Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Extended genome report
  • Open access
  • Published:

High quality draft genome sequences of Mycoplasma agassizii strains PS6T and 723 isolated from Gopherus tortoises with upper respiratory tract disease

Standards in Genomic Sciences volume 13, Article number: 12 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Mycoplasma agassizii is one of the known causative agents of upper respiratory tract disease (URTD) in Mojave desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) and in gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus). We sequenced the genomes of M. agassizii strains PS6T (ATCC 700616) and 723 (ATCC 700617) isolated from the upper respiratory tract of a Mojave desert tortoise and a gopher tortoise, respectively, both with signs of URTD. The PS6T genome assembly was organized in eight scaffolds, had a total length of 1,274,972 bp, a G + C content of 28.43%, and contained 979 protein-coding genes, 13 pseudogenes and 35 RNA genes. The 723 genome assembly was organized in 40 scaffolds, had a total length of 1,211,209 bp, a G + C content of 28.34%, and contained 955 protein-coding genes, seven pseudogenes, and 35 RNA genes. Both genomes exhibit a very similar organization and very similar numbers of genes in each functional category. Pairs of orthologous genes encode proteins that are 93.57% identical on average. Homology searches identified a putative cytadhesin. These genomes will enable studies that will help understand the molecular bases of pathogenicity of this and other Mycoplasma species.

Introduction

The genus Mycoplasma , within the bacterial class Mollicutes ( Tenericutes ), contains over one hundred species, many of which are pathogenic to vertebrates [1]. An upper respiratory tract disease has been implicated in population declines in Mojave Desert tortoises ( Gopherus agassizii ) found in the desert southwest of the United States and gopher tortoises ( Gopherus polyphemus ) inhabiting forests of the U.S. southeast [2,3,4]. Pathogens associated with this disease include two Mycoplasma , Mycoplasma agassizii and Mycoplasma testudineum [5,6,7]. Due to conservation concerns regarding URTD, this disease and its associated pathogens have become a topic of research interest, though our understanding of the biology and progression of URTD is lacking [8, 9]. In particular, disease in tortoises is found with varying levels of morbidity, and one hypothesis for this finding is that there is genetic variation of M. agassizii associated with varying levels of virulence [8]. To understand better the amount of genomic differentiation occurring between M. agassizii collected from different tortoise host species, and to identify markers associated with virulence, we sequenced the M. agassizii genome from two strains, PS6T and 723. This sequencing is part of a larger project to ultimately genetically detect variation in strains and their virulence from field-cultured samples.

Organism information

Classification and features

Mycoplasma agassizii has been isolated from multiple tortoise species, and was found to be pathogenic in Mojave Desert tortoises and gopher tortoises in North America, causing URTD [5, 6, 10]. In infected North American tortoises, M. agassizii is most often found in the nasal passages and choana, but can also be isolated from the trachea and lungs [10]. This microbe forms a close extracellular association with the nasal epithelium of its host, and severe infections can result in lesions [11]. Infected hosts experience clinical signs of disease including nasal exudate, possibly leading to lethargic behavior and loss of appetite [5, 11].

M. agassizii is coccoid to pleomorphic in shape, lacks a cell wall, and has a three-layer membrane (Table 1, Fig. 1). These microbes range in size under 1 μm [10, 11] and grow in culture at an optimal temperature of 30 °C, with an extremely slow growth rate [10, 12]. Mortality of M. agassizii occurs at temperatures above 37 °C [12], and it retains viability after prolonged periods of cold temperatures [6, 10], indicating that body temperatures experienced by its ectothermic hosts likely affect the microbe’s success over the seasons. In an experiment to detect co-infection patterns of M. agassizii with its close relative M. testudineum , there was some indication that the two species form a facilitative relationship in a host-context-dependent manner [13]. Preliminary microbiome data suggest that the presence of M. agassizii is associated with a shift in the microbial community composition in Mojave and Sonoran Desert tortoises ( Gopherus morafkai ) (CLW, FCS and CRT, unpublished data).

