Open Access

Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis sp. nov.

  • Ajay Kumar Mishra1,
  • Sophie Edouard1,
  • Nicole Prisca Makaya Dangui1,
  • Jean-Christophe Lagier1,
  • Aurelia Caputo1,
  • Caroline Blanc-Tailleur1,
  • Isabelle Ravaux2,
  • Didier Raoult1, 3 and
  • Pierre-Edouard Fournier1Email author
Standards in Genomic Sciences20139:9010205

https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.4378121

Published: 16 October 2013

Abstract

Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis strain NP2T sp. nov. is the type strain of a new species within the genus Nosocomiicoccus. This strain, whose genome is described here, was isolated from the fecal flora of an AIDS-infected patient living in Marseille, France. N. massiliensis is a Gram-positive aerobic coccus. Here we describe the features of this organism, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 1,645,244 bp long genome (one chromosome but no plasmid) contains 1,738 protein-coding and 45 RNA genes, including 3 rRNA genes.

Keywords

Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis genome culturomics taxono-genomics

Introduction

Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis strain NP2T (= CSUR P246 = DSM 26222) is the type strain of N. massiliensis sp. nov. This bacterium is a Gram-positive, non-spore-forming, indole negative, aerobic and motile coccus that was isolated from the stool of an AIDS-infected patient living in Marseille (France) and is part of a “culturomics” study aiming at cultivating all species within human feces [1,2].

The current prokaryote species classification, known as polyphasic taxonomy, is based on a combination of genomic and phenotypic properties [3]. With each passing year, the number of completely sequenced genomes increases geometrically while the cost of such techniques decreases. More than 4,000 bacterial genomes have been published and approximately 15,000 genome projects are anticipated to be completed in the near future [4]. We recently proposed to integrate genomic information in the taxonomic framework and description of new bacterial species [522].

Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for N. massiliensis sp. nov. strain NP2T (= CSUR P246 = DSM 26222), together with the description of the complete genomic sequence and its annotation. These characteristics support the circumscription of the species N. massiliensis. The genus Nosocomiicoccus Alves et al. 2008 was created on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence and phenotypic analyses within the family Staphylococcaceae [23]. To date, this genus is comprised of a single species, N. ampullae, which was isolated from the surface of saline bottles used for washing wounds in hospital wards [23].

Classification and features

A stool sample was collected from an HIV-infected patient living in Marseille (France). The patient gave an informed and signed consent. This study and the assent procedure were approved by the ethics committee of the IFR48 (Marseille, France) under reference 09-022. The fecal specimen was preserved at −80°C after collection. Strain NP2T (Table 1) was isolated in January 2012 by aerobic cultivation on 5% sheep blood agar (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) at 37°C, after 14-days of preincubation of the stool sample in a blood culture bottle supplemented with 5 ml of sterile ovine rumen fluid. This strain exhibited a 97% nucleotide sequence similarity with N. ampullae [23] and a range of 92–94% nucleotide sequence similarity to the most closely related members of the genus Jeotgalicoccus [34] (Figure 1). These values were lower than the 98.7% 16S rRNA gene sequence threshold recommended by Stackebrandt and Ebers to delineate a new species without carrying out DNA-DNA hybridization [35].
Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis strain NP2T relative to a selection of type strains of validly published type strains within the Staphylococcaceae family. GenBank accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW, and phylogenetic inferences obtained using the maximum-likelihood method within MEGA program. Numbers at the nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating the analysis 500 times to generate a majority consensus tree. Marinococcus halophilus was used as the outgroup. The scale bar represents a 2% nucleotide sequence divergence.

Table 1.

