Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Oscillibacter valericigenes Sjm18–20T (=NBRC 101213T)

  • Yoko Katano1,
  • Shun Fujinami1,
  • Akatsuki Kawakoshi1,
  • Hidekazu Nakazawa1,
  • Syoko Oji1,
  • Takao Iino2,
  • Akio Oguchi3,
  • Akiho Ankai3,
  • Shigehiro Fukui3,
  • Yasuyuki Terui3,
  • Sachi Kamata1,
  • Takeshi Harada1,
  • Satoshi Tanikawa1,
  • Ken-ichiro Suzuki2 and
  • Nobuyuki Fujita1Email author
Standards in Genomic Sciences20126:6030406

https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2826118

Published: 30 July 2012

Abstract

Oscillibacter valericigenes is a mesophilic, strictly anaerobic bacterium belonging to the clostridial cluster IV. Strain Sjm18–20T (=NBRC 101213T =DSM 18026T) is the type strain of the species and represents the genus Oscillibacter Iino et al. 2007. It was isolated from the alimentary canal of a Japanese corbicula clam (Corbicula japonica) collected on a seacoast in Shimane Prefecture in Japan. Phylogenetically, strain Sjm18–20T is closest to uncultured bacteria in digestive tracts, including the enriched cells thought to represent Oscillospira guilliermondii Chatton and Perard 1913. The isolated phylogenetic position and some distinct characteristics prompted us to determine the complete genome sequence. The 4,410,036 bp chromosome and the 60,586 bp plasmid were predicted to encode a total of 4,723 protein-coding genes.

Keywords

strict anaerobe mesophile valerate-producing oscillatory motility alimentary canal Japanese corbicula clam

Introduction

Strain Sjm18-20T (=NBRC 101213T =DSM 18026T) is the type strain of the species Oscillibacter valericigenes, which is the type species of the monotypic genus Oscillibacter Iino et al. 2007 [1]. The strain was isolated from the alimentary canal of a Japanese corbicula clam (Corbicula japonica) collected on a seacoast in Shimane Prefecture in Japan. The strain belongs to clostridial cluster IV, one of the 19 clusters of clostridial bacteria proposed based on 16S rRNA gene sequences [2]. Clostridial cluster IV includes phenotypically heterogeneous bacteria, most of which were isolated from digestive tracts and feces of various organisms as well as from anaerobic sewage sludge. While draft genome sequences of some species affiliated with cluster IV, including those obtained as reference sequences for human microbiome projects, have been published, complete genome sequences are thus far been limited to those of a ruminal cellulolytic bacterium Ruminococcus albus 7 [3] and an ethanologenic sludge bacterium Ethanoligenens harbinense YUAN-3, both of which are phylogenetically distant from O. valericigenes with 16S sequence similarities of 86% and 84%, respectively. In addition, the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain Sjm18-20T is distantly related to the other species within the cluster (Figure 1), with similarity values less than 91%. Instead, the 16S gene sequence is most similar to those of uncultured bacteria in digestive tracts and feces of both herbivorous and omnivorous animals. The latter include the large cells enriched from sheep rumen contents by flow cytometric sorting, which are thought to represent Oscillospira guilliermondii Chatton and Perard 1913 [5]. Although O. guilliermondii was first described nearly a century ago [6] and has attracted much attention due to its conspicuous morphology, growth in pure culture has not been achieved. In the current NCBI taxonomy database [7], the family Oscillospiraceae Peshkoff 1940 [8] is tentatively classified within the order Clostridiales to accommodate O. valericigenes and related environmental samples, although there is no type strain for the type species Oscillospira guilliermondii. Accordingly, the strain Sjm18-20T is currently the only strain in this family having a validly published name.
Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of O. valericigenes strain Sjm18-20T relative to other representative type strains within the clostridial cluster IV. The tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method [4] based on an alignment of 1,339 bp 16S rRNA gene sequences. Corresponding INSDC accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Numbers at nodes indicate support values obtained from 1,000 bootstrap replications. Type strains within the clostridial cluster III were used as the outgroup. Species for which draft assembly sequences are available are labeled with one asterisk, while species for which complete genome sequences are available are labeled with two asterisks. INSDC accession numbers for draft and complete genome sequences are as follows: A. colihominis, ABGD00000000; C. leptum, ABCB00000000; C. methylpentosum, ACEC00000000; E. harbinense, CP002400; E. siraeum, ABCA00000000; F. prausnitzii, ACOP00000000; F. plautii, AGCK00000000; O. valericigenes, AP012044; P. capillosus, AAXG00000000; R. albus, CP002403; R. bromii, FP929051; R. flavefaciens, ACOK00000000; S. variabile, ACBY00000000; C. cellulolyticum, CP001348; C. thermocellum, CP000568.

