Open Access

Complete genome sequence of Truepera radiovictrix type strain (RQ-24T)

  • Natalia Ivanova1,
  • Christine Rohde2,
  • Christine Munk1, 3,
  • Matt Nolan1,
  • Susan Lucas1,
  • Tijana Glavina Del Rio1,
  • Hope Tice1,
  • Shweta Deshpande1,
  • Jan-Fang Cheng1,
  • Roxane Tapia1, 3,
  • Cliff Han1, 3,
  • Lynne Goodwin1, 3,
  • Sam Pitluck1,
  • Konstantinos Liolios1,
  • Konstantinos Mavromatis1,
  • Natalia Mikhailova1,
  • Amrita Pati1,
  • Amy Chen4,
  • Krishna Palaniappan4,
  • Miriam Land1, 5,
  • Loren Hauser1, 5,
  • Yun-Juan Chang1, 5,
  • Cynthia D. Jeffries1, 5,
  • Evelyne Brambilla2,
  • Manfred Rohde6,
  • Markus Göker2,
  • Brian J. Tindall2,
  • Tanja Woyke1,
  • James Bristow1,
  • Jonathan A. Eisen1, 7,
  • Victor Markowitz4,
  • Philip Hugenholtz1, 8,
  • Nikos C. Kyrpides1,
  • Hans-Peter Klenk2 and
  • Alla Lapidus1
Standards in Genomic Sciences20114:4010091

https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.1563919

Published: 4 March 2011

Abstract

Truepera radiovictrix Albuquerque et al. 2005 is the type species of the genus Truepera within the phylum “Deinococcus/Thermus”. T. radiovictrix is of special interest not only because of its isolated phylogenetic location in the order Deinococcales, but also because of its ability to grow under multiple extreme conditions in alkaline, moderately saline, and high temperature habitats. Of particular interest is the fact that, T. radiovictrix is also remarkably resistant to ionizing radiation, a feature it shares with members of the genus Deinococcus. This is the first completed genome sequence of a member of the family Trueperaceae and the fourth type strain genome sequence from a member of the order Deinococcales. The 3,260,398 bp long genome with its 2,994 protein-coding and 52 RNA genes consists of one circular chromosome and is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Keywords

aerobic chemoorganotrophic non-motile thermophilic facultatively halophilic alkaliphilic radiation resistant Gram-indeterminate spherical-shaped Trueperaceae GEBA

Introduction

Strain RQ-24T (= DSM 17093 = LMG 22925 = CIP 108686) is the type strain of Truepera radiovictrix which is the sole and type species of the genus Truepera [1,2]. The generic name of strain RQ-24T derives from the name “Trüper”, in honor of the German microbiologist Hans G. Trüper. The species epithet is derived from the Latin radiovictrix, the vanquisher of radiation [1]. Strain RQ-24T was isolated in 2005 from a hot spring within a geothermal area located along an almost vertical wall and dry bed of the stream Ribeira Quente, about 500m south-east of a geothermal area on the eastern edge of the town Furnas, Azores [1]. Close to the area where RQ-24T was isolated an accompanying isolate, strain TU-8, was also obtained [1]. Strains RQ-24T and TU-8 share most physiological features as well as identical 16S rRNA sequence. The two T. radiovictrix strains also share many chemotaxonomic and physiological characteristics with the members of the genus Deinococcus, including the extreme resistance to ionizing radiation. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for T. radiovictrix RQ-24T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of strain RQ-24T in a 16S rRNA based tree. The sequences of the two 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome differ from each other by four nucleotides, and differ by up to three nucleotides from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (DQ022076), which contains one ambiguous base call.
Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of T. radiovictrix relative to the type strains of the other species within the class ‘Deinococci’. The tree was inferred from 1,457 aligned characters [3,4] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [5] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above branches are support values from 1,000 bootstrap replicates [6] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [7] are shown in blue, publicly available complete genome sequences [CP002361, Oceanithermus profundus] and published genomes [811] in bold. The genome of D. radidurans published by White et al. in 1999 [12] later turned out to be not from the type strain [13].

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of strain RQ-2T was compared using NCBI BLAST under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [14] and the relative frequencies, weighted by BLAST scores, of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [15]) were determined. The five most frequent genera were Deinococcus (84.0%), Truepera (8.0%), Oceanithermus (6.3%), Thiocapsa (0.9%) and Thiobaca (0.8%) (98 hits in total). Regarding the two hits to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 99.7%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 97.6%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was O. profundus, which corresponded to an identity of 87.5% and an HSP coverage of 61.9%. The highest-scoring environmental sequence was EU924247 (‘Microbiology and geochemistry Little Hot Creek hot spring sediment temperature 80 degrees C clone LHC1 L4 D07’), which showed an identity of 96.6% and an HSP coverage of 91.4%. The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits were ‘rock’ (3.1%), ‘microbi’ (2.9%), ‘skin’ (2.1%), ‘soil’ (1.9%) and ‘air’ (1.6%) (152 hits in total). The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were ‘rock’ (4.2%), ‘microbi’ (2.7%), ‘air’ (2.4%), ‘soil’ (2.1%) and ‘cabin/commerci’ (2.0%) (60 hits in total), indicating the existence of close relatives of the strain also in less extreme habitats.

