coding gene (nirK).

An arsenate reductase coding gene (arsC) was identified with 77% similarity to the Bacillus megaterium arsC gene (AJ515540). An arsenite efflux pump gene was also identified as arsB with 78% similarity to Bacillus sp. CDB3 arsB gene (AF178758.2). Two DMSO reductase genes have 59.2% and 60.3% similarity with Desulfosporosinus orientis DMSO reductase (Fe-S cluster containing hydrogenase coding gene) and Bacillus sp. 1NLA3E DMSO reductase (dimethylsulfoxide reductase, chain B), respectively. The discovery of an arsenate reductase coding gene (arsC) and DMSO reductase sequences suggests that the reduction capabilities of strain ZYK are broader than expected, and that other substrates be tested. Particularly, we are interested in determining whether selenite reduction activity in ZYK is mediated by a hydrogenase [33], a nitrite reductase [34] or a DMSO reductase. While the reduction of selenite to elemental selenium is a common feature of diverse microorganisms, the genes responsible for this process remain largely uncharacterized and virtually nothing is known about their regulation [3335], or their interactions with other respiratory pathways. In addition to Bacillus sp. ZYK, the genomes of two bacteria capable of selenite reduction, Bacillus selenitireducens (NC_014219.1) [36] and Desulfirispirillum indicum S5 [37,38], have been sequenced. The investigation of the functional genes of strain ZYK will consequently enhance the understanding of the electron acceptor utilization pathways in microorganisms, and how nitrogen, selenium and arsenic cycling is mediated by microorganisms active in paddy soil. Further study of these reductase gene-coding sequences may reveal the importance of the Bacillus genus in elemental cycling in paddy soils.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the technically support of Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI), which worked on sequencing and annotation of this genome. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41090280) and (No. 41090282).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Lab of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(2)
Key Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(3)
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
(4)
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University

References

  1. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pichinoty F, Durand M, Job C, Mandel M, Garcia JL. Etude morphologique, physiologique et taxonomique de Bacillus azotoformans. Can J Microbiol 1978; 24:608–617. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/m78-099View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pichinoty F, De Barjac H, Mandel M, Asselineau J. Description of Bacillus azotoformans. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1983; 33:660–662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-33-3-660View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Suharti J, Heering HA, De Vries S. NO Reductase from Bacillus azotoformans Is a Bifunctional Enzyme Accepting Electrons from Menaquinol and a Specific Endogenous Membrane-Bound Cytochrome c551. Biochemistry 2004; 43:13487–13495. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi0488101View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Watanabe K, Hayano K. Distribution and identification of proteolytic Bacillus spp. in paddy field soil under rice cultivation. Can J Microbiol 1993; 39:674–680. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/m93-097View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang XJ, Yang J, Chen XP, Sun GX, Zhu YG. Phylogenetic diversity of dissimilatory ferric iron reducers in paddy soil of Hunan, South China. J Soils Sediments 2009; 9:568–577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11368-009-0113-xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Li H, Peng JJ, Weber KA, Zhu YG. Phylogenetic diversity of Fe(III)-reducing microorganisms in rice paddy soil: enrichment cultures with different short-chain fatty acids as electron donors. J Soils Sediments 2011; 11:1234–1242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11368-011-0371-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Kögel-Knabner I, Amelung W, Cao Z, Fiedler S, Frenzel P, Jahn R, Kalbitz K, Kölbl A, Schloter M. Biogeochemistry of paddy soils. Geoderma 2010; 157:1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.03.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215:403–410. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen GL. Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72:5069–5072. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03006-05PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol Bol Evol 2011; 28:2731–2739. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Woese CR, Kandier O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibbons NE, Murray RGE. Proposals Concerning the Higher Taxa of Bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1978; 28:1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-28-1-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119–169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Murray RGE. The Higher Taxa, or, a Place for Everything…? In: Holt JG (ed), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, First Edition, Volume 1, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1984, p. 31–34.Google Scholar
  16. List no. 132. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:469–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.022855-0
  17. Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB. Class I. Bacilli class nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009, p. 19–20.Google Scholar
  18. Skerman VBD. McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-225View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Prévot AR. In: Hauderoy P, Ehringer G, Guillot G, Magrou. J., Prévot AR, Rosset D, Urbain A (eds), Dictionnaire des Bactéries Pathogènes, Second Edition, Masson et Cie, Paris, 1953, p. 1–692.Google Scholar
  20. Fischer A. Untersuchungen über bakterien. Jahrbücher für Wissenschaftliche Botanik 1895; 27:1–163.Google Scholar
  21. Cohn F. Untersuchungen über Bakterien. Beitr Biol Pflanz 1872; 1:127–224.Google Scholar
  22. Gibson T, Gordon RE. Genus I. Bacillus Cohn 1872, 174; Nom. gen. cons. Nomencl. Comm. Intern. Soc. Microbiol. 1937, 28; Opin. A. Jud. Comm. 1955, 39. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Eighth Edition, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1974, p. 529–550.Google Scholar
  23. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Widdel F, Bak F. Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate reducing bacteria. In The Prokaryotes. Balows, A., Trüper, H.G., Dworkin, M., Harder, W., and Schleifer, K.H. 1992, New York: Springer, pp 3352–3378.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Marmur J. A procedure for the isolation of DNA from microorganisms. J Mol Biol 1961; 3:208–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(61)80047-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. The SOAPdenovo software package. http://soap.genomics.org.cn/soapdenovo.html
  27. Integrated Microbial Genome portal of JGI. http://genomesonline.org/cgi-bin/GOLD/bin/GOLDCards.cgi?goldstamp=Gi22906.
  28. NCBI. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome?db=genome&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Overview&list+uids=1609.
  29. Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 1999; 27:4636–4641. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/27.23.4636PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscanSE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.5.0955PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm160PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Griffiths-Jones S, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR, Bateman A. Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:D121–D124. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki081PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. DeMoll-Decker H, Macy JM. The periplasmic nitrite reductase of Thauera selenatis may catalyze the reduction of selenite to elemental selenium. Arch Microbiol 1993; 160:241–247.Google Scholar
  34. Tomei FA, Barton LL, Lemanski CL, Zocco TG. Reduction of selenate and selenite to elemental selenium by Wolinella succinogenes. Can J Microbiol 1992; 38:1328–1333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/m92-219View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Bao P, Huang H. HuZY, Häggblom MM, Zhu YG. Impact of temperature, CO2 fixation and nitrate reduction on selenium reduction, by a paddy soil Clostridium strain. J Appl Microbiol 2013; 114:703–712. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.12084View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Switzer Blum J, Burns Bindi A, Buzzelli J, Stolz JF, Oremland RS. Bacillus arsenicoselenatis, sp. nov., and Bacillus selenitireducens, sp. nov.: two haloalkaliphiles from Mono Lake, California that respire oxyanions of selenium and arsenic. Arch Microbiol 1998; 171:19–30. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002030050673View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rauschenbach I, Yee N, Häggblom MM, Bini E. Energy metabolism and multiple respiratory pathways revealed by genome sequencing of Desulfurispirillum indicum strain S5. Environ Microbiol 2011; 13:1611–1621. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02473.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bini E, Rauschenbach I, Narasingarao P, Starovoytov V, Land M, Hauser L, Jeffries CD, Held B, Bruce D, Detter C, et al. Complete genome sequence of Desulfurispirillum indicum strain S5T. Stand Genomic Sci 2011; 5:371–378. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2425302PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2014