Open Access

Genome sequence and description of Timonella senegalensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the suborder Micrococcinae

  • Ajay Kumar Mishra1,
  • Jean-Christophe Lagier1,
  • Catherine Robert1,
  • Didier Raoult1 and
  • Pierre-Edouard Fournier1Email author
Standards in Genomic Sciences20138:8020318

https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3476977

Published: 15 June 2013

Abstract

Timonella senegalensis strain JC301T gen. nov., sp. nov. is the type strain of T. senegalensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new species within the newly proposed genus Timonella. This bacterial strain was isolated from the fecal flora of a healthy Senegalese patient. In this report, we detail the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. Timonella senegalensis strain JC301T exhibits the highest 16S rRNA similarity (95%) with Sanguibacter marinus, the closest validly published bacterial species. The genome of T. senegalensis strain JC301T is 3,010,102-bp long, with one chromosome and no plasmid. The genome contains 2,721 protein-coding genes and 72 RNA genes, including 5 rRNA genes. The genomic annotation revealed that T. senegalensis strain JC301T possesses the complete complement of enzymes necessary for the de novo biosynthesis of amino acids and vitamins (except for riboflavin and biotin), as well as the enzymes involved in the metabolism of various carbon sources, chaperone genes, and genes involved in the regulation of polyphosphate and glycogen levels.

Keywords

Timonella senegalensis genomeculturomicstaxono-genomics

Introduction

Timonella senegalensis strain JC301T (= CSUR P167 = DSMZ 25696) is the type strain of T. senegalensis gen. nov., sp. nov. This bacterium is a Gram-positive, facultatively anaerobic, flagellated, indole-positive bacillus that was isolated from the feces of a healthy Senegalese patient in a study aiming at cultivating all bacterial species in human feces [1].

The current classification of prokaryotes, known as polyphasic taxonomy, relies on a combination of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics [2]. However, as more than 4,000 bacterial genomes have been sequenced [3] and the cost of genomic sequencing is decreasing, we recently proposed to integrate genomic information in the description of new bacterial species [422].

Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for T. senegalensis gen. nov., sp. nov. strain JC301T (= CSUR P167 = DSMZ 25696) together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation. These characteristics support the circumscription of a novel genus, Timonella gen. nov. within the suborder Micrococcineae, with Timonella senegalensis gen. nov., sp. nov. as the type species.

The suborder Micrococcineae was created in 1997 [23] and currently comprises eighteen different families that mostly includes Gram-positive bacteria. Members of the suborder Micrococcineae are usually present in soil, water, terrestrial, marine environments, humans and animal intestinal microbiota.

Classification and features

A stool sample was collected from a healthy 16-year-old male Senegalese volunteer patient living in Dielmo (rural village in the Guinean-Sudanian zone in Senegal), who was included in a research protocol. Written assent was obtained from this individual. No written consent was needed from his guardians for this study because he was older than 15 years old (in accordance with the previous project approved by the Ministry of Health of Senegal and the assembled village population and as published elsewhere [24]).

Both this study and the assent procedure were approved by the National Ethics Committee of Senegal (CNERS) and the Ethics Committee of the Institut Fédératif de Recherche IFR48, Faculty of Medicine, Marseille, France (agreement numbers 09-022 and 11-017). Several other new bacterial species were isolated from this specimen using various culture conditions, including the recently described Aeromicrobium massiliense sp. nov., Alistipes senegalensis sp. nov., Alistipes timonensis sp. nov., Anaerococcus senegalensis sp. nov., Brevibacterium senegalense sp. nov., Cellulomonas massiliensis sp. nov., Clostridium senegalense sp. nov., Enterobacter massiliensis sp. nov., Herbaspirillum massiliense sp. nov., Kurthia massiliensis sp. nov., Paenibacillus senegalensis sp. nov., Peptoniphilus timonensis sp. nov., and Senegalemassilia anaerobia gen. nov., sp. nov. [516, 18,19].

The fecal specimen was preserved at −80°C after collection and sent to Marseille. Strain JC 301T was isolated in June 2011 by cultivation on 5% sheep blood agar under anaerobic conditions at 37°C, after a 14-day preincubation in a blood culture bottle with sterile rumen sheep fluid. In the inferred phylogenetic tree (Figure 1), strain JC301T fell into a large cluster containing the genera Cellulomonas, Oerskovia and Sanguibacter. In this cluster, strain JC301T formed a distinct lineage. The 16S rRNA gene sequence identity between JC301T and the type strains of related species (Cellulomonas, Oerskovia and Sanguibacter) of suborder Micrococcineae ranged from 92 to 95%. These values were lower than the threshold recommended by Schloss and Handelsman [25] to delineate a new genus without carrying out DNA-DNA hybridization, thus suggesting that strain JC301T represents a novel genus. Based on the 16S rRNA phylogenetic evidence described above, we conclude that JC301T represents a novel genus and species within the suborder Micrococcineae of the phylum Actinobacteria (see Table 1).
Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Timonella senegalensis strain JC301T relative to several type species of suborder Micrococcineae. Genbank accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Sequences were aligned using ClustalW, and phylogenetic inferences obtained using the maximum-likelihood method within the MEGA software package. Numbers at the nodes are bootstrap values obtained by repeating 500 times the analysis to generate a majority consensus tree. Cellulosimicrobium cellulans was used as an outgroup. The scale bar represents a 2% nucleotide sequence divergence.

