Skip to main content

Table 1 Palmer’s Pollution Index results for BML and BCR surface waters (≤ 0.6 m) by year and overall

From: Phytoplankton ecology in the early years of a boreal oil sands end pit lake

Phytoplankton Genus

Index Value

BML

BCR

2016

2017

2018

2019

2021

Total

2016

2017

2018

2019

2021

Total

Cyclotella

1

18S

18S

23S, 18S, 16S

23S, 18S, CC

23S, 18S, 16S, CC

23S

23S, 18S, 16S, CC

Gomphonema

1

NA

CC

CC

Melosira

1

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Navicula

3

CC

CC

CC

CC

CC

CC

Nitzschia

3

CC

CC

CC

CC

18S, CC

18S, CC

Synedra

2

CC

CC

Ankistrodemsus

2

NA

Chlamydomonas

4

23S, CC

23S

23S, CC

CC

CC

Chlorella

3

 

23S

23S

23S, 18S

23S

23S, 18S

CC

23S

23S

23S

23S

23S, CC

Closterium

1

NA

NA

NA

NA

CC

Micractinium

1

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Pandorina

1

NA

NA

CC

CC

CC

CC

NA

NA

NA

NA

Scenedesmus

4

18S

CC

18S

18S, CC

18S, CC

CC

CC

CC

18S

18S, CC

Stigeoclonium

2

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Anacystis

1

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Oscillatoria

5

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Phormidum

1

NA

CC

NA

NA

CC

NA

NA

NA

NA

Euglena

5

23S, CC

23S, 16S, CC

23S, 16S, CC

23S

23S

23S, 16S, CC

23S

23S

23S

23S, CC

Lepocinclis

1

16S

CC

CC

CC

23S, 16S, CC

23S

23S

23S, CC

23S, CC

23S, CC

Phacus

2

CC

23S, 16S, CC

CC

CC

23S, 16S, CC

23S

CC

23S, CC

Score

44

11

26

21

22

16

28

11

17

16

14

13

30

Low

High

High

High

Moderate

High

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Low

High

  1. Scores were assigned if a genus had an average relative abundance ≥ 0.50% and was present in at least 3 samples for that given year and source for at least one dataset (cell count data or 23S/18S/16S rRNA gene data). “CC” indicates cell count, “NA” indicates complete absence of the genus and “-” indicates the genus is present with < 0.50% average relative abundance. “Total” indicates the score for all years combined. Scores ≥ 20 indicate clear evidence of high organic pollution, those ranging from 15–19 were moderate and were considered to have probable evidence of organic pollution, and scores < 15 were low and were considered to have no evidence of organic pollution [45]