Open Access

Draft genome sequence of Mycobacterium rufum JS14T, a polycyclic-aromatic-hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium from petroleum-contaminated soil in Hawaii

Standards in Genomic Sciences201611:47

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-016-0167-5

Received: 12 June 2015

Accepted: 13 July 2016

Published: 2 August 2016

Abstract

Mycobacterium rufum JS14T (=ATCC BAA-1377T, CIP 109273T, JCM 16372T, DSM 45406T), a type strain of the species Mycobacterium rufum sp. . belonging to the family Mycobacteriaceae, was isolated from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-contaminated soil in Hilo (HI, USA) because it harbors the capability of degrading PAH. Here, we describe the first genome sequence of strain JS14T, with brief phenotypic characteristics. The genome is composed of 6,176,413 bp with 69.25 % G + C content and contains 5810 protein-coding genes with 54 RNA genes. The genome information on M. rufum JS14T will provide a better understanding of the complexity of bacterial catabolic pathways for degradation of specific chemicals.

Keywords

Mycobacterium Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonBiodegradation

Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, defined as organic molecules consisting of two or more fused aromatic rings in linear, angular, or cluster arrangement, mostly result from coke production, petroleum refining, fossil fuel combustion, and waste incineration [1]. Although the physical and chemical properties of PAHs vary depending on the number of rings, the characteristics such as hydrophobicity, recalcitrance, and mutagenic and carcinogenic potentials have been considered the main factors for the toxic effects on environmental ecosystems and human beings [1, 2].

For removal of PAHs from contaminated environments, the bioremediation process based on microbial activities has attracted interest and has been actively studied [3]. Various bacteria, such as Sphingomonas spp., Pseudomonas spp., Rhodococcus spp., Burkholderia spp., and Mycobacterium spp., have been investigated regarding whether they can metabolize PAHs. In particular, several Mycobacterium species have been reported to effectively degrade high-molecular-weight PAHs [4, 5]. Moreover, genomic studies on these bacterial species have contributed to the understanding of whole regulatory mechanisms of bacterial PAH degradation, for example for M. vanbaalenii PYR-1 [6], M. gilvum Spyr1 [7], and M. gilvum PYR-GCK [8] as well as the most recently reported M. aromaticivorans JS19b1T [9].

M. rufum JS14T (=ATCC BAA-1377 T, CIP 109273T , JCM 16372 T, DSM 45406 T) is the type strain of the species Mycobacterium rufum sp. nov. [10]. This bacterium was isolated from petroleum-contaminated soil at a former oil gasification company site in Hilo (HI, USA). The bacterium was identified because of PAH degradation activities, especially toward a four-ring-fused compound, fluoranthene [11]. Although the PAH-degrading ability has been demonstrated through metabolic and proteomic assays [12], genetic studies on the whole bacterial system with a PAH degradation pathway have not been conducted. Here, we present a brief summary of the characteristics of this strain and a genetic description of its genome sequence.