Table 1.

Classification and general features of Timonella senegalensis strain JC301T according to the MIGS recommendations [26]

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence codea

 

Current classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS [27]

 

Phylum Actinobacteria

TAS [28]

 

Class Actinobacteria

TAS [23]

 

Order Actinomycetales

TAS [23,2931]

 

Family Sanguibacteraceae

TAS [32]

 

Genus Timonella

IDA

 

Species Timonella senegalensis

IDA

 

Type strain JC301T

IDA

 

Gram stain

positive

IDA

 

Cell shape

short, irregular rods

IDA

 

Motility

motile

IDA

 

Sporulation

nonsporulating

IDA

 

Temperature range

mesophile

IDA

 

Optimum temperature

37°C

IDA

MIGS-6.3

Salinity

growth in BHI medium + 1% NaCl

IDA

MIGS-22

Oxygen requirement

primarily aerobic, facultatively anaerobic

IDA

 

Carbon source

broad variety of sugars

IDA

 

Energy source

carbohydrates

IDA

MIGS-6

Habitat

human gut

IDA

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

free living

IDA

 

Pathogenicity

unknown

 
 

Biosafety level

2

 

MIGS-14

Isolation

human feces

 

MIGS-4

Geographic location

Senegal

IDA

MIGS-5

Sample collection time

September 2010

IDA

MIGS-4.1

Latitude

13.7167

IDA

MIGS-4.1

Longitude

−16.4167

IDA

MIGS-4.3

Depth

surface

IDA

MIGS-4.4

Altitude

51 m above sea level

IDA

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [33]. If the evidence is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Different growth temperatures (25, 30, 37, 45°C) were tested; growth occurred between 30 and 37°C, and optimal growth was observed at 37°C. Colonies were 1 mm in diameter on blood-enriched Columbia agar and Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar. Growth of the strain was tested in 5% sheep blood agar (BioMérieux), under anaerobic and microaerophilic conditions using GENbag anaer and GENbag microaer systems, respectively (BioMerieux), and under aerobic conditions, with or without 5% CO2. The strain grew optimally under aerobic conditions, however, weak growth was observed in microaerophilic and anaerobic atmospheres. Therefore, we concluded that strain JC301T is a primarily aerobic, facultative anaerobic bacterium. The bacterial cells were Gram-positive, non-endospore-forming, short, irregular, motile rods (Figure 2), and had a mean diameter of 0.59 µm as determined using electron microscopy (Figure 3).
Figure 2.

Gram staining of T. senegalensis strain JC301T

Figure 3.

Transmission electron microscopy of T. senegalensis strain JC301T, using a Morgani 268D (Philips) at an operating voltage of 60kV. The scale bar represents 900 nm

Strain JC301T exhibited catalase but no oxidase activity. Using an API Rapid ID 32A system, positive reactions were obtained for urease, arginine dihydrolase, indole production, β-glucuronidase, mannose fermentation, alkaline phosphatase, arginine arylamidase, leucyl glycine arylamidase and histidine arylamidase. A weak positive reaction was obtained for pyroglutamyl arylamidase. Using API 50 CH assays, positive reactions were obtained for L-arabinose, D-galactose, D-glucose, D-maltose, D-saccharose, gentiobiose, arbutin, aesculin hydrolysis, and salicin. Nitrate reduction ability and β-galactosidase activities were found by using the API 20 NE kit. T. senegalensis strain JC301T was susceptible to amoxicillin, imipenem, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin but resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and metronidazole. When compared with representative species from the suborder Micrococcineae, T. senegalensis gen. nov., sp. nov. strain JC301T exhibited the phenotypic differences detailed in Table 2.
Table 2.

