Open Access

A Genomic Encyclopedia of the Root Nodule Bacteria: assessing genetic diversity through a systematic biogeographic survey

  • Wayne Reeve5Email author,
  • Julie Ardley5,
  • Rui Tian5,
  • Leila Eshragi5, 6,
  • Je Won Yoon5,
  • Pinyaruk Ngamwisetkun5,
  • Rekha Seshadri7,
  • Natalia N Ivanova7 and
  • Nikos C Kyrpides7, 8
Standards in Genomic Sciences201510:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/1944-3277-10-14

Received: 26 November 2014

Accepted: 5 December 2014

Published: 9 February 2015

Abstract

Root nodule bacteria are free-living soil bacteria, belonging to diverse genera within the Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria, that have the capacity to form nitrogen-fixing symbioses with legumes. The symbiosis is specific and is governed by signaling molecules produced from both host and bacteria. Sequencing of several model RNB genomes has provided valuable insights into the genetic basis of symbiosis. However, the small number of sequenced RNB genomes available does not currently reflect the phylogenetic diversity of RNB, or the variety of mechanisms that lead to symbiosis in different legume hosts. This prevents a broad understanding of symbiotic interactions and the factors that govern the biogeography of host-microbe symbioses.

Here, we outline a proposal to expand the number of sequenced RNB strains, which aims to capture this phylogenetic and biogeographic diversity. Through the Vavilov centers of diversity (Proposal ID: 231) and GEBA-RNB (Proposal ID: 882) projects we will sequence 107 RNB strains, isolated from diverse legume hosts in various geographic locations around the world. The nominated strains belong to nine of the 16 currently validly described RNB genera. They include 13 type strains, as well as elite inoculant strains of high commercial importance. These projects will strongly support systematic sequence-based studies of RNB and contribute to our understanding of the effects of biogeography on the evolution of different species of RNB, as well as the mechanisms that determine the specificity and effectiveness of nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation by RNB with diverse legume hosts.

Keywords

GEBA-RNB Root nodule bacteria Diversity Symbiosis Nitrogen fixation

Introduction

The importance of the research

Legumes, with around 20,000 species and over 700 genera, are the third largest flowering plant family and are found on all continents (except Antarctica). They are major components of most of the world’s vegetation types and have important roles in agriculture as both pastures and pulses [1, 2]. Most legumes are able to form dinitrogen-fixing symbioses with soil bacteria, collectively known as root nodule bacteria or rhizobia. RNB infection elicits the organogenesis of a unique structure, the nodule, which forms on the root (or less commonly, the stem) of the host plant. The mode of infection and the morphology and structure of the resulting nodule varies within the different legume tribes and has phylogenetic significance [3, 4]. Following infection, RNB migrate to the nodule primordium, are endocytosed within the host cell and differentiate into N2-fixing bacteroids.

The availability of utilizable nitrogen is the critical determinant for plant productivity. Legume-RNB symbiotic nitrogen fixation is a vital source of N in both natural and agricultural ecosystems. Based on different estimates, the total annual input of biologically fixed N ranges from 139 to 175 million tons, 35 to 44 million tons of which is attributed to RNB-legume associations growing on arable land, with those in permanent pastures accounting for another 45 million tons of N. N2-fixation by legume pastures and crops provides 65% of the N currently utilized in agricultural production [5, 6]. The economic value of legumes on the farm is estimated at $30 billion annually, including $22 billion in the value of legume crops and $8 billion in the value of N2-fixation. Increasing the efficiency of the legume-RNB symbiosis has been projected to have an annual US benefit of $1,067 million, while transferring SNF technology to cereals and totally eliminating chemical N fertilization of the major crops will have an annual US benefit of $4,484 million [7].

