Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Extended genome report
  • Open access
  • Published:

Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus jeddahensis sp. nov.

Standards in Genomic Sciences volume 10, Article number: 47 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Strain JCET was isolated from the fecal sample of a 24-year-old obese man living in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. It is an aerobic, Gram-positive, rod-shaped bacterium. This strain exhibits a 16S rRNA nucleotide sequence similarity of 97.5 % with Bacillus niacini, the phylogenetically closest species with standing nomenclature. Moreover, the strain JCET presents many phenotypic differences, when it is compared to other Bacillus species, and shows a low MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry score that does not allow any identification. Thus, it is likely that this strain represents a new species. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 4,762,944 bp long genome (1 chromosome but no plasmid) contains 4,654 protein-coding and 98 RNAs genes, including 92 tRNA genes. The strain JCET differs from most of the other closely Bacillus species by more than 1 % in G + C content. In addition, digital DNA-DNA hybridization values for the genome of the strain JCET against the closest Bacillus genomes range between 19.5 to 28.1, that confirming again its new species status. On the basis of these polyphasic data made of phenotypic and genomic analyses, we propose the creation of Bacillus jeddahensis sp. nov. that contains the strain JCET.

Introduction

Currently, a polyphasic approach that combines proteomic by MALDI-TOF spectra analysis, genomic data and phenotypic characterization is used widely to describe new bacterial species [1–13].

The genus Bacillus, described by Cohn [14] more than 140 years ago, includes actually 310 species names (296 validly and 14 not-validly published species) [15]. Species belonging to this genus are Gram-positive or variable and mostly motile and spore-forming bacteria. Bacillus spp. are ubiquitous bacteria isolated from various environmental sources but it could be involved in human infections [16].

Strain JCET (= CSUR P732 = DSM 28281) is the type strain of Bacillus jeddahensis sp. nov. This bacterium is a Gram-positive, flagellated, facultatively anaerobic, indole-negative bacillus that has rounded-ends. It was isolated from the stool sample of a 24-year-old obese man living in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia as part of a culturomics study aiming at cultivating bacterial species within human feces. By applying large scale of culture conditions, culturomics allowed previously the isolation of many new bacterial species from human stool samples [17–19].

Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for B. jeddahensis sp. nov. strain JCET together with the description of the complete genome sequence and annotation. These characteristics support the circumscription of the species B. jeddahensis [20].

Organism information

Classification and features

In April 2013, a fecal sample was collected from a 24-year-old obese (body mass index 52 kg/m2) man living in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (Table 1). Written assent was obtained from this individual. Both the study and the assent procedure were approved by Ethical Committee of the King Abdulaziz University, King Fahd medical Research Centre, Saudi Arabia (agreement number 014-CEGMR-2-ETH-P) and the Ethical Committee of the Institut Fédératif de Recherche IFR48, Faculty of Medecine, Marseille, France (agreement numbers 09–022 and 11–017). The fecal specimen was preserved at −80 °C after collection and sent to Marseille. Strain JCET (Table 1) was isolated in July 2013 by cultivation on blood culture bottle (Becton Dickinson, Temse, Belgique) supplemented with rumen fluid and sheep blood. This strain exhibited a 97.5 % 16S rRNA nucleotide sequence similarity with Bacillus niacini, the phylogenetically closest validly published Bacillus species (Fig. 1), when it was compared against NCBI database and Ribosomal Database Project. This value was equal to the percentage of 16S rRNA gene sequence threshold recommended by Meier-Kolthoff et al. for Firmicutes to delineate a new species without carrying out DNA-DNA hybridization with maximum error probability of 0.01 % [21].

Table 1 Classification and general features of Bacillus jeddahensis strain JCET
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Bacillus jeddahensis strain JCET relative to other type strains within the Bacillus genus. GenBank accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Sequences were aligned using MUSCLE, and phylogenetic inferences obtained using the maximum-likelihood method and Kimura 2-parameter model within the MEGA 6 software [50]. Numbers at the nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating the analysis 1,000 times to generate a majority consensus tree. Clostridium botulinum was used as outgroup. The scale bar represents a rate of substitution per site of 0.01. *indicates the strains used in the tree have a sequenced genome. # indicates that a sequenced genome is available for this species but not for the strain used to build the tree

