Skip to content


Standards in Genomic Sciences

Open Access

Permanent draft genome sequence of Desulfurococcus mobilis type strain DSM 2161, a thermoacidophilic sulfur-reducing crenarchaeon isolated from acidic hot springs of Hveravellir, Iceland

  • Dwi Susanti1,
  • Eric F. Johnson2,
  • Alla Lapidus3, 4,
  • James Han5,
  • T. B. K. Reddy5,
  • Manoj Pilay6,
  • Natalia N. Ivanova5,
  • Victor M. Markowitz6,
  • Tanja Woyke5,
  • Nikos C. Kyrpides5, 7 and
  • Biswarup Mukhopadhyay1, 2, 8Email author
Standards in Genomic Sciences201611:3

Received: 6 August 2015

Accepted: 30 December 2015

Published: 13 January 2016


This report presents the permanent draft genome sequence of Desulfurococcus mobilis type strain DSM 2161, an obligate anaerobic hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon that was isolated from acidic hot springs in Hveravellir, Iceland. D. mobilis utilizes peptides as carbon and energy sources and reduces elemental sulfur to H2S. A metabolic construction derived from the draft genome identified putative pathways for peptide degradation and sulfur respiration in this archaeon. Existence of several hydrogenase genes in the genome supported previous findings that H2 is produced during the growth of D. mobilis in the absence of sulfur. Interestingly, genes encoding glucose transport and utilization systems also exist in the D. mobilis genome though this archaeon does not utilize carbohydrate for growth. The draft genome of D. mobilis provides an additional mean for comparative genomic analysis of desulfurococci. In addition, our analysis on the Average Nucleotide Identity between D. mobilis and Desulfurococcus mucosus suggested that these two desulfurococci are two different strains of the same species.


Desulfurococcus Sulfur-reducing crenarchaeonThermophileAcidic hot spring


Desulfurococcus mobilis type strain DSM 2161 was isolated from acidic hot springs in Hveravellir, Iceland [1]. This hyperthermophilic crenarchaeaon utilizes casein and peptides present in yeast extract, and tryptic digest of casein as energy and carbon source [1]. In the presence of sulfur as electron acceptor, D. mobilis undergoes sulfur respiration generating H2S and CO2, whereas in the absence of sulfur it performs peptide oxidation coupled to hydrogen production for regeneration of electron carriers [1, 2]. Growth in the presence of sulfur yields five times more cell density compared to that without sulfur [1].

Among known desulfurococci, D. mobilis is a closer relative of Desulfurococcus mucosus which is also a peptide degrader [1, 3]. D. mucosus genome was sequenced in 2011 under the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea program [3]. In addition to D. mobilis and D. mucosus , three desulfurococci are known, and these are Desulfurococcus fermentans [4, 5], Desulfurococcus amylolyticus [6], and Desulfurococcus kamchatkensis [7]. All of these organisms degrade peptides. As far as other substrates for growth, starch is used only by Desulfurococcus fermentans and Desulfurococcus amylolyticus whereas sugars can be used by Desulfurococcus fermentans and Desulfurococcus kamchatkensis . The only cellulose degrading Desulfurococcus is Desulfurococcus fermentans [4, 5]. The Desulfurococcus fermentans and Desulfurococcus kamchatkensis genomes have been sequenced by the US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute and the Russian Academy of Sciences Centre “Bioengineering”, respectively [5, 7].

Almost all organisms that belong to the genus Desulfurococcus are dependent on or stimulated by sulfur [13, 7]. Sulfur is used as a terminal electron acceptor. The only exception is Desulfurococcus fermentans [4, 5] as elemental sulfur does not influence the growth of this organism and it is also the only Desulfurococcus species for which the growth is not inhibited by the presence of hydrogen.