Incorporating SNF in agricultural systems also reduces energy consumption, compared with systems that rely on chemical N-input. Every ton of manufactured N-fertilizer requires 873 m3 of natural gas and ultimately releases ~2 tons of CO2 into the air [8]. Furthermore, >50% of US N-fertilizer is imported, which further increases the energy cost of chemical N fertilizer. SNF has the potential to reduce the application of manufactured N-fertilizer by ~160 million tons pa, equating to a reduction of 270 million tons of coal or equivalent fossil fuel consumed in the production process. As well as energy cost savings, this reduces CO2 greenhouse gas emissions. Legume- and forage-based rotations also reduce CO2 emission by maintaining high levels of soil organic matter, thus enhancing both soil fertility and carbon storage in soil [9]. There are additional significant environmental costs to the use of N fertilizer: agriculturally based increases in reactive N are substantial and widespread, and lead to losses of biological diversity, compromised air and water quality, and threats to human health [10]. Microbial nitrification and denitrification of soil N are major contributors to emissions of the potent greenhouse gas and air pollutant, nitrous oxide, from agricultural soils [5]. Emission of N2O is in direct proportion to the amount of fertilizer applied. In addition, fertilizer N not recovered by the crop rapidly enters surface and groundwater pools, leading to drinking water contamination, and eutrophication and hypoxia in aquatic ecosystems [8].

The global increase in population is predicted to double demand for agricultural production by 2050 [11]. To meet this demand without incurring the high and unsustainable costs associated with the increased use of chemical N-fertilizer, the N2-fixing potential of the legume-RNB symbiosis must be maximized. Achieving this target will require a greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern specificity and effectiveness of N2-fixation in diverse RNB-legume symbioses.

Genome sequencing of RNB strains has revolutionized our understanding of the bacterial functional genomics that underpin symbiotic interactions and N2-fixation. However, previous RNB sequencing projects have not reflected the phylogenetic and biogeographic diversity of RNB or the variety of mechanisms that lead to symbiosis in different legume hosts. As a result, the insights gained into SNF have been limited to a small group of symbioses and there has not yet been a systematic effort to remedy this narrow focus.

Here, we outline proposals for two sequencing projects to be undertaken at the DoE Joint Genome Institute that aim to expand the number of sequenced RNB strains in order to capture this phylogenetic and biogeographic diversity. Through the Vavilov centers of diversity (Proposal ID: 231) and GEBA-RNB (Proposal ID: 882) projects we will sequence 107 RNB strains isolated from diverse legume hosts in various geographic locations in over 30 countries around the world. The sequenced strains belong to nine of the 16 validly described RNB genera and have been isolated from 69 different legume species, representing 39 taxonomically diverse genera, growing in diverse biomes. These proposals will provide unprecedented perspectives on the evolution, ecology and biogeography of legume-RNB symbioses, as no rhizobial sequencing project so far has attempted to relate extensive genomic characterization of RNB strains to comprehensive metadata and thereby identify correlations between the genomes of rhizobial strains, their symbiotic associations with specific legume hosts, and the environmental parameters of their habitats.

Project design

Selection of target organisms

The proposed RNB genome sequencing projects were designed with two different but complementary objectives in mind. In the “Analysis of the clover, pea/bean and lupin microsymbiont genetic pool by studying isolates from distinct Vavilov centres of diversity” project (Proposal ID: 231), the nominated RNB included clover, pea/Vicia and lupin-nodulating strains, chosen because their hosts are of highly significant commercial importance [12]. The legumes originate from six distinct Vavilov centres of diversity: the Mediterranean basin, high altitude Temperate Europe, North America, South America, highland central Africa and southern Africa [13]. The rhizobial associations in these centers have phenological and geographic specificity for nodulation and nitrogen fixation [14, 15]. A detailed analysis of strains representing the six centres of diversity will enable the investigation of the evolution and biodiversity of symbioses from a geographic and phenological viewpoint.

The GEBA-RNB project falls under the umbrella of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea family projects. The original GEBA project [16] sequenced and analysed the genomes of Bacteria and Archaea species selected to maximize phylogenetic coverage. RNB are polyphyletic, belonging to diverse genera of the Alphaproteobacteria- and Betaproteobacteria; currently, 16 genera and over 100 species have been validly described (ICSP Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Rhizobium and Agrobacterium). Existing RNB sequencing programs have tended to focus on particular organisms or on RNB isolated from specific hosts. The GEBA-RNB project was therefore designed as a systematic genome sequencing project to capture RNB phylogenetic and symbiotic diversity. RNB strains were selected on the basis of (i) phylogenetic diversity, (ii) legume host diversity, (iii) economic importance and (iv) biogeographic origin. Strains were also required to have comprehensive metadata records and well characterized phenotypes, in particular relating to symbiotic effectiveness. In addition, the phylogenetic divergence of strains from previously sequenced isolates was taken into account.