Organism information

Classification and features

The 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence of M. rufum JS14T was compared with those from other Mycobacterium species using the BLAST software of NCBI [13]. The highest similarity was found with M. chlorophenolicum PCP-1 (99 % identity) [14, 15] followed by M. gilvum Spyr1 (99 % identity) [7], M. gilvum PYR-GCK (99 % identity) [8], M. vanbaalenii PYR-1 (98 % identity) [16], and M. fluoranthenivorans FA4T (97 % identity) [17]. Species identified by the BLAST search and represented by full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences were included in the phylogenetic analysis. The phylogenetic tree was generated by the neighbor-joining method [18], and bootstrapping was set to 1000 times for random replicate selections. The consensus phylogenetic neighborhood of M. rufum JS14T within the genus Mycobacterium is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree depicting the position of M. rufum JS14T [10] (shown in boldface with an asterisk) relative to the other species within the genus Mycobacterium. In this genus, species carrying the full length of 16S rRNA gene sequence were selected from the NCBI database [45]. The collected nucleotide sequences were aligned using ClustalW [46], and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using software MEGA version 6 [47] by the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates [18]. The generated bootstrap values for each species are presented at the nodes, and the scale bar indicates 0.005 nucleotide changes per nucleotide position. The strains under study and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers for 16S rRNA genes are as follows: M. chlorophenolicum PCP-I [14, 15] (NR_119093); M. gilvum Spyr1 [37, 48] (NR_074644); M. gilvum PYR-GCK [37, 48] (NR_074553); M. rhodesiae NBB3 [49] (NR_102870); M. vanbaalenii PYR-1 [16] (NR_074572); M. fluoranthenivorans FA4 [17, 50] (NR_042224); M. wolinskyi 700010 [51] (NR_119253); M. mageritense 938 [52] (NR_042265); M. smegmatis str. MC2 155 [37, 53] (NR_074726); M. flavescens ATCC 14474 [37, 54] (NR_044815); M. novocastrense 73 [55] (NR_029208); M. insubricum FI-06250 [56] (NR_125525); M. florentinum FI-93171 [57] (NR_042223); M. montefiorense ATCC BAA-256 [58, 59] (NR_028808); M. confluentis 1389/90 [60] (NR_042245); M. holsaticum 1406 [61] (NR_028945); M. elephantis DSM 44368 [62] (NR_025296); M. marinum M [37, 63] (NR_074864); M. ulcerans Agy99 [37, 64] (NR_074861); M. bovis BCG str. Pasteur 1173P2 [37, 65] (NR_074838); M. canettii CIPT 140010059 [66] (NR_074836); M. africanum GM041182 [37, 67] (NR_074835)

M. rufum JS14T is a non-motile, aerobic, Gram-positive bacterium belonging to the family Mycobacteriaceae [10]. The cell shape is medium-to-long thin rods, and cell size is approximately 1.0–2.0 μm in length with the width of 0.4–0.6 μm as shown in Fig. 2. Generally, large, round, raised, smooth orange-pigmented colonies form within 7 days [10]. As one of the rapidly growing members of the genus Mycobacterium , the strain grows optimally at 28 °C, reduces nitrate, but does not tolerate salinity (over 2.5 % NaCl, w/v) [10]. Strain JS14T shows positive reactions in tests for catalase, α-glucosidase, aesculin hydrolysis, and urease, but negative reactions regarding β-glucuronidase, β-galactosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, gelatin hydrolysis, alkaline phosphatase, and pyrrolidonyl arylamidase activities [10]. Substrate oxidation was noticed for Tween 40, Tween 80, D-gluconic acid, D-glucose, D-fructose, D-xylose, D-mannose, D-psicose, trehalose, dextrin, glycogen, and D-mannitol, but not for α-/β-cyclodextrin, D-galactose, α-D-lactose, maltose, sucrose, mannan, or maltotriose [10]. When cultured in the minimal medium (per liter: 8.8 g of Na2HPO4°2H2O, 3.0 g of KH2PO4, 1.0 g of NH4Cl, 0.5 g of NaCl, 1.0 mL of 1 M MgSO4, and 2.5 mL of a trace element solution [per liter: 23 mg of MnCl2°2H2O, 30 mg of MnCl4∙H2O, 31 mg of H3BO3, 36 mg of CoCl2°6H2O, 10 mg of CuCl2°2H2O, 20 mg of NiCl2°6H2O, 30 mg of Na2MoO4°2H2O, and 50 mg of ZnCl2]) [11] supplemented with the four-aromatic ring-fused PAH compound fluoranthene (final concentration of 40 mg/L), M. rufum JS14T showed an effective degrading action on the added compound by utilizing it completely during 10 days as a sole source of carbon and energy [11].
Fig. 2

A scanning electron micrograph of M. rufum JS14T. The image was taken using a Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (SU8220; Hitachi, Japan) at an operating voltage of 10.0 kV. The scale bar represents 5.0 μm

Chemotaxonomic data

The main cellular fatty acids of M. rufum JS14T are C18:1ω9c (36.72 %), C16:0 (26.24 %), C16:1ω7c + C16:1ω6c (9.40 %), C17:1ω7c (8.44 %), C14:0 (5.27 %), C18:0 (3.14 %), and C17:0 (1.94 %), respectively [10]. The profile of whole-cell fatty acids showed a pattern similar to that of the other representative of Mycobacterium species [10, 1921]. The strain showed bright red color under a microscope after acid-fast staining. A gas chromatogram of fatty acid methyl esters from the transmethylated cells of M. rufum JS14T revealed a major C24:0 peak and a trace of a C22:0 peak. The general characteristics of the strain are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Classification and general features of M. rufum JS14T [22]