The draft genome sequence of D. mobilis together with the complete genome sequence of D. mucosus , Desulfurococcus fermentans and Desulfurococcus kamchatkensis could give insight into the finer differences between peptide, starch and cellulose metabolism systems of these closely related desulfurococci leading to the discoveries of new thermophilic enzymes and pathways. Similar inquiries could be made for their differences in elemental sulfur requirements as well as their responses to the presence of H2 in their environment.

Organism Information

Classification and features

Desulfurococcus mobilis belongs to the phylum Crenarchaeota and class of Thermoprotei . Within this class, three orders namely Desulfurococcales , Sulfolobales and Thermoproteales have been recognized. A phylogenetic tree based on 16S-ribosomal DNA sequences (Fig. 1) shows the position of D. mobilis relative to its neighbours. Desulfurococcus mobilis is closely related to Desulfurococcus mucosus . The value of ANI between Desulfurococcus mobilis and Desulfurococcus mucosus is 99.88. Such a high ANI value suggested that these organisms should be considered as two strains of the same species.
Fig. 1

A 16S ribosomal DNA sequence-based phylogenetic tree showing the position of Desulfurococcus mobilis DSM 2161 (shown in bold) relative to other Desulfurococcus species and other organisms from Sulfolobales and Thermoproteales orders. Alignment and trimming of genes encoding 16S rRNA (aligned size of 1112 bp) were performed by the use of Muscle 3.8.31 [33] and Gblocks 0.91, respectively. The tree was constructed using Maximum Likelihood method, dnaml, in the Phylip-3.696 package [34] and viewed by the use of FigTree (, as previously described [35]. Type strains are indicated with the superscript T. NCBI accession numbers for genome sequence are presented within parenthesis. Methanocaldococcus jannaschii, a euryarchaeon (not shown), was used as an outgroup [36]. Number in each branch shows a percentage of bootstrap value from 100 replicates. The bar indicates 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position

Desulfurococcus mobilis is a Gram-negative spherical coccus, with diameter about 0.1-1 μm [1]. Unlike Desulfurococcus mucosus , Desulfurococcus mobilis is motile [1]. The latter possesses monopolar polytrichus flagella that form bundle of 12.5 nm diameter (Fig. 2). Classification and general features of Desulfurococcus mobilis are shown in Table 1.
Fig. 2

An electron micrograph of Desulfurococcus mobilis type strain DSM 2161 showing unipolar polytrichus archaella. The picture has been reproduced from [1] with permission

Table 1

Classification and general features of Desulfurococcus mobilis DSM 2161T [37]




Evidence codea



Domain Archaea

TAS [38]


Phylum Crenarchaeota

TAS [38]


Class Thermoprotei

TAS [39]


Order Desulfurococcales

TAS [40]


Family Desulfurococcaceae

TAS [1]


Genus Desulfurococcus

TAS [1]


Species Desulfurococcus mobilis

TAS [1]


Type strain DSM 2161/ATCC 35582

TAS [1]


Gram stain


TAS [1]


Cell shape


TAS [1]




TAS [1]



Not reported


Temperature range

55-97 °C

TAS [1]


Optimum temperature

85 °C

TAS [1]


pH range; Optimum

2.2-6.5; 5.5-6.0

TAS [1]


Carbon source

Yeast extract, bactotryptone, a tryptic-digest of casein or casein

TAS [1]


Energy source


TAS [1]


Terminal electron receptor

Elemental sulfur (favored)

TAS [1]



Free living

TAS [1]



Not reported



Oxygen requirement


TAS [1]


Biotic relationship

Not reported







Geographic location


TAS [1]


Sample collection time


TAS [1]



Not reported




Not reported




Not reported




Not reported


aEvidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [41]

Genome Sequencing Information

Genome project history

D. mobilis was selected for sequencing by the Joint Genome Institute Community Sequencing Program in 2009 as part of a genome comparison project for the genus Desulfurococcaceae . Project information is available in the Genomes OnLine Database (Table 2) [8]. DRAFT sequencing, initial gap closure and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute using state-of-the-art sequencing technology [9]. The draft genome was partly assembled and annotated in 2012 and was deposited in the Integrated Microbial Genome Data Management System [10] in 2012.
Table 2

