Skip to main content

Complete genome sequence of Halorhodospira halophila SL1

Abstract

Halorhodospira halophila is among the most halophilic organisms known. It is an obligately photosynthetic and anaerobic purple sulfur bacterium that exhibits autotrophic growth up to saturated NaCl concentrations. The type strain H. halophila SL1 was isolated from a hypersaline lake in Oregon. Here we report the determination of its entire genome in a single contig. This is the first genome of a phototrophic extreme halophile. The genome consists of 2,678,452 bp, encoding 2,493 predicted genes as determined by automated genome annotation. Of the 2,407 predicted proteins, 1,905 were assigned to a putative function. Future detailed analysis of this genome promises to yield insights into the halophilic adaptations of this organism, its ability for photoautotrophic growth under extreme conditions, and its characteristic sulfur metabolism.

Introduction

Halorhodospira halophila is an anoxygenic photosynthetic halophile that was isolated from salt-encrusted mud along the shore of Summer Lake in Oregon [1], and from the hypersaline Wadi Natrun lakes in Egypt [2]. The original name of this organism, Ectothiorhodospira halophila, was modified to Halorhodospira halophila when the genus Ectothiorhodospira was divided into two genera (Ectothiorhodospira and Halorhodospira), and E. halophila was reclassified as a member of the genus Halorhodospira, serving as the type species of the new genus [3]. Over the last decade, the genomes of a number of extremely halophilic Archaea have been sequenced and analyzed, including Halobacterium salinarum [4,5], Haloarcula marismortui [6], Natronomonas pharaonis [7], and Haloquadratum walsbyi [8]. In addition, the genomes of three halophilic Bacteria have become available: Salinibacter ruber [9], Halothermothrix orenii [10], and ‘Halanaerobium hydrogenoformans’ [11]. All of these organisms are obligate chemotrophs. Thus, H. halophila is the first phototrophic extreme halophile to have its genome sequence determined and analyzed. In contrast to other extreme halophiles that grow well in saturated salt concentrations, H. halophila has a high flexibility with respect to the salt concentrations that it tolerates, and grows optimally at all NaCl concentrations from 15% to 35%, with growth down to 3.5% NaCl [12]. In contrast, the above extremely halophilic archaea and S. ruber require 15% NaCl for growth.

H. halophila is of significant interest because it is an obligately anaerobic purple sulfur bacterium, and among the most halophilic organisms known [13]. To date, genome sequences are available for two phototrophic purple sulfur bacteria, Allochromatium vinosum DSM 180 and the H. halophila SL1 genome reported here. H. halophila has very few growth requirements. However, it does need reduced sulfur compounds for growth, as does A. vinosum [14]. Its pathways for both photosynthetic electron transfer [1517] and nitrogen fixation [18] have attracted attention. In addition, H. halophila contains photoactive yellow protein [19,20]. This is the first member of a novel class of blue light receptors, and triggers a negative phototaxis response in H. halophila [21]. The photoactive yellow protein (PYP) from H. halophila has been studied extensively for its biophysical characteristics [2224].

The sulfur metabolism of H. halophila is unusual, resulting in the transient accumulation of extracellular sulfur globules via metabolic pathways that are not yet fully resolved [14]. While purple non-sulfur phototrophs such as Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodospirillum rubrum use organic compounds like malate as electron donors, H. halophila obtains electrons from reduced sulfur compounds. The genome sequence of H. halophila promises to reveal insights into its adaptations to hypersaline environments, and to allow a better understanding of its unique combination of metabolic capabilities, combining properties from extreme halophiles, anoxygenic phototrophs, and purple sulfur bacteria.

Classification and features

H. halophila belongs to the Gammaproteobacteria [3] (Table 1). The 16S rRNA gene sequence of H. halophila SL1 reveals closer relationships with H. halochloris and Alkalilimnicola ehrlichii, the other representatives of the Ectothiorhodospiraceae (Figure 1), than with A. vinosum, a purple sulfur bacterium in the Chromatiaceae family, and the haloalkaliphilic chemolithoautotrophic Thioalkalivibrio strains.