Differential characteristics of Timonella senegalensis gen. nov., sp. nov., strain JC301T, Cellulomonas fimi strain ATCC484, Oerskovia turbata strain ATCC 25835 and Sanguibacter keddieii strain ST-74T

Properties

T. senegalensis

C. fimi

O. turbata

S. keddieii

Cell diameter (µm)

0.59

0.9–3.3

1.1

0.82

Oxygen requirement

facultatively anaerobic

aerobic

facultatively anaerobic

facultatively anaerobic

Colony color

white

yellow-white

yellow

yellow

Gram stain

+

+

+

+

Salt requirement

+

+

na

Motility

+

+

+

Cell Wall (major constituents)

alanine, glutamic acid and glucosamine

rhamnose, mannose, fucose and glucosamine

alanine, glutamic acid, glucosamine, muramic acid, galactose, lysine

alanine, glutamic acid, rhamnose and glucosamine

Endospore formation

Production of

    

Phosphatase

+

na

na

Catalase

+

+

+

na

Oxidase

na

na

Nitrate reductase

+

+

Urease

na

β-galactosidase

+

+

+

N-acetyl-glucosamine

+

+

+

Acid from

    

Inositol

+

Mannitol

Melibiose

+

Raffinose

+

Rhamnose

+

+

Sorbitol

na

+

+

Utilization of

    

L-arabinose

+

+

+

D-ribose

+

+

D-glucose

+

+

+

+

D-fructose

+

+

D-mannose

+

+

+

D-maltose

+

+

+

+

D-lactose

+

+

Esculin

+

+

Habitat

human gut

soil

soil, decaying plant materials and clinical specimens

blood of healthy cow

na= data not available

Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS protein analysis was carried out as previously described [34]. Briefly, a pipette tip was used to pick one isolated bacterial colony from a culture agar plate and spread it as a thin film on a MTP 384 MALDI-TOF target plate (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). Twelve distinct deposits from twelve isolated colonies were performed for strain JC301T. Each smear was overlaid with 2 µl of matrix solution (a saturated solution of alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid) in 50% acetonitrile, 2.5% trifluoracetic acid and allowed to dry for 5 minutes. Next, measurements were taken with a Microflex spectrometer (Bruker). The spectra were recorded using a positive linear mode for the mass range of 2,000 to 20,000 Da (parameter settings: ion source 1 (ISI), 20kV; IS2, 18.5 kV; lens, 7 kV). A spectrum was obtained after 675 shots with variable laser power. The time of acquisition was between 30 seconds and 1 minute per spot. The twelve JC301T spectra were imported into the MALDI Bio Typer software (version 2.0, Bruker) and analyzed via standard pattern matching (with default parameter settings) against the main spectra of 2,843 bacteria, including spectra from six validly published species of Sanguibacter, twenty-three validly published species of Cellulomonas and five validly published species of Oerskovia which were used as reference data. The method of identification included the m/z from 3,000 to 15,000 Da. For every spectrum, a maximum of 100 peaks at most were compared with the spectra in database. The resulting score enabled the identification of tested species: a score ≥ 2 with a validly publsihed species enabled identification at the species level, a score ≥ 1.7 but < 2 enabled identification at the genus level, and a score < 1.7 did not enable any identification. No significant MALDI-TOF score was obtained for strain JC301T against the Bruker database, suggesting that our isolate was not a member of a known genus (Figures 4 and 5). We added the spectrum from strain JC301 T to our database.
Figure 4.

Reference mass spectrum from T. senegalensis strain JC301T. Spectra from 12 individual colonies were compared and a reference spectrum was generated.

Figure 5.

Gel view comparing T. senegalensis strain JC301T. The gel view displays the raw spectra of loaded spectrum files arranged in a pseudo-gel like look. The x-axis records the m/z value. The left y-axis displays the running spectrum number originating from subsequent spectra loading. The peak intensity is expressed by a Gray scale scheme code. The color bar and the right y-axis indicate the relation between the color a peak is displayed with and the peak intensity in arbitrary units. Displayed species are indicated on the left.

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position and 16S rRNA similarity to other members of the suborder Micrococcineae, and is part of a “culturomics” study of the human digestive flora aiming at isolating all bacterial species within human feces. It was first genome of Timonella senegalensis gen. nov., sp. nov. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 3. The Genbank accession number is CAHH00000000 and consists of 78 contigs. Table 3 shows the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [35].
Table 3.

Project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS-31

Finishing quality

High-quality draft

MIGS-28

Libraries used

Shot Gun, Paired-end 3 Kb library

MIGS-29

Sequencing platforms

454 GS FLX Titanium

MIGS-31.2

Fold coverage

22.05x

MIGS-30

Assemblers

Newbler version 2.5.3

MIGS-32

Gene calling method

Prodigal

 

INSDC ID

PRJEA82329

 

Genbank ID

CAHH00000000

 

Genbank Date of Release

June 1, 2012

MIGS-13

Project relevance

Study of the human gut microbiome

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

T. senegalensis sp. gen. nov. strain JC301T (= CSUR P167 = DSMZ 25696) was grown aerobically on 5% sheep blood-enriched BHI agar at 37°C. The growth from four Petri dishes was collected and resuspended in 4×500 µl of TE buffer and stored at −20°C. Then, 500 µl of this suspension was thawed, centrifuged for 3 minutes at 10,000 rpm and resuspended in 4×100 µL of G2 buffer (EZ1 DNA Tissue Kit, Qiagen). An initial mechanical lysis was performed with glass powder and the Fastprep-24 device (Sample Preparation System, MP Biomedicals, USA) using two 20-seconds cycles. DNA was then treated with 2.5 µg/µL lysozyme for 30 minutes at 37°C and extracted using the BioRobot EZ1 Advanced XL (Qiagen). The DNA was then concentrated and purified using a QIAmp Kit (Qiagen). The yield and the concentration were measured at 754 ng/µL using the Quant-it Picogreen Kit (Invitrogen) on the Genios Tecan fluorometer.

