Open Access

Draft genome sequence of Halomonas meridiana R1t3 isolated from the surface microbiota of the Caribbean Elkhorn coral Acropora palmata

  • Julie L. Meyer1,
  • Brian A. Dillard1,
  • John M. Rodgers1,
  • Kim B. Ritchie2,
  • Valerie J. Paul3 and
  • Max Teplitski1, 3Email author
Standards in Genomic Sciences201510:75

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-015-0069-y

Received: 8 May 2015

Accepted: 28 September 2015

Published: 7 October 2015

Abstract

Members of the gammaproteobacterial genus Halomonas are common in marine environments. Halomonas and other members of the Oceanospirillales have recently been identified as prominent members of the surface microbiota of reef-building corals. Halomonas meridiana strain R1t3 was isolated from the surface mucus layer of the scleractinian coral Acropora palmata in 2005 from the Florida Keys. This strain was chosen for genome sequencing to provide insight into the role of commensal heterotrophic bacteria in the coral holobiont. The draft genome consists of 290 scaffolds, totaling 3.5 Mbp in length and contains 3397 protein-coding genes.

Keywords

Coral microbiomeSurface mucus layerCommensal Oceanospirillales Florida keys

Introduction

As the name denotes, the first isolated members of the genus Halomonas were acquired from saline environments, and members of this halotolerant genus are increasingly isolated from a wide variety of marine environments. While the type species of Halomonas meridiana was isolated from an Antarctic saline lake [1], several strains of this species have been isolated from Acropora corals, including strain R001 from Palk Bay, India [2] and strains R1t3 and R1t4 from A. palmata in the Florida Keys [3]. Halomonas spp. have also been identified in surveys of uncultured bacteria in the surface microbiota of Acropora corals from the Caribbean and Indonesia [4], while the microbiota of A. millepora corals from the Great Barrier Reef are more commonly dominated by members of another genus in the order Oceanospirillales , Endozoicomonas [5]. Members of the Oceanospirillales are increasingly identified as important components of the stable, commensal coral microbiota, and the loss of commensal bacteria is often correlated with disease symptoms [68].

Coral-associated commensal bacteria may inhibit pathogens from colonizing the carbon-rich coral mucus layer by outcompeting non-commensals or through the active production of antimicrobial compounds, as previously demonstrated in Halomonas strain R1t4 [3]. We chose H. meridiana strain R1t3 for whole genome sequencing as a representative coral commensal bacterium from Acropora corals. To date, only one other coral commensal bacterial strain has been sequenced: Endozoicomonas montiporae from the encrusting pore coral, Montipora aequituberculata , isolated from Taiwan [9].

Organism information

Classification and features

Within the polyphyletic family Halomonadaceae [10], Halomonas strain R1t3 is a member of the Group 2 assemblage, which may represent a separate genus, however defining characteristics have not been clearly determined for this potential revision [11]. The small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequence of Halomonas strain R1t3 is nearly indistinguishable from the sequence in type strains of both H. meridiana and H. aquamarina (Fig. 1). Comparison of functional gene loci used in a previously published MLSA study [11] reveal that the loci secA, atpA, and rpoD are approximately 99 % identical between the two type strains and strain R1t3. In contrast, gene sequences for the gyrB locus are identical in the type strains, but only 87 % similar to the gyrB locus in strain R1t3. Strain R1t3 also exhibits high sequence identity to the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene to strain RA001 isolated from Acopora coral in India, and to uncultured Halomonas retrieved from Acropora corals in Mexico and Indonesia (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree of select Halomonas type species and H. meridiana strain R1t3. The phylogenetic placement H. meridiana strain R1t3 in relation to select type species of marine and salt-tolerant Halomonas. Sequences from the 16S rRNA gene were aligned with MUSCLE and trimmed to 1154 bp, the length of the shortest sequence. Evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model [26]. Branch lengths are measured in the number of substitutions per site. Branch labels indicate the percentage of trees in which the associated taxa were clustered based on 500 bootstraps using MEGA v 5.2.2 [27]. Genome sequences are not currently available for any of the type strains included in this figure