Figure 1.
figure 1

Phylogram representation of a phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Halorhodospira halophila strain SL1 relative to other organisms of interest, including members of the Ectothiorhodospiraceae, as well as additional strains that were included for comparison purposes, based on environmental and functional considerations. The strains (type=T) and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers (and coordinates) for 16S rRNA genes are: H. halophila strain SL1T, CP00544:380025-381562; Alkalilimnicola ehrlichii strain MLHE-1, CP00453:369818-369894; Thioalkalivibrio sp. HL-EbGR7, CP001339:2548250-2549775; Thioalkalivibrio sp. K90mix, CP001905:423231-424758; Allochromatium vinosum DSM 180T, CP001896:112452-113967; Ectothiorhodospira halochloris M59152; Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN, CP001052:1541578-1543101; Desulfovibrio vulgaris subsp. vulgaris strain Hildenborough, AE017285:105921-107426; Rhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1, CP000143:1-1464; Rhodospirillum rubrum ATCC 11170, CP000230: 192528–194004; Escherichia coli B strain REL606, CP000819: 226609–228150. The 16S rRNA sequences were aligned by MUSCLE [37]. The tree was determined by the maximum likelihood model of PhyML [38] and rendered with TreeDyn [39], using the “one click” pipeline of the Phylogeny.fr web resource [40].

Table 1. Classification and general features of H. halophila SL1 according to the MIGS recommendations [25].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing to better understand its halophilic adaptations, its unusual sulfur metabolism, its photosynthetic pathways, and to provide a framework for better understanding signaling pathways for photoactive yellow protein. The complete genome sequence has been deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). Table 2 presents the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [25].

Table 2. Project information

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

H. halophila SL1 strain DSM 44T was obtained from Deutsche Sammlung vor Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (DSMZ), Braunschweig, Germany, and were grown in DSMZ 253 medium. The cells were grown anaerobically and photosynthetically by placing them in 20 ml glass culture tubes completely filled with growth medium and sealed with screw caps. The tubes were kept at 42ºC in a water bath and illuminated with 70 W tungsten light bulbs. Chromosomal DNA was purified from the resulting cell cultures using the CTAB procedure.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The random shotgun method was used in sequencing the genome of H. halophila SL1. Large (40 kb), median (8 kb) and small (3 kb) insert random sequencing libraries were sequenced for this genome project with an average success rate of 88% and average high-quality read lengths of 750 nucleotides. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with Dupfinisher (unpublished, C. Han) or by transposon bombing of bridging clones (EZ-Tn5 <P6Kyori/KAN-2> Tnp Transposome kit, Epicentre Biotechnologies). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing, custom primer walks or PCR amplification. The completed genome sequence of H. halophila SL1 contains 36,035 reads, achieving an average of 12-fold sequence coverage per base with error rate less than 1 in 100,000.

Genome annotation

Identification of putative protein-encoding genes and initial automated annotation of the genome was performed by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the IMG platform [41].

Genome properties

The genome is 2,678,452 bp long and comprises one circular chromosome with 67% GC content (Figure 2). For the main chromosome, 2,493 genes were predicted, 2,407 of which are protein-coding genes. A total of 1,905 of protein coding genes were assigned to a putative function, with the remaining annotated as hypothetical proteins. In addition, 31 pseudo genes were identified. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Tables 34.

Figure 2.
figure 2

Graphical circular map of the genome. From outside to the center: Circle 1, genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories); Circle 2, genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories); Circle 3, RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black); Circle 4, mobile element genes; Circle 5, CRISPR-associated protein genes; Circle 6, GC content; Circle 7, GC skew.

Table 3. Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome
Table 4. Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Conclusion

H. halophila is among the most halophilic eubacteria known. Further analysis and characterization of its genome will provide insights into the mechanisms it uses to adapt to hypersaline environments.

