Open Access

High quality draft genome sequence of Janthinobacterium psychrotolerans sp. nov., isolated from a frozen freshwater pond

  • Xianzhe Gong1,
  • Stig Skrivergaard1,
  • Benjamin Smed Korsgaard1,
  • Lars Schreiber1, 2,
  • Ian P. G. Marshall1, 2,
  • Kai Finster1, 3 and
  • Andreas Schramm1, 2Email author
Standards in Genomic Sciences201712:8

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-017-0230-x

Received: 22 July 2016

Accepted: 27 November 2016

Published: 19 January 2017

Abstract

Strain S3-2T, isolated from sediment of a frozen freshwater pond, shares 99% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity with strains of the genus Janthinobacterium. Strain S3-2T is a facultative anaerobe that lacks the ability to produce violacein but shows antibiotic resistance, psychrotolerance, incomplete denitrification, and fermentation. The draft genome of strain S3-2T has a size of ~5.8 Mbp and contains 5,297 genes, including 115 RNA genes. Based on the phenotypic properties of the strain, the low in silico DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) values with related genomes (<35%), and the low whole genome-based average nucleotide identity (ANI) (<86%) with other strains within the genus Janthinobacterium, we propose that strain S3-2T is the type strain (= DSM 102223 = LMG 29653) of a new species within this genus. We propose the name Janthinobacterium psychrotolerans sp. nov. to emphasize the capability of the strain to grow at low temperatures.

Keywords

Janthinobacterium psychrotolerans Freshwater sedimentLow temperatureDenitrificationFermentation

Introduction

The genus Janthinobacterium includes Gram-negative, motile, aerobic rod-shaped bacteria, which were isolated from soil and aquatic environments. Production of violacein, a purple, water-insoluble, secondary metabolite, is a feature commonly found in this genus [1, 2]. Violacein has anti-bacterial, anti-viral, and anti-fungal properties [3], and has even been reported to protect frogs against fungal infection, when produced by the frog skin microbiota [4].

Strain S3-2T, which is affiliated with the genus Janthinobacterium was isolated from freshwater sediment while screening for denitrifying bacteria. However, strain S3-2T has traits that unambiguously distinguish it from the other strains of the genus [2, 5, 6]. Among these traits is the ability of strain S3-2T to grow at −3 °C, and to ferment different sugars. In contrast to the other strains, strain S3-2T does not produce the violet pigment violacein, not even when grown on glycerol medium (20 g L−1) that induces violacein synthesis in other members of the genus Janthinobacterium . Here we present the genome of strain S3-2T as well as its classification and phenotypic features. Taken together, these characteristics support the circumscription of S3-2T as novel species, Janthinobacterium psychrotolerans sp. nov.

Organism information

Classification and features

Sediment was obtained from a small fresh water pond near Aarhus, Denmark (coordinates 56.182804 N, 10.176294 E); the pond was covered with a thick layer of ice at the time of sampling. Strain S3-2T was isolated at room temperature under oxic conditions from a diluted sediment sample (3 g in 10 mL sterile water) by direct plating on TSB agar, containing 3 g tryptic soy broth (Scharlau Chemie S.A., Spain) L−1, 15 g agar L−1.

Strain S3-2T exhibits a 99% 16S rRNA sequence identity with Janthinobacterium agaricidamnosum (GenBank accession number: HG322949; IMG Genome ID 2585427668), the closest validly published species (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic relationship between Janthinobacterium psychrotolerans S3-2T (shown in bold) and other closely related strains. The sequence alignment of 16S rRNA genes was generated using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Aligner tool [32] and manually optimized with ARB [33]. The shown maximum likelihood tree was inferred based on the General Time Reversible (GTR) model with gamma rate heterogeneity as implemented in RAxML 7.4.2 [34]. Bootstrap support (1,000 replicates) of >70% is shown next to the branches. The genus Polymucleobacter was used to root the tree (not shown in the figure). Scale bar, 0.1 substitutions per nucleotide position. Star represents species with available sequenced genome in NCBI

Different growth temperatures (−3 °C, 0 °C, 4 °C, 10 °C, 21 °C, 25 °C, 30 °C, 35 °C, and 40 °C) were tested on TSB plates. Growth occurred between −3 °C and 30 °C, with the optimal growth temperature being 25 °C. The range of pH tolerance was tested in TSB (10 g L−1) adjusted to pH values 4–9 and buffered with citric acid, phosphate, or Tris [7]. Growth occurred between pH 6 and 8, with optimal growth at pH 7. Salt tolerance was tested on TSB (10 g L−1) agar with NaCl concentrations ranging from 0.17% to 3.17%. Strain S3-2T tolerated up to 2.17% of NaCl. Strain S3-2T produced N2O (determined by an N2O sensor [8]) as the end product of denitrification in anoxic incubations with TSB containing 5 mM nitrate; nitrite or N2 gas were never detected.