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree of H. meridiana strain R1t3 and other Halomonas spp. associated with corals. Sequences from the 16S rRNA gene were aligned with MUSCLE and trimmed to 691 bp, the length of the shortest sequence. Evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model [26]. Branch lengths are measured in the number of substitutions per site. Branch labels indicate the percentage of trees in which the associated taxa were clustered based on 500 bootstraps using MEGA v 5.2.2 [27]. Genome sequences are currently available for H. meridiana strain R1t3 and Endozoicomonas montiporae strain LMG 24815

While the strain was originally isolated using sterile coral mucus as a growth substrate [3], subsequent growth in both marine broth and Luria broth have been successful. H. meridiana strain R1t3 is aerobic, heterotrophic, and utilizes a wide range of carbon sources, including D-galatonic acid γ-lactone, D-galacturonic acid, D-glucosaminic acid, γ-hydroxybutyric acid, itaconic acid, glycyl-L-glutamic acid, L-phenylalanine, L-serine, L-threonine, phenylethylamine, α-cyclodextrin, Tween 80, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, D-cellobiose, i-erythritol, α-D-lactose, D-mannitol, putrescine, D,L-α-glycerol phosphate, glucose-1-phosphate, glycogen, Tween 40, and L-asparagine [12]. The carbon sources utilized by the type strains of H. meridiana and H. aquamarina have been previously documented using Biolog GN2 plates [13] and carbon sources utilized by Halomonas strain R1t3 (33E7) have been previously documented using Biolog Ecoplates [12]. Of the 23 substrates in common between the two types of Biolog plates, strain R1t3 can use 12 more substrates than H. meridiana and 16 more substrates than H. aquamarina (see Additional file 1).

Halomonas strain R1t3 grows at 20 to 37 °C in culture, with the highest growth rates at 30 °C (Table 1). No growth was detected at 10 or 50 °C. Strain R1t3 grows at pH 7 to 9, with the highest growth rates at pH 8. Weak growth was detected at pH 6.5 and 10 and no growth occurred at pH 6 and 10.5. Cultures of strain R1t3 produce an unidentified acid during growth, and buffered growth medium at pH 10 was reduced to pH 8 within 24 h of inoculation. Strain R1t3 is halotolerant, exhibiting growth at 2 to 5 % (w/v) sea salt (Coral Pro Salts, Red Sea, Houston, TX) in liquid cultures and growth on 10 % sea salt marine agar. No growth was detected on 20 % sea salt marine agar or at 0 % (w/v) sea salt.
Table 1

Classification and general features of Halomonas meridiana strain R1t3 [28]

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence codea

 

Classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS [29]

  

Phylum Proteobacteria

TAS [30]

  

Class Gammaproteobacteria

TAS [31]

  

Order Oceanospirillales

TAS [32]

  

Family Halomonadaceae

TAS [33]

  

Genus Halomonas

TAS [34]

  

Species Halomonas meridiana

TAS [1]

  

strain: R1t3

 
 

Gram stain

Negative

NAS

 

Cell shape

Rod-shaped

IDA

 

Motility

Motile

IDA

 

Sporulation

Non-sporulating

NAS

 

Temperature range

20–37 °C

IDA

 

Optimum temperature

30 °C

IDA

 

pH range; Optimum

7–9; 8

IDA

 

Carbon source

Varied

TAS [12]

MIGS-6

Habitat

Coral, Marine host

TAS [3]

MIGS-6.3

Salinity

2–10 % NaCl (w/v)

IDA

MIGS-22

Oxygen requirement

Aerobic

TAS [3]

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

Host-associated

TAS [3]

MIGS-14

Pathogenicity

Non-pathogen

NAS

MIGS-4

Geographic location

Looe Key Reef, Florida

TAS [3]