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence codea

 

Classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS [33]

 

Phylum Actinobacteria

TAS [34]

 

Class Actinobacteria

TAS [35]

 

Order Actinomycetales

TAS [3638]

 

Family Mycobacteriaceae

TAS [3739]

 

Genus Mycobacterium

TAS [37, 40, 41]

 

Species Mycobacterium rufum

TAS [37, 39]

 

(Type) strain: JS14T (=ATCC BAA-1377T, CIP 109273T, JCM 16372T, DSM 45406T)

TAS [10]

 

Gram stain

Positive: weak uptake of Gram stain

TAS [10]

 

Cell shape

Medium to long thin rods

TAS [10]

 

Colony pigmentation

Orange

TAS [10]

 

Motility

Non-motile

TAS [10]

 

Sporulation

Not reported

NAS

 

Temperature range

Mesophile

NAS

 

Optimum temperature

28 °C

TAS [10]

 

pH range; Optimum

7.0–8.0; 7.5

NAS

 

Carbon source

Fluoranthene, glucose, fructose, mannitol, trehalose, xylose, others

TAS [1012]

 

Energy source

Fluoranthene

TAS [11, 12]

MIGS-6

Habitat

Soil

TAS [10]

MIGS-6.3

Salinity

Not tolerant salinity (2.5–5.0 % NaCl, w/v)

TAS [10]

MIGS-22

Oxygen requirement

Aerobic

TAS [10]

MIGS-15

Biotic relationships

Free living

NAS

MIGS-14

Pathogenicity

None

NAS

MIGS-4

Geographic location

Hawaii, United States

TAS [10]

MIGS-5

Sample collection

February, 2003

NAS

MIGS-4.1

Latitude

19° 49′ 20″ N

TAS [11]

MIGS-4.2

Longitude

155° 05′ 01″ W

TAS [11]

MIGS-4.3

Depth

Not reported

 

MIGS-4.4

Altitude

Not reported

 

a Evidence codes. IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [42]

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

Strain M. rufum JS14T was selected for sequencing because of its effective ability to degrade PAH, as a model organism for a recalcitrant organic-pollutant-degrading bacterium. The genome sequencing was performed in September, 2014, and the Whole Genome Shotgun project was deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank databases under the accession number JROA00000000. The version described in this study is the first version, labeled JROA00000000.1. The sequencing project information and its association with the Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence version 2.0 compliance [22] are described in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS-31

Finishing quality

Draft

MIGS-28

Libraries used

20 kb SMRT-bell library

MIGS-29

Sequencing platforms

PacBio RS II

MIGS-31.2

Fold coverage

113.03×

MIGS-30

Assemblers

RS HGAP Assembly Protocol [24] in SMRT analysis pipeline v.2.2.0

MIGS-32

Gene-calling method

NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline [43]; GeneMarkS+ [44]

 

Locus Tag

EU78

 

INSDC ID

JROA00000000

 

GenBank Date of Release

October 2, 2014

 

GOLD ID

Gi0074119

 

BIOPROJECT

PRJNA247390

MIGS-13

Source Material Identifier

ATCC BAA-1377T, CIP 109273T, JCM 16372T, DSM 45406T

 

Project relevance

Environmental

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

M. rufum JS14T from Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH (strain accession number DSM 45406 T) was used for preparation of genomic DNA. The strain was cultured aerobically in a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 mL of tryptic soy broth (Difco Laboratories Inc., Detroit, MI), on a rotary shaker at 200 rpm and 30 °C. Genomic DNA was isolated from 50 mL of culture using the QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the standard protocol recommended by the manufacturer. The quantity and purity of the extracted genomic DNA were assessed with a Picodrop Microliter UV/Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA) and Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Fisher Scientific Inc.), respectively. Finally, a DNA concentration of 780.0 ng/μL and OD 260/OD 280 of 1.87 was determined.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of M. rufum JS14T was sequenced using the single-molecule real-time DNA sequencing platform on the Pacific Biosciences RS II sequencer with P5 polymerase - C3 sequencing chemistry (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA) [23]. A 20-kb insert SMRT-bell library was prepared from the sheared genomic DNA and loaded onto two SMRT cells. During the single 180-min run-time, 1,020,750,498 read bases were generated with 300,584 reads. Reads of less than 100 bp or with low accuracy (below 0.8) were removed. In total, 111,515 reads produced 823,795,879 bases with a read quality of 0.831.