Cells of strain S3-2T are rod-shaped, and stain Gram-negative. Cells in stationary growth phase on TSB agar were motile, and had a mean length of 1.9 ± 0.3 μm, and a mean width of 0.7 ± 0.1 μm under a phase contrast microscope (n = 27) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Phase contrast micrograph of Janthinobacterium psychrotolerans strain S3-2T. Scale bar, 5 μm

Strain S3-2T showed mucoid pale yellow colonies on TSB agar, while colonies were non-mucoid, circular with undulate margins, and orange on modified Lysogeny broth (LB) agar (10 g L−1 tryptone, 5 g L−1 yeast extract, 10 g L−1 NaCl, 1% glycerol, 15 g L−1 agar), and brownish on glycerol medium (20 g L−1 glycerol, 0.5 g L−1 NaCl, 2.4 g L−1 MgSO4, 1 ml L−1 trace metal solution [9], 15 g L−1 agar). None of the media induced the production of violacein [10]. None of the observed pigments were fluorescent under UV light (365 nm; Vilber Lourmat, Germany).

Strain S3-2T was resistant to penicillin (5 μg disc), and ampicillin (10 μg disc), but susceptible to streptomycin (10 μg disc) and tetracycline (30 μg disc) on TSB (3 g L−1) agar. In GEN III microplate assays (Biolog), strain S3-2T was resistant to rifamycin SV, lincomycin, and vancomycin; susceptible to niaproof 4. Strain S3-2T did not inhibit growth of Escherichia coli K12 (DSM498; a strain resistant to penicillin, ampicillin, streptomycin, and tetracycline) on TSB (10 g L−1) agar.

Strain S3-2T was tested positive for alkaline phosphatase using the API ZYM test (BioMérieux, France), catalase using hydrogen peroxide, and oxidase (Bactident Oxidase, Merck, Germany). Using API 20E (BioMérieux, France), positive reactions were observed for enzymatic activity of arginine dihydrolase, for indole production, and the fermentation of D-glucose, D-mannitol, D-sucrose, and L-arabinose. Negative reactions were observed for enzymatic activities of β-galactosidase, lysine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase, urease, and gelatinase. Inositol, D-sorbitol, L-rhamnose, D-melibiose, and amygdalin were not fermented, and H2S and acetoin were not produced. Janthinobacterium has previously been considered as non-fermentative [1, 11]. The capability of linking fermentation to growth has only been reported for J. lividum strain UTB1302 with glucose [5]. Using API 20NE (BioMérieux, France), positive reactions were observed for hydrolysis of esculin ferric citrate, and the assimilation of arabinose. Negative reactions were observed for the assimilation of D-maltose, phenylacetic acid, N-acetyl-glucosamine, capric acid, and adipic acid. According to GEN III microplate assays (Biolog) at 25 °C, strain S3-2T could metabolize dextrin, D-cellobiose, D-raffinose, α-D-lactose, D-salicin, D-mannose, D-galactose, L-fucose, L-rhamnose, inosine, D-mannitol, D-arabitol, myo-inositol, glycyl-L-proline, L-alanine, L-aspartic acid, L-glutamic acid, L-histidine, L-pyroglutamic acid, D-galacturonic acid, L-galacturonic acid lactone, L-lactic acid, citric acid, α-keto-glutaric acid, D-malic acid, L-malic acid, bromo-succinic acid, Tween 40, and α-hydroxy-butyric acid. D-maltose, D-trehalose, N-acetyl-D-galactosamine, and formic acid were not metabolized.

