Open Access

Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Gorillibacterium massiliense gen. nov, sp. nov., a new member of the family Paenibacillaceae

  • Mamadou Bhoye Keita1,
  • Roshan Padhmanabhan1,
  • Aurélia Caputo1,
  • Catherine Robert1,
  • Eric Delaporte2,
  • Didier Raoult1, 3,
  • Pierre-Edouard Fournier1 and
  • Fadi Bittar1Email author
Standards in Genomic Sciences20149:9030807

DOI: 10.4056/sigs.5199182

Published: 15 June 2014

Abstract

Strain G5T gen. nov., sp. nov. is the type strain of Gorillibacterium massiliense, a newly proposed genus within the family Paenibacillaceae. This strain, whose genome is described here, was isolated in France from a stool sample of a wild Gorilla gorilla subsp. gorilla from Cameroon. G. massiliense is a facultatively anaerobic, Gram negative rod. Here we describe the features of this bacterium, together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 5,546,433 bp long genome (1 chromosome but no plasmid) contains 5,145 protein-coding and 76 RNA genes, including 69 tRNA genes.

Keywords

Gorillibacterium massiliense genome culturomics taxono-genomics

Introduction

Strain G5T (= CSUR P290 = DSM 27179) is the type strain of Gorillibacterium massiliense gen. nov., sp. nov. This bacterium which is proposed to belong to the family Paenibacillaceae, is a Gram-negative, flagellated, facultative anaerobic, indole-negative bacillus that was isolated from a fecal sample of a wild western lowland gorilla from Cameroon, through a culturomics study of the bacterial diversity of the feces of wild gorillas. This technique was used successfully to explore the human gut microbiota allowing the isolation of many new species and genera [13].

The newly proposed strategy of applying high throughput genome sequencing, MALDI-TOF spectral analysis of cellular proteins, coupled with more traditional methods of phenotypic characterization has been demonstrated as a useful approach for the description of new bacterial taxa [415]. A principle advantage is that this method circumvents the vagaries of methods that rely mainly on DNA-DNA hybridization to delineate species. Here, we applied this polyphasic approach to describe G. massiliense gen. nov., sp. nov. strain G5T.

The family Paenibacilliaceae [16] belongs to the phylum Firmicutes and includes the 9 following genera [17]: Paenibacillus [18,19], Ammoniphilus [20], Aneurinibacillus [21], Brevibacillus [21], Thermobacillus [22], Fontibacillus [23], Cohnella [24], Saccharibacillus [25] and Oxalophagus [26]. Members belonging to this family were isolated mainly from soil, roots, blood, feces and other sources [16]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the isolation of a novel genus from the fecal flora of a gorilla.

Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for G. massiliense gen. nov., sp. nov. strain G5T (= CSUR P290 = DSM 27179) together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and its annotation. These characteristics support the circumscription of a novel genus, Gorillibacterium gen. nov. within the family Paenibacillaceae, with Gorillibacterium massiliense gen. nov., sp. nov. as the type species.

Classification and features

In July 2011, a fecal sample was collected from a wild Gorilla gorilla subsp.gorilla near Minton, a village in the south-central part of the DJA FAUNAL Park (Cameroon). The collection of the stool sample was approved by the Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation of Cameroon. No experiments were conducted on this gorilla. The fecal specimen was preserved at −80°C after collection and sent to Marseille. Strain G5T (Table 1) was isolated in August 2012 by aerobic cultivation at 37°C on sterilized soil medium (12 g of soil (Latitude: N 43°17′20.151″; Longitude: E 5°24′15.3822″)/agar (14g/l). This strain exhibited a 93.72% 16S rRNA nucleotide sequence similarity with Paenibacillus turicensis, the phylogenetically closest validly published Paenibacillus species (Figure 1). This value was lower than the 95.0% 16S rRNA gene sequence threshold recommended by Stackebrandt and Ebers to delineate a new genus without carrying out DNA-DNA hybridization [37].
Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of Gorillibacterium massiliense strain G5T relative to other type strains within the Paenibacillaceae family. GenBank accession numbers are indicated in parentheses. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL X (V2), and phylogenetic inferences obtained using the maximum-likelihood method within the MEGA 5 software [36]. Numbers at the nodes are percentages of bootstrap values obtained by repeating the analysis 1,000 times to generate a majority consensus tree. Brevibacillus brevis was used as out-group. The scale bar represents a 2% nucleotide sequence divergence.