The map in Figure 1 shows collection sites of strains selected for sequencing. Table 1 lists the strains nominated for sequencing, their country of origin and original host. Extensive metadata is available for all strains and was used to guide strain selection; proposed strains display a wide range of host specificities (from strictly specific to highly promiscuous) and SNF efficiency. The RNB were collected from sites that spanned a broad range of soils and climates (e.g. neutral, acidic or alkaline soil, tropical, arid or temperate climate). These strains differ in their physiological attributes (ability to recycle hydrogen, rhizobitoxine production, salt and acid tolerance, heavy metal resistance, methylotrophy) and some of them display unusual genetic features (unique genotype based on multilocus sequence typing, nodulation phenotype, atypical organization of symbiosis islands or identical symbiosis islands in different genetic backgrounds).
Figure 1

This map shows the location of isolation of root nodule bacteria strains requested for sequencing in this proposal. Color codes are as follows: Alphaproteobacteria; Azorhizobium (yellow), Bradyrhizobium (green), Ensifer (red), Mesorhizobium (light blue), Methylobacterium (purple), Microvirga (orange), Rhizobium (blue) and Betaproteobacteria (circles); Burkholderia (yellow), Cupriavidus (blue).

Table 1

Root nodule bacteria strains used in the Vavilov centers of diversity (Proposal ID: 231) and GEBA-RNB (Proposal ID: 882) genome sequencing projects

Genus

Species

Strain

Country of isolation

Original host

Azorhizobium

Azorhizobium doebereinerae

UFLA1-100T

Brazil

Sesbania virgata

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium elkanii

USDA 76T

USA

Glycine max

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium elkanii

USDA 94

USA

Glycine max

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium elkanii

USDA 3259

USA

Phaseolus lunatus

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium elkanii

USDA 3254

USA

Phaseolus acutifolius

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

WSM1741

Australia

Rhynchosia minima

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp

USDA 4

USA

Glycine max

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium japonicum

*USDA 6T

Japan

Glycine max

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium japonicum

USDA 38

Japan

Glycine max

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

*USDA 122

USA

Glycine max

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

USDA 123

USA

Glycine max

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

USDA 124

USA

Glycine max

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

USDA 135

USA

Glycine max

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

WSM1743

Australia

Indigofera sp.

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

*WSM2254

Australia

Acacia dealbata

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

WSM2793

South Africa

Rhynchosia totta.

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

Ai1a-2

Costa Rica

Andira inermis

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

ARR65

Australia

Stylosanthes viscosa

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

*CB756

Zimbabwe

Macrotyloma africanum

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

Cp5.3

Panama

Centrosema pubescens

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

EC3.3

Panama

Erythrina costaricensis

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

Th.b2

USA

Amphicarpaea bracteata

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

TV2a.2

Panama

Tachigali versicolor

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

*USDA 3384

Brazil

Crotalaria paulina

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

*WSM471

Australia

Ornithopus pinnatus

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

WSM1253

Greece

Ornithopus compressus

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

WSM1417

Chile

Lupinus sp.

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

WSM2783

South Africa

Leobordea carinata

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

WSM3983

Australia

Kennedia coccinea

Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium sp.

WSM4349

USA

Syrmatium glabrum

Burkholderia

Burkholderia dilworthii

WSM3556T

South Africa

Lebeckia ambigua

Burkholderia

Burkholderia mimosarum

STM3621

French Guiana

Mimosa pudica

Burkholderia

Burkholderia mimosarum

LMG 23256T

Taiwan

Mimosa pigra

Burkholderia

Burkholderia sprentiae

WSM5005T

South Africa

Lebeckia ambigua

Burkholderia

Burkholderia symbiotica

JPY347

Brazil

Mimosa cordistipula

Burkholderia

Burkholderia tuberum

WSM4176

South Africa

Lebeckia ambigua

Burkholderia

Burkholderia sp.