Table 1 Classification and general features of Mycoplasma agassizii, strains PS6T and 723
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Electron micrograph of ultrathin section of Mycoplasma agassizii strain PS6T. Image from ref. [10], reproduced with permission from the publisher. Scale bar = 0.5 μm

Full size image

The strains of M. agassizii that we have sequenced were isolated from two host species. Strain PS6T was isolated from the upper respiratory tract of a Mojave Desert tortoise in the Las Vegas Valley, Nevada, USA [10], while strain 723 was obtained from an ill gopher tortoise in Sanibel Island, Florida, USA [6]. Strains were cultured in SP4 broth, and have been used in experiments to demonstrate their pathogenic effects on their tortoise hosts [5, 6].

To determine the placement of M. agassizii in the mycoplasmal phylogeny, all 16S rRNA gene sequences from the type strains of Mycoplasma species were obtained from the SILVA database [14] and aligned using MUSCLE 3.8.31 [15], and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method implemented in MEGA7 [16] (Fig. 2). Consistent with prior results [17, 18], M. testudineum is a sister group of M. agassizii in the resultant tree, and the M. agassizii / M. testudineum clade is a sister group of Mycoplasma pulmonis , the agent of murine respiratory mycoplasmosis. All three species fall within the hominis group of Mycoplasma (see ref. [19] for group definitions). The 16S rRNA gene sequence from M. agassizii , strain PS6T, is 99.8, 93.2 and 89.2% identical to those of M. agassizii strain 723, M. testudineum strain BH29T, and M. pulmonis strain PG34T, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic tree of the Mycoplasma genus based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the phylogenetic position of M. agassizii PS6T and 723 (●). All 16S sequences from the Mycoplasma genus were obtained from the SILVA database [14]. Only sequences in the ‘The All-Species Living Tree’ Project (LTP), release 128, were retained. This dataset only contains sequences from type strains, designated with a superscripted “T”. Clostridium botulinum strain ATCC 25763 was also included in the dataset as outgroup. Sequences were aligned using MUSCLE 3.8.31 [15]. A phylogenetic tree was obtained using the maximum likelihood method implemented in MEGA7 [16], with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Species with available genomes at the NCBI Genomes database or the Genomes Online Database are represented in bold face. GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Bootstrap support values above 50% are represented. The scale bar represents a divergence of 0.05 nucleotide substitutions per nucleotide position

Full size image

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

Two strains of M. agassizii were selected for sequencing, strains PS6T and 723, both isolated from tortoises with signs of URTD [5, 6, 10, 20]. Sequencing was conducted in October 2016. The Whole Genome Shotgun projects were deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers NQMN00000000 (strain PS6T) and NQNY00000000 (strain 723). The versions described in this paper are the first versions. A summary of the information of both projects in compliance with MIGS version 2.0 [21] is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Project information
Full size table

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

Freeze-dried M. agassizii strains were obtained from the ATCC in March 2011 (strain PS6T) and May 2016 (strain 723). Strain PS6T was cultured on SP4 media and re-pelleted in-lab prior to DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit protocol for Gram-negative bacteria and eluted with water. Extracted DNA was quantified on a Qiagen QIAxpert system and with Picogreen analysis.

Genome sequencing and assembly

Genome sequencing was conducted using the Illumina Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, USA) with the Illumina NextSeq500 platform (150 bp, paired-end) and 2 ng of starting genomic DNA at the Nevada Genomics Center (University of Nevada, Reno). Sequencing was performed in multiplex with multiple samples, using dual index sequences from the Illumina Nextera XT Index Kit, v2 (PS6 indices: index 1 N702, index 2 S510; 723 indices: index 1 N702, index 2 S511). A total of 349,251 and 332,967 read pairs were obtained for strains PS6T and 723, respectively. Using Trimmomatic, version 0.36 [22], reads were trimmed to remove Nextera adapter sequences and low quality nucleotides from either end (average Phred score Q ≤ 5, four bp sliding window), and sequences trimmed to < 35 bp were removed. After trimming, 330,351 (PS6T) and 305,002 (723) read pairs, and 16,438 (PS6T) and 25,017 (723) single-reads (the pairs of which were removed) remained. De novo genome assembly was performed using SPAdes 3.10.1 [23], using as inputs the trimmed paired reads, and the trimmed single reads (assembly k-mer sizes 21, 33, 55, and 77, with read error-correction enabled and ‘--careful’ mode mismatch correction). After removing scaffolds of less than 500 bp, the final assemblies consisted of 8 (PS6T) and 40 (723) scaffolds with a total length of 1,274,972 bp (PS6T) and 1,211,209 bp (723), an average length of 159,372 bp (PS6T) and 30,280 bp (723), and an N50 of 654,010 bp (PS6T) and 56,701 bp (723). The coverage was 38.51× for the PS6T assembly and 37.73× for the 723 assembly.