Classification and general features of Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis strain NP2T

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence codea

 

Current classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS [24]

 

Phylum Firmicutes

TAS [2527]

 

Class Bacilli

TAS [28,29]

 

Order Bacillales

TAS [30,31]

 

Family Staphylococcaceae

TAS [28,32]

 

Genus Nosocomiicoccus

TAS [23]

 

Species Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis

IDA

 

Type strain NP2T

IDA

 

Gram stain

Positive

IDA

 

Cell shape

Cocci

IDA

 

Motility

Motile

IDA

 

Sporulation

Nonsporulating

IDA

 

Temperature range

Mesophile

IDA

 

Optimum temperature

37°C

IDA

MIGS-6.3

Salinity

Unknown

IDA

MIGS-22

Oxygen requirement

Aerobic

IDA

 

Carbon source

Unknown

NAS

 

Energy source

Unknown

NAS

MIGS-6

Habitat

Human gut

IDA

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

Free living

IDA

MIGS-14

Pathogenicity

Unknown

 
 

Biosafety level

2

 
 

Isolation

Human feces

 

MIGS-4

Geographic location

France

IDA

MIGS-5

Sample collection time

January 2012

IDA

MIGS-4.1

Latitude

43.296482

IDA

MIGS-4.2

Longitude

5.36978

IDA

MIGS-4.3

Depth

Surface

IDA

MIGS-4.4

Altitude

0 m above sea level

IDA

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [33]. If the evidence is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Different growth temperatures (25, 30, 37, 45°C) were tested. Growth was observed between 25 and 45°C, with optimal growth at 37°C after 24 hours of incubation. Colonies were 1 mm in diameter on blood-enriched Columbia agar. Growth of the strain was tested on 5% sheep blood agar, under anaerobic and microaerophilic conditions using GENbag anaer and GENbag microaer systems, respectively (BioMerieux), and under aerobic conditions, with or without 5% CO2. The strain optimal growth was obtained aerobically, weak growth was observed in microaerophilic but no growth was observed under anaerobic atmospheres. Gram staining showed Gram-positive coccus. The motility test was positive. Cells grown on agar are Gram-positive cocci (Figure 2) and have a mean diameter of 0.72 µm as determined by electron microscopy (Figure 3).
Figure 2.

Gram staining of N. massiliensis strain NP2T

Figure 3.

Transmission electron microscopy of N. massiliensis strain NP2T, using a Morgani 268D (Philips) at an operating voltage of 60kV. The scale bar represents 900 nm.

Strain NP2T exhibited catalase but no oxidase activities. Using an API 20NE strip (BioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile), negative reactions were obtained for nitrate reduction, urease, indole production, glucose fermentation, arginine dihydrolase, β-galactosidase, glucose, arabinose, mannose, mannitol, N-acetyl-glucosamine, maltose, gluconate, caprate, adipate, malate, citrate, phenyl-acetate and cytochrome oxidase. Substrate oxidation and assimilation was examined with an API 50CH strip (BioMerieux) at the optimal growth temperature but sugar fermentation reactions and assimilation were not observed. N. massiliensis strain NP2T was susceptible to amoxicillin, imipenem, rifampicin, vancomycin doxycycline and gentamicin but resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole and ciprofloxacine. When compared with representative species from the family Staphylococcaceae, N. massiliensis strain NP2T exhibited the phenotypic differences detailed in Table 2.
Table 2.

Differential characteristics of Nosocomiicoccus species*

Properties

N. massiliensis

N. ampullae

J. psychrophilus

M. caseolyticus

S. pseudointermedius

S. albus

Cell diameter (µm)

0.72

na

0.6–1.1

1.1–2

1.0–1.5

1.0–2.0

Oxygen requirement

aerobic

aerobic

anaerobic

facultative anaerobic

aerobic

aerobic

Pigment production

+

+

+

+

Gram stain

+

+

+

+

+

+

Salt requirement

+

+

+

na

+

Motility

+

Peptidoglycan type

na

L-Lys-Gly4-L-Ser(Gly)

L-Lys-Gly3-4-L-Ala(Gly)

L-Lys-Gly3-4-L-Ser-teichoic acid

na

L-Lys-Gly5

Endospore formation

Production of

      