The generation time of strain S3-2T was approx. 160 min in TSB (10 g L−1) with 5 mM nitrate when grown aerobically at 20 °C. Overall, strain S3-2T has traits that unambiguously distinguish it from other strains of the genus [2, 5, 6]. Among these traits is the ability of strain S3-2T to grow at −3 °C. In contrast to the other strains, strain S3-2T does not produce the pigment violacein, not even when grown on glycerol medium (20 g L−1), which induces violacein synthesis in other members of the genus Janthinobacterium [10]. Strain S3-2T is available from the Belgian Co-ordinated Collection of Micro-organisms - BCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection as strain LMG 29653 and the Leibniz Institute DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures as strain DSM 102223; its general properties are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Classification and general features of Janthinobacterium psychrotolerans S3-2T [35]

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence codea

 

Classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS [36]

  

Phylum Proteobacteria

TAS [37]

  

Class Betaproteobacteria

TAS [38]

  

Order Burkholderiales

TAS [39]

  

Family Oxalobacteraceae

TAS [40]

  

Genus Janthinobacterium

TAS [40]

  

Species Janthinobacterium psychrotolerans

TAS [40]

  

Strain S3-2T (LMG 29653 = DSM 102223)

IDA

 

Gram stain

Negative

IDA

 

Cell shape

Rod

IDA

 

Motility

Motile

IDA

 

Sporulation

None

IDA

 

Temperature range

−3 °C – 30 °C

IDA

 

Optimum temperature

25 °C

IDA

 

pH range; Optimum

6–8; 7

IDA

 

Carbon source

Sugars, amino acids, fatty acids etc.

IDA

MIGS-6

Habitat

Freshwater sediment

IDA

MIGS-6.3

Salinity

0.17–2.17% NaCl (w/v)

IDA

MIGS-22

Oxygen requirement

Facultative anaerobic

IDA

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

Free-living

IDA

MIGS-14

Pathogenicity

Unknown

IDA

MIGS-4

Geographic location

Aarhus, Denmark

IDA

MIGS-5

Sample collection

2015–01-16

IDA

MIGS-4.1

Latitude

56°10'58.1"N

IDA

MIGS-4.2

Longitude

10°10'34.7"E

IDA

MIGS-4.4

Altitude

70 m

IDA

aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [41]

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The draft genome sequence of strain S3-2T was completed on December 21, 2015. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) as project Gp0124039. This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at GenBank under the accession LOCQ00000000. The version described in this paper is version LOCQ01000000. The summarized information of this project is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS 31

Finishing quality

High quality draft

MIGS-28

Libraries used

NexteraXT DNA sample preparation

MIGS 29

Sequencing platforms

Illumina MiSeq

MIGS 31.2

Fold coverage

178

MIGS 30

Assemblers

SPAdes 3.6.1

MIGS 32

Gene calling method

Prodigal v2.6.2

 

Locus Tag

ASR47

 

Genbank ID

LOCQ00000000

 

GenBank Date of Release

2017-01-31

 

GOLD ID

Gp0124039

 

BIOPROJECT

PRJNA300713

MIGS 13

Source Material Identifier

LMG 29653, DSM 102223

 

Project relevance

Environmental, denitrification

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

Strain S3-2T was grown at 25 °C in TSB (10 g L−1) supplemented with 5 mM nitrate. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and DNA was extracted from the pellet using the PowerLyser® PowerSoil® DNA extraction kit (MoBio, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of strain S3-2T was sequenced with the Illumina MiSeq Reagent Kit V3 (Illumina Inc. San Diego, CA, USA). Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT Library Preparation Kit (Illumina). The sequencing library produced 3,761,645 paired end reads totalling ~2.11 Gbp. In total, 2,868,634 reads remained after quality trimming and adapter removal with Trimmomatic-0.33 [12] and the following trimming parameters: CROP:235 HEADCROP:25 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:20. Read quality before and after trimming was assessed by FastQC version 0.11.4 [13]. The trimmed reads (~1.04 Gbp) represented an average genome coverage of ~178-fold based on the size of the assembled draft genome of strain S3-2T. Reads were assembled using SPAdes 3.6.1 [14]. Contigs shorter than 1,000 bp were removed after the assembly.

Genome annotation

The draft genome was annotated using the standard operation procedure of the DOE-JGI Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MGAP v.4) supported by the JGI (Walnut Creek, CA; USA) [15]. Briefly, CRISPR elements were determined by the programs CRT [16] and PILER-CR v1.06 [17]. Non-coding RNAs, and tRNAs, were predicted by tRNAscan-SE 1.3.1 [18]. rRNA genes were identified by HMMER 3.1b2 [19]. Protein-coding genes were determined by Prodigal v2.6.2 [20]. Functional annotation was based on assigning the genes to different databases: the COG & KOG database (November, 2014) [21], the KEGG database (release 71.0, July 2014) [22], the MetaCyc database (release 18.1, June 2014) [23], the Pfam database (version 28.0, May, 2015) [24], the TIGRfam database (release 14.0, January, 2014) [25], and the InterPro Scan database (release 48) [26]. In silico DNA-DNA hybridization (GGDC 2.0) was carried out with the online genome-to-genome calculator provided by the DSMZ [27].