Genome annotation

Gene prediction was carried out using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline 4.2 [24]. For each predicted protein, (i) families were identified using the Pfam 31.0 [25] batch search tool (“gathering threshold” option), (ii) Clusters of Orthologous Groups categories were assigned using eggNOG-mapper [26] based on eggNOG 4.5.1 data [27], (iii) signal peptides were identified using the SignalP server 4.1 [28], and (iv) transmembrane helices were inferred using the TMHMM server v. 2.0 [29]. CRISPR repeats were identified using PGAP and CRISPRFinder [30].

Genome properties

The properties of both draft genomes are summarized in Table 3. The final assembly for strain PS6T consisted of 8 scaffolds, with a total length of 1,274,972 bp, and a G + C content of 28.43%. PGAP [24] identified a total of 979 protein-coding genes, 13 pseudogenes, and 35 RNA genes. The assembly for strain 723 consisted of 40 scaffolds, with a total length of 1,211,209 bp, and a G + C content of 28.34%. A total of 955 protein-coding genes, 7 pseudogenes, and 35 RNA genes were identified. In both cases, the identified RNA genes include 3 rRNAs (one 5S, one 16S and one 23S), 3 ncRNAs and 29 tRNAs. PGAP identified no CRISPR repeats in any of the two genomes, and CRISPRFinder [30] identified 6 “questionable” repeats in the PS6T genome and one “questionable” repeat in the 723 genome, but no “confirmed” repeats. The numbers of protein-coding genes in each COG category [31] were similar for both strains, and are summarized in Table 4.

Table 3 Genome statistics
Full size table
Table 4 Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories
Full size table

Insights from the genome sequence

The small genome size and low G + C content of both M. agassizii genomes described here are consistent with those of other Mycoplasma genomes sequenced [18, 32, 33]. However, the M. agassizii genomes are significantly larger than the genome of M. testudineum , strain BH29T (960,895 bp, 788 protein-coding genes; ref. [18]). The difference in the genome size of both sister species might account for the fact that M. agassizii is associated with URTD, whereas the link between M. testudineum and URTD is less clear [13]; i.e., genes present in M. agassizii but not in M. testudineum might be responsible for pathogenicity.

In spite of the fact that the two M. agassizii strains sequenced here were obtained from geographically distant locations (the Mojave Desert and Sanibel Island) and from different tortoise species ( G. agassizii and G. polyphemus ; refs. [5, 6, 10, 20]), the two genomes are very similar, exhibiting very similar sizes, numbers of genes (Table 3), functional composition (Table 4), and a high degree of synteny (Fig. 3a). A best-reciprocal-hit approach (based on BLASTP searches, E-value ≤10− 10) identified 828 pairs of putative orthologs within both genomes. The sequences of proteins encoded by pairs of orthologous genes were aligned using ProbCons version 1.12 [34], and were 93.57% identical on average (median: 96.84%). In contrast, comparison of the genomes of M. agassizii strain PS6T and M. testudineum strain BH29T [18] revealed much less synteny (Fig. 3b) and protein identity (average: 54.78%, median: 54.71%).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of the genomes of M. agassizii strains PS6T and 723 (a), and M. agassizii strain PS6T and M. testudineum strain BH29T (b). The figure was generated using Circoletto 07.09.16 [45], a web interface for Circos [46]. The relative order of scaffolds is unknown. For strain PS6T, scaffolds are sorted by size