Genome sequencing and assembly

DNA (5 µg) was mechanically fragmented with a Hydroshear device (Digilab, Holliston, MA, USA) with an enrichment size of 3–4 kb. The DNA fragmentation was visualized using the Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer on a DNA Labchip 7500 with an optimal size of 3.3 kb. The library was constructed using the 454 GS FLX Titanium paired-end protocol. Circularization and nebulization were performed and generated a pattern with an optimal size of 544 bp. After PCR amplification for 15 cycles and double size selection, the single-stranded paired-end library was then quantified using a Quant-it Ribogreen Kit (Invitrogen) using the Genios Tecan fluorometer. The library concentration equivalence was calculated as1.99× 109 molecules/µL. The library was stored at −20°C until further use.

The shotgun library was clonally amplified with 0.5 cpb and the paired-end library was amplified with 1 cpb in four emPCR reactions using the GS Titanium SV emPCR Kit (Lib-L) v2 (Roche). The yields of the emPCR were 16.25% for the shotgun library and 15.92% for the paired-end library. These yields fall into the expected 5 to 20% range as per the Roche protocol.

Approximately 790,000 beads for a quarter region and 340,000 beads for an eighth region were loaded on the GS Titanium PicoTiterPlate PTP Kit 70×75 and sequenced with the GS FLX Titanium Sequencing Kit XLR70 (Roche). The run was performed overnight and then analyzed on a cluster using the gsRunBrowser and Newbler assembler (Roche). For the shotgun sequencing, 794,539 passed-filter wells were obtained. The sequencing generated 77.43 Mb with an average length of 190 bp. The passed-filter sequences were assembled using Newbler with 90% identity and 40 bp as overlap. The final assembly identified 78 contigs (between 1,468 bp and 199,104 bp) generated a genome size of 3.0 Mb, which corresponds to coverage of 22.05 genome equivalents.

Genome annotation

Open Reading Frames (ORFs) were predicted using Prodigal [36] with default parameters but the predicted ORFs were excluded if they were spanning a sequencing gap region. The predicted bacterial protein sequences were searched against the GenBank database [37] and the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) databases using BLASTP. The tRNAScanSE tool [38] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNAs were found by using RNAmmer [39] and BLASTn against the GenBank database. Signal peptides and numbers of transmembrane helices were predicted using SignalP [40] and TMHMM [41] respectively. ORFans were identified if their BLASTP E-value was lower than 1e-03 for alignment length greater than 80 amino acids. If alignment lengths were smaller than 80 amino acids, we used an E-value of 1e-05. Such parameter thresholds have already been used in previous works to define ORFans. To estimate the mean level of nucleotide sequence similarity at the genome level between T. senegalensis strain JC301T, Sanguibacter keddieii strain ST-74T (GenBank accession number CP001819) and Cellulomonas fimi strain ATCC 484 (GenBank accession number CP002666), we identified orthologous proteins using the Proteinortho software (version 1.4) and the following criteria: 30% amino acid identity and a E-value of 1e-05. The average percentages of nucleotide sequence identity between corresponding orthologous sets were then determined using the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm global alignment technique. Artemis [42] was used for data management and DNA Plotter [43] was used for visualization of genomic features. Mauve alignment tool was used for multiple genomic sequence alignment and visualization [44].

Genome properties

The genome of T. senegalensis sp. gen. nov. strain JC301T is 3,010,102 bp long (1 chromosome, but no plasmid) with a 61.40% G+C content (Figure 6 and Table 4). Of the 2,793 predicted genes, 2,721 were protein-coding genes and 72 were RNAs. Six rRNA genes (two 16S rRNA, two 23S rRNA and two 5S rRNA) and 66 predicted tRNA genes were identified in the genome. A total of 1,949 genes (69.78%) were assigned a putative function. ORFans accounted for 285 (10.4%) of the genes. The remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 5. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Tables 4 and 5.
Figure 6.

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From the outside in, the outer two circles show open reading frames oriented in the forward (colored by COG categories) and reverse (colored by COG categories) direction, respectively. The third circle marks the rRNA gene operon (red) and tRNA genes (green). The fourth circle shows the G+C% content plot. The inner-most circle shows GC skew, purple indicating negative values whereas olive for positive values.