Full size image

Different growth temperatures (28, 30, 37, 45, 56 °C) were tested. Growth occurred for the temperatures (28–45 °C), but the optimal growth was observed at 37 °C. Colonies were 0.4–0.5 mm in diameter on Columbia agar, appear smooth and grey in color at 37 °C. Growth of the strain was tested under anaerobic and microaerophilic conditions using GENbag anaer and GENbag microaer systems, respectively (BioMérieux), and in aerobic conditions, with or without 5 % CO2. Growth was achieved under aerobic (with and without CO2), microaerophilic and anaerobic conditions. Gram staining showed Gram positive bacilli (Fig. 2). A motility test was negative. Cells grown on agar sporulate and the rods have a length ranging from 3.83 to 4.71 μm (mean 4.14 μm) and a diameter ranging from 0.75 to 0.95 μm (mean 0.87 μm). Both the length and the diameter were determined by negative staining transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Gram staining of B. jeddahensis strain JCET

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Transmission electron microscopy of B. jeddahensis strain JCET, using a Morgani 268D (Philips) at an operating voltage of 60 kV. The scale bar represents 1 μm

Full size image

Strain JCET exhibited oxidase activity but not catalase activity. Using API 50CH system (BioMerieux), a positive reaction was observed for D-arabinose, L-arabinose, D-xylose, D-glucose, D-fructose, D-mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, esculin, D-maltose, D-trehalose, and weak reaction for D-melezitose. Negative reactions were observed for the remaining carbohydrate tests (i.e. glycerol, erythritol, D-ribose, L-xylose, D-adonitol, methyl-β-D-xylopyranoside, D-galactose, L-sorbose, L-rhamnose, dulcitol, inositol, D-mannitol, D-sorbitol, methyl-α-D-mannopyranoside, methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside, amygdalin, arbutin, salicin, D-cellobiose, D-lactose, D-melibiose, D-saccharose, inulin, D-raffinose, amidon, glycogen, xylitol, gentiobiose, D-turanose, D-lyxose, D-tagatose, D-fucose, L-fucose, D-arabitol, L-arabitol, potassium gluconate, potassium 2-ketogluconate and potassium 5-ketogluconate). Using API ZYM, positive reactions were observed for esterase (C 4), esterase lipase (C 8), acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase and β-glucosidase. Negative reactions were observed for alkaline phosphatase, lipase (C 14), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase and α-fucosidase. Using API NE system, nitrates were reduced to nitrites, the urease reaction, indole production, arginine dihydrolase and gelatin hydrolysis were negative, the following carbon sources were assimilated: D-glucose, D-mannose, N-acetylglucosamine and D-maltose, and the following carbon sources were not assimilated: L-arabinose, D-mannitol, potassium gluconate, capric acid, adipic acid, malic acid, trisodium citrate and phenylacetic acid. B. jeddahensis is susceptible to imipenem, doxycyclin amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate and gentamycin, but resistant to metronidazole, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, rifampicin, vancomycin, erythromycin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin and benzylpenicillin.

When compared to other Bacillus species [18, 22–24], B. jeddahensis sp. nov. strain JCET exhibited the phenotypic differences detailed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS protein analysis was carried out as previously described [2] using a Microflex spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany). Twelve distinct deposits were done for strain JCET from 12 isolated colonies. The twelve JCET spectra were imported into the MALDI BioTyper software (version 2.0, Bruker) and analyzed by standard pattern matching (with default parameter settings) against 6,335 bacterial spectra including 210 spectra from 110 Bacillus species, used as reference data, in the BioTyper database. Interpretation of scores was as follows: a score ≥ 2 enabled the identification at the species level, a score ≥ 1.7 but < 2 enabled the identification at the genus level; and a score < 1.7 did not enable any identification (These scores were established by the manufacturer Bruker Daltonics). For strain JCET, the obtained scores ranged from 1.4 to 1.6, thus suggesting that our isolate was not a member of a known species. We incremented our database with the spectrum from strain JCET (Fig. 4). Spectrum differences with other of Bacillus species are shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Reference mass spectrum from B. jeddahensis strain JCET. Spectra from twelve individual colonies were compared and a reference spectrum was generated