JPY251

Brazil

Mimosa velloziana

Burkholderia

Burkholderia sp.

JPY366

Brazil

Mimosa misera

Burkholderia

Burkholderia sp.

UYPR1.413

Uruguay

Parapiptadenia rigida

Burkholderia

Burkholderia sp.

WSM2230

Australia

Kennedia coccinea

Burkholderia

Burkholderia sp..

WSM2232

Australia

Gastrolobium capitatum

Cupriavidus

Cupriavidus taiwanensis

STM6018

French Guiana

Mimosa pudica

Cupriavidus

Cupriavidus taiwanensis

STM6070

New Caledonia

Mimosa pudica

Cupriavidus

Cupriavidus sp.

AMP6

USA

Mimosa asperata

Cupriavidus

Cupriavidus sp.

UYPR2.512

Uruguay

Parapiptadenia rigida

Ensifer

Ensiferar boris

LMG 14919T

Sudan

Prosopis chilensis

Ensifer

Ensifer medicae

Di28

Sardinia

Medicago arabica

Ensifer

Ensifer medicae

WSM244

Iraq

Medicago polymorpha

Ensifer

Ensifer medicae

*WSM1115

Greece

Medicago polymorpha

Ensifer

Ensifer medicae

WSM1369

Sardinia

Medicago sphaerocarpos

Ensifer

Ensifer medicae

WSM4191

Australia

Melilotus siculus

Ensifer

Ensifer meliloti

*4H41

Tunisia

Phaseolus vulgaris

Ensifer

Ensifer meliloti

CIAM1775

Kazakhstan

Medicago lupulina

Ensifer

Ensifer meliloti

GVPV12

Canary Islands (Spain)

Phaseolus vulgaris

Ensifer

Ensifer meliloti

Mlalz-1

Canary Islands (Spain)

Medicago laciniata

Ensifer

Ensifer meliloti

MVII-I

Germany

Medicago sativa

Ensifer

Ensifer meliloti

*RRI128

Australia

Medicago truncatula

Ensifer

Ensifer meliloti

WSM1022

Greece

Medicago orbicularis

Ensifer

Ensifer sp.

BR816

Brazil

Leucaena leucocephala

Ensifer

Ensifer sp.

PC2

India

Prosopis cineraria

Ensifer

Ensifer sp.

TW10

India

Tephrosia wallichii

Ensifer

Ensifer sp.

USDA 6670 (CC 2017)

Australia

Medicago sativa

Ensifer

Ensifer sp.

WSM1721

Australia

Indigofera sp.

Mesorhizobium

Mesorhizobium ciceri

CMG6

Tunisia

Cicer arietinum

Mesorhizobium

Mesorhizobium ciceri

WSM4083

Canary Islands (Spain)

Bituminaria bituminosa

Mesorhizobium

Mesorhizobium loti

CJ3sym

New Zealand

Lotus corniculatus

Mesorhizobium

Mesorhizobium loti

NZP2037

New Zealand

Lotus divaricatus

Mesorhizobium

Mesorhizobium loti

R7A

New Zealand

Lotus corniculatus

Mesorhizobium

Mesorhizobium loti

R88b

New Zealand

Lotus corniculatus

Mesorhizobium

Mesorhizobium loti

USDA 3471T

New Zealand

Lotus corniculatus

Mesorhizobium

Mesorhizobium sp.

WSM1293

Greece

Lotus sp.

Mesorhizobium

Mesorhizobium sp.

WSM2561

South Africa

Lessertia diffusa

Mesorhizobium

Mesorhizobium sp.

WSM3224

South Africa

Otholobium candicans

Mesorhizobium

Mesorhizobium sp.

WSM3626

South Africa

Lessertia diffusa

Methylobacterium

Mesorhizobium sp.