Table 1.

Classification and general features of Gorillibacterium massiliense strain G5T

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence codea

 

Current classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS [27]

  

Phylum Firmicutes

TAS [2830]

  

Class Bacilli

TAS [31,32]

  

Order Bacillales

TAS [33,34]

  

Family Paenibacillaceae

TAS [16,32]

  

Genus Gorillibacterium

IDA

  

Species Gorillibacterium massiliense

IDA

  

Type strain G5T

IDA

 

Gram stain

Negative

IDA

 

Cell shape

rod

IDA

 

Motility

non-motile

IDA

 

Sporulation

non-sporulating

IDA

 

Temperature range

mesophilic

IDA

 

Optimum temperature

37°C

IDA

MIGS-6.3

Salinity

no Growth in BHI medium + 5% NaCl

IDA

MIGS-22

Oxygen requirement

facultative anerobic

IDA

 

Carbon source

varied (see Table 2)

IDA

 

Energy source

Chemoorganoheterotrophic

IDA

MIGS-6

Habitat

gorilla gut

IDA

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

free living

IDA

 

Pathogenicity

Unknown

NAS

 

Biosafety level

2

NAS

MIGS-14

Isolation

Gorilla feces

IDA

MIGS-4

Geographic location

Cameroon

IDA

MIGS-5

Sample collection time

July 2011

IDA

MIGS-4.1

Latitude

2.783938

IDA

MIGS-4.1

Longitude

13.030472

IDA

MIGS-4.3

Depth

surface

IDA

MIGS-4.4

Altitude

> 600 m above sea level

IDA

aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [35]. If the evidence is IDA, then the property was directly observed for a live isolate by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Different growth temperatures (25, 30, 37, 45°C) were tested. No growth occurred at 45°C, growth occurred between 25°and 37°C, and optimal growth was observed at 37°C. Colonies were bright grey with a diameter of 1.0 mm on 5% blood-enriched Columbia agar. Growth of the strain was tested under anaerobic and microaerophilic conditions using GENbag anaer and GENbag microaer systems, respectively (BioMérieux), and under aerobic conditions, with or without 5% CO2. Growth was observed under anaerobic and microaerophilic conditions, but optimal growth was obtained aerobically. Moreover, the Gram staining showed Gram-negative rod (Figure 2). A motility test produced a negative result. Cells grown on agar did not sporulate and the rods exhibited peritrichous flagella and had a mean length of 1.75 µm and a mean diameter of 0.67 µm as determined by negative staining transmission electron microscopy (Figure 3).
Figure 2.

Gram staining of G. massliensis strain G5T.

Figure 3.

Transmission electron microscopy of G. massiliense strain G5T using a Morgani 268D (Philips) at an operating voltage of 60kV. The scale bar represents 500 nm.

Strain G5T exhibited catalase activity but not oxidase activity. Using the API 50CH system (BioMerieux), a positive reaction was obtained for D-xylose, D-glucose, D-fructose, D-mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, aesculin, salicin, D-cellobiose, D-maltose, D-lactose, D-melibiose, D-saccharose, D-trehalose, inulin, D-melezitose, D-raffinose, glycogen, gentiobiose, D-turanose, Methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside and hydrolysis of starch. A weak positive reaction was observed for L-arabinose. A negative reaction was observed for glycerol, ribose, D-galactose, L-rhamnose, L-sorbose, dulcitol, inositol, D-mannitol, D-sorbitol, methyl-αD-mannopyranoside, D-arabinose, amygdalin, arbitin, potassium gluconate, potassium 2-cetogluconate, potassium 5-cetogluconate, adonitol and D-tagatose. Using the API ZYM system, positive reactions were obtained only for naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucosidase, arginine arylamidase and arginine dihydrolase. The production of α-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase, esterase lipase, leucine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, glycine arylamidase, phenylalanine arylamidase, lipase, alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase and a-chymotrypsin were negative. Urease reaction and reduction of nitrates to nitrogen were also positive. Indole production was negative. G. massiliense was susceptible to ticarcillin, amoxicillin, tobramycin, imipenem, vancomycin and rifampin but resistant to ceftazidime (Caz 30), colistin (CT50) and metronidazole.