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Gel view comparing Bacillus jeddahensis JCET spectra with other members of the Bacillus genus (B. niacini, B. drentensis, B. novalis, B. bataviensis, B. vireti, B. massilioanorexius, B. massiliosenegalensis, B. megaterium, B. timonensis, B. cereus and B. licheniformis). The Gel View displays the raw spectra of all loaded spectrum files arranged in a pseudo-gel like look. The x-axis records the m/z value. The left y-axis displays the running spectrum number originating from subsequent spectra loading. The peak intensity is expressed by a gray-scale scheme code. The color bar and the right y-axis indicate the relation between the color a peak is displayed with and the peak intensity in arbitrary units

Full size image

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

On the basis of phenotypic characteristics of this strain and because of the low16S rRNA similarity to other members of the genus Bacillus , it is likely that the strain represents a new species and thus it was chosen for genome sequencing. It was the 348th genome of a Bacillus species (Genomes Online Database) and the first genome of Bacillus jeddahensis sp. nov. sequenced. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2. The Genbank accession number is CCAS00000000 (Table 2) and consists of 149 contigs. Table 2 shows the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [25].

Table 2 Project information
Full size table

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

B. jeddahensis sp. nov. strain JCET, CSUR P732, DSM 28281, was grown aerobically on 5 % sheep blood-enriched Columbia agar at 37 °C. Four Petri dishes were spread and resuspended in 3 × 500 μl of TE buffer and stored at 80 °C. Then, 500 μl of this suspension were thawed, centrifuged 3 min at 10,000 rpm and resuspended in 3 × 100 μL of G2 buffer (EZ1 DNA Tissue kit, Qiagen). A first mechanical lysis was performed by glass powder on the Fastprep-24 device (Sample Preparation system, MP Biomedicals, USA) using 2 × 20 s cycles. DNA was then treated with 2.5 μg/μL lysozyme (30 min at 37 °C) and extracted using the BioRobot EZ1 Advanced XL (Qiagen). The DNA was then concentrated and purified using the Qiamp kit (Qiagen). The yield and the concentration was measured by the Quant-it Picogreen kit (Invitrogen) on the Genios Tecan fluorometer at 50 ng/μl.

Genome sequencing and assembly

Genomic DNA of B. jeddahensis was sequenced on the MiSeq Technology (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA, USA) with the 2 applications: paired end and mate pair. The paired end and the mate pair strategies were barcoded in order to be mixed respectively with 14 others genomic projects prepared with the Nextera XT DNA sample prep kit (Illumina) and eleven others projects with the Nextera Mate Pair sample prep kit (Illumina). The DNAg was quantified by a Qubit assay with the high sensitivity kit (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to 16 ng/μl and dilution was performed to require 1ng of each genome as input to prepare the paired end library. The « tagmentation » step fragmented and tagged the DNA. Then limited cycle PCR amplification (twelve cycles) completed the tag adapters and introduced dual-index barcodes. After purification on AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter Inc, Fullerton, CA, USA), the libraries were then normalized on specific beads according to the Nextera XT protocol (Illumina). Normalized libraries were pooled into a single library for sequencing on the MiSeq. The pooled single strand library was loaded onto the reagent cartridge and then onto the instrument along with the flow cell. Automated cluster generation and paired end sequencing with dual index reads were performed in a single 39-h run in 2 × 250-bp. Total information of 5.3 Gb was obtained from a 574 K/mm2 cluster density with a cluster passing quality control filters of 95.4 % (11,188,000 clusters). Within this run, the index representation for B. jeddahensis was determined to 10.3 %. The 1,062,432 reads were filtered according to the read qualities. The mate pair library was prepared with 1 μg of genomic DNA using the Nextera mate pair Illumina guide. The genomic DNA sample was simultaneously fragmented and tagged with a mate pair junction adapter. The profile of the fragmentation was validated on an Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a DNA 7500 labchip. The DNA fragments ranged in size from 1 kb up to 11 kb with an optimal size at 5 kb. No size selection was performed and 600 ng of tagmented fragments were circularized. The circularized DNA was mechanically sheared to small fragments with an optimal at 692 bp on the Covaris device S2 in microtubes (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA). The library profile was visualized on a High Sensitivity Bioanalyzer LabChip (Agilent Technologies Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The libraries were normalized at 2 nM and pooled. After a denaturation step and dilution at 10 pM, the pool of libraries was loaded onto the reagent cartridge and then onto the instrument along with the flow cell. Automated cluster generation and sequencing run were performed in a single 42-h run in a 2 × 250-bp. Total information of 3.9 Gb was obtained from a 399 K/mm2 cluster density with a cluster passing quality control filters of 97.9 % (7,840,000 clusters). Within this run, the index representation for B. jeddahensis was determined to 9.37 %. The 718,848 reads were filtered according to the read qualities. The passed filter sequences were assembled using Newbler with 90 % identity and 40-bp as overlap. The final assembly identified 149 large contigs (>1.5 kb) generating a genome size of 4.76 Mb which corresponds to a genome coverage of 94.91x.