Full size image

The 16S rRNA gene sequences of M. agassizii , strains PS6T and 723, differed at 3 nucleotide positions (Fig. 4). Surprisingly, our 16S sequence for strain PS6T and that obtained by Brown et al. (also for strain PS6T; ref. [20]) exhibit 8 differences (4 point differences and 4 indels; Fig. 4). These differences may represent mutations accumulated since the isolation of the strain, or sequencing errors.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison of the 16S rRNA gene sequences generated by Brown et al. [20] (M. agassizii strain PS6T; GenBank accession: U09786) and in our study (M. agassizii strains PS6T and 723). Asterisks represent identical sites

Full size image

To initiate pathogenesis, Mycoplasma cells usually require adhering to the host mucosa. Adhesion mechanisms are relatively well understood in Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its close relatives, but poorly understood in other Mycoplasma species [35]. In a prior study, we searched all available Mycoplasma genomic data (nr database, including the genome of M. testudineum BH29T) for homologs of M. pneumoniae cytadhesins P1, P30, P65, P40 and P90 and cytadhesin accessory proteins hmw1, hmw2 and hmw3, finding homologs only in species closely related to M. pneumoniae ( Mycoplasma genitalium , Mycoplasma gallisepticum , Mycoplasma pirum , Mycoplasma alvi , Mycoplasma imitans , and Mycoplasma testudinis ) [18]. Here, we expanded these analyses (BLASTP and TBLASTN searches; E < 10− 5 and low-complexity regions filtering) to the two M. agassizii proteomes/genomes, also with negative results. In addition, none of the predicted M. agassizii proteins exhibit any of the Pfam domains present in the M. pneumoniae (domains “CytadhesinP1”, “Adhesin_P1”, “Cytadhesin_P30”, “MgpC” and “EAGR_box”). This could be attributed either to (i) M. pneumoniae adhesion proteins being specific to this species and its close relatives, or (ii) adhesion proteins evolving very fast, perhaps due to co-evolutionary races, precluding detection of homologs in distantly related species. The first possibility is supported by the fact that M. pulmonis , the most closely related known species to the M. agassizii / M. testudineum clade, exhibits adhesion mechanisms different from M. pneumoniae , lacking an attachment organelle [36]. In support of the second scenario, our analysis of orthologous sequences revealed poor protein conservation among the sister groups M. agassizii and M. testudineum .

We repeated our similarity searches using as query a list of known Mycoplasma adhesins, which we obtained by searching the text “ Mycoplasma adhesin” in the UniProt database [37]. Our prior searches against the M. testudineum BH29T proteome/genome failed to detect any significant hits. In the current study, we detected significant similarity between a Mycoplasma mobile protein annotated as a “Truncated adhesin protein” (UniProt ID: Q8L3E5_9MOLU) and the proteins CJF60_05070 (strain PS6T, 3308 amino acids) and CJJ23_03020 (strain 723, also 3308 amino acids) of M. agassizii . CJF60_05070 and CJJ23_03020 are 92% identical. The C-terminal part of the M. mobile protein exhibits homology to three regions of the M. agassizii proteins (positions 958–1261, 1296–1597 and 1717–1924 of CJF60_05070; positions 956–1259, 1294–1595 and 1715–1922 of CJJ23_03020). A BLASTP search using CJF60_05070 as query sequence against the nr database identified a total of 17 hits, including three adhesion proteins (Table 5). Of note, the first hit is a M. testudineum protein (34%), which was not detected in our prior analyses [18]. Equivalent results were obtained using the CJJ23_03020 protein sequence as query (data not shown). The TMHMM server v. 2.0 [29] predicted both CJF60_05070 and CJJ23_03020 to contain a transmembrane domain at the N-terminal part of the protein (positions 7–29), and most of the protein (positions 30–3308) to be extracellular. Taken together, these observations point to these proteins as potential M. agassizii adhesins.

Table 5 Results of a BLASTP search using CJF60_05070 as query against the nr database
Full size table

Conclusions

We have obtained draft genome sequences for M. agassizii , strains PS6T and 723, both isolated from tortoises of the genus Gopherus with URTD. Both genomes exhibited a very small size and low G + C content, which is typical from Mycoplasma genomes. The two assemblies were very similar, in terms of synteny and protein sequences, in spite of the fact that they were obtained from different hosts and geographical locations. We identified a putative cytadhesin in both genomes. The new genomes will facilitate future studies that will help understand the molecular bases of pathogenicity of this and other Mycoplasma species.