When compared with representative species from the family Paenibacillaceae [3842], G. massiliense gen. nov., sp. nov. strain G5T exhibited the phenotypic differences detailed in Table 2.
Table 2.

Differential phenotypic characteristics between Gorillibacterium massiliense gen. nov., sp. nov., strain G5T and phylogenetically close Paenibacillaceae species.

Characteristic

1

2

3

4

5

Gram stain

+

var

var

+/var

Motility

+

+

+

+

Endospore formation

+

+

+

+

Isolated from

Gorilla gut

Human: valve of a cerebrospinal fluid shunt

Roots of Perilla frutescens

Honeybee larvae

Environment: soil

Production of

     

Catalase

+

+

+

+

Oxidase

+

+

Nitrate reductase

+

+

+

Urease

+

+

na

Indole

+

+

Utilization of:

     

Glycerol

var

D−xylose

+

+

var

D−glucose

+

+

+

+

D−fructose

+

+

w

na

D−mannose

+

+

+

Methyl− aD−mannopyranoside

na

na

N−acetylglucosamine

+

+

+

na

+

Aesculin

+

+

+

na

+

Salicin

+

+

D−cellobiose

+

+

+

+

D−maltose

+

+

+

na

D−lactose

+

+

+

na

D−melibiose

+

+

na

+

D−saccharose

+

+

na

D−trehalose

+

+

D−melezitose

+

na

D−raffinose

+

+

na

+

Starch

+

+

+

+

Glycogen

+

+

w

β-Gentiobiose

+

+

w

na

L−arabinose

w

+

Ribose

+

+

na

D−galactose

+

+

na

+

D−mannitol

+

+

Potassium gluconate

+

w

Amygdalin

+

Strain: 1, Gorillibacterium massiliense G5T; 2, Paenibacillus turicensis MOL722T; 3, Paenibacillus elgii SD17T; 4, Paenibacillus alvei BCRC 11220T; 5, Brevibacillus brevis NBRC 15304T. −: negative result, +: positive result, var: variable, na: data not available, w: weak positive result

Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS protein analysis was carried out as previously described [15] using a Microflex spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Leipzig, Germany). Twelve distinct deposits were done for strain G5T from 12 isolated colonies. The 12 G5T spectra were imported into the MALDI BioTyper software (version 2.0, Bruker) and analyzed by standard pattern matching (with default parameter settings) against 6,252 bacterial spectra used as reference data, in the BioTyper database. A score enabled the presumptive identification of the isolated based on the following heuristicpecies: a score ≥ 2 with a validated species enabled the identification at the species level, a score ≥ 1.7 but < 2 enabled the identification at the genus level; and a score < 1.7 did not enable any identification. For strain G5T, a significant score was not obtained, suggesting it was not a member of any known species or genus. We incremented our database with the spectrum from strain G5T (Figure 4). Spectrum differences with other of Paenibacillaceae family are shown in Figure 5.
Figure 4.

Reference mass spectrum from G. massiliense strain G5T. Spectra from 16 individual colonies were compared and a reference spectrum was generated.

Figure 5.

Gel view comparing Gorillibacterium massilinensis gen. nov., sp. nov strain G5T spectra with other members of the Paenibacillaceae family. The Gel View displays the raw spectra of all loaded spectrum files arranged in a pseudo-gel like look. The x-axis records the m/z value. The left y-axis displays the running spectrum number originating from subsequent spectra loading. The peak intensity is expressed by a Gray scale scheme code. The color bar and the right y-axis indicate the relation between the color a peak is displayed with and the peak intensity in arbitrary units. Displayed species are indicated on the left.