MIGS-5

Sample collection

April 2005

TAS [3]

MIGS-4.1

Latitude

24° 40′ 48″ N

TAS [3]

MIGS-4.2

Longitude

81° 14′ 24″ W

TAS [3]

MIGS-4.3

Depth

~5 m

TAS [3]

MIGS-4.4

Altitude

Not applicable

 

aEvidence codes - IDA Inferred from Direct Assay, TAS Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [35]

Cells of strain R1t3 are around 2 μm long and 1 μm wide (Fig. 3). Cells are motile and multi-flagellated, although the exact number of flagella per cell could not be determined. Colonies grown on marine agar plates are smooth, round, and beige.
Fig. 3

Transmission Electron Micrograph of typical Halomonas meridiana strain R1t3 cells. TEM micrograph of strain R1t3 cells grown in marine broth for 18 h and prepared for microscopy with a negative stain. TEM was performed on a Tecnai G2 Spirit 120 kV Transmission Electron Microscope at the University of Florida Electron Microscopy Core. Panel a shows a single cell, panel b shows multiple cells

Symbiotaxonomy

Halomonas strain R1t3 was isolated from the surface mucus layer of the scleractinian coral Acropora palmata Lamarck 1816 (commonly known as Elkhorn Coral), from the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (Table 1). A. palmata historically dominated shallow Caribbean reefs, but is currently listed as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species due to extensive losses from white-band disease, climate change, and human-related impacts [14].

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

H. meridiana strain R1t3 was chosen for genome sequencing as a representative of the stable, commensal bacterial community inhabiting the dynamic surface mucus layer of an acroporid coral. The genome project information is available through the Genomes On Line Database [15] and the annotated genome sequences are publicly available through both the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) portal [16] and GenBank (Table 2).
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS 31

Finishing quality

Draft

MIGS-28

Libraries used

Illumina DNA-seq, PE library (~350 bp insert size)

MIGS 29

Sequencing platforms

Illumina HiSeq

MIGS 31.2

Fold coverage

23X

MIGS 30

Assemblers

IDBA-UD 1.1.0

MIGS 32

Gene calling method

IMG: DOE-JGI Genome Annotation Pipeline, NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline

 

Locus Tag

IMG: Halo, NCBI: VE30

 

Genbank ID

JZEM00000000

 

GenBank Date of Release

04 March 2015

 

GOLD ID

Gp0103707

 

BIOPROJECT

PRJNA269585

MIGS 13

Source Material Identifier

NCMA B79

 

Project relevance

Host-associated

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

A culture of Halomonas meridiana R1t3 (National Center for Marine Algae & Microbiota, Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, Accession # NCMA B79) was grown from a single colony at room temperature in 5 ml of Difco™ Marine Broth 2216 for 48 h. Cells were separated from the culture medium using microcentrifugation (12,000 rpm for 5 min) and genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from the pelleted cells with a Qiagen AllPrep DNA/RNA Micro Kit (Germantown, MD). The quality of the extracted gDNA was assessed by visualization on a 1 % agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and with a BioAnalyzer DNA chip, then sent to the University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research for library preparation and sequencing.