Genome properties

The properties of the draft genome of strain S3-2T are summarized in Table 3, and the assignment of genes into COG functional categories is shown in Table 4. The assembled draft genome features a G + C content of 63.04 mol%, and consists of 62 contigs ranging in size from 1,026 bp to 498,889 bp and totalling 5,844,062 bp. Based on CheckM 1.0.3 [28] in concert with conserved single copy genes detected in four reference genomes of Janthinobacterium spp. or 5,449 bacterial genomes, the genome of strain S3-2T was estimated to be 98.28% or 95.69% complete, respectively. There are 5,182 (97.83%) protein-coding genes and 115 RNAs of the 5,297 predicted genes. Of the RNA, 77 are tRNAs and 25 are rRNAs. Based on the number of 5S, and partial 16S and 23S rRNA genes, the genome features at least 8 rRNA operons. Putative functions were assigned to 77.08% of the protein-coding genes.
Table 3

Genome statistics

Attribute

Value

% of Totala

Genome size (bp)

5,844,062

100

DNA coding (bp)

5,291,400

90.54

DNA G + C (bp)

3,683,895

63.04

DNA scaffolds

62

100

Total genes

5,297

100

Protein coding genes

5,182

97.83

RNA genes

115

2.17

Pseudo genes

0

0

Genes in internal clusters

639

12.06

Genes with function prediction

4,087

77.16

Genes assigned to COGs

3,543

66.89

Genes with Pfam domains

4,291

81.01

Genes with signal peptides

724

13.67

Genes with transmembrane helices

1,275

24.07

CRISPR repeats

0

0

Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

Code

Value

%age

Description

J

217

5.35

Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

1

0.02

RNA processing and modification

K

338

8.33

Transcription

L

119

2.93

Replication, recombination and repair

B

2

0.05

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

36

0.89

Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning

V

105

2.59

Defense mechanisms

T

336

8.28

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

268

6.61

Cell wall/membrane biogenesis

N

183

4.51

Cell motility

U

87

2.14

Intracellular trafficking and secretion

O

182

4.49

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

221

5.45

Energy production and conversion

G

256

6.31

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

309

7.62

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

87

2.14

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

190

4.68

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

174

4.29

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

232

5.72

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

87

2.14

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

331

8.16

General function prediction only

S

233

5.74

Function unknown

-

1754

33.11

Not in COGs

The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the genome

Insights from the genome sequence

There is a high 16S rRNA sequence identity of 99% between strain S3-2T and all other strains with validly published names within the genus Janthinobacterium (Table 5). This value is higher than the 98.7% identity threshold recommended by Meier-Kolthoff et al. [29] to propose a new species within the phylum Proteobacteria . Therefore, in silico DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) against reference genomes was performed using the online genome-to-genome calculator with the GGDC 2.0 BLAST+ model [27]. DDH values calculated according to formula 2 (to confidently predict DDH values of incomplete genomes [27]) were always <35% (Table 5, and Additional file 1: Table S1), and thus clearly below the 70% threshold to differentiate bacterial species [27]. Whole-genome-based average nucleotide identities (ANI) to other Janthinobacterium genomes were calculated by the online tool [30, 31]. ANI was always < 86% (Table 5, and Additional file 1: Table S2) [30], and thus also well below the threshold for species delineation (95%; [31]). Hence, both results support the phenotypic distinction of strain S3-2T as novel species within the genus Janthinobacterium .
Table 5

Sequence similarity of J. psychrotolerans strain S3-2T with described species of the genus Janthinobacterium

Strain name

16S rRNA identity (%)a

DDH (Model-based Confidence Interval) (%)

ANI ± SDb (%)

Janthinobacterium agaricidamnosum

99

23.3 (21.0–25.7)

81.66 ± 5.07

Janthinobacterium lividum MTR

98

28.0 (25.6–30.5)

84.69 ± 4.73

Janthinobacterium lividum NFR18

99

27.7 (25.3–30.2)

84.73 ± 4.87

Janthinobacterium lividum PMC 25724

99

26.6 (24.3–29.1)

83.84 ± 4.58

Janthinobacterium lividum RIT308

99

27.9 (25.5–30.4)

84.75 ± 4.84

aValues for 16S rRNA identity are based on BLAST of the S3-2T 16S rRNA gene against genomes in IMG, except for J. lividum MTR, which was retrieved from NCBI (acc. nr. JQ070957.1)

bSD: Standard Deviation

Violacein production, a common feature in Janthinobacterium , was never observed in growth studies with strain S3-2T. This observation is consistent with the absence of the vioABCDE operon, which encodes the genes required for the synthesis of this pigment; neither the automated annotation nor manual BLAST searches of the S3-2T genome for known components of the vioABCDE operon (Additional file 1: Table S3) [2, 6] identified any genes encoding violacein synthesis.