Project information





Finishing quality

High quality draft


Libraries used

Illumina standard


Sequencing platforms


MIGS 31.2

Fold coverage

528 ×



Velvet (version 1.1.04), ALLPATHS v. r40295


Gene calling method



Locus tag



Genome Database ID

IMG: 2513237118


Genbank ID



Genbank Date of Release

May 11, 2015








Source Material Identifier

DSM 2161/ ATCC 35582


Project relevance


Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

D. mobilis type strain DSM 2161 (ATCC 35582) was obtained from the ATCC microbiology culture collections (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and was cultivated on ATCC Desulfurococcus medium (medium 1558) containing Tryptone and yeast extract as the carbon and energy sources, each at final concentration of 2 g/l. Elemental sulfur and Na2S, at concentration of 5 g/l and 0.5 g/l, respectively, were added as electron acceptors and medium reductant.

Chromosomal DNA was isolated using a method as described previously [11]. Briefly, cell pellet of D. mobilis was resuspended in TE buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). Proteinase K, EDTA and Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) were added to the suspension at the final concentrations of 100 μg/ml, 5 mM, and 0.5 %, respectively. The mixture was then incubated at 55 °C for one hour. An equal volume of a mixture containing phenol, chloroform, and isoamylalcohol (25:24:1, v/v/v) was added to the cell lysate and the resulting emulsion was centrifuged at 10,000 xg for 30 min. To the recovered aqueous layer containing DNA, an equal volume of a mixture of chloroform, and isoamylalcohol (24:1, v/v) was added and then the combination was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 min. To the aqueous solution recovered from this step, sodium acetate-acetic acid buffer, pH 5.3 at a final concentration of 15 mM and an equal volume of isopropanol were added to precipitate chromosomal DNA. DNA was pelleted by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 30 min and then washed with ice-cold 70 % ethanol for three times, air dried and suspended in TE buffer.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The draft genome of Desulfurococcus mobilis type strain DSM 2161 was generated at the DOE Joint genome Institute using the Illumina technology [12]. An Illumina standard shotgun library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina platform which generated 17,620,486 reads of 150 bp. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at JGI website. All raw Illumina sequence data was passed through DUK, a filtering program developed at JGI (Mingkun, L., Copeland, A. and Han, J., unpublished program), which removes known Illumina sequencing and library preparation artifacts. Following steps were then performed for assembly: (1) filtered Illumina reads were assembled using Velvet [13], (2) 1–3 kb simulated paired end reads were created from Velvet contigs using wgsim [14], (3) Illumina reads were assembled with simulated read pairs using Allpaths–LG [15, 16]. Parameters for assembly steps were: 1) Velvet (velveth: 63 –shortPaired and velvetg: −very clean yes –exportFiltered yes –min contig lgth 500 –scaffolding no –cov cutoff 10) 2) wgsim (−e 0 –1 100 –2 100 –r 0 –R 0 –X 0) 3) Allpaths–LG (PrepareAllpathsInputs: PHRED 64 = 1 PLOIDY = 1 FRAG COVERAGE = 125 JUMP COVERAGE = 25 LONG JUMP COV = 50, RunAllpathsLG: THREADS = 8 RUN = std shredpairs TARGETS = standard VAPI WARN ONLY = True OVERWRITE = True). The final draft assembly contained 58 contigs.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [17] as part of the JGI’s microbial genome annotation pipeline [17]. The predicted coding sequences were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Identification of RNA genes were carried out by using HMMER 3.0rc1 [18] (rRNAs) and tRNAscan-SE 1.23 (tRNAs) [19]. Other non-coding genes were predicted using INFERNAL 1.0.2 [20]. Additional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review platform [21]. CRISPR elements were detected using CRT [22] and PILER-CR [23].