Genome annotation

Open Reading Frames (ORFs) were predicted using Prodigal [26] with default parameters but the predicted ORFs were excluded if they spanned a sequencing gap region. The predicted bacterial protein sequences were searched against the GenBank database [27] and the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) databases using BLASTP. The tRNAScanSE tool [28] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNAs were found by using RNAmmer [29] and BLASTn against the GenBank database. Signal peptides and numbers of transmembrane helices were predicted using SignalP [30] and TMHMM [31], respectively. ORFans were identified if their BLASTP E-value was lower than 1e-03 for alignment length greater than 80 amino acids. If alignment lengths were smaller than 80 amino acids, we used an E-value of 1e-05. Such parameter thresholds have already been used in previous works to define ORFans. Artemis [32] and DNA Plotter [33] were used for data management and visualization of genomic features, respectively. Mauve alignment tool (version 2.3.1) was used for multiple genomic sequence alignment [34].

To estimate the mean level of nucleotide sequence similarity at the genome level between B. jeddahensis sp nov. strain JCET and nine other members of the genus Bacillus, we use the Average Genomic Identity of orthologous gene Sequences (AGIOS) program. Briefly, this software combines the Proteinortho software [35] to detect orthologous proteins between genomes compared on a pair-wise basis, then retrieves the corresponding genes and determines the mean percentage of nucleotide sequence identity among orthologous ORFs using the Needleman-Wunsch global alignment algorithm. Moreover, we used Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) web server available at (http://ggdc.dsmz.de) to estimate of the overall similarity among the compared genomes and to replace the wet-lab DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) by a digital DDH (dDDH) [36, 37]. GGDC 2.0 BLAST+ was chosen as alignment method and the recommended formula 2 was taken into account to interpret the results.

Genome properties

The genome 4,762,944 bp long (1 chromosome, but no plasmid) with a 39.42 % G + C content (Fig. 6 and Table 3). It is composed of 149 contigs. Of the 4,741 predicted genes, 4,654 were protein-coding genes and 98 were RNAs including 6 rRNA (1 gene is 16S rRNA, 1 gene is 23S rRNA and 5 genes are 5S rRNA). A total of 3,410 genes (71.92 %) were assigned a putative function (by COGs or by NR blast) and 147 genes were identified as ORFans (3.17 %). The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4. The properties and statistics of the genome are summarized in Tables 3 and 4.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on the forward strand colored by COG categories (only genes assigned to COG), genes on the reverse strand colored by COG categories (only gene assigned to COG), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red), G + C content and GC skew. Purple and olive indicating negative and positive values, respectively

Full size image
Table 3 Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome
Full size table
Table 4 Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories
Full size table