All post-filtered reads were assembled de novo using the RS hierarchical genome assembly process, version 3.3 in SMRT analysis software, version 2.2.0 (Pacific Biosciences) [24] and resulted in 4 contigs corresponding to 4 scaffolds, with 113.03-fold coverage. The maximal contig length and N50 contig length had the same size of 5,760,162 bp. The whole genome was found to be 6,176,413 bp long.

Genome annotation

The protein-coding sequences were predicted by Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline, version 2.8, on the NCBI website (rev. 447580) [25]. Additional gene prediction and functional annotation were performed in the Rapid Annotation using Subsystems Technology server [26] and Integrated Microbial Genomes-Expert Review pipeline [27], respectively.

Genome properties

The genome size of M. rufum JS14T was found to be 6,176,413 bp with the average G + C content of 69.25 %. The genome was predicted to contain a total of 5864 genes, which include 5810 protein-coding genes with 54 RNA genes (6 rRNAs, 47 tRNAs, and 1 ncRNA). Of these, 4498 genes were assigned to putative functions, and 3669 genes (approximately 62.57 %) were assigned to the COG functional categories. The genome statistics are presented in Table 3 and Fig. 3, respectively. The gene distribution within the COG functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome statistics

Attribute

Value

% of Total

Genome size (bp)

6,176,413

100.00

DNA coding (bp)

5,622,516

91.03

DNA G + C (bp)

4,277,025

69.25

DNA scaffolds

4

100.00

Total genes

5864

100.00

Protein-coding genes

5810

99.08

RNA genes

54

0.92

Pseudogenes

367

6.26

Genes in internal clusters

944

16.10

Genes with function prediction

4498

76.71

Genes assigned to COGs

3669

62.57

Genes with Pfam domains

4544

77.49

Genes with signal peptides

314

5.35

Genes with transmembrane helices

1227

20.92

CRISPR repeats

0

0.00

Fig. 3

A graphical circular map of the M. rufum JS14T genome. The circular map was generated using the BLAST Ring Image Generator software [68]. From the inner circle to the outer circle: Genetic regions; GC content (black), and GC skew (purple/green), respectively

Table 4

Numbers of genes associated with general COG functional categories

Code

Value

% age

Description

J

181

4.25

Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

1

0.02

RNA processing and modification

K

353

8.29

Transcription

L

118

2.77

Replication, recombination and repair

B

0

0.00

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

32

0.75

Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning

V

98

2.30

Defense mechanisms

T

173

4.06

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

210

4.93

Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis

N

12

0.28

Cell motility

U

22

0.52

Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport

O

142

3.34

Post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

312

7.33

Energy production and conversion

G

245

5.76

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

333

7.82

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

89

2.09

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

266

6.25

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

422

9.91

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

224

5.26

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

264

6.20

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

516

12.12

General function prediction only

S

209

4.91

Function unknown

W

2

0.05

Extracellular structures

X

33

0.78

Mobilome: prophages, transposons

-

2195

37.43

Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Insights from the genome sequence

Regarding the specific degradation capability toward the four-aromatic-ring-fused compound, fluoranthene [1012], the genome of M. rufum JS14T was found to contain corresponding genes encoding proteins for the aromatic-compound degradation.

Generally, it is known that an initial step of the bacterial degradation of PAHs is mainly catalyzed by multicomponent dioxygenases that produce dihydrodiols [28, 29]. In the genome, multiple genes encoding various dioxygenases such as aromatic-ring-hydroxylating dioxygenase (EU78_28655, 28730, 29130), extradiol dioxygenase (EU78_24090, 26390), protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase alpha subunit (EU78_29035), protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase beta subunit (EU78_29030), phthalate 3,4-dioxygenase ferredoxin reductase subunit (EU78_29090), and extradiol ring-cleavage dioxygenase (EU78_16970, 28720) were predicted. In addition, the genes coding for such enzymes as cytochrome P450 (EU78_02320, 09230, 14085, 14465, 20055, 26160), methyltransferase (EU78_01005), flavin-dependent oxidoreductase (EU78_19900), and 3,4-dihydroxyphthalate decarboxylase (EU78_28715) were also identified as functional genes on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes map [30] for the PAH degradation. Nonetheless, when compared with the complete genome sequences of PAH-degrading organisms [69], several genes coding for representative functional enzymes with relevance to PAH degradation such as nidA (PAH dioxygenase large subunit), nidB (PAH dioxygenase small subunit), phtAa (phthalate 3,4-dioxygenase alpha subunit), phtAb (phthalate 3,4-dioxygenase beta subunit), phtB (phthalate 3,4-cis-dihydrodiol dehydrogenase), phdE (cis-3,4-dihydrophenanthrene-3,4,-diol dehydrogenase), and phdK (2-formylbenzoate dehydrogenase) were not identified (shown in Table 5).
Table 5