Genome sequencing and assembly

A genomic library was prepared with a TruSeq DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq with the high-output, 100-bp paired-end protocol at the University of Maryland Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research. The average insert size was 337 bp with a DNA concentration of 192 nM. Sequencing reads were quality-filtered by trimming adaptors with cutadapt [17] and filtering reads for a minimum quality score of 30, minimum length of 100 bp, and discarding all sequences with ambiguous base calls using Sickle [18]. The unassembled, quality-filtered reads (41,481,885 read pairs) are publicly available through the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRX800904. Quality-filtered reads were interlaced with the shuffleSequences_fastq.pl script from velvet [19] and assembled with IDBA-UD [20] with k-mer sizes of 60, 70, and 80. This assembly yielded 290 contigs greater than 150 bp, a maximum contig length of 173,110 bp, and a total assembly length of 3.5 Mbp. The estimated Illumina sequencing coverage is 23×. To evaluate the quality of the assembly, unassembled reads were mapped to the 290 assembled contigs with bowtie2 [21] and alignment statistics were recovered with samtools [22]. The overall alignment rate was 99.9 %. The coverage of the genome was further assessed from the unassembled reads using nonpareil [23], which gave an estimated coverage of 100 %, indicating the sequencing effort was more than sufficient to capture all of the genome (4.2 Gbp actual effort, compared to 150 Mbp estimated required effort). Whole genome alignment of the draft genome sequences of Halomonas strain R1t3 and Endozoicomonas montiporae strain LMG 24815 was performed with Mauve v2.4 [24].

Genome annotation

The draft genome assembly was submitted to IMG-ER [16] for annotation (Taxon ID 2588254266, publicly available) and discussion of genome content here is restricted to the IMG annotation. The 130 contigs greater than 500 bp were also submitted to GenBank (JZEM00000000) and annotated through the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Locus tags in IMG are prefaced by “Halo” while locus tags in GenBank are prefaced by “VE30”.

Genome properties

The draft genome of strain R1t3 is comprised of 290 scaffolds, with a total length of 3.5 Mbp (Table 3). Compared to the other 28 genomes of Halomonas currently in the IMG database (as of April 2015), which range from 2.8 Mbp to 5.9 Mbp, the genome of strain R1t3 is smaller than the average Halomonas genome size of 4.3 Mbp. The G + C content is 57 %, while the other Halomonas genomes contain 52 to 68 % G + C. A total of 3526 genes were annotated through the IMG pipeline, with approximately 70 % genes assigned to Clusters of Orthologous Genes (Table 4). No pseudogenes or CRISPR repeats were detected.
Table 3

Genome statistics based on the IMG Annotation Pipeline

Attribute

Value

% of Total

Genome size (bp)

3,507,875

100.00

DNA coding (bp)

3,136,266

89.41

DNA G + C (bp)

1,986,943

56.64

DNA scaffolds

290

100.00

Total genes

3526

100.00

Protein coding genes

3397

96.34

RNA genes

129

3.66

Pseudo genes

0

0.00

Genes in internal clusters

2549

72.29

Genes with function prediction

2887

81.88

Genes assigned to COGs

2469

70.02

Genes with Pfam domains

2945

83.52

Genes with signal peptides

259

7.35

Genes with transmembrane helices

811

23.00

CRISPR repeats

0

0

Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories, based on the IMG Annotation Pipeline

Code

Value

% age

Description

J

207

7.53

Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

1

0.04

RNA processing and modification

K

179

6.51

Transcription

L

115

4.18

Replication, recombination and repair

B

2

0.07

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

32

1.16

Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning

V

63

2.29

Defense mechanisms

T

132

4.80

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

171

6.22

Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

71

2.58

Cell motility

U

36

1.31

Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

128

4.65

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

195

7.09

Energy production and conversion

G

149

5.42

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

253

9.20

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

72

2.62

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

155

5.64

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

136

4.95

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

176

6.40

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

64

2.33

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

202

7.35

General function prediction only

S

147

5.35

Function unknown

-

1057

29.98

Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Insights from the genome sequence

Like other members of the Halomonadaceae , strain R1t3 exhibits tolerance to a wide range of salinities that is likely mediated through the production of osmoprotectants, such as glycine betaine. Strain R1t3 has homologues of the two genes needed to produce glycine betaine. These genes, choline dehydrogenase (Halo_00078/VE30_01315) and betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (Halo_00077/VE30_01310) are part of a operon and are preceded by a choline ABC transporter periplasmic binding protein (Halo_00075/VE30_01300) and a TetR-family transcriptional regulator (Halo_00076/VE30_01305). The genome of strain R1t3 also contains a biosynthetic cluster (ectABC) for the production of the cyclic amino acid osmolyte, ectoine (Halo_01324/01325/01326, VE30_07080/07085/07090) as well as ectoine utilization genes eutED (Halo_01398/01399, VE30_04620/04625).