Genome Properties

The draft genome of D. mobilis consists of a 1,198,142 bp chromosome with 52.89 % GC content. It contains 1,277 protein coding genes, and 54 ribosomal RNA genes that encode 1, 2, 41, and 10 of 16S-, 23S-ribosomal RNA, tRNA and other RNAs, respectively. Tables 3 and 4 present genome statistics, and distribution of genes into COG categories, respectively.
Table 3

Genome statistics



% of total

Genome size (bp)



DNA coding (bp)



DNA G + C (bp)



DNA scaffolds



Total genes



Protein-coding genes



RNA genes



Pseudo genes



Genes in internal clusters



Genes with function prediction



Genes assigned to COGs



Genes with Pfam domains



Genes with signal peptides



Genes with transmembrane helices



CRISPR repeats



Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories








Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis




RNA processing and modification








Replication, recombination and repair




Chromatin structure and dynamics




Cell cycle control, cell division, and chromosome partitioning




Defense mechanisms




Signal transduction mechanisms




Cell wall/membrane biogenesis




Cell motility




Intracellular trafficking and secretion




Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones




Energy production and conversion




Carbohydrate transport and metabolism




Amino acid transport and metabolism




Nucleotide transport and metabolism




Coenzyme transport and metabolism




Lipid transport and metabolism




Inorganic ion transport and metabolism




Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism




General function prediction only




Function unknown




Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Insights from the Genome Sequence

A metabolic construction derived from the draft genome indicates that a Pyrococcus furiosus -type peptide degradation pathway operates in D. mobilis [24]. Peptides likely enter the cell via peptide/amino acid transporters that are encoded by YWQDRAFT_00113, 00114, 00115, and 00118. Once inside the cell, peptides are catabolized into amino acids by peptidases. A total of 10 peptidases were identified in the draft genome of D. mobilis . An example is YWQDRAFT_00964 that is a homolog of pyroglutamyl peptidase of Desulfurococcus fermentans (Desfe_1254) with e-value of 2e-63. The resulting amino acids are then converted into their respective keto-acids in reactions catalyzed by transaminases (YWQDRAFT0500, 00632, 00843, 00124). These keto-acids are catabolized further into acyl-CoA by several putative keto-acid:ferredoxin oxidoreductase such as indole pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (YWQDRAFT_00457 and 00458), aldehyde ferredoxin oxidoreductase (YWQDRAFT_00049 and 00586), and pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (YWQDRAFT_00252, 00251, 00253, 00254). Then ATP generation occurs via the acetyl-CoA synthetase reaction (YWQDRAFT_00758).

In the presence of sulfur, electrons generated from peptide oxidation are transferred into sulfur via a sulfur reductase (YWQDRAFT_00031), a cytoplasmic protein with high similarity to NADPH-dependent polysulfide reductase of Desulfurococcus kamchatkensis (ORF Dkam_0441) [7] and sulfide dehydrogenase of Pyrococcus furiosus that is composed of two subunits, A and B (ORF PF1327-28) [25]. This process generates H2S and a proton motive force and the latter helps to synthesize ATP via ATPase (YWQDRAFT_00542).

Genome analysis also reveals genes encoding putative Ni-Fe hydrogenases that were found in three hydrogenase clusters (YWQDRAFT_01235-01241; 01256–64, 01282–01285; and 00877–00866). This finding explains previous observation that during growth in the absence of elemental sulfur D. mobilis produces hydrogen to dispose off electrons originating from peptide degradations [1, 2].

Similarly, enzymes for converting acetyl-CoA to glucose-6-phosphate via gluconeogenesis pathways and for glycogen synthesis were found. Key enzymes for gluconeogenesis were phosphoenolpyruvate synthase (YWQDRAFT_00160) and 1,6-fructosebisphosphatase (YWQDRAFT_00288). The ORF for a characteristic enzyme for glycogen synthesis, glycogen synthase (YWQDRAFT_00470), was also found.

