Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Saccharomonospora viridis type strain (P101T)

  • Amrita Pati1,
  • Johannes Sikorski2,
  • Matt Nolan1,
  • Alla Lapidus1,
  • Alex Copeland1,
  • Tijana Glavina Del Rio1,
  • Susan Lucas1,
  • Feng Chen1,
  • Hope Tice1,
  • Sam Pitluck1,
  • Jan-Fang Cheng1,
  • Olga Chertkov1, 3,
  • Thomas Brettin1, 3,
  • Cliff Han1, 3,
  • John C. Detter1, 3,
  • Cheryl Kuske1, 3,
  • David Bruce1, 3,
  • Lynne Goodwin1, 3,
  • Patrick Chain1, 4,
  • Patrik D’haeseleer1, 4,
  • Amy Chen5,
  • Krishna Palaniappan5,
  • Natalia Ivanova1,
  • Konstantinos Mavromatis1,
  • Natalia Mikhailova1,
  • Manfred Rohde6,
  • Brian J. Tindall2,
  • Markus Göker2,
  • Jim Bristow1,
  • Jonathan A. Eisen1, 7,
  • Victor Markowitz4,
  • Philip Hugenholtz1,
  • Nikos C. Kyrpides1 and
  • Hans-Peter Klenk2
Standards in Genomic Sciences20091:1020141

https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.20263

Published: 29 September 2009

Abstract

Saccharomonospora viridis (Schuurmans et al. 1956) Nonomurea and Ohara 1971 is the type species of the genus Saccharomonospora which belongs to the family Pseudonocardiaceae. S. viridis is of interest because it is a Gram-negative organism classified among the usually Gram-positive actinomycetes. Members of the species are frequently found in hot compost and hay, and its spores can cause farmer’s lung disease, bagassosis, and humidifier fever. Strains of the species S. viridis have been found to metabolize the xenobiotic pentachlorophenol (PCP). The strain described in this study has been isolated from peat-bog in Ireland. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence, and annotation. This is the first complete genome sequence of the family Pseudonocardiaceae, and the 4,308,349 bp long single replicon genome with its 3906 protein-coding and 64 RNA genes is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Keywords

thermophile hot compost Gram-negative actinomycete farmer’s lung disease bagassosis humidifier fever pentachlorophenol metabolism Pseudonocardiaceae

Introduction

Strain P101T (= DSM 43017 = ATCC 15386 = JCM 3036 = NCIMB 9602) is the type strain of Saccharomonospora viridis, and the type species of the genus Saccharomonospora [1,2], which currently contains eight species [3]. Although phylogenetically a member of the Gram-positive actinomycetes, already the initial report on S. viridis strain P101T noticed the astonishing feature of the organism to be Gram-negative, despite showing the typical mycelium morphology of Saccharomonospora [2]. Like in other actinomycetes, spores of S. viridis are readily dispersed in air, and the prolonged exposure to spores can apparently result in acute respiratory distress (farmer’s lung disease) which may lead to irreversible lung damage [4,5]. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for S. viridis P101T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Members of the species S. viridis have been isolated or molecularly identified on several occasions from hot composts in Europe and USA [1214,17], and also from soil in Japan [1]. One novel, yet unpublished, cultivated member of the species has been reported by Lu and Liu from Chinese soil (AF127525). Uncultured clone sequences with significant (99%) sequence similarity were observed from composting mass in China (AM930281 and AM930338). Screening of environmental genomic samples and surveys reported at the NCBI BLAST server indicated no closely related phylotypes that can be linked to the species or genus, with the closest matches (about 90% sequence similarity) to strain P101T 16S rRNA identified in a marine metagenome from the Sargasso Sea [18].

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of S. viridis strain P101T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of all three copies of the 16S rRNA gene are identical and perfectly match the previously published 16S rRNA sequence generated from NCIMB 9602 (Z38007).
Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree of S. viridis strain P101T and all type strains of the genus Saccharomonospora inferred from 1,474 aligned characters [19,20] of the 16S rRNA gene under the maximum likelihood criterion [21]. The tree was rooted with all type strains of the members of the genus Prauserella, another genus in the family Pseudonocardiaceae. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [22] are shown in blue, published genomes in bold.

The hyphae of the vegetative mycelium of strain P101T are branched and sometimes show curved endings [12]. Single spores are observed only on the aerial mycelium either directly on the hyphae or on short sporophores (Table 1 and Figure 2). The spores are oval, 0.9–1.1 µm × 1.2–1.4 µm in size. Only very occasionally two spores are observed. The aerial mycelium is either grayish green in color, or turns from white to greenish as on Czapek Agar. The optimal temperature for growth is 55°C, but 45°C for aerial mycelium formation and pigment production. At 37°C and 60°C the growth is very limited and without aerial mycelia. No growth occurs at 27°C and 70°C [12].
Figure 2.