Table 4.

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome

Attribute

Value

% of totala

Genome size (bp)

3,010,102

 

DNA coding region (bp)

2,656,410

88.24

DNA G+C content (bp)

1,848,203

61.40

Number of replicons

1

 

Extrachromosomal elements

0

 

Total genes

2,793

100

RNA genes

72

2.58

rRNA operons

2

 

Protein-coding genes

2,721

97.42

Genes with function prediction

2,291

82.02

Genes assigned to COGs

1,949

69.78

Genes with peptide signals

153

5.48

Genes with transmembrane helices

659

23.60

CRISPR repeats

0

 

aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Table 5.

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code

Value

%agea

Description

J

149

5.47

Translation

A

1

0.03

RNA processing and modification

K

210

7.71

Transcription

L

122

4.48

Replication, recombination and repair

B

1

0.03

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

18

0.66

Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis

Y

0

0

Nuclear structure

V

41

1.50

Defense mechanisms

T

90

3.30

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

102

3.75

Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

35

1.28

Cell motility

Z

0

0

Cytoskeleton

W

0

0

Extracellular structures

U

40

1.47

Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

85

3.12

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

133

4.88

Energy production and conversion

G

249

9.15

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

204

7.49

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

68

2.50

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

75

2.75

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

64

2.35

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

140

5.14

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

37

1.36

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

275

10.11

General function prediction only

S

152

5.58

Function unknown

-

772

28.37

Not in COGs

a The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Genome comparison with Sanguibacter keddieii and Cellulomonas flavigena

We compared the genome of T. senegalensis strain JC301T with those of Sanguibacter keddieii strain ST-74T (GenBank accession number CP001819) [45] and Cellulomonas fimi strain ATCC 484 T (GenBank accession number CP002666). The T. senegalensis genome is smaller in size than those of S. keddieii and C. fimi (3.0, 4.5 and 4.2 Mb, respectively). The G+C content of T. senegalensis is lower than that of S. keddieii and C. fimi (61.40%, 71.90% and 74.72%, respectively). The gene content of T. senegalensis is also lower than S. keddieii and C. fimi (2,793, 3,800 and 3,875 genes, respectively). Moreover, T. senegalensis presented a lower ratio of genes per Mb than S. keddieii and C. fimi (917, 931 and 922, respectively) and a comparable number of genes assigned to COGs (69.78%, 71.29% and 76.03%, respectively). However, the distribution of genes into COG categories (Figure 7) is not entirely similar in the three compared genomes. T. senegalensis sp. nov. exhibited a lower average genomic nucleotide sequence identity with S. keddiei (71.95%) and C. fimi (70.24%) than that observed between S. keddiei and C. fimi (76.94%). Table 6 summarizes the numbers of orthologous genes and the average percentage of nucleotide sequence identity between the different genomes studied.
Figure 7.

Distribution of functional classes of the predicted genes in the T. senegalensis strain JC301T (colored in red), S. keddieii strain ST-74T (colored in blue) and C. fimi strain ATCC 484 (colored in green) chromosomes according to the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins.

Table 6.

Numbers of orthologous protein shared between genomes (upper right triangle), average percentage similarity of nucleotides corresponding to orthologous protein shared between genomes (lower left triangle) and the numbers of proteins per genome (bold).

 

Timonella senegalensis

Sanguibacter keddieii

Cellulomonas fimi

Timonella senegalensis

2,721

1,368

1,410

Sanguibacter keddieii

71.95

3,710

1,632

Cellulomonas fimi

70.24

76.94

3,762

Carbohydrate metabolism

Experimentally, T. senegalensis strain JC301T was able to grow under aerobic conditions and to utilize a variety of carbon substrates. Genome annotation clearly confirmed that this strain was able to use these carbon sources and to catabolize them via different pathways (glycolysis, pentose phosphate, TCA cycles and Entner-Doudoroff pathways). Strain JC301T could effectively catabolize a variety of carbon substrates, such as D-fructose, L-arabinose, ribose, D-raffinose, xylose, D-galacturonate and D-glucuronate. Glycogen is a major intracellular carbon source reserve polymer. It is accumulated under conditions of limiting growth when an excess of carbon is available and other nutrients are deficient [46]. In strain JC301T, both the genes encoding the proteins required for glycogen biosynthesis and glycogen degradation are present, suggesting that it can survive for a longer period under carbohydrate starvation conditions. A variety of enzymes are present, including those required for gluconeogenesis and fermentation to lactate and acetate, as well as production of butyrate from branched amino acids. Acetyl-CoA can be used for anabolic purposes (fatty acid synthesis) or converted to acetate and butyrate. All four genes that encode enzymes for butyrate fermentation are found in the genome, including acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, 3-hydroxybutyryl-CoA dehydrogenase, crotonase, and butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase.