Although D. mobilis does not use sugars as carbon source [1], genes for two sugar transporters (YWQDRAFT_00575-76) were found in the genome. Similarly, key enzymes of the modified Emden-Meyerhof pathway [26], namely glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate ferredoxin oxidoreductase/GAPOR (YWQDRAFT_00049 and 00586) that converts glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate into 3-phosphoglycerate and pyruvate kinase (YWQDRAFT_00285) that dephosphorylates phosphoenolpyruvate to form pyruvate were detected in the genome. The two GAPOR homologs show 38 % and 21 % identity with the same enzymes of Methanococcus maripaludis [27], while the pyruvate kinase is similar to that of Thermoproteus tenax showing 36 % of identity [28]. In accordance, we hypothesize that D. mobilis utilizes carbohydrates at least as co-substrates.

As expected, D. mobilis genome carries flaI (YWQDRAFT_00614) that encodes a type IV secretory pathway/VirB11 component, which would be involved in the biogenesis of archaeal flagellum (archaellum) [2931]. However, genes encoding known archaeal and bacterial flagellins are absent in the draft genome [32]. Since the genome sequence of D. mobilis is at a draft stage and approximately 100 kb of genome sequence is missing, as estimated from the average size of other desulfurococci, it is possible that the flagella structural genes are located in the missing regions. Therefore, a complete genome sequence of D. mobilis is needed to rule out the possibility of a novel flagella system in this organism.


This study presents the genome sequence and metabolic reconstruction of Desulfurococcus mobilis type strain DSM 2161. The genome revealed three hydrogenase clusters that are likely responsible for electron disposal during growth in the absence of sulfur. The presence of genes encoding sugar transporters and key enzymes of the Embden Meyerhoff pathway raises the possibility of sugar utilization in D. mobilis . The near 100 % value of Average Nucleotide Identity for this archaeon and its close relative D. mucosus indicated that these organisms are very similar and reclassification of these two desulfurococci into two strains is suggested.



The Institute for Genome Research


Protein family database


Profils pour l’Identification Automatique du Métabolisme


Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes


Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins


Community Sequencing Program


Average Nucleotide Identity



This project has been supported by the Community Sequencing Program of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Joint Genome Institute. The sequencing, assembly and automated genome analysis work at the DOE-JGI was supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. D.S was supported by NASA Astrobiology: Exobiology and Evolutionary Biology grants NNG05GP24G and NNX09AV28G to B.M. B.M. was supported in part by the Virginia Tech and the Agricultural Experiment Station Hatch Program (CRIS project VA-160021). The authors thank Jason R. Rodriguez for discussions on sulfur metabolism.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Biochemistry, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA
Biocomplexity Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA
Centre for Algorithmic Biotechnology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia
Algorithmic Biology Lab, St. Petersburg Academic University, St. Petersburg, Russia
US DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, USA
Biological Data Management and Technology Center, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, USA


