Genome sequence of the dark pink pigmented Listia bainesii microsymbiont Methylobacterium sp. WSM2598
© Ardley et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 13 June 2014
Accepted: 16 June 2014
Published: 8 December 2014
Strains of a pink-pigmented Methylobacterium sp. are effective nitrogen- (N2) fixing microsymbionts of species of the African crotalarioid genus Listia. Strain WSM2598 is an aerobic, motile, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming rod isolated in 2002 from a Listia bainesii root nodule collected at Estcourt Research Station in South Africa. Here we describe the features of Methylobacterium sp. WSM2598, together with information and annotation of a high-quality draft genome sequence. The 7,669,765 bp draft genome is arranged in 5 scaffolds of 83 contigs, contains 7,236 protein-coding genes and 18 RNA-only encoding genes. This rhizobial genome is one of 100 sequenced as part of the DOE Joint Genome Institute 2010 G enomic E ncyclopedia for B acteria and A rchaea-R oot N odule B acteria (GEBA-RNB) project.
Nodulated legumes are important and established components of Australian agricultural systems: the value of atmospheric nitrogen (N2) fixed by rhizobia in symbiotic association with these legumes is estimated to be worth more than $2 billion annually [1, 2]. The major agricultural region of south-western Australia has a Mediterranean climate, with soils that are often acid, have a low clay content and low organic matter, and tend to be inherently infertile [3, 4]. The last forty years, however, have seen a sharp decrease in average winter rainfall by about 15–20% . This, together with the development of dryland salinity , has challenged the sustainability of using the commonly sown subterranean clover and annual medics as pasture legumes in these systems. Alternative perennial legume species (and their associated rhizobia) are therefore being sought . We have identified a suite of South African perennial, herbaceous forage legumes, including several species in the crotalarioid genus Listia (previously Lotononis) , that are potentially well-adapted to the arid climate and acid, infertile soils of the target agricultural areas.
Listia species are found in seasonally wet habitats throughout southern and tropical Africa . They produce stoloniferous roots [8, 9] and form lupinoid nodules rather than the indeterminate type found in other crotalarioid species [7, 10]. Rhizobial infection occurs by epidermal entry rather than via root hair curling . Listia-rhizobia symbioses are highly specific. The tropically distributed L. angolensis forms effective (i.e. N2-fixing) nodules with newly described species of Microvirga , while all other studied Listia species are only nodulated by strains of pigmented methylobacteria [7, 10, 12]. Unlike the methylotrophic Methylobacterium nodulans, which specifically nodulates some species of Crotalaria , the Listia methylobacteria are unable to utilize methanol as a sole carbon source . In Australia, strains of pigmented methylobacteria have been used as commercial inoculants for Listia bainesii and are able to persist in acidic, sandy, infertile soils, while remaining symbiotically and serologically stable [10, 15].
A pigmented Methylobacterium strain, WSM2598, isolated from a root nodule of L. bainesii cv “Miles” in South Africa in 2002, was found to be a highly effective nitrogen fixing microsymbiont of both L. bainesii and Listia heterophylla (previously Lotononis listii) . Here we present a set of preliminary classification and general features for Methylobacterium sp. strain WSM2598, together with the description of the genome sequence and annotation.
Species Methylobacterium sp.
Formate, succinate & glutamate
Soil, root nodule on host
Free living, symbiotic
Root nodule of Listia bainesii
Estcourt Research Station, South Africa
Sample collection date
May 27, 2002
Compatibility of Methylobacterium sp. WSM2598 with 11 host legume genotypes for nodulation (Nod) and N 2 -Fixation (Fix)
Listia angolensis (Welw. ex Bak.) B.-E. van Wyk & Boatwr.
Listia bainesii (Bak.) B.-E. van Wyk & Boatwr.
Listia heterophylla E. Mey.
Listia marlothii (Engl.) B.-E. van Wyk & Boatwr.
Listia solitudinis (Dümmer) B.-E. van Wyk & Boatwr.
Listia subulata (B.-E. van Wyk) B.-E. van Wyk & Boatwr.
Leobordea lanata (Thunb.) B.-E. van Wyk & Boatwr. (=Lotononis bolusii)
Leobordea longiflora (H. Bolus) B.-E. van Wyk & Boatwr.
Leobordea stipulosa (Bak. f.) B.-E. van Wyk & Boatwr.
Macroptilium atropurpureum (DC.) Urb. cv. Siratro
(w) indicates nodules present were white.