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position and 16S rRNA similarity to other members of the family Paenibacillaceae, and is part of a “culturomics” study of the gorilla flora aiming at isolating all bacterial species within gorilla feces. It was the 81st genome of the Paenibacillaceae family and the first genome of Gorillibacterium massiliense gen. nov., sp. nov. A summary of the project information is shown in Table 3. The Genbank accession number is CBQR000000000 and consists of 176 large contigs. Table 3 shows the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [43].
Table 3.

Project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS-31

Finishing quality

High-quality draft

MIGS-28

Libraries used

454 paired-end 3-kb libraries

MIGS-29

Sequencing platform

454 GS FLX Titanium

MIGS-31.2

Sequencing coverage

25.71×

MIGS-30

Assemblers

Newbler version 2.5.3

MIGS-32

Gene calling method

Prodigal

 

EMBL Date of Release

August 07, 2013

 

EMBL ID

CBQR000000000

MIGS-13

Project relevance

Study of the gorilla gut microbiome

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

Gorillibacterium massiliense gen. nov., sp. nov., strain G5T (= CSUR P290 = DSM 27179) was grown aerobically on 5% sheep blood-enriched Columbia agar at 37°C. Four petri dishes were spread and resuspended in 3×500µl of TE buffer and stored at 80°C. Then, 500 µl of this suspension were thawed, centrifuged 3 minutes at 10,000 rpm and resuspended in 3×100 µL of G2 buffer (EZ1 DNA Tissue kit, Qiagen). A first mechanical lysis was performed by glass powder on the Fastprep-24 device (Sample Preparation system, MP Biomedicals, USA) using 2×20 seconds cycles. DNA was then treated with 2.5µg/µL lysozyme (30 minutes at 37°C) and extracted using the BioRobot EZ1 Advanced XL (Qiagen). The DNA was then concentrated and purified using the Qiamp kit (Qiagen). The yield and the concentration were measured by the Quant-it Picogreen kit (Invitrogen) on the Genios Tecan fluorometer at 50ng/µl.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The paired-end library was prepared with 5 µg of bacterial DNA using DNA fragmentation on a Covaris S-Series (S2) instrument (Woburn, Massachusetts, USA) with an enrichment size at 4.5kb. DNA fragmentation was visualized with an Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer on a DNA labchip 7500. The library was constructed according to the 454 GS FLX Titanium paired-end protocol (Roche). Circularization and nebulization were performed and generated a pattern with an optimum at 510 bp. After PCR amplification through 17 cycles followed by double size selection, the single stranded paired-end library was quantified using a BioAnalyzer 2100 on a RNA pico 6000 labchip at 68 pg/µL. The library concentration equivalence was calculated as 2.45E+08 molecules/µL. The library was stored at −20°C until further use.

The paired-end library was clonally amplified with 0.25 cpb and 0.5 cpb in 2 emPCR reactions with the GS Titanium SV emPCR Kit (Lib-L) v2 (Roche). The yield of the emPCR was respectively of 5 and 6% as expected of the yield ranging from 5 to 20% recommended by the Roche procedure.

Approximately 790,000 beads were loaded twice (i.e. two runs were performed using the same paired-end library) on a ¼ region of the GS Titanium PicoTiterPlate PTP Kit 70×75 and sequenced with the GS FLX Titanium Sequencing Kit XLR70 (Roche). The two runs were performed overnight and then analyzed on the cluster through the gsRunBrowser and Newbler assembler (Roche). A total of 387,157 passed filter wells were obtained and generated 142.7 Mb of sequences with a length average of 369 bp. The passed filter sequences were assembled using Newbler with 90% identity and 40-bp as overlap. The final assembly identified 12 scaffolds with 176 large contigs (>1.5kb), generating a genome size of 5.5 Mb which corresponds to a genome coverage of 25.71×.