Fatty acid biosynthesis and oxidation

T. senegalensis strain JC301T uses the non-mevalonate pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis. All genes necessary for fatty acid and phospholipid biosynthesis are present. The strain also possesses the genes necessary for fatty acid biosynthesis initiation, keto group reduction, dehydration, and enoyl reduction. A cardiolipin synthetase gene is predicted in the JC301T genome. This enzyme is found almost exclusively in certain bacterial membranes (plasma membrane and hydrogenosomes) and functions to generate an electrochemical potential for substrate transport and ATP synthesis [47]. In addition, the strain has genes of the fatty acid beta-oxidation system, suggesting that it can use fatty acids as carbon sources.

Nucleotide metabolism

All genes required for de novo inosine monophosphate synthesis appear to be present in the T. senegalensis genome. Genes for uracil monophosphate synthesis are also organized in an operon interrupted by a conserved hypothetical ORF. The ORFs that encode the enzymes of uracil monophosphate (UMP) biosynthesis are closely related to the Gram-positive S. keddieii. Nucleoside monophosphate kinases for all types of nucleotides are present. Deoxyribonucleotides can be synthesized under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions by ribonucleoside-diphosphate and ribonucleoside-triphosphate reductases. Enzymes necessary for the purine and pyrimidine salvage pathway are also present. The purine salvage enzymes and uracil phosphoribosyltransferase are highly homologous to the corresponding enzymes of Gram-positive bacteria. Thymidine monophosphate is formed by thymidylate synthase from dUMP, providing the only interconversion pathway between pyrimidine nucleotides. In addition, there are four genes from the xanthine/uracil permease family of proteins involved in the transport of free bases. Thus, T. senegalensis can use exogenous bases and nucleosides. The pst operon encodes a phosphate-binding periplasmic protein, transport protein PstC, and a permease protein (PstA). All genes for phosphate lyase or other phosphonate degradation enzymes are present, suggesting that phosphates can be transported and further used.

Respiration and proton transfer

All key proteins and protein complexes known to be important in aerobic complexes are present in the genome of T. senegalensis, including genes responsible for the synthesis of terminal cytochrome or quinol oxidases or complexes I, II, and III of the aerobic respiratory chain and ORFs for the synthesis of quinones or menaquinones. Two genes required for anaerobic respiration, arsenate reductase and ferredoxin reductase are present in the genome. Several proteins contributing to the proton gradient, including a proton:sodium-glutamate symporter, a sodium:proton antiporter, a V-type H+-translocating ATP synthase (EC 3.6.1.34), and a Na+-transporting ATP synthase (EC 3.6.3.15) are present in the genome.

Transcription and translation

The T. senegalensis components of the transcriptional apparatus, consisting of the genes encoding the αββ′β″ and ω subunits of RNA polymerase (RNAP), are similar to those of a Gram-positive polymerase. For transcription termination, one gene encodes a Rho factor similar to that of S. keddieii. In addition, homologs of NusA and NusB are also present. All the typical prokaryotic translation initiation factors, IF-1, IF-2, and IF-3, are present. Two ORFs for the elongation factor EF-G as well as EF-Tu, EF-Ts, and EF-p (elongation factor for peptide bond synthesis) genes are also present. T. senegalensis encodes three peptide chain release factors, RF-1, RF-2 and RF-3. Large and small ribosomal subunit proteins for the assembly of the ribosome are present in the genome. Modifying proteins such as ribosomal protein alanine acetyltransferase and large ribosomal subunit pseudouridine synthase subunits A, B, and D are present. Sixty-four ORFs code for tRNAs for all 20 amino acids. All types of tRNA ligases are present in the genome.

Transporter system

Approximately 5% of the ORFs in the genome are dedicated to transport of a variety of compounds by primary and secondary transport systems. These transporters are energized by ATP, sodium, or proton gradients. There are 40 complete ABC transporter operons. The predominant substrates for ABC transporters appear to be oligopeptides and iron compounds. In contrast, there are three ABC transporters for amino acids. There are ABC transporters for other metal ions such as cobalt, nickel, manganese, zinc, and copper. The transmembrane sodium gradient appears to be as important for transport as the proton gradient. Most of the amino acid transporters are sodium-dependent. There are two potassium uptake systems: one is a sodium symporter, and the other is a proton symporter. Eight predicted sodium:proton antiporters are present in the genome. T. senegalensis uses these antiporters to balance ion gradients and to adjust to the pH changes in the gut environment. There are transporters for all of the essential ions and all the L-amino acids.

Adaptability to human gut

Strain JC301T was isolated from the human gut, suggesting that it can use substrates present in the colon. Accordingly, the complete pathway for gluconic acid degradation, including gluconate kinase and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase was identified, in agreement with gluconate utilization.