Genome sequencing and annotation information
Genome project history
Genome sequencing project information for Methylobacterium sp. WSM2598
Improved high quality draft
Illumina GAii standard PE and CLIP PE libraries
Illumina GAii technology
Velvet, version 1.0.05; Allpaths r39750
Gene calling method
GenBank release date
August 28, 2013
NCBI project ID
Symbiotic N2 fixation, agriculture
Growth conditions and DNA isolation
Methylobacterium sp. WSM2598 was grown to mid-logarithmic phase in TY rich media on a gyratory shaker at 28°C . DNA was isolated from 60 mL of cells using a CTAB (Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) bacterial genomic DNA isolation method .
Genome sequencing and assembly
The draft genome of Methylobacterium sp. WSM2598 was generated at the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using Illumina technology [34, 35]. For this genome, we constructed and sequenced an Illumina short-insert paired-end library with an average insert size of 270 bp which generated 19,048,548 reads and an Illumina long-insert paired-end library with an average insert size of 6354.14 +/− 3100.07 bp which generated 18,876,864 reads totaling 5,689 Mbp of Illumina data. (unpublished, Feng Chen). All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at the JGI website. The initial draft assembly contained 141 contigs in 41 scaffold(s). The initial draft data was assembled with Allpaths, version 39750, and the consensus was computationally shredded into 10 Kbp overlapping fake reads (shreds). The Illumina draft data was also assembled with Velvet, version 1.1.05  and the consensus sequences were computationally shredded into 1.5 Kbp overlapping fake reads (shreds). The Illumina draft data was assembled again with Velvet using the shreds from the first Velvet assembly to guide the next assembly. The consensus from the second VELVET assembly was shredded into 1.5 Kbp overlapping fake reads. The fake reads from the Allpaths assembly and both Velvet assemblies and a subset of the Illumina CLIP paired-end reads were assembled using parallel phrap, version 4.24 (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with manual editing in Consed [37–39]. Gap closure was accomplished using repeat resolution software (Wei Gu, unpublished), and sequencing of bridging PCR fragments with Sanger and/or PacBio (unpublished, Cliff Han) technologies. One round of manual/wet lab finishing was also completed. 17 PCR PacBio consensus sequences were completed to close gaps and to raise the quality of the final sequence. The total (“estimated size” for the unfinished) size of the genome is 8.3 Mbp and the final assembly is based on 5,689 Mbp of Illumina draft data, which provides an average 685× coverage of the genome.
Genes were identified using Prodigal  as part of the DOE-JGI Annotation pipeline , followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline . Within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG-ER) system , predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Non-coding genes and miscellaneous features were predicted using tRNAscan-SE , RNAMMer , Rfam , TMHMM , and SignalP . Additional gene prediction analyses and functional annotation were performed within IMG.
Genome statistics for Methylobacterium sp. WSM2598
% of total
Genome size (bp)
DNA coding region (bp)
DNA G+C content (bp)
Number of scaffolds
Number of contigs
Genes with function prediction
Genes assigned to COGs
Genes assigned Pfam domains
Genes with signal peptides
Genes with transmembrane helices
Number of protein coding genes of Methylobacterium sp. WSM2598 associated with the general COG functional categories
Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
RNA processing and modification
Replication, recombination and repair
Chromatin structure and dynamics
Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Signal transduction mechanisms
Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
Intracellular trafficking and secretion
Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
Energy production conversion
Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
Amino acid transport metabolism
Nucleotide transport and metabolism
Coenzyme transport and metabolism
Lipid transport and metabolism
Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Secondary metabolite biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
General function prediction only
Not in COGS
WSM2598 was sequenced as part of the DOE Joint Genome Institute GEBA-RNB project. In common with other sequenced rhizobial strains, WSM2598 has a comparatively large genome of around 7.69 Mbp, with a high proportion of genes assigned to the COG functional categories associated with transcription control and signal transduction (14.69%), transport and metabolism (29.38%) and secondary metabolite biosynthesis (3.12%). These features are characteristic of soil bacteria, which inhabit oligotrophic environments with typically diverse but scarce nutrient sources. Rhizobial methylobacteria are unusual, however, in that they form symbiotic associations exclusively with African crotalarioid legume hosts, several species of which are well-adapted to arid climates and acid, infertile soils and are therefore potentially useful pasture plants in marginal agricultural systems. The molecular basis for this symbiotic specificity has yet to be determined. As WSM2598 is highly effective for N2-fixation on several of these hosts, its sequenced genome is a valuable resource for gaining an understanding of symbiotic specificity and N2-fixation in a currently understudied group of legumes and rhizobia.
This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396. We gratefully acknowledge Strategic Research Funds allocated by Murdoch University to support this project.