Acid phosphatase

+

+

+

+

Catalase

+

+

+

+

+

+

Oxidase

+

+

+

+

Nitrate reductase

+

+

+

Urease

+

+

β-galactosidase

na

+

N-acetyl-glucosamine

na

na

+

Acid from

      

L-Arabinose

w

+

+

Ribose

+

+

+

Mannose

+

+

+

Mannitol

+

w

+

Sucrose

w

na

+

+

D-glucose

+

+

+

D-fructose

+

+

+

D-maltose

+

+

+

D-lactose

+

+

Hydrolysis of gelatin

+

+

na

na

+

G+C content (mol%)

36.4

33.5

42

36.5

37.5

43.88

Habitat

human gut

surface of used saline bottles

fermented seafood

raw cow milk and dairy products

skin and mucosal surfaces of most healthy dogs

subterranean brine sample

na = data not available; w = weak

*Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis strain NP2T, Nosocomiicoccus ampullae strain TRF-1T, Jeotgalicoccus psychrophilus strain YKJ-115T, Macrococcus caseolyticus strain JCSC5402, Staphylococcus pseudointermedius strain ED 99 and Salinicoccus albus strain DSM 19776

Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS protein analysis was carried out as previously described [36] using a Microflex spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany). Twelve individual colonies were deposited on a MTP 384 MALDI-TOF target plate (Bruker). The twelve NP2T spectra were imported into the MALDI BioTyper software (version 2.0, Bruker) and analyzed by standard pattern matching (with default parameter settings) against the main spectra of 4, 706 bacteria, including spectra from one validly published species of Nosocomiicoccus, used as reference data in the BioTyper database. A score enabled the presumptive identification and discrimination of the tested species from those in a database: a score ≥ 2 with a validly published species enabled the identification at the species level; and a score < 1.7 did not enable any identification. For strain NP2T, no significant score was obtained, suggesting that our isolate was not a member of any known species (Figures 4 and 5).
Figure 4.

Reference mass spectrum from N. massiliensis strain NP2T. Spectra from 12 individual colonies were compared and a reference spectrum was generated.

Figure 5.

Gel view comparing N. massiliensis sp. nov strain NP2T and other Staphylococcus species. The gel view displays the raw spectra of loaded spectrum files arranged in a pseudo-gel like look. The x-axis records the m/z value. The left y-axis displays the running spectrum number originating from subsequent spectra loading. The peak intensity is expressed by a Gray scale scheme code. The color bar and the right y-axis indicate the relation between the color a peak is displayed with and the peak intensity in arbitrary units. Displayed species are indicated on the left.

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position and 16S rRNA similarity to other members of the genus Nosocomiicoccus, and is part of a “culturomics” study of the human digestive flora aiming at isolating all bacterial species within human feces. It was the first genome of a Nosocomiicoccus species and the first genome of Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis sp. nov. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 3. The Genbank accession number is CAVG00000000 and consists of 154 contigs. Table 3 shows the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [37].
Table 3.

Project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS-31

Finishing quality

High-quality draft

MIGS-28

Libraries used

One 454 paired end 3-kb library

MIGS-29

Sequencing platforms

454 GS FLX Titanium

MIGS-31.2

Fold coverage

94.97 ×

MIGS-30

Assemblers

Newbler version 2.5.3

MIGS-32

Gene calling method

Prodigal

 

Genbank Bioproject

PRJEB644

 

Genbank Date of Release

May 6, 2013

 

Gold ID

Gi22016

MIGS-13

Project relevance

Study of the human gut microbiome

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

N. massiliensis sp. nov. strain NP2T, (= CSURP246 = DSM 26222), was grown aerobically on M17 agar medium at 37°C. Five Petri dishes were spread and resuspended in 3x100µl of G2 buffer (EZ1 DNA Tissue kit, Qiagen). A first mechanical lysis was performed by glass powder on the Fastprep-24 device (Sample Preparation system, MP Biomedicals, USA) for 2×20 seconds. DNA was treated with 2.5 µg/µL of lysozyme (30 minutes at 37°C) and extracted using the BioRobot EZ 1 Advanced XL (Qiagen). The DNA was concentrated and purified on a Qiamp kit (Qiagen). The yield and the concentration of DNA was 69.3 ng/µl as measured by using Quant-it Picogreen kit (Invitrogen) on the Genios Tecan fluorometer.