WSM2598

South Africa

Listia bainesii

Microvirga

Microvirga lotononidis

WSM3557T

Zambia

Listia angolensis

Microvirga

Microvirga lupini

Lut6T

USA

Lupinus texensis

Rhizobium

Rhizobium giardinii

H152T

France

Phaseolus vulgaris

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Phaseoli

4292

UK

Phaseolus vulgaris

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Phaseoli

FA23

Poland

Phaseolus vulgaris

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii

*CB782

Kenya

Trifolium semipilosum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii

CC278f

USA

Trifolium nanum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii

*CC283b

Russia

Trifolium ambiguum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii

SRDI565

Australia

Trifolium subterraneum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii

SRDI943

Australia

Trifolium subterraneum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii

*TA1

Australia

Trifolium subterraneum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii

WSM597

Uruguay

Trifolium pallidum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii

WSM1689

Greece

Trifolium uniflorum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii

WSM2012

Ethiopia

Trifolium ruepellianum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Trifolii

WSM2297

South Africa

Trifolium africanum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae

248

UK

Vicia faba

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae

128C53

UK

Pisum sativum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae

GB30

Poland

Pisum sativum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae

Ps8

UK

Pisum sativum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae

TOM

Turkey

Pisum sativum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae

UPM1131

Italy

Pisum sativum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae

UPM1137

Italy

Pisum sativum

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae

Vc2

UK

Vicia cracca

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae

VF39

Germany

Vicia faba

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae

Vh3

UK

Vicia hirsuta

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae

WSM1455

Greece

Vicia faba

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. Viciae

WSM1481

Greece

Vicia faba

Rhizobium

Rhizobium leucaenae

*USDA 9039T

Brazil

Phaseolus vulgaris

Rhizobium

Rhizobium mesoamericanum

STM6155

New Caledonia

Mimosa pudica

Rhizobium

Rhizobium mongolense

USDA 1844T

China

Medicago ruthenica

Rhizobium

Rhizobium sullae

*WSM1592

Italy

Hedysarum coronarium

Rhizobium

Rhizobium tibeticum

OR 191

USA

Medicago sativa

Ttype strain; *commercial inoculant.

Organism growth and nucleic acid isolation

The international consortium, which consists of more than 34 experts in the field from 15 different countries, together with Culture Collections Centers in Australia and Belgium will be growing the 107 different RNB. Quality Control will be performed for all samples before shipping the DNA to the JGI. All samples from members of the consortium that are based in the US, will be sent to Dr Peter van Berkum in Washington DC, and all other samples will be quality controlled at the Centre for Rhizobium Studies, Murdoch University in Australia before shipping to the JGI. Scientists at the Centre for Rhizobium Studies have extensive experience in producing high quality DNA, a skill acquired as a result of a long collaboration with the JGI as is evidenced by collaborative publication [1722].

Sequencing approach

Most RNB strains are characterized by multipartite genomes, the size of which varies between 5-10 Mb, with an average G + C%age of 60-65%. We propose drafting of the 107 RNB genomes using Illumina, PacBio or Roche sequencing platforms. All genomes will be completed to at least the stage of high quality draft. As most RNB strains carry their symbiotic genes on plasmids or within mobile islands that can be integrated in different sites on the chromosome, accurate scaffolding information is important for separation of chromosomal and plasmid-borne genes of interest.

Annotation and comparative analysis

The microbial genome annotation pipeline at the JGI has been scaled to handle hundreds of microbial genomes per month [2325].

Publication of analyzed genomes

As many genomes as possible that are of publication quality will be published in Standards in Genomic Sciences [26, 27].

The scientific questions we expect to answer

The genome sequences of RNB generated in this project will be used to identify the core genomes of different RNB species, as well as dispensable parts of species pangenomes and their distribution between strains from different locales and/or plant hosts. Symbiotically relevant sets of genes such as those participating in adhesion, biosynthesis of nodulation factors, SNF, energy metabolism and exopolysaccharide biosynthesis will be characterized in detail. This will include the genes’ evolutionary histories and genome dynamics, such as localization on plasmids or within genomic islands and relation to mobile genetic elements. Statistical analyses will be performed in order to identify genes and gene sets that correlate with host specificity, nodulation and SNF efficiency and with various environmental metadata such as edaphic and climatic constraints. Within RNB strains of the same species, but from different environmental sites and/or legume hosts, genes that are under selective pressure will be identified and characterized by analysis of synonymous and non-synonymous substitution rates.