- Herridge DF, Peoples MB, Boddey RM: Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant Soil 2008, 311: 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104–008–9668–3 10.1007/s11104-008-9668-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Howieson JG, Yates RJ, Foster K, Real D, Besier B: Prospects for the future use of legumes. In Leguminous Nitrogen-Fixing Symbioses. Edited by: Dilworth MJ, James EK, Sprent JI, Newton WE. London, UK: Elsevier; 2008:363–394.Google Scholar
- Howieson JG, O’Hara GW, Carr SJ: Changing roles for legumes in Mediterranean agriculture: developments from an Australian perspective. Field Crops Res 2000, 65: 107–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378–4290(99)00081–7 10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00081-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nichols P, Loi A, Nutt B, Snowball R, Revell C: Domestication of new Mediterranean annual pasture legumes. Edited by: Huyghe C. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Sustainable Use of Genetic Diversity in Forage and Turf Breeding: Springer; 2010:137–142.Google Scholar
- Initiative IOC: Climate variability and change in southwest Western Australia. 2002, 1–34.Google Scholar
- Sy A, Giraud E, Jourand P, Garcia N, Willems A, de Lajudie P, Prin Y, Neyra M, Gillis M, Boivin-Masson C, Dreyfus B: Long-term groundwater trends and their impact on the future extent of dryland salinity in Western Australia in a varible climate. University of Western Australia: Crawley, Western Australia: Salinity Forum; 2008.Google Scholar
- Ardley JK, Reeve WG, O’Hara GW, Yates RJ, Dilworth MJ, Howieson JG: Nodule morphology, symbiotic specificity and association with unusual rhizobia are distinguishing features of the genus Listia within the southern African crotalarioid clade Lotononis s.l. Ann Bot (Lond) 2013, 112: 1–15. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct095 10.1093/aob/mct095View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Wyk BE: A Synopsis of the Genus Lotononis (Fabaceae: Crotalarieae). Cape Town, South Africa: Rustica Press; 1991.Google Scholar
- Boatwright JS, Wink M, van Wyk BE: The generic concept of Lotononis (Crotalarieae, Fabaceae): Reinstatement of the genera Euchlora, Leobordea and Listia and the new genus Ezoloba . Taxon 2011, 60: 161–177.Google Scholar
- Yates RJ, Howieson JG, Reeve WG, Nandasena KG, Law IJ, Bräu L, Ardley JK, Nistelberger HM, Real D, O’Hara GW: Lotononis angolensis forms nitrogen fixing, lupinoid nodules with phylogenetically unique, fast-growing, pink-pigmented bacteria, which do not nodulate L. bainesii or L. listii . Soil Biol Biochem 2007, 39: 1680–1688. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.01.025 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.01.025View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ardley JK, Parker MA, De Meyer SE, Trengove RD, O’Hara GW, Reeve WG, Yates RJ, Dilworth MJ, Willems A, Howieson JG: Microvirga lupini sp. nov., Microvirga lotononidis sp. nov. and Microvirga zambiensis sp. nov. are alphaproteobacterial root-nodule bacteria that specifically nodulate and fix nitrogen with geographically and taxonomically separate legume hosts. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012, 62: 2579–2588. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.035097–0 10.1099/ijs.0.035097-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Norris DO: A red strain of Rhizobium from Lotononis bainesii Baker. Aust J Agric Res 1958, 9: 629–632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR9580629 10.1071/AR9580629View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sy A, Giraud E, Jourand P, Garcia N, Willems A, de Lajudie P, Prin Y, Neyra M, Gillis M, Boivin-Masson C, et al.: Methylotrophic Methylobacterium bacteria nodulate and fix nitrogen in symbiosis with legumes. J Bacteriol 2001, 183: 214–220. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.1.214–220.2001 10.1128/JB.183.1.214-220.2001PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ardley JK, O’Hara GW, Reeve WG, Yates RJ, Dilworth MJ, Tiwari RP, Howieson JG: Root nodule bacteria isolated from South African Lotononis bainesii, L. listii and L. solitudinis are species of Methylobacterium that are unable to utilize methanol. Arch Microbiol 2009, 191: 311–318. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203–009–0456–0 10.1007/s00203-009-0456-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diatloff A: Ecological studies of root-nodule bacteria introduced into field environments—6. Antigenic and symbiotic stability in Lotononis rhizobia over a 12-year period. Soil Biol Biochem 1977, 9: 85–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038–0717(77)90042–6 10.1016/0038-0717(77)90042-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Hara GW, Goss TJ, Dilworth MJ, Glenn AR: Maintenance of intracellular pH and acid tolerance in Rhizobium meliloti . Appl Environ Microbiol 1989, 55: 1870–1876. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen M, Angiuoli SV, Ashburner M, Axelrod N, Baldauf S, Ballard S, Boore J, Cochrane G, Cole J, Dawyndt P, De Vos P, De Pamphilis C, Edwards R, Faruque N, Feldman R, Gilbert J, Gilna P, Glöckner FO, Goldstein P, Guralnick R, Haft D, Hancock D: Towards a richer description of our complete collection of genomes and metagenomes “Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence ” (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26: 541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360 10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML: Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea , Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990, 87: 4576–4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576 10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garrity GM, Bell JA, Phylum LT, XIV: Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Edited by: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT. Springer, New York: Part B; 2005:1. Second Edition, Volume 2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn TG: Class I. Alphaproteobacteria . In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Volume Volume 2. Second edition. Edited by: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT. New York: Springer - Verlag; 2005.Google Scholar