Organism information

Strain Sjm18-20T is a mesophilic, neutrophilic, strictly anaerobic bacterium with features as summarized in Table 1 [1]. Unlike other clostridial bacteria, which are typically characterized as being low G+C content, Gram-positive, endospore-forming and anaerobic, Sjm18-20T is Gram-stain negative and non-sporulating. Cells are straight to slightly curved rods with 0.4–0.6 × 2.5–6.0 µm in size. Cells are elongated after prolonged cultivation and often reach 30 µm in length. Optimum growth is observed at 30°C and pH 6.0–6.5. The strain tolerates up to 4% NaCl, but growth is also observed in the absence of NaCl.
Table 1.

Classification and general features of Oscillibacter valericigenes Sjm18-20T

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence codea

 

Current classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS [9]

 

Phylum Firmicutes

TAS [1012]

 

Class Clostridia

TAS [13,14]

 

Order Clostridiales

TAS [15,16]

 

Family Oscillospiraceae

NAS [15,17]

 

Genus Oscillibacter

TAS [18]

 

Species Oscillibacter valericigenes

TAS [1]

 

Type strain Sjm18-20

TAS [1]

 

Gram stain

negative

TAS [1]

 

Cell shape

straight or slightly curved rods

TAS [1]

 

Motility

oscillatory motility by peritrichous flagella

TAS [1]

 

Sporulation

non-sporulating

TAS [1]

 

Temperature range

15–35°C

TAS [1]

 

Optimum temperature

30°C

TAS [1]

 

Carbon source

yeast extract, polypeptone

TAS [1]

 

Energy source

heterotrophic

TAS [1]

 

Terminal electron receptor

  

MIGS-6

Habitat

alimentary canal of Japanese corbicula clam (Corbicula japonica)

TAS [1]

MIGS-6.3

Salinity

0–4% NaCl (no growth in 6%)

TAS [1]

MIGS-22

Oxygen

strictly anaerobic

TAS [1]

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

free-living

NAS

MIGS-14

Pathogenicity

none

NAS

MIGS-4

Geographic location

sea coast in Shimane Pref., Japan

TAS [1]

MIGS-5

Sample collection time

November 10, 2004

NAS

MIGS-4.1

Latitude

NAS

 

MIGS-4.2

Longitude

NAS

 

MIGS-4.3

Depth

NAS

 

MIGS-4.4

Altitude

NAS

 

a) Evidence codes - TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [19].

Cells are motile with oscillatory movements. Electron microscopic observation demonstrated the presence of peritrichous flagella [1]. In agreement with this observation, the genome encodes genes necessary for flagellar synthesis and chemotaxis, as is typical in many Gram-positive bacteria. In contrast, while some clostridial bacteria, including the pathogenic species Clostridium perfringens, are known to utilize type IV pili for their gliding motility [20], neither genes encoding the constituents of type IV pili, nor the gld motility genes of Flavobacterium johnsoniae [21], were found in the Sjm18-20T genome, suggesting that flagella are solely responsible for the oscillatory movements.

Strain Sjm18-20T grows poorly even in the medium supplemented with 0.5% each of yeast extract and polypeptone, with a generation time of 18.3 hours under optimum growth conditions [1]. From the genome sequence, strain Sjm18-20T seems to be able to synthesize most amino acids, with the exception of branched-chain amino acids. The genome encodes, however, several ABC transporters possibly involved in the uptake of branched-chain amino acids (OBV_11160-11200, OBV_36860-6900 and OBV_40040-40050).