Genome sequencing and assembly

DNA (5 µg) was mechanically fragmented for the paired-end sequencing, using a Covaris device (Covaris Inc., Woburn, MA, USA) with an enrichment size of 3–4 kb. The DNA fragmentation was visualized through an Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer on a DNA Labchip 7500 which yielded an optimal size of 3.4 kb. The library was constructed using a 454 GS FLX Titanium paired-end rapid library protocol. Circularization and nebulization were performed and a pattern of optimal size of 589 bp was generated. PCR amplification was performed for 17 cycles followed by double size selection. The single-stranded paired-end library was quantified using a Quant-it Ribogreen Kit (Invitrogen) using a Genios Tecan fluorometer. The library concentration equivalence was calculated as 1.42× 1010 molecules/µL. The library was stored at −20°C until further use.

For the shotgun sequencing, DNA (500 ng) was mechanically fragmented using a Covaris device (Covaris Inc.) as described by the manufacturer. The DNA fragmentation was visualized using an Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer on a DNA Labchip 7500 which yielded an optimal size of 1.7 kb. The library was constructed using the GS Rapid library Prep kit (Roche) and quantified using a TBS 380 mini fluorometer (Turner Biosystems, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The library concentration equivalence was calculated as 2.8× 109 molecules/µL. The library was stored at −20°C until further use.

The shotgun library was clonally amplified with 1 and 2 cpb in two emPCR reactions each, and the paired-end library was amplified with 0.5 cpb in three emPCR reactions using the GS Titanium SV emPCR Kit (Lib-L) v2 (Roche). The yields of the emPCR were 6.8 and 9.8%, respectively, for the shotgun library, and 11.29% for the paired-end library. These yields fall into the expected 5 to 20% range according to Roche protocol.

For each library, approximately 790,000 beads for a quarter region were loaded on the GS Titanium PicoTiterPlate PTP kit and sequenced with the GS FLX Titanium Sequencing Kit XLR70 (Roche). The run was performed overnight and analyzed on a cluster using the gsRunBrowser and Newbler assembler (Roche). For the shotgun sequencing, 188,659 passed-filter wells were obtained. The sequencing generated 129.3 Mb with a length average of 685 bp. For the paired-end sequencing, 106,675 passed-filter wells were obtained. The sequencing generated 35 Mb with an average length of 262 bp. The passed-filter sequences were assembled using Newbler with 90% identity and 40 bp as overlap. The final assembly identified 12 scaffolds and 154 contigs (> 1,500 bp) and generated a genome size of 1.65 Mb, which corresponds to a coverage of 94.97 genome equivalents.

Genome annotation

Open Reading Frames (ORFs) were predicted using Prodigal [38] with default parameters but the predicted ORFs were excluded if they were spanning a sequencing gap region. The predicted bacterial protein sequences were searched against the GenBank database [39] and the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) databases using BLASTP. The tRNAScanSE tool [40] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNAs were found by using RNAmmer [41] and BLASTn against the GenBank database. Lipoprotein signal peptides and numbers of transmembrane helices were predicted using SignalP [42] and TMHMM [43] respectively. ORFans were identified if their BLASTP E-value was lower than 1e−03 for alignment length greater than 80 amino acids. If alignment lengths were smaller than 80 amino acids, we used an E-value of 1e-05. Such parameter thresholds have already been used in previous works to define ORFans. To estimate the mean level of nucleotide sequence similarity at the genome level between N. massiliensis and three other members of the family Staphylococcaceae (Table 6), we used the Average Genomic Identity of Orthologous gene Sequences (AGIOS) home-made software. Briefly, this software combines the Proteinortho software (version 1.4) [44] for detecting orthologous proteins between genomes compared two by two, then retrieves the corresponding genes and determines the mean percentage of nucleotide sequence identity among orthologous ORFs using the Needleman-Wunsch global alignment algorithm. Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis strain NP2T was compared to Macrococcus caseolyticus strain JCSC5402 (GenBank accession number NC_011999), Staphylococcus pseudointermedius strain ED 99 (NC_017568), and Salinicoccus albus strain DSM 19776 (ARQJ00000000). Artemis [45] was used for data management and DNA Plotter [46] was used for visualization of genomic features. The Mauve alignment tool was used for multiple genomic sequence alignment and visualization [47].