Scanning electron micrograph of S. viridis P101T

Table 1.

Classification and general features of S. viridis P101T in accordance with the MIGS recommendations [6]

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence code

 

Current classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS [7]

 

Phylum Actinobacteria

TAS [8]

 

Order Actinomycetales

TAS [9]

 

Suborder Pseudonocardineae

TAS [9]

 

Family Pseudonocardiaceae

TAS [9]

 

Genus Saccharomonospora

TAS [1]

 

Species Saccharomonospora viridis

TAS [2]

 

Type strain P101

 
 

Gram stain

negative

TAS [2]

 

Cell shape

variable

TAS [10]

 

Motility

nonmotile

NAS

 

Sporulation

single spores mainly on aerial mycelium

TAS [1]

 

Temperature range

thermophile, 37–60°C

TAS [11]

 

Optimum temperature

55°C for growth, 45°C for aerial mycelium formation

TAS [1,11,12]

 

Salinity

7% NaCl

TAS [11]

MIGS-22

Oxygen requirement

aerobic; nor reported if essential

TAS [11]

 

Carbon source

D-glucose, sucrose, dextrin

TAS [11]

 

Energy source

carbohydrates

TAS [11]

MIGS-6

Habitat

peat and compost (species occurrence)

TAS [1,4,1214]

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

free living

 

MIGS-14

Pathogenicity

lung damage

TAS [4]

 

Biosafety level

1

TAS [15]

 

Isolation

peat-bog at 250 cm depth

TAS [12]

MIGS-4

Geographic location

Irish peat

 

MIGS-5

Sample collection time

before 1963

TAS [12]

MIGS-4.1

   

MIGS-4.2

Latitude - Longitude

not reported

 

MIGS-4.3

Depth

not reported

 

MIGS-4.4

Altitude

not reported

 

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [16]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was observed for a living isolate by one of the authors, or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Strain P101T has been observed to be sensitive to a variety of phages [11]. Members of S. viridis are apparently able to metabolize pentachlorophenol but not other chlorophenols [14]. It was suggested that S. viridis metabolizes PCP by conjugation to form a more polar transformation product, but, unlike other PCP-degrading bacteria, the organism is incapable of effecting total degradation of the xenobiotic [14]. Microorganisms such as S. viridis may therefore contribute to PCP removal by microbial communities in situ, despite being unable to completely mineralize chlorophenols in pure culture [14]. S. viridis produces a thermostable α-amylase which forms 63% (w/w) maltose on hydrolysis of starch [23]. Maltotriose and maltotetraose are the only intermediate products observed during this reaction, with maltotriose accumulating to 40% (w/w). Both unimolecular and multimolecular mechanisms (transfers and condensation) have been shown to occur during the concentration-dependent degradation of maltotriose and maltotetraose. Such reactions result in the almost exclusive formation of maltose from maltotriose at high initial concentration [23]. S. viridis produces thermoviridin, an antibiotic that is primarily active against the Gram-positive bacteria (growth inhibition) [2,11]. At higher concentrations, also Gram-negative bacteria were growth-inhibited [2].

Chemotaxonomy

The murein of P101T is of cell wall type IV. It contains meso-diaminopimelic acid in the peptidoglycan and arabinose and galactose in whole-cell hydrolysates (sugar type A). Mycolic acids and teichonic acids were not reported. Strain P101T contains menaquinones MK-9(H4) (60%) and MK-8(H4) (20 to 30%). The combination of the tetrahydromultiprenyl menaquinones MK-9(H4) and MK-8(H4) is characteristic for the genus Saccharomonospora [11]. The major cellular fatty acids are saturated, iso-branched acids with 16 and 18 carbon atoms, and 2-hydroxydodecanoic acids. Details are described in the Compendium of Actinobacteria [10]. Phosphatidylethanolamine, hydroxy-phosphatidyl-ethanolamine, and lyso-phosphatidyl-ethanolamine were identified as the main phospholipids.

Genome sequencing and annotation-Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position, and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project. The genome project is deposited in the Genome OnLine Database [22] and the complete genome sequence in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2.