The presence of stress-induced genes reflect the ability to cope with digestive (acid and bile) stresses. Regulation of intracellular pH is crucial for survival. Genome analysis of strain JC301T revealed a complete atpBEFHAGDC operon, which is induced by acid and bile salts [48]. These stimuli also induce pyruvate-flavodoxin oxidoreductase and succinate dehydrogenase, involved in electron transport and ATP synthesis, as well as glutamate decarboxylase and aspartate ammonia-lyase, which regulates the homeostasis of intracellular pH [49]. Proteins involved in protection and repair of DNA are crucial for survival. Genome analysis demonstrated the presence of members of the SOS response including lexA, recA and uvrABC in T. senegalensis and S. keddieii. Moreover, the helix-destabilizing single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB), involved in DNA recombination and repair [50], as well as Dps (DNA-binding proteins from starved cells), which protects DNA against oxidative stress [51], are present in the genome. This reflects the ability to modulate envelope properties. In addition, strain JC301T possesses an arsenal of genes for disulfide-reduction and elimination of reactive oxygen species, required for survival and activity within the gut against oxidative stress induced by bile. The occurrence of a sodium/bile acid symporter also reflects adaptation to the gut environment [52]. Moreover, genes encoding multidrug resistance transporters are present in T. senegalensis and S. keddieii, indicating an ability to cope with toxic compounds. The presence of two genes encoding heavy metal translocating P-type ATPases further suggests an adaptation to toxic environments. Thus, the genome content suggests T. senegalensis has significant environmental adaptation ability. Further genome analysis revealed the presence of several genes required for the inducibility of the different aspects of the chaperone and protease machinery. This suggests an ability to efficiently and rapidly adapt to stressful environments, such as would be found in a human host.

Conclusion

Description of Timonella gen. nov.

Timonella (Ti.mon.el′la N.L. fem. N. Timonella, from Timone, the name of the hospital in Marseille where strain JC301T was first cultivated).

Gram-positive rods. Facultatively anaerobic. Mesophilic. Motile. catalase-positive. Absent oxidase. Positive for urease, arginine dihydrolase, indole production, β-glucuronidase, mannose fermentation, alkaline phosphatase alcaline, arginine arylamidase, leucyl glycine arylamidase and histidine arylamidase. Habitat: human digestive tract. Type species: Timonella senegalensis.

Description of Timonella senegalensis gen. nov., sp. nov.

Timonella senegalensis (se.ne.gal.e′n.sis. L. gen. masc. n. senegalensis, pertaining to Senegal, the country from which the patient came).

Gram-positive, catalase-positive, oxidase-negative and facultatively anaerobic. Cells are irregular, non-endospore forming, short, irregular motile rods with a mean diameter of 0.59 µm. Colonies are white, circular and convex with entire edges on 5% sheep blood agar in aerobic atmosphere at 37°C. Diffusible pigments are not produced. Optimal growth occurs under aerobic conditions. Grows at 30–37 °C (optimum 37 °C). Cells are positive for urease, arginine dihydrolase, indole production, β-glucuronidase, mannose fermentation, alkaline phosphatase alcaline, arginine arylamidase, leucyl glycine arylamidase and histidine arylamidase (API50CH). Cells have nitrate reduction ability and β-galactosidase activity (API 20 NE kit). Positive reactions for L-arabinose, D-galactose, D-glucose, D-maltose, D-saccharose, gentiobiose, arbutine, esculine, salicine (API 50 CH). A weak reaction was obtained for pyroglutamyl arylamidase. Susceptible to amoxicillin, imipenem, ciprofloxacin and gentamicin but resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and metronidazole. The potential pathogenesis of the type strain JC301T is unknown.

The type strain is JC301T (= CSUR P167 = DSMZ 25696) was isolated from the fecal flora of a healthy patient from Dielmo (a rural village in the Guinean-Sudanian zone in Senegal). The genomic DNA G+C content of the type strain is 61.4 mol%. The 16S rRNA gene sequences were deposited in GenBank with the accession number JN657220. The whole-genome shotgun sequence of T. senegalensis strain JC301T has been deposited in GenBank/DDBJ/EMBL under accession number CAHH00000000.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Xegen Company (www.xegen.fr) for automating the genomic annotation process. This study was funded by the Mediterranee Infection Foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
URMITE, Faculté de médecine, Aix-Marseille Université

