Skip to main content

Table 2. Comparison of MCI scores from the GOLD database.1

From: The Metadata Coverage Index (MCI): A standardized metric for quantifying database metadata richness

Project List

Field group

Fields per Record

Records

Total Fields

Filled Fields

MCI %

A.

1. GEBA

CORE

103

256

26,368

14,287

54.18

2. Complete

2,040

211,253

109,532

52.00

3. HMP

2,096

215,888

87,007

39.91

4. All Projects

13,790

1,420,370

522,850

37.00

B.

1. Archaea

CORE

103

340

35,020

16,767

48.00

2. Bacteria

11,233

1,156,999

443,474

38.00

3. Eukarya

2,217

228,351

62,609

27.00

C.

1. GEBA

MIGS

12

256

3,072

2,102

68.43

2. Complete

2,040

24,612

14,667

59.59

3. HMP

2,096

25,152

9,642

38.34

4. All Projects

13,790

165,480

62,564

37.81

D.

1. HMP

HMP

10

2,096

20,960

14,673

70.00

E.

1. All-2008

2008

33

2,905

95,865

59,097

61.65

2. All-2010

5,843

192,819

119,881

62.17

3. All-2012

13,790

455,070

273,805

60.17

  1. 1Note that if all variables in a database or collection apply to all records, then ‘total fields’ is equal to records multiplied by fields. If some variables are specific to a subset of records then the total number of possible fields will be smaller.