These analyses will be informed by the comprehensive metadata that are available for each strain, including data on the strains’ collection site, host specificity, nodulation and SNF efficiency. Considerable efforts have been devoted to sourcing strains from different geographical locations in order to improve legume productivity across a range of environments, and the project takes advantage of the particularly well characterized RNB that have been sourced from several culture collections around the globe. Biogeographic considerations are particularly relevant to the RNB as their survival and persistence as soil saprophytes is dictated by environmental and edaphic constraints such as temperature, salinity, pH, and soil moisture and clay content [28].

This project will support systematic sequence-based studies of the RNB and contribute to our understanding of the biogeographic effects on the evolution of different rhizobial species, as well as the mechanisms determining the specificity and efficiency of nodulation and N2-fixation by RNB.

The relevance of the project to problems of societal importance

The symbiotic nitrogen fixation by RNB is a significant asset for world agricultural productivity, farming economy and environmental sustainability. Large-scale agricultural use of highly effective N2-fixing legumes will be critical for sustainable food production for livestock and humans. Increased incorporation of SNF into agricultural systems reduces the requirement for inputs of economically and environmentally costly nitrogenous fertilizer. Currently, ~1–2% of the world's annual energy supply is used in the Haber-Bosch process to manufacture chemical N, at a cost of $US 6.8 billion pa. In addition, SNF significantly reduces greenhouse gas emissions compared to intensive agriculture practice, which requires large inputs of chemical N. SNF also benefits the environment by helping to reduce dry-land salinity, increase soil fertility, promote carbon sequestration and prevent eutrophication of waterways. Recent publications have also emphasized the importance of providing renewable sources of biofuels [29, 30], and a detailed understanding of endosymbionts and SNF will aid this quest. Pongamia pinnata, for example, is a leguminous tree that is important for the biofuel industry and is nodulated by a Bradyrhizobium strain [31] that has been included for sequencing in this proposal.

Apart from their economic importance, RNB also represent a uniquely tractable biological system that can offer insights into the shared genetic mechanisms between fungal and bacterial root endosymbioses [32] and between intracellular pathogens and endocytosed RNB microsymbionts. The latter have been shown to share similar host-adapted strategies in their infection processes and adaptation to growth within the cytoplasm of a eukaryotic host [33, 34]. An understanding of these mechanisms will facilitate the quest to extend N2-fixation to cereals, a goal which is being vigorously pursued and which has been described as essential for future sustainable food production [35].

Conclusion

The legume-RNB symbiosis is one of the best-studied associations between microbes and eukaryotes, due to the economic and ecological importance of symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Targeting RNB for sequencing on the basis of firstly, phylogenetic diversity and secondly, isolation from taxonomically distinct host legumes growing in diverse biomes offers significant benefits. Previous RNB sequencing projects have tended to focus on a narrow range of model organisms. By setting a goal of maximizing the phylogenetic diversity of sequenced RNB strains, these projects, in keeping with the other members of the GEBA family of projects, aid the development of a phylogenetically balanced genomic representation of the microbial tree of life and allow for the large-scale discovery of novel rhizobial genes and functions. The chosen RNB strains are available to the global research community and are stored in culture collections that are dedicated to long-term storage and distribution. A wealth of experimental data and metadata is available for each strain, which will inform analyses to identify genes and gene sets that correlate with rhizobial adaptation to diverse biomes, to the nodule environments found in taxonomically distinct legume hosts and to the effectiveness of nitrogen fixation within these nodules. Moreover, the legume-RNB symbiosis is an excellent model system to study plant-bacterial associations, including symbiotic signaling, cell differentiation and the mechanisms of endocytosis. The sequenced RNB genomes will not only provide a greater understanding of legume-RNB associations, but can be used to gain insights into the evolution of N2-fixing symbioses and microbe-eukaryote interactions.