Abbreviations

PYP:

photoactive yellow protein

References

  1. Raymond JC, Sistrom WR. The isolation and preliminary characterization of a halophilic photosynthetic bacterium. Arch Mikrobiol 1967; 59:255–268. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00406339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Imhoff JF, Hashwa F, Trüper HG. Isolation of extremely halophilic phototrophic bacteria from the alkaline Wadi Natrun, Egypt. Arch Hydrobiol 1978; 84:381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Imhoff JF, Suling J. The phylogenetic relationship among Ectothiorhodospiraceae: A reevaluation of their taxonomy on the basis of 16S rDNA analyses. Arch Microbiol 1996; 165:106–113. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002030050304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ng WV, Kennedy SP, Mahairas GG, Berquist B, Pan M, Shukla HD, Lasky SR, Baliga NS, Thorsson V, Sbrogna J, et al. Genome sequence of Halobacterium species NRC-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:12176–12181. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.190337797

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pfeiffer F, Schuster SC, Broicher A, Falb M, Palm P, Rodewald K, Ruepp A, Soppa J, Tittor J, Oesterhelt D. Evolution in the laboratory: the genome of Halobacterium salinarum strain R1 compared to that of strain NRC-1. Genomics 2008; 91:335–346. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.01.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baliga NS, Bonneau R, Facciotti MT, Pan M, Glusman G, Deutsch EW, Shannon P, Chiu Y, Weng RS, Gan RR, et al. Genome sequence of Haloarcula marismortui: a halophilic archaeon from the Dead Sea. Genome Res 2004; 14:2221–2234. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.2700304

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Falb M, Pfeiffer F, Palm P, Rodewald K, Hickmann V, Tittor J, Oesterhelt D. Living with two extremes: conclusions from the genome sequence of Natronomonas pharaonis. Genome Res 2005; 15:1336–1343. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.3952905

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolhuis H, Palm P, Wende A, Falb M, Rampp M, Rodriguez-Valera F, Pfeiffer F, Oesterhelt D. The genome of the square archaeon Haloquadratum walsbyi: life at the limits of water activity. BMC Genomics 2006; 7:169. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-169

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mongodin EF, Nelson KE, Daugherty S, Deboy RT, Wister J, Khouri H, Weidman J, Walsh DA, Papke RT, Sanchez Perez G, et al. The genome of Salinibacter ruber: convergence and gene exchange among hyperhalophilic bacteria and archaea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:18147–18152. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509073102

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mavromatis K, Ivanova N, Anderson I, Lykidis A, Hooper SD, Sun H, Kunin V, Lapidus A, Hugenholtz P, Patel B, et al. Genome analysis of the anaerobic thermohalophilic bacterium Halothermothrix orenii. PLoS ONE 2009; 4:e4192. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004192

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown SD, Begemann MB, Mormile MR, Wall JD, Han CS, Goodwin LA, Pitluck S, Land ML, Hauser LJ, Elias DA. Complete genome sequence of the haloalkaliphilic, hydrogen-producing bacterium Halanaerobium hydrogeniformans. J Bacteriol 2011; 193:3682–3683. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.05209-11

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deole R, Challacombe J, Raiford DW, Hoff WD. An Extremely Halophilic Proteobacterium Combines a Highly Acidic Proteome with a Low Cytoplasmic Potassium Content. J Biol Chem 2012.

  13. Ollivier B, Caumette P, Garcia JL, Mah RA. Anaerobic bacteria from hypersaline environments. Microbiol Rev 1994; 58:27–38. PubMed

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Frigaard NU, Dahl C. Sulfur metabolism in phototrophic sulfur bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol 2009; 54:103–200. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2911(08)00002-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leguijt T, Engels PW, Crielaard W, Albracht SPJ, Hellingwerf KJ. Abundance, subunit composition, redox properties, and catalytic activity of the cytochrome bc1 complex from alkaliphilic and halophilic, photosynthetic members of the family Ectothiorhodospiraceae. J Bacteriol 1993; 175:1629–1636. PubMed

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leguijt T, Hellingwerf KJ. Characterization of reaction center antenna complexes from bacteriochlorophyll a containing Ectothiorhodospiraceae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1991; 1057:353–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0005-2728(05)80147-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lieutaud C, Alric J, Bauzan M, Nitschke W, Schoepp-Cothenet B. Study of the high-potential iron sulfur protein in Halorhodospira halophila confirms that it is distinct from cytochrome c as electron carrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:3260–3265. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0407768102