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS-31

Finishing quality

Finished

MIGS-28

Libraries used

Two Sanger libraries - 8 kb pMCL200 and fosmid pcc1Fos

MIGS-29

Sequencing platforms

ABI3730

MIGS-31.2

Sequencing coverage

12.9× Sanger

MIGS-30

Assemblers

phrap

MIGS-32

Gene calling method

Genemark 4.6b, tRNAScan-SE-1.23, infernal 0.81, GenePRIMP

 

INSDC / Genbank ID

CP001683

 

Genbank Date of Release

August 26, 2009

 

GOLD ID

Gc01088

 

NCBI project ID

20835

 

Database: IMG-GEBA

2500901760

MIGS-13

Source material identifier

DSM 43017

 

Project relevance

Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

S. viridis strain P101T, DSM 43017, was grown in DSMZ medium 535 (Trypticase soy broth) at 45°C. DNA was isolated from 1–1.5 g of cell paste using Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with a modified protocol, st/FT, for cell lysis, as described in Wu et al. [24].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using Sanger sequencing platform only. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website (http://www.jgi.doe.gov). The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment. After the shotgun stage reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher [25] or transposon bombing of bridging clones (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, custom primer walk or PCR amplification (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). A total of 354 finishing reactions were produced to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. The completed genome sequences of S. viridis contains 66,210 Sanger reads, achieving an average of 12.9 sequence coverage per base, with an error rate less than 1 in 100,000.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using GeneMark [26] as part of the genome annotation pipeline in the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG-ER) system [27], followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline (http://geneprimp.jgi-psf.org) [28]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. The tRNAScanSE tool [29] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNAs were found by using the tool RNAmmer [30]. Other non coding RNAs were identified by searching the genome for the Rfam profiles using INFERNAL (v0.81) [31]. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) platform (http://img.jgi.doe.ogv/er) [32].

Metabolic network analysis

The metabolic Pathway/Genome Database (PGDB) was computationally generated using Pathway Tools software version 12.5 [33] and MetaCyc version 12.5 [34], based on annotated EC numbers and a customized enzyme name mapping file. It has undergone no subsequent manual curation and may contain errors, similar to a Tier 3 BioCyc PGDB [35].

Genome properties

The genome is 4,308,349 bp long and comprises one main circular chromosome with a 67.3% GC content (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,970 genes predicted, 3,906 were protein coding genes, and 64 RNAs; 78 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (71.2%) were assigned with a putative function, while the remaining ones were annotated as having hypothetical function. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 3. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4 and a cellular overview diagram is presented in Figure 4, followed by a summary of metabolic network statistics shown in Table 5.
Figure 3.

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Figure 4.

Cellular overview diagram. This diagram provides a schematic of all pathways of S. viridis strain P101T metabolism. Nodes represent metabolites, with shape indicating class of metabolite (see key to right). Lines represent reactions.

Table 3.

Genome Statistics

Attribute

Value

% of Total

Genome size (bp)

4,308,349

100.00%

DNA Coding region (bp)

3,805,483

88.33%

DNA G+C content (bp)

2,900,171

67.32%

Number of replicons

1

 

Extrachromosomal elements

0

 

Total genes

3,970

100%

RNA genes

64

1.61%

rRNA operons

3

 

Protein-coding genes

3,906

98.39%

Pseudo genes

78

1.96%

Genes with function prediction

2,828

71.23%

Genes in paralog clusters

534

13.45%

Genes assigned to COGs

2,709

68.24%

Genes assigned Pfam domains

2,845

71.66%

Genes with signal peptides

725

18.26%

Genes with transmembrane helices

880

22.17%

CRISPR repeats

9

 
Table 4.

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code

Value

%

Description

J

158

4.0

Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

1

0.0

RNA processing and modification

K

276

7.1

Transcription

L

125

3.2

Replication, recombination and repair

B

1

0.0

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

25

0.6

Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis

Y

0

0.0

Nuclear structure

V

44

1.1

Defense mechanisms

T

146

3.7

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

125

3.2

Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

2

0.1

Cell motility

Z

0

0.0

Cytoskeleton

W

0

0.0

Extracellular structures

U

27

0.7

Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

107

2.7

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

214

5.5

Energy production and conversion

G

214

5.5

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

293

7.5

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

85

2.2

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

175

4.5

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

189

4.8

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

146

3.7

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

139

3.6

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

389

10.0

General function prediction only

S

182

4.7

Function unknown

-

1197

30.6

Not in COGs

Table 5.

Metabolic Network Statistics

Attribute

Value

Total genes

3,970

Enzymes

880

Enzymatic reactions

1,155

Metabolic pathways

244

Metabolites

863

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Marlen Jando for growing S. viridis cultures and Susanne Schneider for DNA extraction and quality analysis (both at DSMZ). This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy’s Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-1 and SI 1352/1-1.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
DOE Joint Genome Institute
(2)
DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH
(3)
Bioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
(4)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
(5)
Biological Data Management and Technology Center, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
(6)
HZI - Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
(7)
University of California Davis Genome Center