The strain grows fermentatively and produces acids from D-glucose, L-arabinose, D-ribose and D-xylose, with n-valeric acid being the major end product from glucose [1]. Consistent with these observations, genes encoding catabolic enzymes and possible transporters for these sugars could be assigned on the genome. However, we could not identify a gene encoding the authentic form of enolase (EC 4.2.1.11), which catalyzes the penultimate step of glycolysis. Trials of genomic PCR using degenerate primers designed based on the enolase gene sequences of related clostridial bacteria also failed (data not shown). Considering the fermentative phenotype of the strain, either an alternative enolase-like enzyme or a novel metabolic pathway which directs the glycolytic flow towards the synthesis of pyruvate could be present.

Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences unequivocally placed strain Sjm18-20T within the clostridial cluster IV [1] (Figure 1). In addition, phylogenetic analysis based on protein-coding genes such as ileS, valS, gyrB and rplKLM, which were extracted from genomic sequences, consistently placed strain Sjm18-20T within the cluster IV (data not shown).

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

O. valericigenes Sjm18-20T was selected for sequencing because of its isolated phylogenetic position and characteristics which distinguish this strain from other described clostridial species. Table 2 presents the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [25].
Table 2.

Project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS-31

Finishing quality

Finished

MIGS-28

Libraries used

Three genomic libraries; two plasmid libraries with average insert sizes of 1.7kb and 4.6kb and a fosmid library with average insert size of 40 kb

MIGS-29

Sequencing platforms

ABI 3730xl

MIGS-31.2

Fold coverage

10.2 ×

MIGS-30

Assemblers

Phrap [22,23]

MIGS-32

Gene calling method

Glimmer3 [24]

 

INSDC ID

AP012044.1 (chromosome)

 

AP012045.1 (plasmid pOBV01)

 

Genbank Date of Release

Oct 1, 2011

 

NCBI project ID

41823

 

GOLD ID

Gc01995

MIGS-13

Source material identifier

NBRC 101213

 

Project relevance

biotechnology, systematics

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

O. valericigenes Sjm18-20T cells were grown in a 200 ml volume at 30°C under N2 atmosphere in GYP medium in which air had been replaced with nitrogen gas by flushing [1]. DNA was isolated from 1 g of wet cells by manual extraction after lysis with lysozyme and SDS.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of O. valericigenes Sjm18-20T was sequenced using the conventional whole-genome shotgun sequencing method. DNA shotgun libraries with average insert sizes of 1.7kb and 4.6kb were generated in pUC18 (TaKaRa), while a fosmid library with average insert size of 40 kb was constructed in pCC1FOS (EPICENTRE) as described previously [26]. A total of 37,824 clones (20,352, 12,288 and 5,184 clones from libraries with 1.7kb, 4.6 kb and 40 kb inserts, respectively) were subjected to sequencing from both ends of the inserts on ABI 3730xl DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Sequence reads were trimmed at a threshold of 20 in Phred score and assembled by using Phrap and CONSED assembly tools [22,23]. For alignment and validation of contigs, Optical Mapping (OpGen) was used. Gaps between contigs were closed by sequencing PCR products which bridge two neighboring contigs. Finally, each base of the genome was ensured to be sequenced from multiple clones either from both directions with Phrap quality score70 or from one direction with Phrap quality score 40.

Genome annotation

Complete sequences of the chromosome and the plasmid were analyzed using Glimmer3 [24] for predicting protein-coding genes, tRNAscan-SE [27] and ARAGORN [28] for tRNA genes, and RNAmmer [29] for rRNA genes. The functions of predicted protein-coding genes were assigned manually, using in-house genome annotation system OCSS (unpublished), from the comparison with Uniprot [30], Interpro [31], HAMAP [32] and KEGG [33] databases.

Genome properties

The genome of O. valericigenes Sjm18-20T consisted of a circular chromosome of 4,410,036 bp and a circular plasmid of 60,586 bp (Figure 2). The chromosome was predicted to contain 4,656 protein-coding genes, 58 tRNA genes, 9 rRNA genes and 5 other RNA genes, whereas the plasmid contained 67 predicted protein-coding genes. Of the total of 4,723 protein-coding genes predicted in the genome, 2,483 (52.6%) were assigned known functions, 1,499 (31.7%) were similar to genes with unknown function in other bacterial genomes, and 741 (15.7%) had no similarity with other genes. Average G+C contents of the chromosome and the plasmid were 53.3% and 43.3%, respectively. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Tables 34.
Figure 2.