Genome annotation

Open Reading Frames (ORFs) were predicted using Prodigal [44] with default parameters but the predicted ORFs were excluded if they spanned a sequencing gap region. The predicted bacterial protein sequences were searched against the GenBank database [45] and the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) databases using BLASTP. The tRNAScanSE tool [46] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNAs were found by using RNAmmer [47] and BLASTn against the GenBank database. ORFans were identified if their BLASTP E-value was lower than 1e-03 for alignment length greater than 80 amino acids. If alignment lengths were smaller than 80 amino acids, we used an E-value of 1e-05.

To estimate the mean level of nucleotide sequence similarity at the genome level between G. massiliense and another 2 members of the family Paenibacillaceae and Brevibacillus brevis, we use the Average Genomic Identity of Orthologous gene Sequences (AGIOS), a custom application we developed. Briefly, the AGIOS software combines the Proteinortho software [48] for detecting orthologous proteins between genomes compared two by two, then retrieves the corresponding genes and determines the mean percentage of nucleotide sequence identity among orthologous ORFs using the Needleman-Wunsch global alignment algorithm.

Genome properties

The genome is 5,546,433 bp long with a 50.39% G+C content (Figure 6 and Table 4). It is composed of 189 Contigs (176 large contigs, 12 scaffolds). Of the 5,221 predicted genes, 5,145 were protein-coding genes, and 76 were RNAs (1 gene is 16S rRNA, 1 gene is 23S rRNA, 5 genes are 5S rRNA, and 69 are tRNA genes). A total of 3,865 genes (75.12%) were assigned a putative function (by cogs or by NR blast). In addition, 272 genes were identified as ORFans (5.29%). The remaining genes were annotated as hypothetical proteins (680 genes => 13.22%). The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 5. The properties and the statistics of the genome are summarized in Table 4 and 5.
Figure 6.

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on the forward strand colored by COG categories (only genes assigned to COG), genes on the reverse strand colored by COG categories (only gene assigned to COG), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red), G+C content and GC skew. Purple and olive indicating negative and positive values, respectively.

Table 4.

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the chromosome

Attribute

Value

% of totala

Genome size (bp)

5,546,433

100

DNA G+C content (bp)

2,794,611

50.39

DNA coding region (bp)

4,888,209

88.13

Total genes

5,221

100

RNA genes

76

1.46

Protein-coding genes

5,145

98.54

Genes with function prediction

3,865

75.12

Genes assigned to COGs

3,881

75.43

Genes with peptide signals

709

13.78

Genes with transmembrane helices

1,267

24.63

aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein-coding genes in the annotated genome

Table 5.

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

Code

Value

% agea

Description

J

201

3.91

Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

0

0

RNA processing and modification

K

483

9.39

Transcription

L

166

3.23

Replication, recombination and repair

B

1

0.02

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

43

0.84

Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis

Y

0

0

Nuclear structure

V

119

2.31

Defense mechanisms

T

313

6.08

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

205

3.98

Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

73

1.42

Cell motility

Z

5

0.1

Cytoskeleton

W

0

0

Extracellular structures

U

50

0.97

Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

121

2.35

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

180

3.5

Energy production and conversion

G

560

10.88

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

355

6.9

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

93

1.81

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

130

2.53

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

108

2.1

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

248

4.82

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

113

2.2

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

648

12.59

General function prediction only

S

328

6.38

Function unknown

-

1,264

24.57

Not in COGs

aThe total is based on the total number of protein-coding genes in the annotated genome

Genomic comparison of G. massiliense and other members of the family Paenibacillaceae