The genome of strain S3-2T features all necessary genes for nitrate reduction to N2O but lacks genes encoding the nitrous oxide reductase (Additional file 1: Table S4), which is consistent with N2O as end-product of denitrification. Genes affiliated with aerobic respiration were identified, including terminal oxidases with both high- and low-affinity for oxygen (Additional file 1: Table S5). Another characteristic of strain S3-2T is its capability to ferment different sugars, a trait which has not been reported for other strains in the genus Janthinobacterium [1, 5, 11]. The genes that encode these properties were summarized (Additional file 1: Table S6, and Figure S1).

Conclusions

Based on the phenotypic properties, phylogenetic position, and whole genome comparison, we formally propose strain S3-2T as novel species of the genus Janthinobacterium , for which we propose the name Janthinobacterium psychrotolerans sp. nov. with strain S3-2T (=DSM 102223 = LMG 29653) as the type strain.

Description of Janthinobacterium psychrotolerans sp. nov.

Janthinobacterium psychrotolerans (psy.chro.to'le.rans. Gr. adj. psychros cold; L. part. adj. tolerans tolerating; N.L. neut. part. adj. psychrotolerans tolerating cold temperatures).

Janthinobacterium psychrotolerans is a facultative anaerobic, Gram-negative bacterium. Cells are rod-shaped, motile, and have a size of 1.9 ± 0.3 × 0.7 ± 0.1 μm. Colonies are pale yellow and mucoid on TSB agar. Growth occurs between −3 and 30 °C, with optimal growth observed at 25 °C. Strain S3-2T tolerates salinity between 0.17% and 2.17% NaCl, and grows within the pH range of 6 to 8 with optimal growth observed at pH 7.

Positive for catalase, oxidase, alkaline phosphatase, arginine dihydrolase. Negative for β-galactosidase, lysine decarboxylase, ornithine decarboxylase, urease, gelatinase.

Positive for metabolizing dextrin, D-cellobiose, D-raffinose, α-D-lactose, D-salicin, D-mannose, D-galactose, L-fucose, L-rhamnose, inosine, D-mannitol, D-arabitol, myo-inositol, glycyl-L-proline, L-alanine, L-aspartic acid, L-glutamic acid, L-histidine, L-pyroglutamic acid, D-galacturonic acid, L-galacturonic acid lactone, L-lactic acid, citric acid, α-keto-glutaric acid, D-malic acid, L-malic acid, bromo-succinic acid, Tween 40, and α-hydroxy-butyric acid. Negative for metabolizing D-maltose, D-trehalose, N-acetyl-D-galactosamine, and formic acid.

Positive for hydrolysis of esculin ferric citrate, assimilation of arabinose, and indole production. Negative for assimilation of D-maltose, phenylacetic acid, N-acetyl-glucosamine, capric acid, and adipic acid, acetoin production, and H2S production.

Strain S3-2T is able to ferment D-glucose, D-mannitol, D-sucrose, and L-arabinose; unable to ferment inositol, D-sorbitol, L-rhamnose, D-meliblose, and amygdalin.

Resistant to penicillin, vancomycin, rifamycin SV, lincomycin, and ampicillin; susceptible to streptomycin, niaproof 4, and tetracycline.

The G + C content of the genome is 63.04 mol%. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database (GOLD) as project Gp0124039. This Whole Genome Shotgun project is deposited at GenBank under the accession LOCQ00000000. The type strain S3-2T (= LMG 29653 = DSM 102223) was isolated from sediment of a small, frozen pond in Hasle, Aarhus, Denmark (coordinates 56.182804 N, 10.176294 E) in January, 2015.

Abbreviations

ANI: 

Average nucleotide identities

DDH: 

DNA-DNA hybridization

GOLD: 

Genomes OnLine database

GTR: 

General time reversible

LB: 

Lysogeny broth

MGAP: 

Microbial genome annotation pipeline

RDP: 

Ribosomal database project

TSB: 

Tryptic soy broth.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Anne B. Stentebjerg, Britta Poulsen, Trine B. Søgaard, Lars B. Pedersen, Preben G. Sørensen, and Lars R. Damgaard for excellent technical assistance. This study was supported by the Danish National Research Foundation (grants no. DNRF104), the European Research Council (grants no. 267233 and 294200), the Graduate School of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Denmark, and the Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University.