Circular representation of the O. valericigenes Sjm18-20T chromosome and the plasmid. From outside to the center: circles 1 and 2, predicted protein coding genes on the forward and reverse strands, respectively; circle 3, tRNA genes; circle 4, rRNA operons; circle 5, G+C content; circle 6, GC skew. Predicted protein coding genes are colored according to their assigned COG functional categories (see Table 4).

Table 3.

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome

Attribute

Value

% of totala

Genome Size (bp)

4,470,622

100.0%

Coding region (bp)

3,837,687

85.8%

G+C content (bp)

2,377,733

53.2%

Number of replicons

1

 

Extrachromosomal elements

1

 

Total genes

4,795

 

RNA genes

72

 

rRNA operons

3

 

Protein-coding genes

4,723

100.0%

Pseudo genes

0

0.0%

Genes with function prediction

2,483

52.6%

Genes in paralog clusters

1,666

35.3%

Genes assigned to COGs

3,037

64.3%

Genes assigned Pfam domains

3,007

63.7%

Genes with signal peptides

1,064

22.5%

Genes with transmembrane helices

1,002

21.2%

Paralogous groups

500

% of totala

a) The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Table 4.

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code

Value

% agea

Description

J

160

3.39

Translation

A

1

0.02

RNA processing and modification

K

375

7.94

Transcription

L

419

8.87

Replication, recombination and repair

B

0

0.00

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

47

1.00

Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis

Y

0

0.00

Nuclear structure

V

92

1.95

Defense mechanisms

T

222

4.70

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

116

2.46

Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

61

1.29

Cell motility

Z

1

0.02

Cytoskeleton

W

0

0.00

Extracellular structures

U

60

1.27

Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

81

1.72

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

224

4.74

Energy production and conversion

G

150

3.18

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

284

6.01

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

77

1.63

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

103

2.18

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

79

1.67

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

125

2.65

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

34

0.72

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

370

7.83

General function prediction only

S

240

5.08

Function unknown

-

1,686

35.70

Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Similarities to O. guilliermondii

Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that O. valericigenes Sjm18-20T is closely related to the uncultivated cells thought to represent Oscillospira guilliermondii Chatton and Perard 1913 [5]. In addition, strain Sjm18-20T shares some phenotypic characteristics, including the elongated and often curved cell morphology, the oscillatory motility by means of peritrichous flagella, and the Gram-negative staining, with those described for O. guilliermondii [1]. However, while O. guilliermondii was reported to form endospores, spore formation was not detected with O. valericigenes Sjm18-20T by microscopic observations and by heat treatment for testing the presence of heat resistant bodies such as spores. In phylogenetically related bacteria such as Bacillus and Clostridium, phosphorylation of Spo0A, a master regulatory factor, is known to initiate the process of sporulation through the successive synthesis of sporulation-stage specific sigma factors. We found that the genome of strain Sjm18-20T encoded the Spo0A factor (OBV_15500) and all sporulation sigma factors known in other bacteria, i.e., sigma H (OBV_22080), sigma E (OBV_21490), sigma F (OBV_29180), sigma K (OBV_12200), and sigma G (OBV_24420), as well as other regulatory proteins related to the sigma cascade.

In contrast, genes necessary for the later stages of sporulation, i.e., the formation of cortex and spore coat, seemed either largely different or partly missing. For example, cotF, cotS and yabQ genes, widely found in the genomes of clostridial species, could not be found in the genome of strain Sjm18-20T. Strain Sjm18-20T might have the potential for sporulation, although it needs to be further investigated whether conditions exist under which this bacterium would actually sporulate.