Abbreviations

ATCC:

American Type Culture Collection

BLAST:

Basic local alignment search tool

COG:

Clusters of Orthologous Groups

MIGS:

Minimum information on the genome sequence

MRM:

Murine respiratory mycoplasmosis

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

PGAP:

Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline

URTD:

Upper respiratory tract disease

References

  1. Brown DR. Mycoplasmosis and immunity of fish and reptiles. Front Biosci. 2002;7:d1338–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Seigel RA, Smith RB, Seigel NA. Swine flu or 1918 pandemic? Upper respiratory tract disease and the sudden mortality of gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) on a protected habitat in Florida. J Herpetol. 2003;37(1):137–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR, Lindzey J. Conservation strategies and emergent diseases: the case of upper respiratory tract disease in the gopher tortoise. Chelonian Conserv Biol. 2007;6(2):170–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Desert Tortoise Recovery Team. Desert tortoise (Mojave population): recovery plan. Portland: US Fish and Wildlife Service; 1994.

  5. Brown MB, Schumacher IM, Klein PA, Harris K, Correll T, Jacobson ER. Mycoplasma agassizii causes upper respiratory tract disease in the desert tortoise. Infect Immun. 1994;62(10):4580–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown M, McLaughlin G, Klein P, Crenshaw B, Schumacher I, Brown D, Jacobson E. Upper respiratory tract disease in the gopher tortoise is caused by mycoplasma agassizii. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(7):2262–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown D, Merritt J, Jacobson E, Klein P, Tully J, Brown M. Mycoplasma testudineum sp. nov., from a desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) with upper respiratory tract disease. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54(5):1527–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sandmeier FC, Tracy CR, Hunter K. Upper respiratory tract disease (URTD) as a threat to desert tortoise populations: a reevaluation. Biol Conserv. 2009;142(7):1255–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Diemer Berish JE, Wendland LD, Kiltie RA, Garrison EP, Gates CA. Effects of mycoplasmal upper respiratory tract disease on morbidity and mortality of gopher tortoises in northern and Central Florida. J Wildl Dis. 2010;46(3):695–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown M, Brown D, Klein P, McLaughlin G, Schumacher IM, Jacobson E, Adams H, Tully J. Mycoplasma agassizii sp. nov., isolated from the upper respiratory tract of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) and the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51(2):413–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobson ER, Gaskin J, Brown M, Harris R, Gardiner C, LaPointe J, Adams H, Reggiardo C. Chronic upper respiratory tract disease of free-ranging desert tortoises (Xerobates agassizii). J Wildl Dis. 1991;27(2):296–316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohammadpour HA. Mycoplasma agassizii infections in the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). PhD dissertation. Reno: University of Nevada; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weitzman CL, Gov R, Sandmeier FC, Snyder SJ, Tracy CR. Co-infection does not predict disease in Gopherus tortoises. Royal Soc Open Sci. 2017;4:171003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glockner FO. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D590–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Volokhov DV, Simonyan V, Davidson MK, Chizhikov VE. RNA polymerase beta subunit (rpoB) gene and the 16S–23S rRNA intergenic transcribed spacer region (ITS) as complementary molecular markers in addition to the 16S rRNA gene for phylogenetic analysis and identification of the species of the family Mycoplasmataceae. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012;62(1):515–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weitzman CL, Tillett RL, Sandmeier FC, Tracy CR, Alvarez-Ponce D. High quality draft genome sequence of Mycoplasma testudineum strain BH29T, isolated from the respiratory tract of a desert tortoise. Stand Genomic Sci. 2018;13:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Weisburg W, Tully J, Rose D, Petzel J, Oyaizu H, Yang D, Mandelco L, Sechrest J, Lawrence T, Van Etten J. A phylogenetic analysis of the mycoplasmas: basis for their classification. J Bacteriol. 1989;171(12):6455–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown D, Crenshaw B, McLaughlin G, Schumacher I, McKenna C, Klein P, Jacobson E, Brown M. Taxonomic analysis of the tortoise mycoplasmas mycoplasma agassizii and mycoplasma testudinis by 16S rRNA gene sequence comparison. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1995;45(2):348–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(5):541.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comp Biol. 2012;19(5):455–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(14):6614–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J, Mitchell AL, Potter SC, Punta M, Qureshi M, Sangrador-Vegas A. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D279–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Pedro Coelho L, Szklarczyk D, Juhl Jensen L, von Mering C, Bork P. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34(8):2115–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D, Walter MC, Rattei T, Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Kuhn M. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;44(D1):D286–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8(10):785–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. TMHMM Server v. 2.0. http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/. Accessed Aug 2017.