References

  1. Nonomura H, Ohara Y. Distribution of Actinomycetes in soil. (X) New genus and species of monosporic actinomycetes. J Ferment Technol 1971; 49:895–903.Google Scholar
  2. Schuurmans DM, Olson BH, San Clemente CL. Production and isolation of thermoviridin, an antibiotic produced by Thermoactinomyces viridis n. sp. Appl Environ Microbiol 1956; 4:61–66.Google Scholar
  3. Euzéby JP. List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: a folder available on the internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:590–592. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Amner W, Edwards C, McCarthy AJ. Improved medium for recovery and enumeration of the farmer’s lung organism, Saccharomonospora viridis. Appl Environ Microbiol 1989; 55:2669–2674. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Roussel S, Reboux G, Dalphin JC, Pernet D, Laplante JJ, Millon L, Piarroux R. Farmer’s Lung Disease and Microbiological Composition of Hay: A Case Control Study. Mycopathologia 2005; 160:273–279. PubMed doi:10.1007/s11046-005-0155-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thompson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. Towards a richer description of our complete collection of genomes and metagenomes: the “Minimum Information about a Genome Sequence” (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed doi:10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 4576–4579. PubMed doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Garrity GM, Holt J. In: Garrity GM., Boone DR and Castenholz RW, eds. Taxonomic Outline of the Archaea and Bacteria. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd Ed. Vol 1 The Archaea, Deeply Branching and Phototrophic Bacteria. 2001 pp. 155–166Google Scholar
  9. Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey NL. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:479–491.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wink JM. Compendium of Actinobacteria. http://www.gbif-prokarya.de/microorganisms/-wink_pdf/DSM43017.pdf 2009.
  11. Greiner-Mai E, Korn-Wendisch F, Kutzner HJ. Taxonomic revision of the genus Saccharomonospora and description of Saccharomonospora glauca sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 38:398–405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Küster E, Locci R. Studies on peat and peat microorganisms. I. Taxonomic studies on thermophilic Actinomycetes isolated from peat. Arch Microbiol 1963; 45:188–197.Google Scholar
  13. Steger K, Jarvis Å, Vasara T, Romantschuk M, Sundh I. Effects of differing temperature management on development of Actinobacteria populations during composting. Res Microbiol 2007; 158:617–624. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2007.05.006View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Webb MD, Ewbank G, Perkins J, McCarthy AJ. Metabolism of pentachlorophenol by Saccharomonospora viridis strains isolated from mushroom compost. Soil Biol Biochem 2001; 33:1903–1914. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00115-8View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Anonymous. Biological Agents: Technical rules for biological agents www.baua.de TRBA 466.
  16. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed doi:10.1038/75556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dees PM. WCG. Microbial diversity in hot synthetic compost as revealed by PCR-amplified rRNA sequences from cultivated isolates and extracted DNA. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2001; 35:207–216. PubMed doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00805.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Venter JC, Remington K, Heidelberg J, Halpern A, Rusch D, Eisen JA, Wu D, Paulsen I, Nelson KE, Nelson W, et al. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 2004; 304:66–74. PubMed doi:10.1126/science.1093857View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:452–464. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.452View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540–552. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Syst Biol 2008; 57:758–771. PubMed doi:10.1080/10635150802429642View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Liolios K, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) in 2007: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:D475–D479. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gkm884PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fogarty WM, Collins BS, Doyle EM, Kelly CT. The high maltose-forming α-amylase of Saccharomonospora viridis: mechanisms of action. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 1993; 11:199–204.Google Scholar
  24. Wu M, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova N, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature (In press)Google Scholar
  25. Sims D, Brettin T, Detter JC, Han C, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Chen F, Lucas S, et al. Complete genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541T). SIGS 2009; 1:12–20.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:2607–2618. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/29.12.2607PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. Expert IMG ER: A system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:2271–2278. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pati A, Ivanova N, Mikhailova N, Ovchinikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: A Gene Prediction Improvement Pipeline for microbial genomes. (Submitted) 2009Google Scholar
  29. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/25.5.955PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gkm160PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Griffiths-Jones S, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Eddy SR, Bateman A. Rfam: annotating non-coding RNAs in complete genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:D121–D124. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gki081PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Markowitz VM, Szeto E, Palaniappan K, Grechkin Y, Chu K, Chen IM, Dubchak I, Anderson I, Lykidis A, Mavromatis K, et al. The Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system in 2007: data content and analysis tool extensions. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:D528–D533. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gkm846PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Karp PD, Paley SM, Romero P. The Pathway Tools Software. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:S225–S232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Caspi R, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Kaipa P, Krummenacker M, Latendresse M, Paley SM, Rhee SY, Shearer A, Tissier B et al. The MetaCyc Database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:D623–D631. PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Karp PD, Ouzounis CA, Moore-Kochlacs C, Goldovsky L, Kaipa P, Ahren D, Tsoka S, Darzentas N, Kunin V, Lopez-Bigas N. Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33:6083–6089. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gki892PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. List of growth media used at DSMZ: http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/media_list.php

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2009