Abbreviations

RNB: 

Root nodule bacteria

N2

Dinitrogen

N: 

nitrogen

SNF: 

Symbiotic nitrogen fixation

N2O: 

Nitrous oxide

GEBA: 

Genomic Encyclopedia for Bacteria and Archaea.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Rhizobium Studies, Murdoch University
(2)
Centre for Phytophthora Science and Management, Murdoch University
(3)
DOE Joint Genome Institute
(4)
Department of Biological Sciences, King Abdulaziz University

References

  1. Lewis G, Schrire B, Mackinder B, Lock M: Legumes of the World. Richmond, Surrey: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; 2005.Google Scholar
  2. Graham PH, Vance CP: Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol 2003, 131:872–7. 10.1104/pp.017004View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sprent JI, James EK: Legume evolution: where do nodules and mycorrhizas fit in? Plant Physiol 2007, 144:575–81. 10.1104/pp.107.096156View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sprent JI, Ardley JK, James EK: From North to South: a latitudinal look at legume nodulation processes. S Afr J Bot 2013, 89:31–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Socolow RH: Nitrogen management and the future of food: Lessons from the management of energy and carbon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999, 96:6001–8. 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6001View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Galloway JN, Schlesinger WH, Levy H, Michaels A, Schnoor JL: Nitrogen fixation: anthropogenic enhancement-environmental response. Global Biogeochem Cy 1995, 9:235–52. 10.1029/95GB00158View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Tauer L: Economic impact of future biological nitrogen fixation technologies on United States agriculture. Plant Soil 1989, 119:261–70. 10.1007/BF02370418View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Vance CP: Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition: plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol 2001, 127:390–7. 10.1104/pp.010331View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gregorich EG, Rochette P, VandenBygaart AJ, Angers DA: Greenhouse gas contributions of agricultural soils and potential mitigation practices in Eastern Canada. Soil Till Res 2005, 83:53–72. 10.1016/j.still.2005.02.009View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Robertson GP, Vitousek PM: Nitrogen in agriculture: balancing the cost of an essential resource. Annu Rev Env Resour 2009, 34:97–125. 10.1146/annurev.environ.032108.105046View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ray DK, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA: Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. Plos One 2013, 8:e66428. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066428View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Howieson JG, O’Hara GW, Carr SJ: Changing roles for legumes in Mediterranean agriculture: developments from an Australian perspective. Field Crop Res 2000, 65:107–22. 10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00081-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zohary M, Heller D: The Genus Trifolium. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities Ahva Printing Press; 1984.Google Scholar
  14. Gladstones JS, Atkins CA, Hamblin J: Lupins as Crop Plants: Biology, Production, and Utilization. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: New York, NY, USA: CAB International; 1998.Google Scholar
  15. Howieson J, Yates R, O'Hara G, Ryder M, Real D: The interactions of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii in nodulation of annual and perennial Trifolium spp from diverse centres of origin. Aust J Exp Agric 2005, 45:199–207. 10.1071/EA03167View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, Hooper SD, Pati A, Lykidis A, Spring S, Anderson IJ, D'haeseleer P, Zemla A, Singer M, Lapidus A, Nolan M, Copeland A, Han C, Chen F, Cheng J-F, Lucas S, Kerfeld C, Lang E, Gronow S, Chain P, Bruce D, et al.: A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea . Nature 2009, 462:1056–60. 10.1038/nature08656View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Reeve W, Chain P, O'Hara G, Ardley J, Nandesena K, Brau L, Tiwari R, Malfatti S, Kiss H, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Nolan M, Land M, Hauser L, Chang YJ, Ivanova N, Mavromatis K, Markowitz V, Kyrpides N, Gollagher M, Yates R, Dilworth M, Howieson J: Complete genome sequence of the Medicago microsymbiont Ensifer ( Sinorhizobium ) medicae strain WSM419. Stand Genom Sci 2010, 2:77–86. 