Notes

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biological Resource Center, National Institute of Technology and Evaluation, Shibuya
(2)
Biological Resource Center, National Institute of Technology and Evaluation
(3)
Tohoku Regional Office, National Institute of Technology and Evaluation

References

  1. Iino T, Mori K, Tanaka K, Suzuki K, Harayama S. Oscillibacter valericigenes gen. nov., sp. nov., a valerate-producing anaerobic bacterium isolated from the alimentary canal of a Japanese corbicula clam. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1840–1845. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64717-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Collins MD, Lawson PA, Willems A, Cordoba JJ, Fernandez-Garayzabal J, Garcia P, Cai J, Hippe H, Farrow JAE. The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combination. Int J Syst Microbiol 1994; 44:12–816.Google Scholar
  3. Suen G, Stevenson DM, Bruce DC, Chertkov O, Copeland A, Cheng JF, Detter C, Detter JC, Goodwin LA, Han CS, et al. Complete genome of the cellulolytic ruminal bacterium Ruminococcus albus 7. J Bacteriol 2011; 193:5574–5575. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.05621-11PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining methods: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425. PubMedPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Yanagita K, Manome A, Meng XY, Hanada S, Kanagawa T, Tsuchida T, Mackie RI, Kamagata Y. Flow cytometric sorting, phologenetic analysis and in situ detection of Oscillospira guillermondii, a large, morphologically conspicuous but uncultured ruminal bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:1609–1614. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02541-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chatton E, Perard C. Schizophytes du caecum du cobaye. I. Oscillospira guilliermondi n.g., n.sp. C R Sceances Soc Biol 1913; 74:1159–1162.Google Scholar
  7. The NCBI Taxonomy Database. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy
  8. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA, eds. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-225
  9. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibbons NE, Murray RGE. Proposals Concerning the Higher Taxa of Bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1978; 28:1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-28-1-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119–169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Murray RGE. The Higher Taxa, or, a Place for Everything…? In: Holt JG (ed), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, First Edition, Volume 1, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1984, p. 31–34.Google Scholar
  13. List Editor. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. List no. 132. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:469–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.022855-0
  14. Rainey FA. Class II. Clostridia class nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009, p. 736.Google Scholar
  15. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-225View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Prévot AR. In: Hauderoy P, Ehringer G, Guillot G, Magrou. J., Prévot AR, Rosset D, Urbain A (eds), Dictionnaire des Bactéries Pathogènes, Second Edition, Masson et Cie, Paris, 1953, p. 1–692.Google Scholar
  17. Peshkoff MA. Phylogenics of new microbes Caryophanon latum and Caryophanon tenus — intermediate organisms between the Cyanophyceae and Bacteria. Zh Obshch Biol 1940; 1:597–617.Google Scholar
  18. Iino T, Mori K, Tanaka K, Suzuki K, Harayama S. Oscillibacter valericigenes gen. nov., sp. nov., a valerate-producing anaerobic bacterium isolated from the alimentary canal of a Japanese corbicula clam. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1840–1845. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64717-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Varga JJ, Nguyen V, O’Brien DK, Rodgers K, Walker RA, Melville SB. Type IV pili-dependent gliding motility in the Gram-positive pathogen Clostridium perfringens and other Clostridia. Mol Microbiol 2006; 62:680–694. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1113652958.2006.05414.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. McBride MJ, Xie G, Martens EC, Lapidus A, Henrissat B, Rhodes RG, Goltsman E, Wang W, Xu J, Hunnicutt DW, et al. Novel features of the polysaccharide-digesting gliding bacterium Flavobacterium johnsoniae as revealed by genome sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009; 75:6864–6875. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01495-09PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 1998; 8:175–185. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ewing B, Green P. Basecalling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 1998; 8:186–194. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:673–679. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Takarada H, Sekine M, Kosugi H, Matsuo Y, Fujisawa T, Omata S, Kishi E, Shimizu A, Tsukatani N, Tanikawa S, et al. Complete genome sequence of the soil actinomycete Kocuria rhizophila. J Bacteriol 2008; 190:4139–4146. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.01853-07PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964. PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Laslett D, Canback B. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:11–16. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh152PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm160PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. UniProt Consortium. The universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:D190–D195. PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Mulder NJ, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, Bork P, Buillard V, Cerutti L, Copley R, et al. New developments in the InterPro database. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:D224–D228. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl841PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lima T, Auchincloss AH, Coudert E, Keller G, Michoud K, Rivoire C, Bulliard V, de Castro E, Lachaize C, Baratin D, et al. HAMAP: a database of completely sequenced microbial proteome sets and manually curated microbial protein families in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:D471–D478. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn661PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, Hattori M, Hirakawa M, Itoh M, Katayama T, Kawashima S, Okuda S, Tokimatsu T, Yamanishi Y. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 36:D480–D484. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm882PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2012