Comparison of the functional gene counts in the function profile of genome sequences

Function ID

Name

M. van a

M. gil GCKa

M. gil Sp1a

M. aro b

M. ruf b

KO:K00448

protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase, alpha subunit [EC:1.13.11.3] (pcaG)

1

1

1

1

3

KO:K00449

protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase, beta subunit [EC:1.13.11.3] (pcaH)

1

1

1

1

2

KO:K18253

phthalate 3,4-dioxygenase ferredoxin subunit (phtAc)

0

2

1

2

1

KO:K18254

phthalate 3,4-dioxygenase ferredoxin reductase subunit [EC:1.18.1.3] (phtAd)

1

2

1

0

1

KO:K00517

E1.14.-.- (cytochrome P450)

12

10

10

5

6

KO:K18256

3,4-dihydroxyphthalate decarboxylase [EC:4.1.1.69] (phtC)

1

2

1

0

1

KO:K11943

PAH dioxygenase large subunit [EC:1.13.11.-] (nidA)

1

2

1

1

0

KO:K11944

PAH dioxygenase small subunit [EC:1.13.11.-] (nidB)

2

4

2

4

0

KO:K11948

1-hydroxy-2-naphthoate dioxygenase [EC:1.13.11.38] (phdI)

1

2

1

0

0

KO:K11949

4-(2-carboxyphenyl)-2-oxobut-3-enoate aldolase [EC:4.1.2.34] (phdJ)

1

2

1

1

0

KO:K18251

phthalate 3,4-dioxygenase alpha subunit [EC:1.14.12.-] (phtAa)

1

2

1

0

0

KO:K18252

phthalate 3,4-dioxygenase beta subunit [EC:1.14.12.-] (phtAb)

1

2

1

1

0

KO:K18255

phthalate 3,4-cis-dihydrodiol dehydrogenase [EC:1.3.1.-] (phtB)

1

2

1

1

0

KO:K18257

cis-3,4-dihydrophenanthrene-3,4-diol dehydrogenase [EC:1.3.1.49] (phdE)

1

2

1

1

0

KO:K18275

2-formylbenzoate dehydrogenase [EC:1.2.1.78] (phdK)

1

1

1

1

0

Comparison of the selected five genome sequences was conducted using function profile categories in the IMG-ER pipeline [27], and the genome sequences analyzed are as follows: M. van, M. vanbaalenii PYR-1 (IMG Genome ID 639633044) [6]; M. gil GCK, M. gilvum PYR-GCK (IMG Genome ID 640427122) [8]; M. gil Sp1, M. gilvum Spyr1 IMG Genome ID 649633070) [7]; M. aro, M. aromaticivorans JS19b1 (whole Genome Sequencing) (IMG Genome ID 2558309009) [9]; M. ruf, M. rufum JS14 (whole Genome Sequencing) (IMG Genome ID 2593339261)

Reported sequencing status for the individual genome set: a Complete genome sequence; b Draft whole-genome sequence

Generally, research on bacteria degrading PAHs holds great promise for biotechnological applications to decontamination of pollutants [10]. In this regard, understanding of PAH degradation by indigenous microbes is important for evaluation of ecological effects of these microbes [31]. On Hawaiian islands, PAH contamination has occurred through various activities such as the petroleum industry, waste incineration, and fossil fuel combustion, even via natural causes such as volcanic activity [10]. Mycobacterium is a well-known genus capable of mineralizing PAHs [12]. Considering the Hawaiian delicate island ecosystem, several native bacteria belonging to the genus Mycobacterium were isolated, M. rufum JS14T is one of them [10].