Insights from the genome sequence

Here, we compared the genome of B. jeddahensis strain JCET with those of “Bacillus massiliosenegalensis” strain JC6T , “ Bacillus massilioanorexius ” strain AP8T , “ Bacillus timonensis” strain MM10403188, Bacillus cereus strain ATCC 14579, Bacillus megaterium strain DSM 319, Bacillus licheniformis strain ATCC 14580, Bacillus bataviensis strain DSM 15601T, Bacillus vireti DSM 15602T, Bacillus niacini JAM F8 and Bacillus niacini DSM 2923T (Tables 5 and 6). The draft genome sequence of B. jeddahensis strain is larger in size than those of “B. massilioanorexius”, “B. timonensis”, B. licheniformis and B. niacini DSM 2923T (4.76 vs 4.59, 4.66, 4.22 and 2.2 Mb, respectively), but smaller than those of “B. massiliosenegalensis”, B. cereus, B. megaterium , B. bataviensis , B. vireti and B. niacini JAM F8 (4.76 vs 4.97, 5.43, 5.10, 5.37, 5.29 and 6.37 Mb, respectively) (Table 5). B. jeddahensis has a lower G + C content than those of B. licheniformis , B. bataviensis and B.vireti (39.42 vs 46.19, 39.6 and 39.74 %, respectively) and higher than those of “B. massiliosenegalensis”,” B. massilioanorexius”,” B. timonensis”, B. cereus , B. megaterium , B. niacini JAM F8 and B. niacini DSM 2923T (39.42 vs 37.58, 34.10, 37.28, 35.29, 38.13, 37.83 and 38.30 %, respectively) (Table 5). As it was reported recently that the G + C content varies no more than 1 % within species [38] and because the strain JCET differs from most of the other closely strains by more than 1 % in G + C content, this might provide an additional argument for the new taxon described herein. The protein content of B. jeddahensis is higher than those of “B. massilioanorexius”, “ B. timonensis”, B. licheniformis and B. niacini DSM 2923T (4654 vs 4436, 4647, 4173 and 2184, respectively) but lower than those of “B. massiliosenegalensis”, B. cereus , B. megaterium , B. bataviensis , B.vireti andB. niacini JAM F8 (4654 vs 4935, 5231, 5100, 5207, 5092 and 6103, respectively) (Table 6). The distribution of genes into COG categories was not entirely similar in all the nine compared genomes (Fig. 7). In addition, B. jeddahensis shares 2075, 1786, 1930, 1729, 1894, 1715, 2494, 2433, 2404 and 914 orthologous genes with those of “B. massiliosenegalensis”, “ B. massilioanorexius”, “ B. timonensis”, B. cereus , B. megaterium , B. licheniformis , B. bataviensis , B. vireti , B. niacini JAM F8 and B. niacini DSM 2923T, respectively. Among compared genomes except B. jeddahensis, AGIOS values range from 64.44 between B.cereus and B. licheniformis to 83.91 % between B. niacini JAM F8 and B. niacini DSM 2923T. When B. jeddahensis was compared to other species, AGIOS values range from 65.50 with B. licheniformis to 78.49 % with B. bataviensis (Table 6). dDDH estimation of the strain JCET against the compared genomes ranged between 19.50 to 28.10. These values are very low and below the cutoff of 70 %, thus confirming again the new species status of the strain JCET. Table 5 summarizes the number of orthologous genes and the average percentage of nucleotide sequence identity between the different genomes studied.

Table 5 Genomic comparison of B. jeddahensis sp. nov., strain JCET with other Bacillus species. Species and strain names, GenBank genome accession numbers, sizes and G + C contents
Full size table
Table 6 Genomic comparison of B. jeddahensis sp. nov., strain JCET with other Bacillus species. Numbers of orthologous proteins shared between genomes (upper right triangle), average percentage similarity of nucleotides corresponding to orthologous proteins shared between genomes (lower left triangle)
Full size table
Fig. 7
figure 7

Distribution of predicted genes of B. jeddahensis and eight other Bacillus species into COG categories

Full size image

Conclusions

On the basis of phenotypic characteristics (Additional file 1: Table S1), phylogenetic position (Fig. 1), genomic analyses (taxonogenomics) (Table 5) and GGDC results, we formally propose the creation of Bacillus jeddahensis sp. nov. that contains the strain JCET. This strain has been found in obese human feces collected from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Description of Bacillus jeddahensis sp. nov. strain JCET

Bacillus jeddahensis (jed.dah. en′sis L. gen. neutr. n. jeddahensis, pertaining to, or originating from Jeddah, the capital of Saudi Arabia, where the type strain was isolated).

B. jeddahensis is a Gram-positive. Optimal growth is achieved aerobically. But growth is also observed in microaerophilic or anaerobic conditions. Growth occurs on axenic media between 28 and 45 °C, with optimal growth observed at 37 °C. Cells stain Gram-positive, are rod-shaped, endospore-forming and non-motile with a mean diameter of 0.87 μm (range 0.75 to 0.95 μm) and a mean length of 4.1 μm (range 3.8 to 4.7 μm). Colonies are smooth grey and 0.4–0.5 mm in diameter on blood-enriched Columbia agar.