- Validation List No. 107: List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006, 56: 1–6. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64188–0 View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuykendall LD: Order VI. Rhizobiales ord. nov. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Second edition. Edited by: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Kreig NR, Staley JT. New York: Springer - Verlag; 2005:324.Google Scholar
- Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn TG: Family IX. Methylobacteriaceae . In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Volume Volume 2. Second edition. Edited by: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT. New York: Springer - Verlag; 2005.Google Scholar
- Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA: Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980, 30: 225–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713–30–1-225 10.1099/00207713-30-1-225View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Patt TE, Cole GC, Hanson RS: Methylobacterium , a new genus of facultatively methylotrophic bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1976, 26: 226–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713–26–2-226 10.1099/00207713-26-2-226View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Green PN, Bousfield IJ: Emendation of Methylobacterium Patt, Cole and Hanson 1976; Methylobacterium rhodinum (Heumann 1962) comb. nov. corrig.; Methylobacterium radiotolerans , (Ito and Iizuka 1971) comb. nov. corrig.; and Methylobacterium mesophilicum , (Austin and Goodfellow 1979) comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1983, 33: 875–877. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713–33–4-875 10.1099/00207713-33-4-875View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Biological Agents: Technical rules for biological agents. TRBA. ( ):466 http://www.baua.de
- Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using Maximum Likelihood, evolutionary distance, and Maximum Parismony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011, 28: 2731–2739. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121 10.1093/molbev/msr121PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Felsenstein J: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39: 783–791. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408678 10.2307/2408678View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Kyrpides NC: The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36: D475-D479. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm884 10.1093/nar/gkn240PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al.: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000, 25: 25–29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556 10.1038/75556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reeve WG, Tiwari RP, Worsley PS, Dilworth MJ, Glenn AR, Howieson JG: Constructs for insertional mutagenesis, transcriptional signal localization and gene regulation studies in root nodule and other bacteria. Microbiology 1999, 145: 1307–1316. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/13500872–145–6-1307 10.1099/13500872-145-6-1307View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DOE Joint Genome Institute user home http://my.jgi.doe.gov/general/index.html
- Bennett S: Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics 2004, 5: 433–438. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/146224188.8.131.523 10.1517/146224184.108.40.2063View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Doe Joint Genome Institute. http://www.jgi.doe.gov
- Zerbino DR: Using the Velvet de novo assembler for short-read sequencing technologies. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 2010, Chapter 11: Unit 11 5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ewing B, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 1998, 8: 186–194. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.8.3.175 View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P: Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 1998, 8: 175–185. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.8.3.175 10.1101/gr.8.3.175View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P: Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res 1998, 8: 195–202. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.8.3.195 10.1101/gr.8.3.195View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ: Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11: 119. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471–2105–11–119 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Szeto E, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC: The DOE-JGI Standard operating procedure for the annotations of microbial genomes. Stand Genomic Sci 2009, 1: 63–67. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.632 10.4056/sigs.632PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC: GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods 2010, 7: 455–457. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1457 10.1038/nmeth.1457View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Chu K, Kyrpides NC: IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 2009, 25: 2271–2278. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lowe TM, Eddy SR: tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25: 955–964. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.5.0955 10.1093/nar/25.5.0955PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW: RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35: 3100–3108. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm160 10.1093/nar/gkm160PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Griffiths-Jones S, Bateman A, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR: Rfam: an RNA family database. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31: 439–441. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg006 10.1093/nar/gkg006PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer ELL: Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: Application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 2001, 305: 567–580. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S: Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol 2004, 340: 783–795. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.