One of native isolates from the petroleum-contaminated Hawaiian soil in Hilo (HI, USA), M. aromaticivorans JS19b1T [10], is known to have rapid degrading capabilities toward various PAHs such as fluorene, phenanthrene, pyrene, and fluoranthene [10, 11, 29]. Similarly, M. rufum JS14T was found as an effective degrader of a four-aromatic-ring-fused compound, fluoranthene, not showing degrading capacity toward other high-molecular-weight PAHs (e.g., pyrene, benzo[a]pyrene) or toward low-molecular-weight PAHs (e.g., fluorene, phenanthrene) [11, 12]. The gene annotation profiles for the genome of M. rufum JS14T may provide important clues to the identity of the whole metabolic pathway for fluoranthene degradation. Just as a recent study on the functional pan-genome analysis of the genus Mycobacterium capable of degrading PAHs [32], our data can also help to explain the complexity of bacterial catabolic pathways for degradation of specific chemicals, from the standpoint of microbial ecology.

Conclusions

M. rufum JS14T was isolated from PAH-contaminated soil of a former oil gasification company site in Hilo (HI, USA) and was designated as a novel species that was named Mycobacterium rufum (ru’fum. L. neut. adj. rufum ruddy or red, pertaining to the colony pigmentation of the type strain) [10]. In this study, we presented the genome sequence of the strain. This genetic information may provide new insights that will help to extend the application potential of bacterial bioremediation of various toxic compounds and to elucidate the features of metabolic degradation pathways for PAHs.

Abbreviations

PAHs: 

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

SMRT: 

single-molecule real-time

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIP) (NRF-2015R1C1A2A01055308).

Authors’ contributions

QXL isolated and characterized the M. rufum JS14T and drafted the manuscript. YK and JHS performed all the experiments on the genome sequencing and drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Applied Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kyungpook National University
(2)
Department of Molecular Biosciences and Bioengineering, University of Hawaii