Catalase negative, oxidase positive. A positive reaction is obtained for D-arabinose, L-arabinose, D-xylose, D-glucose, D-fructose, D-mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, esculin, D-maltose, D-trehalose, and weak reaction for D-melezitose. Negative reactions are obtained for the remaining carbohydrate tests (i.e. glycerol, erythritol, D-ribose, L-xylose, D-adonitol, methyl-β-D-xylopyranoside, D-galactose, L-sorbose, L-rhamnose, dulcitol, inositol, D-mannitol, D-sorbitol, methyl-α-D-mannopyranoside, methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside, amygdalin, arbutin, salicin, D-cellobiose, D-lactose, D-melibiose, D-saccharose, inulin, D-raffinose, amidon, glycogen, xylitol, gentiobiose, D-turanose, D-lyxose, D-tagatose, D-fucose, L-fucose, D-arabitol, L-arabitol, potassium gluconate, potassium 2-ketogluconate and potassium 5-ketogluconate). Positive reactions are observed for esterase (C 4), esterase lipase (C 8), acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase and β-glucosidase. Negative reactions are obtained for alkaline phosphatase, lipase (C 14), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase and α-fucosidase. Nitrates are reduced to nitrites, the urease reaction, indole production, arginine dihydrolase and gelatin hydrolysis are negative, the following carbon sources are assimilated: D-glucose, D-mannose, N-acetylglucosamine and D-maltose, and the following carbon sources were not assimilated: L-arabinose, D-mannitol, potassium gluconate, capric acid, adipic acid, malic acid, trisodium citrate and phenylacetic acid. B. jeddahensis is susceptible to imipenem, doxycyclin amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate and gentamycin, but resistant to metronidazole, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, rifampicin, vancomycin, erythromycin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin and benzylpenicillin.

The G + C content of the genome is 39.42 %. The 16S rRNA and genome sequences are deposited in GenBank under accession numbers HG931339 and CCAS00000000, respectively. The type strain JCET (= CSUR P732 = DSM 28281) was isolated from the fecal flora of an obese man from Jeddah in Saudi Arabia.

Abbreviations

URMITE:

Unité de Recherchesur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes

CSUR:

Collection de Souches de l’Unité des Rickettsies

DSM:

Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen

MALDI-TOF MS:

Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry

TE buffer:

Tris-EDTA buffer

GGDC:

Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator

dDDH:

digital DNA-DNA hybridization

References

  1. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Rivet R, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of “Paenibacillus senegalensis” sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2012;7:70–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mamadou Bhoye K, Seydina D, Catherine R, Didier R, Pierre-Edouard F, Fadi B. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus massiliogorillae sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;9:93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Clostridium senegalense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2012;6:386–95.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Mishra AK, Ngyuen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2012;6:315–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lagier JC, El Karkouri K, Nguyen TT, Armougom F, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Anaerococcus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2012;6:116–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roux V, El Karkouri K, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Kurthia massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2012;7:221–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2012;7:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hugon P, Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Rivet R, Couderc C, Raoult D, et al. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes obesi sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;7:427–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Dielma fastidiosa gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the Family Erysipelotrichaceae. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;8:336–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Genome sequence and description of Timonella senegalensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the suborder Micrococcinae. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;8:318–35.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mishra AK, Hugon P, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Couderc C, Raoult D, et al. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Enorma massiliensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the Family Coriobacteriaceae. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;8:290–305.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Gorlas A, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus massiliosenegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;8:264–78.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hugon P, Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Couderc C, Raoult D, et al. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Brevibacillus massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;8:1–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohn F. Untersuchungen über Bakterien. Beitrage zur Biologie der Pflanzen Heft. 1872;1:127–224.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abstract for the genus Bacillus. NamesforLife, LLC. Retrieved January 30, 2014. http://doi.namesforlife.com/10.1601/tx.4857

  16. Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. Elsevier. 2010; 4320 p. CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE, Pennsylvania.

  17. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Million M, Hugon P, Pagnier I, Robert C, et al. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:1185–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dubourg G, Lagier JC, Armougom F, Robert C, Hamad I, Brouqui P, et al. The gut microbiota of a patient with resistant tuberculosis is more comprehensively studied by culturomics than by metagenomics. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32:637–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pfleiderer A, Lagier JC, Armougom F, Robert C, Vialettes B, Raoult D. Culturomics identified 11 new bacterial species from a single anorexia nervosa stool sample. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32:1471–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sentausa E, Fournier PE. Advantages and limitations of genomics in prokaryotic taxonomy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:790-5.