The genome of G. massiliense strain G5T was compared to those of P. elgii strain B69, P. alvei strain DSM 29 and B. brevis strain NBRC 100599 (Table 6A and Table 6B). The draft genome of G. massiliense is smaller in size than those of P. elgii, P. alvei and B. brevis (5.54 vs 7.96, 6.83 and 6.3 Mb respectively). G. massiliense has a lower G+C content than P. elgii (50.39% vs 52.6%) but higher than those of P. alvei and B. brevis (50.39% vs 45.9% and 47.3% respectively). The protein content of G. massiliense is lower than those of P. elgii, P. alvei and B. brevis (5,146 vs 7,597, 6,823 and 5,946 respectively) (Table 6 and Table 6B). In addition, G. massiliense shares 2,122, 1,846 and 1,716 orthologous genes with P. elgii, P. alvei and B. brevis, respectively (Table 6). The nucleotide sequence identity of orthologous genes ranges from 66 to 67.6% among previously published genomes, and from 65.3 to 68.7% between G. massiliense and other studied genomes (Table 6A and Table 6B). Table 6 summarizes the number of orthologous genes and the average percentage of nucleotide sequence identity between the different genomes studied.
Table 6A.

Genomic comparison of G. massiliense gen. nov., sp. nov., strain G5T with four other members of the family Paenibacillaceae

Species

Strain

Genome accession number

Genome size (Mb)

G+C content

Gorillibacterium massiliense

G5T

CBQR000000000

5.54

50.39

Paenibacillus elgii

B69

AFHW00000000

7.96

52.6

Paenibacillus alvei

DSM 29

AMBZ00000000

6.83

45.9

Brevibacillus brevis

NBRC 100599

AP008955

6.3

47.3

Species and strain names, GenBank genome accession numbers, sizes and G+C contents

Table 6B.

Genomic comparison of G. massiliense gen. nov., sp. nov., strain G5T with four other members of the family Paenibacillaceae

 

G. massiliense

P. elgii

P. alvei

B. brevis

G. massiliense

5,146

68.7

66.7

65.3

P. elgii

2,122

7,597

67.6

66.4

P. alvei

1,846

2,336

6,823

66

B. brevis

1,716

2,278

1,936

5,946

Numbers of orthologous protein shared between genomes (lower left triangle), average percentage similarity of nucleotides corresponding to orthologous proteins shared between genomes (upper right triangle). Bold numbers indicate numbers of proteins per genome.

Conclusion

On the basis of phenotypic, phylogenetic and genomic analyses, we formally propose the creation of Gorillibacterium massiliense gen. nov., sp. nov., that contains the strain G5T. This bacterium has been found in stool sample of wild gorilla collected in Cameroon.

Description of Gorillibacterium gen. nov.

Gorillibacterium (go.ri.li.bac.te.ri’um. gor.il.i NL gen fem, the genus name of the great ape; bac.ter’i.um N.L. neut. n., bacterium a rod; gorillibacterium a rod-shaped bacterium isolated from a gorilla).

Gram-negative rod. Facultatively anaerobic. Mesophilic. Non-motile. Oxidase negative, catalase positive. Positive for urease, nitrate reduction, α- and β-galactosidase, arginine dihydrolase, arginine arylamidase, and β-glucosidase. Habitat: gorilla gut. Type species: Gorillibacterium massiliense.

Description of Gorillibacterium massiliense gen. nov., sp. nov.

Gorillibacterium massiliense (ma.si.li.en’se. L. gen. neut. n. massiliense, of Massilia, the ancient Roman name for Marseille, France, where the type strain was isolated).

G. massiliense is Gram-negative rod. Facultatively anaerobic. Mesophilic. Optimal growth is achieved at 37°C. Non-sporulating and non-motile bacterium. Colonies are bright gray and 0.5–1 mm in diameter on blood-enriched Columbia agar. Cells are rod-shaped and have a mean diameter of 0.67 µm and a mean length of 1.75 µm.