References

  1. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Million M, Hugon P, Pagnier I, Robert C, Bittar F, Fournous G, Gimenez G, Maraninchi M, et al. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18:1185–1193. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Tindall BJ, Rossello-Mora R, Busse HJ, Ludwig W, Kampfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. [PubMed]. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:249–266. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.016949-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Genome Online Database. http://www.genomesonline.org/cgi-bin/GOLD/index.cgi
  4. Kokcha S, Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Million M, Leroy Q, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:346–355. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2776064PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lagier JC, El Karkouri K, Nguyen TT, Armougom F, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Anaerococcus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:116–125. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2415480PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mishra AK, Gimenez G, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:304–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2625821View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Mishra AK, Ngyuen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:315–324. PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Clostridium senegalense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:386–395. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:1–11. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2956294PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Rivet R, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Paenibacillus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:70–81. PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lagier JC, Gimenez G, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Herbaspirillum massiliense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:200–209. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Roux V, El Karkouri K, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Kurthia massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:221–232. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3206554PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kokcha S, Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Brevibacterium senegalense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:233–245. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3256677PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ramasamy D, Kokcha S, Lagier JC, N’Guyen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Aeromicrobium massilense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:246–257. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3306717PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lagier JC, Ramasamy D, Rivet R, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Cellulomonas massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:258–270. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3316719PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lagier JC, El Karkouri K, Rivet R, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Senegalemassilia anaerobia sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:343–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3246665PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mishra AK, Hugon P, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Robert C, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus obesi sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:357–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.32766871PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:370–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3366764PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lagier JC, El Karkouri K, Mishra AK, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Enterobacter massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:399–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3396830PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hugon P, Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Rivet R, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes obesi sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:427–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3336746PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mishra AK, Hugon P, Robert C, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus grossensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:320–330. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hugon P, Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Brevibacillus massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3466975PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey NL. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:479–491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-47-2-479View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Trape JF, Tall A, Diagne N, Ndiath O, Ly AB, Faye J, Dieye-Ba F, Roucher C, Bouganali C, Badiane A, et al. Malaria morbidity and pyrethroid resistance after the introduction of insecticide-treated bednets and artemisinin-based combination therapies: a longitudinal study. Lancet Infect Dis 2011; 11:925–932. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70194-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Schloss PD, Handelsman J. Status of the microbial census. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2004; 68:686–691. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.68.4.686-691.2004PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119–169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-225View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Buchanan RE. Studies in the nomenclature and classification of bacteria. II. The primary subdivisions of the Schizomycetes. J Bacteriol 1917; 2:155–164. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhi XY, Li WJ, Stackebrandt E. An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and emended descriptions of the existing higher taxa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:589–608. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65780-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Stackebrandt E, Schumann P. Description of Bogoriellaceae fam. nov., Dermacoccaceae fam. nov., Rarobacteraceae fam. nov. and Sanguibacteraceae fam. nov. and emendation of some families of the suborder Micrococcineae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:1279–1285. Pub-Med http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-50-3-1279View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Rolain JM, Raoult D. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:543–551. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/600885View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Prodigal. http://prodigal.ornl.gov
  37. GenBank database. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank
  38. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964. PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm160PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol 2004; 340:783–795. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 2001; 305:567–580. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, Barrell B. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 2000; 16:944–945. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Carver T, Thomson N, Bleasby A, Berriman M, Parkhill J. DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:119–120. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn578PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 2004; 14:1394–1403. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.2289704PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Eydallin G, Montero M, Almagro G, Sesma MT, Viale AM, Muñoz FJ, Rahimpour M, Baroja-Fernández E, Pozueta-Romero J. Genome-wide screening of genes whose enhanced expression affects glycogen accumulation in Escherichia coli. DNA Res 2010; 17:61–71. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsp028PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Schlame M. Cardiolipin synthesis for the assembly of bacterial and mitochondrial membranes. J Lipid Res 2008; 49:1607–1620. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R700018-JLR200PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson WA, Roach PJ, Montero M, Baroja-Fernández E, Muñoz FJ, Eydallin G, Viale AM, Pozueta-Romero J. Regulation of glycogen metabolism in yeast and bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2010; 34:952–985. PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sánchez B, Reyes-Gavilan CGD, Margolles A. The F1F0-ATPase of Bifidobacterium animalis is involved in bile tolerance. Environ Microbiol 2006; 8:1825–1833. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/J.1462-2920.2006.01067.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Marais A, Mendz GL, Hazell SL, Mégraud F. Metabolism and Genetics of Helicobacter pylori: the Genome Era. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1999; 63:642–674. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Eggington JM, Haruta N, Wood EA, Cox MM. The single-stranded DNA-binding protein of Deinococcus radiodurans. BMC Microbiol 2004; 4:2. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-4-2PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Bellapadrona G, Ardini M, Ceci P, Stefanini S, Chiancone E. Dps proteins prevent Fenton-mediated oxidative damage by trapping hydroxyl radicals within the protein shell. Free Radic Biol Med 2010; 48:292–297. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.10.053View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ivanova N, Sikorski J, Sims D, Brettin T, Detter JC, Han C, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, et al. Complete genome sequence of Sanguibacter keddieii type strain (ST-74T). Stand Genomic Sci 2009; 1:110–118. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.16197PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2013