  21. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Spröer C, Klenk HP. When should a DDH experiment be mandatory in microbial taxonomy? Arch Microbiol. 2013;6:413–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Heyrman J, Vanparys B, Logan NA, Balcaen A, Rodríguez-Díaz M, Felske A, et al. Bacillus novalis sp. nov., Bacillus vireti sp. nov., Bacillus soli sp. nov., Bacillus bataviensis sp. nov. and Bacillus drentensis sp. nov., from the Drentse A grasslands. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:47–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mishra AK, Pfleiderer A, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus massilioanorexius sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013;8:465–79.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagel M, Andreesen JR. Bacillus niacini sp. nov. a nicotinate-metabolizing mesophile isolated from soil. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991;41:134–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:541–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Prodigal. http://prodigal.ornl.gov

  27. GenBank database. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank

  28. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. t-RNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA gene in genomic sequence. Nucl Acids Res. 1997;25:955–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucl Acids Res. 2007;35:3100–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol. 2004;340:783–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:567–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, et al. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2000;16:944–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Carver T, Thomson N, Bleasby A, Berriman M, Parkhill J. DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:119–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004;14:1394–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lechner M, Findeib S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ. Proteinortho: detection of (Co-) orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:124.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci. 2010;2:117–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Klenk HP, Göker M. Taxonomic use of DNA G + C content and DNA-DNA hybridization in the genomic age. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64(Pt 2):352–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archae, Bacteria, and Eukarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:4576–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gibbons NE, Murray RGE. Proposals concerning the higher taxa of Bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1978;28:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Garrity GM, Holt JG. The road map to the manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2001. p. 119–69.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Murray RGE. The higher taxa, or, a place for everything…? In: Holt JG, editor. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1. 1st ed. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co.; 1984. p. 31–4.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB. Class I. Bacilli class nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Second ed. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Euzéby J. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. List no. 132. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:469–472.

  45. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1980;30:225–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Prévot AR. In: Hauderoy P, Ehringer G, Guillot G, Magrou J, Prévot AR, Rosset D, Urbain A (eds), Dictionaire des Bactéries Pathogènes, Second Edition, Masson et Cie, Paris, 1953, p. 1–692

  47. Fischer A. Untersuchungen über bakterien. Jahrbücher für Wissenschaftliche Botanik. 1895;27:1–163.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gibson T, Gordon RE, Genus I. Bacillus Cohn 1872, 174; Nom. gen. cons. Nomencl. Comm. Intern. Soc. Microbiol. 1937, 28; Opin. A. Jud. Comm. 1955, 39. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Eighthth ed. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co; 1974. p. 529–50.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, under grant No. (1-141/1433 HiCi). The authors, therefore, acknowledge technical and financial support of KAU. Fadi Bittar was supported by a Chair of Excellence IRD provided by the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement / Méditerranée-Infection foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. URMITE, Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de médecine, Marseille, France

    Fadi Bittar, Dhamodharan Ramasamy, Jean-Christophe Lagier, Ti Thien Nguyen, Pierre-Edouard Fournier & Didier Raoult

  2. Special Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Fehmida Bibi, Esam I. Azhar, Muhammad Yasir & Didier Raoult

  3. Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Esam I. Azhar & Ahmed K. Al-Ghamdi

  4. Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Asif A. Jiman-Fatani

Authors
  1. Fadi Bittar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fehmida Bibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dhamodharan Ramasamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jean-Christophe Lagier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Esam I. Azhar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Asif A. Jiman-Fatani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ahmed K. Al-Ghamdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ti Thien Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Muhammad Yasir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Pierre-Edouard Fournier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Didier Raoult
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fadi Bittar.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

F Bittar, PE Fournier and D Raoult conceived the study, participated in its design and drafted the manuscript. F Bittar, F Bibi, JC Lagier, EI Azhar, AA Jiman-Fatani, AK Al-Ghamdi, M Yasir and D Raoult contributed materials and analyses. F Bittar and JC Lagier performed the phenotypic characterization of the bacterium. D Ramasamy performed the genomic analyses and helped to draft the manuscript. TT Nguyen performed the genomic sequencing and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional file

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Differential phenotypic characteristics between B. jeddahensis sp. nov. strain JCET and phylogenetically close Bacillus species.

Rights and permissions

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bittar, F., Bibi, F., Ramasamy, D. et al. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus jeddahensis sp. nov.. Stand in Genomic Sci 10, 47 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-015-0024-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-015-0024-y

Keywords

Environmental Microbiome

ISSN: 2524-6372