References

  1. Cerniglia C. Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Biodegradation. 1992;3:351–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lors C, Damidot D, Ponge JF, Perie F. Comparison of a bioremediation process of PAHs in a PAH-contaminated soil at field and laboratory scales. Environ Pollut. 2012;165:11–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lu XY, Zhang T, Fang HH. Bacteria-mediated PAH degradation in soil and sediment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89:1357–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kanaly RA, Harayama S. Advances in the field of high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation by bacteria. Microb Biotechnol. 2010;3:136–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Peng RH, Xiong AS, Xue Y, Fu XY, Gao F, Zhao W, et al. Microbial biodegradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:927–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim SJ, Kweon O, Jones RC, Edmondson RD, Cerniglia CE. Genomic analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation in Mycobacterium vanbaalenii PYR-1. Biodegradation. 2008;19:859–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kallimanis A, Karabika E, Mavromatis K, Lapidus A, Labutti KM, Liolios K, et al. Complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium sp. strain (Spyr1) and reclassification to Mycobacterium gilvum Spyr1. Stand Genomic Sci. 2011;5:144–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Badejo AC, Badejo AO, Shin KH, Chai YG. A gene expression study of the activities of aromatic ring-cleavage dioxygenases in Mycobacterium gilvum PYR-GCK to changes in salinity and pH during pyrene degradation. PLoS One. 2013;8:e58066.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kwak Y, Park GS, Lee SE, Li QX, Shin JH. Genome sequence of Mycobacterium aromaticivorans JS19b1T, a novel isolate from Hawaiian soil. J Biotechnol. 2014;186:137–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hennessee CT, Seo JS, Alvarez AM, Li QX. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading species isolated from Hawaiian soils: Mycobacterium crocinum sp. nov., Mycobacterium pallens sp. nov., Mycobacterium rutilum sp. nov., Mycobacterium rufum sp. nov. and Mycobacterium aromaticivorans sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:378–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Seo JS, Keum YS, Harada RM, Li QX. Isolation and characterization of bacteria capable of degrading polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and organophosphorus pesticides from PAH-contaminated soil in Hilo. Hawaii J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55:5383–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee SE, Seo JS, Keum YS, Lee KJ, Li QX. Fluoranthene metabolism and associated proteins in Mycobacterium sp. JS14. Proteomics. 2007;7:2059–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Briglia M, Eggen RI, Van Elsas DJ, De Vos WM. Phylogenetic evidence for transfer of pentachlorophenol-mineralizing Rhodococcus chlorophenolicus PCP-IT to the genus Mycobacterium. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994;44:494–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Haggblom MM, Nohynek LJ, Palleroni NJ, Kronqvist K, Nurmiaho-Lassila EL, Salkinoja-Salonen MS, et al. Transfer of polychlorophenol-degrading Rhodococcus chlorophenolicus (Apajalahti et al. 1986) to the genus Mycobacterium as Mycobacterium chlorophenolicum comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1994;44:485–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Khan AA, Kim SJ, Paine DD, Cerniglia CE. Classification of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-metabolizing bacterium, Mycobacterium sp. strain PYR-1, as Mycobacterium vanbaalenii sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1997–2002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hormisch D, Brost I, Kohring GW, Giffhorn F, Kroppenstedt RM, Stackebrandt E, et al. Mycobacterium fluoranthenivorans sp. nov., a fluoranthene and aflatoxin B1 degrading bacterium from contaminated soil of a former coal gas plant. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2004;27:653–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Derz K, Klinner U, Schuphan I, Stackebrandt E, Kroppenstedt RM. Mycobacterium pyrenivorans sp. nov., a novel polycyclic-aromatic-hydrocarbon-degrading species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:2313–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Willumsen P, Karlson U, Stackebrandt E, Kroppenstedt RM. Mycobacterium frederiksbergense sp. nov., a novel polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading Mycobacterium species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:1715–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kleespies M, Kroppenstedt RM, Rainey FA, Webb LE, Stackebrandt E. Mycobacterium hodleri sp. nov., a new member of the fast-growing Mycobacteria capable of degrading polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1996;46:683–7.Google Scholar
  22. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotech. 2008;26:541–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Eid J, Fehr A, Gray J, Luong K, Lyle J, Otto G, et al. Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science. 2009;323:133–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Meth. 2013;10:563–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Ciufo S, Li W. Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline, in The NCBI Handbook. Bethesda: National Center for Biotechnology Information; 2013.Google Scholar
  26. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen I-MA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2271–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Moody JD, Fu PP, Freeman JP, Cerniglia CE. Regio- and stereoselective metabolism of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene by Mycobacterium vanbaalenii PYR-1. Appl Environ Mirobiol. 2003;69:3924–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Seo JS, Keum YS, Li QX. Mycobacterium aromativorans JS19b1T degrades phenanthrene through C-1,2, C-3,4 and C-9,10 dioxygenation pathways. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2012;70:96–103.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG:kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Ren G, Ren W, Teng Y, Li Z. Evident bacterial community changes but only slight degradation when polluted with pyrene in a red soil. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:22.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Kweon O, Kim SJ, Blom J, Kim SK, Kim BS, Baek DH, et al. Comparative functional pan-genome analyses to build connections between genomic dynamics and phenotypic evolution in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolism in the genus Mycobacterium. BMC Evol Biol. 2015;15:21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:4576–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Volume 1. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2001. p. 119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-rainey NL. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:479–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Buchanan RE. Studies in the nomenclature and classification of the bacteria: II. The primary subdivisions of the schizomycetes. J Bacteriol. 1917;2:155–64.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Skermen VBD, Mcgowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1980;30:225–420.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhi X-Y, Li W-J, Stackebrandt E. An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and emended descriptions of the existing higher taxa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:589–608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Chester FD. Report of mycologist: bacteriological work. Del Agr Exp Sta Bull. 1897;9:38–145.Google Scholar