10.4056/sigs.43526View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Reeve W, O'Hara G, Chain P, Ardley J, Brau L, Nandesena K, Tiwari R, Copeland A, Nolan M, Han C, Brettin T, Land M, Ovchinikova G, Ivanova N, Mavromatis K, Markowitz V, Kyrpides N, Melino V, Denton M, Yates R, Howieson J: Complete genome sequence of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii strain WSM1325, an effective microsymbiont of annual Mediterranean clovers. Stand Genom Sci 2010, 2:347–56. 10.4056/sigs.852027View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Reeve W, O'Hara G, Chain P, Ardley J, Brau L, Nandesena K, Tiwari R, Malfatti S, Kiss H, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Nolan M, Land M, Ivanova N, Mavromatis K, Markowitz V, Kyrpides N, Melino V, Denton M, Yates R, Howieson J: Complete genome sequence of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv trifolii strain WSM2304, an effective microsymbiont of the South American clover Trifolium polymorphum . Stand Genom Sci 2010, 2:66–76. 10.4056/sigs.44642View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Reeve WG, Nandasena K, Yates R, Tiwari R, O'Hara G, Ninawi M, Chertkov O, Goodwin L, Bruce D, Detter C, Tapia R, Han S, Woyke T, Pitluck S, Nolan M, Land M, Copeland A, Liolios K, Pati A, Mavromatis K, Markowitz V, Kyrpides N, Ivanova N, Meenakshi U, Howieson J: Complete genome sequence of Mesorhizobium opportunistum type strain WSM2075 T . Stand Genom Sci 2013, 9:294–303. 10.4056/sigs.4538264View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Reeve W, Nandasena K, Yates R, Tiwari R, O'Hara G, Ninawi M, Gu W, Goodwin L, Detter C, Tapia R, Han C, Copeland A, Liolios K, Chen A, Markowitz V, Pati A, Mavromatis K, Woyke T, Kyrpides N, Ivanova N, Howieson J: Complete genome sequence of Mesorhizobium australicum type strain (WSM2073 T ). Stand Genom Sci 2013, 9:410–19. 10.4056/sigs.4568282View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Nanadasena K, Yates R, Tiwari R, O'Hara G, Howieson J, Ninawi M, Chertkov O, Detter C, Tapia R, Han S, Woyke T, Pitluck S, Nolan M, Land M, Liolios K, Pati A, Copeland A, Kyrpides NC, Ivanova N, Goodwin L, Meenakshi U, Reeve W: Complete genome sequence of Mesorhizobium ciceri bv. biserrulae type strain (WSM1271 T ). Stand Genom Sci 2013, 9:462–72. 10.4056/sigs.4458283View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Szeto E, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC: The DOE-JGI standard operating procedure for the annotations of microbial genomes. Stand Genom Sci 2009, 1:63–67. 10.4056/sigs.632View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC: GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods 2010, 7:455–7. 10.1038/nmeth.1457View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IM, Chu K, Kyrpides NC: IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2271–8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Garrity GM, Field D, Kyrpides N, Hirschman L, Sansone S-A, Angiuoli S, Cole JR, Glöckner FO, Kolker E, Kowalchuk G, Moran MA, Ussery D, White O: Toward a standards-compliant genomic and metagenomic publication record. Omics 2008, 12:157–60. 10.1089/omi.2008.A2B2View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Garrity GM: The state of standards in genomic sciences. Stand Genom Sci 2011, 5:262–8. 10.4056/sigs.2515706View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Poole PS, Hynes MF, Johnston AWB, Tiwari RP, Reeve WG, Downie JA: Physiology of root nodule bacteria. In Nitrogen-Fixing Legume Symbioses. Volume 7. Edited by: Dilworth MJ, James EK, Sprent JI, Newton WE. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; 2008:241–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, Jones AD, O'Hare M, Kammen DM: Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 2006, 311:506–8. 10.1126/science.1121416View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D: Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:11206–10. 10.1073/pnas.0604600103View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Samuel S, Scott PT, Gresshoff PM: Nodulation in the legume biofuel feedstock tree Pongamia pinnata . Agric Res 2013, 2:207–14. 10.1007/s40003-013-0074-6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Parniske M: Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nat Rev Micro 2008, 6:763–75. 10.1038/nrmicro1987View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Deakin WJ, Broughton WJ: Symbiotic use of pathogenic strategies: rhizobial protein secretion systems. Nat Rev Micro 2009, 7:312–20.Google Scholar
  34. Toft C, Andersson SGE: Evolutionary microbial genomics: insights into bacterial host adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 11:465–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Charpentier M, Oldroyd G: How close are we to nitrogen-fixing cereals? Curr Opin Plant Biol 2010, 13:556–64. 10.1016/j.pbi.2010.08.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Reeve et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.