Genome properties

The genome of N. massiliensis strain NP2T is 1,6452,44 bp long (1 chromosome, but no plasmid) with a 36.40% G + C content of (Figure 6 and Table 4). Of the 1,783 predicted genes, 1,738 were protein-coding genes, and 45 were RNAs. Three rRNA genes (one 16S rRNA, one 23S rRNA and one 5S rRNA) and 42 predicted tRNA genes were identified in the genome. A total of 1,350 genes (75.71%) were assigned a putative function. Two hundred forty-six genes were identified as ORFans (13.79%). The remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 4 and Table 5. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 5.
Figure 6.

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From the outside in, the outer two circles shows open reading frames oriented in the forward (colored by COG categories) and reverse (colored by COG categories) direction, respectively. The third circle marks the rRNA gene operon (red) and tRNA genes (green). The fourth circle shows the G+C% content plot. The inner-most circle shows GC skew, purple indicating negative values whereas olive for positive values.

Table 4.

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome

Attribute

Value

% of totala

Genome size (bp)

1,645,244

 

DNA coding region (bp)

1,479,861

89.94

DNA G+C content (bp)

5,98,869

36.4

Number of replicons

1

 

Extrachromosomal elements

0

 

Total genes

1,783

100

RNA genes

45

2.52

rRNA operons

1

 

Protein-coding genes

1,738

97.47

Genes with function prediction

1,511

84.74

Genes assigned to COGs

1,350

75.71

Genes with peptide signals

84

4.71

Genes with transmembrane helices

425

23.83

CRISPR repeats

0

% of totala

a The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Table 5.

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code

Value

% of totala

Description

J

144

8.29

Translation

A

0

0

RNA processing and modification

K

89

5.12

Transcription

L

111

6.39

Replication, recombination and repair

B

1

0.06

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

21

1.12

Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis

Y

0

0

Nuclear structure

V

36

2.07

Defense mechanisms

T

39

2.24

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

80

4.60

Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

3

0.17

Cell motility

Z

0

0

Cytoskeleton

W

0

0

Extracellular structures

U

23

1.32

Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

59

3.39

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

94

5.41

Energy production and conversion

G

65

3.74

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

114

6.56

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

55

3.16

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

73

4.20

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

46

2.65

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

108

6.21

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

28

1.61

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

185

10.64

General function prediction only

S

137

7.88

Function unknown

-

388

22.32

Not in COGs

a The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Genome comparison of Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis with Macrococcus caseolyticus, Staphylococcus pseudointermedius and Salinicoccus albus

We compared the genome of N. massiliensis strain NP2T, with those of M. caseolyticus strain JCSC5402 (GenBank accession number NC_011999) and S. pseudointermedius strain ED 99 (NC_017568), and S. albus strain DSM 19776 (ARQJ00000000). The draft genome of N. massiliensis is smaller in size than those of M. caseolyticus, S. pseudointermedius and S. albus (1.6, 2.2, 2.5 and 2.6 Mb, respectively). The G+C content of B. massiliensis is comparable to that of M. caseolyticus (36.40 and 36.56%, respectively) and lower than that of S. pseudointermedius and S. albus (37.56 and 43.88%, respectively). The gene content of N. massiliensis is lower than those of M. caseolyticus S. pseudointermedius and S. albus (1,783, 2,113, 2,435 and 2,770, respectively). The ratio of genes per Mb of N. massiliensis is larger to those of M. caseolyticus, S. pseudointermedius and S. albus (1,080, 956, 947 and 1,049, respectively). However, the distribution of genes into COG categories was not entirely similar in the four genomes (Figure 7).
Figure 7.