  1. Zillig W, Stetter KO, Prangishvilli D, Schäfer W, Wunderl S, Janekovic D, et al. Desulfurococcaceae, the Second Family of the Extremely Thermophilic, Anaerobic, Sulfur-Respiring Thermoproteales. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie Mikrobiologie und Hygiene: I Abt Originale C: Allgemeine, angewandte und ökologische Mikrobiologie. 1982;3(2):304–17. doi:10.1016/S0721-9571(82)80044-6.Google Scholar
  2. Slobodin AI, Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA. Growth and formation of metabolic products by extremely thermophilic archaea of the genus Desulfurococcus in the presence and absence of elemental sulfur microbiology (English translation of Mikrobiologiia). Mikrobiologiia. 1994;63:552–4.Google Scholar
  3. Wirth R, Chertkov O, Held B, Lapidus A, Nolan M, Lucas S, et al. Complete genome sequence of Desulfurococcus mucosus type strain (O7/1). Stand Genomic Sci. 2011;4(2):173–82. doi:10.4056/sigs.1644004. PubMed PMID: 21677854, PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3111991.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Perevalova AA, Svetlichny VA, Kublanov IV, Chernyh NA, Kostrikina NA, Tourova TP, et al. Desulfurococcus fermentans sp. nov., a novel hyperthermophilic archaeon from a Kamchatka hot spring, and emended description of the genus Desulfurococcus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55(Pt 3):995–9. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63378-0. PubMed.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Susanti D, Johnson EF, Rodriguez JR, Anderson I, Perevalova AA, Kyrpides N, et al. Complete genome sequence of Desulfurococcus fermentans, a hyperthermophilic cellulolytic crenarchaeon isolated from a freshwater hot spring in Kamchatka, Russia. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(20):5703–4. doi:10.1128/JB.01314-12. PubMed PMID: 23012283; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3458677.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Tourova TP, Kuznetsov BB, Kalganova TV, Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA. Phylogenetic position of Desulfurococcus amylolyticus. Microbiology. 2000;69(3):369–70. PubMed PMID: WOS:000087718300021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ravin NV, Mardanov AV, Beletsky AV, Kublanov IV, Kolganova TV, Lebedinsky AV, et al. Complete genome sequence of the anaerobic, protein-degrading hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Desulfurococcus kamchatkensis. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(7):2371–9. doi:10.1128/JB.01525-08. PubMed PMID: 19114480, PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2655497.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Reddy TB, Thomas AD, Stamatis D, Bertsch J, Isbandi M, Jansson J, et al. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) v. 5: a metadata management system based on a four level (meta)genome project classification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D1099–106. doi:10.1093/nar/gku950. PubMed PMID: 25348402, PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4384021.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mavromatis K, Land ML, Brettin TS, Quest DJ, Copeland A, Clum A, et al. The Fast Changing Landscape of Sequencing Technologies and Their Impact on Microbial Genome Assemblies and Annotation. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e48837. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048837.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Markowitz VM, Chen IM, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, et al. IMG: the Integrated Microbial Genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D115–22. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1044. PubMed PMID: 22194640, PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3245086.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Anderson I, Ulrich LE, Lupa B, Susanti D, Porat I, Hooper SD, et al. Genomic Characterization of Methanomicrobiales Reveals Three Classes of Methanogens. PLoS One. 2009;4(6):e5797. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005797.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bennett S. Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics. 2004;5(4):433–8. doi:10.1517/14622416.5.4.433.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: Algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 2008;18(5):821–9. doi:10.1101/Gr.074492.107. PubMed PMID: WOS:000255504600014.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Li H. wgsim - Read simulator for next generation sequencing. doi: citeulike-article-id:8857492.Google Scholar
  15. Butler J, MacCallum I, Kleber M, Shlyakhter IA, Belmonte MK, Lander ES, et al. ALLPATHS: De novo assembly of whole-genome shotgun microreads. Genome Res. 2008;18(5):810–20. doi:10.1101/Gr.7337908. PubMed PMID: WOS:000255504600013.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. MacCallum I, Przybylski D, Gnerre S, Burton J, Shlyakhter I, Gnirke A, et al. ALLPATHS 2: small genomes assembled accurately and with high continuity from short paired reads. Genome Biology. 2009;10(10). doi: Doi 10.1186/Gb-2009-10-10-R103. PubMed PMID: WOS:000272227000005.Google Scholar