  40. Lehmann KB, Neumann R. Atlas und Grundriss der Bakteriologie und Lehrbuch der speziellen bakteriologischen Diagnostik. 1st ed. München: J. F. Lehmanns; 1896. p. 1–448.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Runyon EH, Wayne LG, Kubica GP, Genus I. Mycobacterium Lehmann and Neumann. 1896, 363. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 8th ed. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co; 1974. p. 682.Google Scholar
  42. Kodaka H, Armfield AY, Lombard GL, Dowell Jr VR. Practical procedure for demonstrating bacterial flagella. J Clin Microbiol. 1982;16:948–52.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Angiuoli SV, Gussman A, Klimke W, Cochrane G, Field D, Garrity G, et al. Toward an online repository of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for (meta)genomic annotation. Omics. 2008;12:137–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Lukashin AV, Borodovsky M. GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998;26:1107–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Benson DA, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D32–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:2725–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Stanford JL, Gunthorpe WJ. A study of some fast-growing scotochromogenic mycobacteria including species descriptions of Mycobacterium gilvum (new species) and Mycobacterium duvalii (new species). Br J Exp Pathol. 1971;52:627–37.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Tsukamura M, Mizuno S, Tsukamura S. Numerical analysis of rapidly growing scotochromogenic mycobacteria, including Mycobacterium obusense sp. nov., nom. rev., Mycobacterium rhodesiae sp. nov., nom. rev., Mycobacterium aichiense sp. nov., nom. rev., Mycobacterium chubuense sp. nov., nom. rev., and Mycobacterium tokaiense sp. nov., nom. rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1981;31:263–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Validation List No. 110. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56:1459-1460.Google Scholar
  51. Brown BA, Springer B, Steingrube VA, Wilson RW, Pfyffer GE, Garcia MJ, et al. Mycobacterium wolinskyi sp. nov. and Mycobacterium goodii sp. nov., two new rapidly growing species related to Mycobacterium smegmatis and associated with human wound infections: a cooperative study from the international working group on mycobacterial taxonomy. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999;49:1493–511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Domenech P, Jimenez MS, Menendez MC, Bull TJ, Samper S, Manrique A, et al. Mycobacterium mageritense sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:535–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Lehmann KB, Lehmann’s NR, Medizin HX. Atlas und Grundriss der Bakteriologie und Lehrbuch der speziellen bakteriologischen Diagnostik. 2nd ed. München: J. F. Lehmann; 1899. p. 1–497.Google Scholar
  54. Bojalil LF, Cerbon J, Trujillo A. Adansonian classification of mycobacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1962;28:333–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Shojaei H, Goodfellow M, Magee JG, Freeman R, Gould FK, Brignall CG. Mycobacterium novocastrense sp. nov., a rapidly growing photochromogenic mycobacterium. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:1205–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Tortoli E, Baruzzo S, Heijdra Y, Klenk HP, Lauria S, Mariottini A, et al. Mycobacterium insubricum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:1518–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tortoli E, Rindi L, Goh KS, Katila ML, Mariottini A, Mattei R, et al. Mycobacterium florentinum sp. nov., isolated from humans. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:1101–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Levi MH, Bartell J, Gandolfo L, Smole SC, Costa SF, Weiss LM, et al. Characterization of Mycobacterium montefiorense sp. nov., a novel pathogenic Mycobacterium from moray eels that is related to Mycobacterium triplex. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:2147–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Validation List No. 94. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003; 53:1701–1702.Google Scholar
  60. Kirschner P, Teske A, Schröder KH, Kroppenstedt RM, Wolters J, Böttger EC. Mycobacterium confluentis sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992;42:257–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Richter E, Niemann S, Gloeckner FO, Pfyffer GE, Rüsch-Gerdes S. Mycobacterium holsaticum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1991–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Shojaei H, Magee JG, Freeman R, Yates M, Horadagoda NU, Goodfellow M. Mycobacterium elephantis sp. nov., a rapidly growing non-chromogenic Mycobacterium isolated from an elephant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50:1817–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Aronson JD. Spontaneous tuberculosis in salt water fish. J Infect Dis. 1926;39:315–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. MacCallum P, Tolhurst JC, Buckle G, Fenner F. The significance of the incubation period in infectious diseases. Med J Aust. 1950;2:813–8.Google Scholar
  65. Karlson AG, Lessel EF. Mycobacterium bovis nom. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1970;20:273–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. van Soolingen D, Hoogenboezem T, de Haas PE, Hermans PW, Koedam MA, Teppema KS, et al. A novel pathogenic taxon of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, Canetti: characterization of an exceptional isolate from Africa. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:1236–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Castets M, Rist N, Boisvert H. La variété africaine du bacille tuberculeux humain. Med Afr Noire. 1969;16:321–2.Google Scholar
  68. Alikhan N-F, Petty N, Ben Zakour N, Beatson S. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:402.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016