Distribution of functional classes of predicted genes on Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis (colored in blue), Macrococcus caseolyticus (colored in green), Staphylococcus pseudointermedius (colored in red) and Salinicoccus albus (colored in yellow) chromosomes according to the clusters of orthologous groups of proteins.

The nucleotide sequence identity ranged from 64.75 to 69.80% among the genera. Table 6 summarizes the numbers of orthologous genes and the average percentage of nucleotide sequence identity between the different genomes studied.
Table 6.

The numbers of orthologous protein shared between genomes

 

Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis

Macrococcus caseolyticus

Salinicoccus albus

Staphylococcus pseudointermedius

Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis

1,742

995

1,003

954

Macrococcus caseolyticus

67.50

2,216

1,176

1,127

Salinicoccus albus

66.22

65.46

2,680

1,135

Staphylococcus pseudointermedius

67.48

69.80

64.75

2,351

Upper right triangle-average percentage similarity of nucleotides corresponding to orthologous protein shared between genomes

Lower left triangle-orthologous protein shared between genomes

Bold-numbers of proteins per genome

Conclusion

On the basis of phenotypic, phylogenetic and genomic analyses, we formally propose the creation of Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis sp. nov. that contains the strain NP2T. This bacterium strain has been isolated from the fecal flora of an AIDS-infected patient living in Marseille, France. Several other undescribed bacterial species were also cultivated from different fecal samples through diversification of culture conditions [522], thus suggesting that the human fecal flora of humans remains partially unknown.

Description of Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis sp. nov.

Nosocomiicoccus massiliensis (mas.si.li.en′sis. L. masc. adj. massiliensis of Massilia, the Roman name of Marseille, France, where the type strain was isolated).

Colonies are 1 mm in diameter on blood-enriched Columbia agar. Cells are cocci-shaped with a mean diameter of 0.72 µm. Optimal growth is achieved aerobically and weak growth was observed microaerophilic condition. No growth is observed in anaerobic conditions. Growth occurs between 25 and 45°C, with optimal growth observed at 37°C. Cells stain Gram-positive, are non-endospore forming and are motile. Cells are negative for nitrate reduction, urease, indole production, glucose fermentation, arginine dihydrolase, β-galactosidase, glucose, arabinose, mannose, mannitol, N-acetyl-glucosamine, maltose, gluconate, caprate, adipate, malate, citrate, phenyl-acetate and cytochrome oxidase. Cells are susceptible to amoxicillin, imipenem, rifampicin, vancomycin doxycycline and gentamicin but resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole and ciprofloxacine. The G+C content of the genome is 36.40%. The 16S rRNA and genome sequences are deposited in Genbank under accession numbers JX424771 and CAVG00000000, respectively.

The type strain NP2T (= CSUR P246 = DSM 26222) was isolated from the fecal flora of an AIDS-infected patient living in Marseille, France.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Xegen company for automating the genome annotation process. The work was funded by the Mediterranee-Infection foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
URMITE, Faculté de médecine, Aix-Marseille Université
(2)
Infectious Diseases Department, Conception Hospital
(3)
King Fahad Medical Research Center, King Abdul Aziz University