Authors’ contributions

KF and AS designed research; SS and BSK isolated and characterized strain S3-2T; XG carried out the genome sequencing and additional strain characterization; XG, LS, and IM performed bioinformatics analyses; all authors analysed data; XG, AS, and KF wrote the manuscript; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Section for Microbiology, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University
(2)
Center for Geomicrobiology, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University
(3)
Stellar Astrophysics Center, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University

References

  1. Shivaji S, Ray MK, Kumar GS, Reddy GSN, Saisree L, Wynn-Williams DD. Identification of Janthinobacterium lividum from the soils of the islands of Scotia Ridge and from Antarctic peninsula. Polar Biol. 1991;11.Google Scholar
  2. Hornung C, Poehlein A, Haack FS, Schmidt M, Dierking K, et al. The Janthinobacterium sp. HH01 genome encodes a homologue of the V. cholerae CqsA and L. pneumophila LqsA autoinducer synthases. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55045.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Durán N, Justo GZ, Ferreira CV, Melo PS, Cordi L, Martins D. Violacein: properties and biological activities. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2007;48:127–33.Google Scholar
  4. Harris RN, Brucker RM, Walke JB, Becker MH, Schwantes CR, et al. Skin microbes on frogs prevent morbidity and mortality caused by a lethal skin fungus. ISME J. 2009;3:818–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kawakami R, Sakuraba H, Ohshima T. Gene cloning and characterization of the very large NAD-dependent l-glutamate dehydrogenase from the psychrophile Janthinobacterium lividum, isolated from cold soil. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:5626–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Schloss PD, Allen HK, Klimowicz AK, Mlot C, Gross JA, et al. Psychrotrophic strain of Janthinobacterium lividum from a cold Alaskan soil produces prodigiosin. DNA Cell Biol. 2010;29:533–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Breznak JA, Costilow RN. Physicochemical factors in growth. In: Gerhard P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR, editors. Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology. Washington: American Society of Microbiology; 2007. p. 137–54.Google Scholar
  8. Andersen K, Kjær T, Revsbech NP. An oxygen insensitive microsensor for nitrous oxide. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2001;81:42–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Widdel F, Bak F. Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria. In: Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer K-H, editors. The Prokaryotes. New York: Springer; 1992. p. 3352–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Pantanella F, Berlutti F, Passariello C, Sarli S, Morea C, Schippa S. Violacein and biofilm production in Janthinobacterium lividum. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:992–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lincoln SP, Fermor TR, Tindall BJ. Janthinobacterium agaricidamnosum sp. nov., a soft rot pathogen of Agaricus bisporus. Int. J Syst Bacteriol. 1999;49:1577–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Babraham Bioinformatics - FastQC. Available at: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. Accessed October 20, 2015.
  14. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Huntemann M, Ivanova NN, Mavromatis K, Tripp HJ, Paez-Espino D, et al. The standard operating procedure of the DOE-JGI Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MGAP v.4). Stand. Genomic Sci. 2015;10:86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bland C, Ramsey TL, Sabree F, Lowe M, Brown K, et al. CRISPR Recognition Tool (CRT): a tool for automatic detection of clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:209.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Edgar RC. PILER-CR: fast and accurate identification of CRISPR repeats. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:955–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(10):e1002195.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:119.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Gonzales NR, et al. CDD: a conserved domain database for interactive domain family analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D237–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D199–205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Caspi R, Altman T, Billington R, Dreher K, Foerster H, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D459–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D290–301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Haft DH, Selengut JD, Richter RA, Harkins D, Basu MK, Beck E. TIGRFAMs and genome properties in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D387–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1236–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015: doi:10.1101/gr.186072.114.
  29. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Spröer C, Klenk H-P. When should a DDH experiment be mandatory in microbial taxonomy? Arch Microbiol. 2013;195:413–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe Mag. 2014;9:111–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, et al. The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D141–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1363–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol. 2008;57:758–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:541–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1990;87:4576–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn TE. Phylum XIV. Proteobacteria phyl. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn TE. Class II. Betaproteobacteria. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 575.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn TE. Order 1. Burkholderiales. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 575.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Family II. Oxalobacteraceae fam. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, editors. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 623.Google Scholar
  41. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016