Catalase positive, oxidase negative. Using the API 20NE system, positive reactions are observed for nitrate reduction and urease reaction, but indole production was negative. Using the API 50CH system (BioMerieux), a positive reaction was obtained for the fermentation of D-xylose, D-glucose, D-fructose, D-mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, aesculin, salicin, D-cellobiose, D-maltose, D-lactose, D-melibiose, D-saccharose, D-trehalose, inulin, D-melezitose, D-raffinose, glycogen, gentiobiose, D-turanose, Methyl-αD-glucopyranoside and starch. Negative reactions are observed for glycerol, ribose, D-galactose, L-rhamnose, L-sorbose, dulcitol, inositol, D-mannitol, D-sorbitol, methyl-αD-mannopyranoside, D-arabinose, amygdalin, arbitin, potassium gluconate, potassium 2-cetogluconate, potassium 5-cetogluconate, adonitol and D-tagatose. Using the API ZYM system, positive reactions were observed for the production of naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, β-glucosidase, Arginine arylamidase and Arginine dihydrolase. The production of α-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase, esterase lipase, leucine arylamidase and cystine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, glycine arylamidase, phenylalanine arylamidase, lipase, alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase and a-chymotrypsin are negative. Susceptible to ticarcillin, amoxicillin, tobramycin, imipenem, vancomycin and rifampin but resistant to ceftazidime, colistin and metronidazole.

The G+C content of the genome is 50.39%. The 16S rRNA and genome sequences are deposited in GenBank under accession numbers KC193239 and CBQR000000000, respectively. The type strain G5T (= CSUR P290 = DSM 27179) was isolated from the fecal flora of a Gorilla gorilla gorilla from Cameroon.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Fadi Bittar was supported by a Chair of Excellence IRD provided by the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement/Méditerranée-Infection foundation. Mamadou Bhoye Keita was funded by the Méditerranée-Infection Foundation. The authors thank the Xegen company for automating the genome annotation process.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
URMITE, Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de médecine
(2)
IRD, University Montpellier 1
(3)
King Fahad Medical Research Center, King Abdul Aziz University