The genome of strain R1t3 reflects its ability to utilize a wide range of carbon sources, including gene homologues for six different glycoside hydrolases (GH), used for breaking down complex carbohydrates. Four belong to GH family 13 (Halo_01730/VE30_08480, Halo_01736/VE30_08510, Halo_02655/VE30_13740, Halo_02891/VE30_RS10055), used for the breakdown of starch and glycogen. Single genes encode for GH family 3 (Halo_00185/VE30_02710) and GH32 (Halo_01720/VE30_08435) glycosidases, which act on oligosaccharides and fructan, respectively. The genome of strain R1t3 also contains homologues of genes required for glycerol transport across the membrane (glpSTPQV) (Halo_00080/00081/00082/00083/00085. VE30_01325/01330/01335/01340/01350) and glycerol degradation (glpAD) (Halo_00086/VE30_01355). The efficient use of multiple sources of carbon may be mediated through the widely conserved csrA carbon storage regulator (Halo_02194/VE30_11745) that is present in the genome.

Previous work examining the utilization of coral mucus as a carbon source in this strain demonstrated that glucose and galactose are preferred carbon sources for strain R1t3 [25]. The addition of glucose to media containing high-molecular-weight components of coral mucus repressed the enzymatic activity of α-D-fucopyranosidase and the addition of galactose repressed α-L-galactopyranosidase activity. This catabolite repression is likely effected through the tctE/D two-component system (Halo_03014/VE30_14870, Halo_03015/VE30_14875) and tctCBA tricarboxylate transport membrane protein (Halo_03016/03017/03018, VE30_14880/14885/14890) encoded in the genome.

Overall, the average nucleotide identity (ANI) between the IMG annotated draft genomes of H. meridiana strain R1t3 (3.5 Mbp) and Endozoicomonas montiporae LMG 24815 (5.6 Mbp) was 68.64 %. Orthologs shared between the two genomes were identified using a minimum of 60 % sequence identity and 70 % coverage. Despite the similarity of the ecological niches filled by these two Oceanospirillales bacteria, only 11 % of the genes in Halomonas strain R1t3 (392 genes) have orthologs in the Endozoicomonas genome. Reducing the threshold to 30 % sequence similarity only increased the total proportion of orthologs to roughly 12.5 % (442 genes). Of the orthologs with at least 30 % sequence identity, three of the four starch/glycogen-degrading glycoside hydrolases and the single oligosaccharide-degrading GH in Halomonas had orthologs in Endozoicomonas .

Conclusions

The draft genome sequence of Halomonas meridiana strain R1t3 provides insight for the role of a representative strain of the commensal bacterial community associated with the surface mucus layer of an Acropora coral. Strain R1t3 can utilize a wide range of carbon sources, as demonstrated in culture and supported by genome content.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Protect Our Reefs grant 2013–2 and a George E. Burch Fellowship in Theoretical Medicine. This is a contribution #998 of the Smithsonian Marine Station.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida-Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
(2)
Mote Marine Laboratory
(3)
Smithsonian Marine Station