  30. Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C. CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(suppl_2):W52–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, Krylov DM, Mazumder R, Mekhedov SL, Nikolskaya AN, et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003;4:41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fraser CM, Gocayne JD, White O, Adams MD, Clayton RA, Fleischmann RD, Bult CJ, Kerlavage AR, Sutton G, Kelley JM, et al. The minimal gene complement of mycoplasma genitalium. Science. 1995;270(5235):397–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Citti C, Blanchard A. Mycoplasmas and their host: emerging and re-emerging minimal pathogens. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21(4):196–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Do CB, Mahabhashyam MS, Brudno M, Batzoglou S. ProbCons: probabilistic consistency-based multiple sequence alignment. Genome Res. 2005;15(2):330–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Browning GF, Noormohammadi AH, Markham PF. Identification and characterization of virulence genes in mycoplasmas. In: Browning GF, Citti C, editors. Mollicutes: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Norfolk: Caister Academic Press; 2014. p. 77–90.

  36. Cassell GH. The pathogenic potential of mycoplasmas: mycoplasma pulmonis as a model. Rev Infect Dis. 1982;4(Supplement_1):S18–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Uniprot Consortium. UniProt: a hub for protein information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D204–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87(12):4576–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer K-H, Whitman W. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology: volume 3: the Firmicutes. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2011.

  40. Whitcomb R, Tully J, Bové J, Bradbury J, Christiansen G, Kahane I, Kirkpatrich B, Laigret F, Leach R, Neimank H. Revised minimum standards for description of new species of the class Mollicutes (division Tenericutes). J Syst Bacteriol. 1995;45:605–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Edward DGF, Freundt E. Type strains of species of the order Mycoplasmatales, including designation of neotypes for mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides, mycoplasma agalactiae subsp. agalactiae, and mycoplasma arthritidis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1973;23(1):55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Freundt E. The classification of the pleuropneumonia group of organisms (Borrelomycetales). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1955;5(2):67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  43. American Type Culture Collection Catalog. https://www.atcc.org. Accessed Oct 2017.

  44. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Darzentas N. Circoletto: visualizing sequence similarity with Circos. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(20):2620–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, Connors J, Gascoyne R, Horsman D, Jones SJ, Marra MA. Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009;19(9):1639–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to Kris Kruse from the Nevada Genomics Center for technical assistance, and to Marco Fondi for helpful discussions. They are also grateful to the Nevada Genomics Center for providing sequencing services for free.

Funding

This work was made possible by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103440) from the National Institutes of Health. The funder did not play any role in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, University of Nevada, Reno, USA

    David Alvarez-Ponce, Chava L. Weitzman & C. Richard Tracy

  2. Nevada Center for Bioinformatics, University of Nevada, Reno, USA

    Richard L. Tillett

  3. Biology Department, Colorado State University, Pueblo, USA

    Franziska C. Sandmeier

Authors
  1. David Alvarez-Ponce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chava L. Weitzman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard L. Tillett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Franziska C. Sandmeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Richard Tracy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DAP, CLW, FCS and CRT conceived the work. CLW conducted laboratory work. DAP and RLT conducted bioinformatic analyses. DAP and CLW drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to interpreting data and improving the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Alvarez-Ponce.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alvarez-Ponce, D., Weitzman, C.L., Tillett, R.L. et al. High quality draft genome sequences of Mycoplasma agassizii strains PS6T and 723 isolated from Gopherus tortoises with upper respiratory tract disease. Stand in Genomic Sci 13, 12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-018-0315-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-018-0315-1

Keywords

Environmental Microbiome

ISSN: 2524-6372