References

  1. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Million M, Hugon P, Pagnier I, Robert C, Bittar F, Fournous G, Gimenez G, Maraninchi M, et al. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18:1185–1193. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dubourg G, Lagier JC, Armougom F, Robert C, Hamad I, Brouqui P. The gut microbiota of a patient with resistant tuberculosis is more comprehensively studied by culturomics than by metagenomics. [Epub]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2013; 32:637–645. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1787-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tindall BJ, Rossello-Mora R, Busse HJ, Ludwig W, Kampfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:249–266. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.016949-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Genome Online Database. http://www.genomesonline.org/cgi-bin/GOLD/index.cgi
  5. Kokcha S, Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Million M, Leroy Q, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:346–355. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2776064PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lagier JC, El Karkouri K, Nguyen TT, Armougom F, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Anaerococcus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:116–125. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2415480PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mishra AK, Gimenez G, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:304–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2625821View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Mishra AK, Ngyuen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:315–324. PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Clostridium senegalense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:386–395. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:1–11. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2956294PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Rivet R, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Paenibacillus senegalensis sp. nov.. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:70–81. PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lagier JC, Gimenez G, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Herbaspirillum massiliense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:200–209. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Roux V, El Karkouri K, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Kurthia massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:221–232. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3206554PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kokcha S, Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Brevibacterium senegalense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:233–245. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3256677PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramasamy D, Kokcha S, Lagier JC, N’Guyen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Aeromicrobium massilense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:246–257. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3306717PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lagier JC, Ramasamy D, Rivet R, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Cellulomonas massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:258–270. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3316719PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lagier JC, El Karkouri K, Rivet R, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Senegalemassilia anaerobia sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:343–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3246665PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mishra AK, Hugon P, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Robert C, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus obesi sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:357–369. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.32766871PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:370–381. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3366764PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lagier JC, El Karkouri K, Mishra AK, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Enterobacter massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:399–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3396830PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hugon P, Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Rivet R, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes obesi sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:427–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3336746PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mishra AK, Hugon P, Robert C, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus grossensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:320–330. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Alves M, Nogueira CM, Chung AP, Morais PV. da Costa. Nosocomiicoccus ampullae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from the surface of bottles of saline solution used in wound cleansing. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2939–2944. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65753-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archae, Bacteria, and Eukarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibbons NE, Murray RGE. Proposals Concerning the Higher Taxa of Bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1978; 28:1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-28-1-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119–169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Murray RGE. The Higher Taxa, or, a Place for Everything…? In: Holt JG (ed), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, First Edition, Volume 1, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1984, p. 31–34.Google Scholar
  28. Validation list no. 132. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:469–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.022855-0
  29. Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB. Class I. Bacilli class nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009, p. 19–20.Google Scholar
  30. Skerman VBD, Sneath PHA. Approved list of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-225View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Prévot AR. In: Hauderoy P, Ehringer G, Guillot G, Magrou. J., Prévot AR, Rosset D, Urbain A (eds), Dictionnaire des Bactéries Pathogènes, Second Edition, Masson et Cie, Paris, 1953, p. 1–692.Google Scholar
  32. Schleifer KH, Bell JA. Family VIII. Staphylococcaceae fam. nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009, p. 392.Google Scholar
  33. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Yoon JH, Lee KC, Weiss N, Kang KH, Park YH. Jeotgalicoccus halotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov. and Jeotgalicoccus psychrophilus sp. nov., isolated from the traditional Korean fermented seafood jeotgal. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:595–602. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02132-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 2006; 33:152–155.Google Scholar
  36. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Rolain JM, Raoult D. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:543–551. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/600885View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Prodigal. http://prodigal.ornl.gov
  39. GenBank database. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank
  40. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964. PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm160PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, von Heijne G, Brunak S. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol 2004; 340:783–795. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 2001; 305:567–580. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lechner M, Findeib S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ. Proteinortho: Detection of (Co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:124. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-124PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream MA, Barrell B. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 2000; 16:944–945. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/16.10.944View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Carver T, Thomson N, Bleasby A, Berriman M, Parkhill J. DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:119–120. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn578PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 2004; 14:1394–1403. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.2289704PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2013