References

  1. James SR, Dobson SJ, Franzmann PD, McMeekin TA. Halomonas meridiana, a new species of extremely halotolerant bacteria isolated from Antarctic saline lakes. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1990;13:270–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Anithajothi R, Nagarani N, Umagowsalya G, Duraikannu K, Ramakritinan CM. Screening, isolation and characterization of protease producing moderately halophilic microorganism Halomonas meridiana associated with coral mucus. Toxicol Environ Chem. 2014;96(2):296–306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ritchie KB. Regulation of microbial populations by coral surface mucus and mucus-associated bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2006;322:1–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. McKew B, Dumbrell A, Daud S, Hepburn L, Thorpe E, Mogensen L, et al. Characterization of geographically distinct bacterial communities associated with coral mucus produced by Acropora spp. and Porites spp. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(15):5229–37.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lema KA, Willis BL, Bourne DG. Amplicon pyrosequencing reveals spatial and temporal consistency in diazotroph assemblages of the Acropora millepora microbiome. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16(10):3345–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cardenas A, Rodriguez RL, Pizarro V, Cadavid LF, Arevalo-Ferro C. Shifts in bacterial communities of two Caribbean reef-building coral species affected by white plague disease. ISME J. 2012;6(3):502–12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Roder C, Arif C, Daniels C, Weil E, Voolstra CR. Bacterial profiling of White Plague Disease across corals and oceans indicates a conserved and distinct disease microbiome. Mol Ecol. 2014;23(4):965–74.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Vezzulli L, Pezzati E, Huete-Stauffer C, Pruzzo C, Cerrano C. 16SrDNA Pyrosequencing of the Mediterranean Gorgonian Paramuricea clavata reveals a link among alterations in bacterial holobiont members, anthropogenic influence and disease outbreaks. PLoS One. 2013;8(6), e67745.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Neave MJ, Mitchell CT, Apprill A, Voolstra CR. Whole-genome sequences of three symbiotic Endozoicomonas strains. Genome Annoucments. 2014;2(4):e00802–14.Google Scholar
  10. Arahal DR, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Ventosa A. Phylogeny of the family Halomonadaceae based on 23S and 16S rDNA sequence analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:241–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. de la Haba RR, Marquez MC, Papke RT, Ventosa A. Multilocus sequence analysis of the family Halomonadaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012;62:520–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Krediet CJ, Ritchie KB, Cohen M, Lipp EK, Sutherland KP, Teplitski M. Utilization of mucus from the coral Acropora palmata by the pathogen Serratia marcescens and by environmental and coral commensal bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(12):3851–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mata JA, Martinez-Canovas J, Quesada E, Bejar V. A detailed phenotypic characterisation of the type strains of Halomons species. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2002;25:360–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Aronson R, Bruckner A, Moore J, Precht B, Weil E. Acropora palmata. In: The IUCN red list of threatend species. Version 2014.3. 2008.Google Scholar
  15. Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Kyrpides N. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D475–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Markowitz VM, Korzeniewski F, Palaniappan K, Szeto E, Werner G, Padki A, et al. The integrated microbial genomes (IMG) system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D344–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17(1):10–12.Google Scholar
  18. Joshi N, Fass J. Sickle: a sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files (Version 1.33). [software]. Available at https://github.com/najoshi/sickle2011. Accessed October 5, 2015.
  19. Zerbino D, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18:821–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(11):1420–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–U54.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Nonpareil: a redundancy-based approach to assess the level of coverage in metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(5):629–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Darling ACE, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004;14(7):1394–403.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Krediet CJ, Ritchie KB, Teplitski M. Catabolite regulation of enzymatic activities in a white pox pathogen and commensal bacteria during growth on mucus polymers from the coral Acropora palmata. Dis Aquat Org. 2009;87(1–2):57–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Takmura K, Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993;10:512–26.Google Scholar
  27. Takmura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(5):541–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(12):4576–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 2. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005.Google Scholar
  31. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Class III. Gammaproteobacteria class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 2. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005.Google Scholar
  32. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Order VIII. Oceanospirillales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 2. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005.Google Scholar
  33. Franzmann PD, Wehmeyer U, Stackebrandt E. Halomonadaceae fam. nov., a new family of the class Proteobacteria to accommodate the genera Halomonas and Deleya. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1988;11:16–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Vreeland R, Litchfield C, Martin E, Elliot E. Halomonas elongata, a new genus and species of extremely salt-tolerant bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1980;30:485–95.Google Scholar
  35. The Gene Ontology C, Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Meyer et al. 2015