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsuihiji H, Yamazaki Y, Kamikubo H, Imamoto Y, Kataoka M. Cloning and characterization of nif structural and regulatory genes in the purple sulfur bacterium, Halorhodospira halophila. J Biosci Bioeng 2006; 101:263–270. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1263/jbb.101.263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Meyer TE. Isolation and characterization of soluble cytochromes, ferredoxins and other chromophoric proteins from the halophilic phototrophic bacterium Ectothiorhodospira halophila. Biochim Biophys Acta 1985; 806:175–183. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(85)90094-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer TE, Yakali E, Cusanovich MA, Tollin G. Properties of a water-soluble, yellow protein isolated from a halophilic phototrophic bacterium that has photochemical activity analogous to sensory rhodopsin. Biochemistry 1987; 26:418–423. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00376a012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sprenger WW, Hoff WD, Armitage JP, Hellingwerf KJ. The Eubacterium Ectothiorhodospira halophila is negatively phototactic, with a wavelength dependence that fits the absorption spectrum of the photoactive yellow protein. J Bacteriol 1993; 175:3096–3104. PubMed

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cusanovich MA, Meyer TE. Photoactive yellow protein: A prototypic PAS domain sensory protein and development of a common signaling mechanism. Biochemistry 2003; 42:4759–4770. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi020690e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hellingwerf KJ, Hendriks J, Gensch T. Photoactive Yellow Protein, a new type of photoreceptor protein: Will this “yellow lab” bring us where we want to go? J Phys Chem A 2003; 107:1082–1094. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp027005y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumauchi M, Hara M, Stalcup P, Xie A, Hoff WD. Identification of six new photoactive yellow proteins: diversity and structure-function relationships in a bacterial blue light photoreceptor. Photochem Photobiol 2008; 84:956–969. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00335.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part B, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. List no. 106. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2235–2238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64108-0

  29. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Class III. Gammaproteobacteria class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part B, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Imhoff J. Order I. Chromatiales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 2, Part B, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 1–3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Imhoff JF. Reassignment of the Genus Ectothiorhodospira Pelsh 1936 to a New Family, Ectothiorhodospiraceae fam. nov., and Emended Description of the Chromatiaceae Bavendamm 1924. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1984; 34:338–339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-34-3-338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. List No. 62. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:915–916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-47-3-915

  33. Imhoff JF, Süling J. The phylogenetic relationship among Ectothiorhodospiraceae: a reevaluation of their taxonomy on the basis of 16S rDNA analyses. Arch Microbiol 1996; 165:106–113. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002030050304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hirschler-Réa A, Matheron R, Riffaud C, Mouné S, Eatock C, Herbert RA, Willison JC, Caumette P. Isolation and characterization of spirilloid purple phototrophic bacteria forming red layers in microbial mats of Mediterranean salterns: description of Halorhodospira neutriphila sp. nov. and emendation of the genus Halorhodospira. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:153–163. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02226-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Raymond JC, Sistrom WR. Ectothiorhodospira halophila: a new species of the genus Ectothiorhodospira. Arch Mikrobiol 1969; 69:121–126. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00409756

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 2003; 52:696–704. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150390235520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chevenet F, Brun C, Bañuls AL, Jacq B, Christen R. TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7:439. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-439

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, Chevenet F, Dufayard JF, Guindon S, Lefort V, Lescot M and others. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(Web Server issue):W465–9. PMID:18424797

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Markowitz VM, Chen IM, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, Ratner A, Jacob B, Huang J, Williams P, et al. IMG: the Integrated Microbial Genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40(Database issue):D115–D122. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1044

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, UT-Battelle, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wouter D. Hoff.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Challacombe, J.F., Majid, S., Deole, R. et al. Complete genome sequence of Halorhodospira halophila SL1. Stand in Genomic Sci 8, 206–214 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3677284

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3677284

Keywords