  17. Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Szeto E, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. The DOE-JGI Standard Operating Procedure for the Annotations of Microbial Genomes. Stand Genomic Sci. 2009;1(1):63–7. doi:10.4056/Sigs.632. PubMed PMID: WOS:000207916300009.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W29–37. doi:10.1093/Nar/Gkr367. PubMed PMID: WOS:000292325300006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(5):955–64. doi:10.1093/nar/25.5.955. PubMed PMID: WOS:A1997WM30000005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Eddy SR. Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(10):1335–7. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp157.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(17):2271–8. doi:10.1093/Bioinformatics/Btp393. PubMed PMID: WOS:000269196000019.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Bland C, Ramsey TL, Sabree F, Lowe M, Brown K, Kyrpides NC, et al. CRISPR Recognition Tool (CRT): a tool for automatic detection of clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats. Bmc Bioinformatics. 2007;8. doi: Doi 10.1186/1471-2105-8-209. PubMed PMID: WOS:000248130600001.Google Scholar
  23. Edgar RC. PILER-CR: Fast and accurate identification of CRISPR repeats. Bmc Bioinformatics. 2007;8. doi: Doi 10.1186/1471-2105-8-18. PubMed PMID: WOS:000243922000001.Google Scholar
  24. Adams MWW, Holden JF, Menon AL, Schut GJ, Grunden AM, Hou C, et al. Key Role for Sulfur in Peptide Metabolism and in Regulation of Three Hydrogenases in the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(2):716–24. doi:10.1128/jb.183.2.716-724.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ma K, Adams MW. Sulfide dehydrogenase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus: a new multifunctional enzyme involved in the reduction of elemental sulfur. J Bacteriol. 1994;176(21):6509–17. PubMed PMID: 7961401, PubMed Central PMCID: PMC197004.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Siebers B, Schönheit P. Unusual pathways and enzymes of central carbohydrate metabolism in Archaea. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005;8(6):695–705. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2005.10.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Park MO, Mizutani T, Jones PR. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate ferredoxin oxidoreductase from Methanococcus maripaludis. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(20):7281–9. doi:10.1128/JB.00828-07. PubMed PMID: 17704226; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2168465.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Schramm A, Siebers B, Tjaden B, Brinkmann H, Hensel R. Pyruvate kinase of the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeote Thermoproteus tenax: Physiological role and phylogenetic aspects. J Bacteriol. 2000;182(7):2001–9. doi:10.1128/Jb.182.7.2001-2009.2000. PubMed PMID: WOS:000085953100030.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Thomas NA, Jarrell KF. Characterization of Flagellum Gene Families of Methanogenic Archaea and Localization of Novel Flagellum Accessory Proteins. J Bacteriol. 2001;183(24):7154–64. doi:10.1128/jb.183.24.7154-7164.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Thomas NA, Mueller S, Klein A, Jarrell KF. Mutants in flaI and flaJ of the archaeon Methanococcus voltae are deficient in flagellum assembly. Mol Microbiol. 2002;46(3):879–87. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03220.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Jarrell KF, Albers S-V. The archaellum: an old motility structure with a new name. Trends Microbiol. 2012;20(7):307–12. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.04.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Faguy DM, Bayley DP, Kostyukova AS, Thomas NA, Jarrell KF. Isolation and characterization of flagella and flagellin proteins from the Thermoacidophilic archaea Thermoplasma volcanium and Sulfolobus shibatae. J Bacteriol. 1996;178(3):902–5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340. PubMed PMID: WOS:000220487200025.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author. Seattle: Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington; 2005.Google Scholar
  35. Susanti D, Mukhopadhyay B. An intertwined evolutionary history of methanogenic archaea and sulfate reduction. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45313. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045313. PubMed PMID: 23028926, PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3448663.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Bult CJ, White O, Olsen GJ, Zhou L, Fleischmann RD, Sutton GG, et al. Complete genome sequence of the methanogenic archaeon, Methanococcus jannaschii. Science. 1996;273(5278):1058–73. PubMed.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotech. 2008;26(5):541–7. doi:10.1038/nbt1360.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(12):4576–9. PubMed PMID: 2112744, PubMed Central PMCID: PMC54159.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Reysenbach AL. Class I. Thermoprotei class. nov. In: Boone DR, Castenholz RW, editors. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology: The Archaea and the deeply branching and phototrophic Bacteria. 1. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Verlag; 2001. p. 169.Google Scholar
  40. Huber H, Stetter KO. Order II: Desulfurococcales. In: Garrity G, editor. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 1. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001. p. 179–80.Google Scholar
  41. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–9. doi:10.1038/75556. PubMed PMID: 10802651; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3037419.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Susanti et al. 2016