References

  1. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Million M, Hugon P, Pagnier I, Robert C, Bittar F, Fournous G, Gimenez G, Maraninchi M, et al. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18:1185–1193. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dubourg G, Lagier JC, Armougom F, Robert C, Hamad I, Brouqui P, Raoult D. The gut microbiota of a patient with resistant tuberculosis is more comprehensively studied by culturomics than by metagenomics. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2013; 32:637–645. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1787-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pfleiderer A, Lagier JC, Armougom F, Robert C, Vialettes B, Raoult D. Culturomics identified 11 new bacterial species from a single anorexia nervosa stool sample. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2013; 32:1471–1481. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-013-1900-2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Clostridium senegalense sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:386–395. PubMedPubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Mishra AK, Ngyuen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:315–324. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2685971PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lagier JC, El Karkouri K, Nguyen TT, Armougom F, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Anaerococcus senegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 6:116–125. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2415480PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Roux V, El Karkouri K, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Kurthia massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:221–232. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3206554PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Peptoniphilus timonensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:1–11. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.2956294PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hugon P, Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Rivet R, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Alistipes obesi sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:427–439. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3336746PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Dielma fastidiosa gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the Family Erysipelotrichaceae. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:336–351. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3567059PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Genome sequence and description of Timonella senegalensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the suborder Micrococcinae. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:318–335. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3476977PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mishra AK, Hugon P, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Enorma massiliensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the Family Coriobacteriaceae. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:290–305. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3426906PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramasamy D, Lagier JC, Gorlas A, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus massiliosenegalensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:264–278. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3496989PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hugon P, Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Nguyen TT, Couderc C, Raoult D, Fournier PE. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Brevibacillus massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 8:1–14. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3466975PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Keita MB, Diene S, Robert C, Raoult D, Fournier PE, Bittar F. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Bacillus massiliogorillae sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 9:93–105. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.4056/sigs.4388124PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. De Vos P, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB. Family IV. Paenibacillaceae fam. nov. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd Edition, vol 3 (The Firmicutes), Springer; New York, 2009, p. 269.Google Scholar
  17. Abstract for the family Paenibacillaceae. NamesforLife, LLC. Retrieved October 21, 2013. http://doi.namesforlife.com/10.1601/tx.5108
  18. Ash C, Priest FG, Collins MD. Molecular identification of rRNA group 3 bacilli (Ash, Farrow, Wallbanks and Collins) using a PCR probe test. Proposal for the creation of a new genus Paenibacillus. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1993; 64:253–260. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00873085View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. The type species of the genus Paenibacillus Ash et al. 1994 is Paenibacillus polymyxa. Opinion 77. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:513.
  20. Zaitsev GM, Tsitko IV, Rainey FA, Trotsenko YA, Uotila JS, Stackebrandt E, Salkinoja-Salonen MS. New aerobic ammonium-dependent obligately oxalotrophic bacteria: description of Ammoniphilus oxalaticus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Ammoniphilus oxalivorans gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48:151–163. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-48-1-151View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Shida O, Takagi H, Kadowaki K, Komagata K. Proposal for two new genera, Brevibacillus gen. nov. and Aneurinibacillus gen. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 46:939–946. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-46-4-939View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Touzel JP, O’Donohue M, Debeire P, Samain E, Breton C. Thermobacillus xylanilyticus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new aerobic thermophilic xylan-degrading bacterium isolated from farm soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:315–320. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-50-1-315View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Saha P, Krishnamurthi S, Bhattacharya A, Sharma R, Chakrabarti T. Fontibacillus aquaticus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a warm spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:422–428. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.012633-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kämpfer P, Rosselló-Mora R, Falsen E, Busse HJ, Tindall BJ. Cohnella thermotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., and classification of ‘Paenibacillus hongkongensis’ as Cohnella hongkongensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:781–786. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63985-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rivas R, García-Fraile P, Zurdo-Piñeiro JL, Mateos PF, Martínez-Molina E, Bedmar EJ, Sänchez-Raya J, Velázquez E. Saccharibacillus sacchari gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from sugar cane. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1850–1854. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.65499-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Collins MD, Lawson PA, Willems A, Cordoba JJ, Fernandez-Garayzabal J, Garcia P, Cai J, Hippe H, Farrow JA. The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:812–826. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-44-4-812View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archae, Bacteria, and Eukarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gibbons NE, Murray RGE. Proposals concerning the higher taxa of Bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1978; 28:1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-28-1-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 119–169.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Murray RGE. The Higher Taxa, or, a Place for Everything…? In: Holt JG (ed), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, First Edition, Volume 1, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1984, p. 31–34.Google Scholar
  31. Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB. Class I. Bacilli class nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009, p. 19–20.Google Scholar
  32. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. List no. 132. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:469–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.022855-0
  33. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225–420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-225View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Prévot AR. In: Hauderoy P, Ehringer G, Guillot G, Magrou. J., Prévot AR, Rosset D, Urbain A (eds), Dictionnaire des Bactéries Pathogènes, Second Edition, Masson et Cie, Paris, 1953, p. 1–692Google Scholar
  35. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011; 28:2731–2739. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 2006; 33:152–155.Google Scholar
  38. Bosshard PP, Zbinden R, Altwegg M. Paenibacillus turicensis sp. nov., a novel bacterium harbouring heterogeneities between 16S rRNA genes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:2241–2249. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02105-0PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim DS, Bae CY, Jeon JJ, Chun SJ, Oh HW, Hong SG, Baek KS, Moon EY, Bae KS. Paenibacillus elgii sp. nov., with broad antimicrobial activity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:2031–2035. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02414-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ueda J, Yamamoto S, Kurosawa N. Paenibacillus thermoaerophilus sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic bacterium isolated from compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3330–3335. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.048090-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee FL, Kuo HP, Tai CJ, Yokota A, Lo CC. Paenibacillus taiwanensis sp. nov., isolated from soil in Taiwan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1351–1354. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64764-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Takebe F, Hirota K, Nodasaka Y, Yumoto I. Brevibacillus nitrificans sp. nov., a nitrifying bacterium isolated from a microbiological agent for enhancing microbial digestion in sewage treatment tanks. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2121–2126. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.032342-0View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Prodigal. http://prodigal.ornl.gov
  45. GenBank database. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank
  46. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. t-RNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA gene in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.5.0955PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rodland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35:3100–3108. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm160PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lechner M, Findeib S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ. Proteinortho: Detection of (Co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:124. PubMed http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-124PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2014