The non-motile, red-pigmented cells of RQ-24T are spherical and approximately 1.25–2.0 µm in diameter, forming predominantly pairs or tetrads (Figure 2 and Table 1). Ultrathin sections of the cytoplasm revealed ribosomes, a fibrillar nucleoid and tubular structures of unknown nature, as well as three distinct layers of the cell wall, the innermost layer being thin, the outermost layer being as thick as 20–90 nm, both being electron dense [1]. Strain RQ-24T grows best at around 50°C, but not at 20°C or 60°C, with 1.0% NaCl in Thermus medium or Degryse medium 162. The acceptable salinity range supporting growth is up to 6.0% NaCl. Optimum pH is 7.5–9.5, with growth detected up to pH 11.2, but no growth was detected at pH 6.0 [1]. Strains RQ-24T and TU-8 are the most alkaliphilic members of the phylum “Deinococcus/Thermus” [1]. Both strains are oxidase and catalase positive and use a wide range of carbohydrates, organic acids or amino acids as carbon and energy sources with a respiratory metabolism (Table 1). Unexpectedly, strains RQ-24T and TU-8 are capable of fermenting glucose to lactate via homolactic fermentation [1]. Also, both strains are extremely resistant to gamma irradiation, with 60% survival rate after exposure to 5.0 kGy [1]. They share this radiation resistance trait with strains from the genus Deinococcus, Kineococcus radiotolerans and the actinobacterial genus Rubrobacter [25].
Figure 2.

Scanning electron micrograph of T. radiovictrix RQ-24T

Table 1.

Classification and general features of T. radiovictrix RQ-24T according to the MIGS recommendations [16].

MIGS ID

Property

Term

Evidence code

 

Current classification

Domain Bacteria

TAS [17]

 

Phylum “Deinococcus-Thermus

TAS [18,19]

 

Class Deinococci

TAS [20,21]

 

Order Deinococcales

TAS [22]

 

Family Trueperaceae

TAS [1,2]

 

Genus Truepera

TAS [1,2]

 

Species Truepera radiovictrix

TAS [1,2]

 

Type strain RQ-24

TAS [1]

 

Gram stain

indeterminate

TAS [1]

 

Cell shape

spherical, mostly in pairs or tetrads

TAS [1]

 

Motility

non-motile

TAS [1]

 

Sporulation

none

TAS [1]

 

Temperature range

25–55°C

TAS [1]

 

Optimum temperature

50°C

TAS [1]

 

Salinity

1% NaCl

TAS [1]

MIGS-22

Oxygen requirement

strictly aerobic

TAS [1]

 

Carbon source

carbohydrates, organic acids, amino acids

TAS [1]

 

Energy source

chemoorganotrophic

TAS [1]

MIGS-6

Habitat

hot spring

TAS [1]

MIGS-15

Biotic relationship

free-living

TAS [1]

MIGS-14

Pathogenicity

none

NAS

 

Biosafety level

1

TAS [23]

 

Isolation

hot spring runoff in geothermal area

TAS [1]

MIGS-4

Geographic location

River Ribeira Quente, near Furnas, Island of Sao Miguel, Azores

TAS [1]

MIGS-5

Sample collection time

2004 or before

TAS [1]

MIGS-4.1

Latitude

37.95

NAS

MIGS-4.2

Longitude

−25.49

NAS

MIGS-4.3

Depth

not reported

 

MIGS-4.4

Altitude

109 meter

NAS

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [24]. If the evidence code is IDA, then the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Chemotaxonomy

All attempts to identify a peptidoglycan of strain RQ-24T failed [1]. The polar lipids comprised as complex mixture of glycolipids and phospholipids, although no attempt has been made to compare them with the characteristic compounds found in members of the orders Deinococcales or Thermales. The major respiratory quinone is menaquinone 8 (MK-8). The fatty acids are predominantly saturated branched acids of which anteiso-C15:0 (38.6%), anteiso-C17 (17.2%) and iso-C17:0 (16.6%) as well as iso-C16:0 (6.9%). One acyl compound has an equivalent chain length (ECL) consistent with iso-C18:0 1,2-diol and another compound with ECL 16.090 probably representing iso-C15:0 diol. The presence of the long-chain 1,2 diols is unknown in members of the genus Deinococcus (although the methods normally used would not identify them), while they are found in some other members of the genera Thermus and Meiothermus. Despite the fact that members of the species T. radiovictrix is described as being red pigmented there is no data on the nature of the pigments.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [26], and is part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project [27]. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes OnLine Database [7] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2.

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID

Property

Term

MIGS-31

Finishing quality

Finished

MIGS-28

Libraries used

Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library, one 454 PE library (18 kb insert size), one Illumina library

MIGS-29

Sequencing platforms

Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium

MIGS-31.2

Sequencing coverage

70.6 × Illumina; 82.5 × pyrosequence

MIGS-30

Assemblers

Newbler version 2.1-PreRelease-4-28-2009-gcc-3.4.6-threads, Velvet, phrap

MIGS-32

Gene calling method

Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP

 

INSDC ID

CP002049

 

Genbank Date of Release

May 28, 2010

 

GOLD ID

Gc01303

 

NCBI project

38371

 

Database: IMG-GEBA

2502957036

MIGS-13

Source material identifier

DSM 17093

 

Project relevance

Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

T. radiovictrix RQ-24T, DSM 17093, was grown in DSMZ medium 1033 (Thermus Medium) [28] at 50°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5–1 g of cell paste using MasterPure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre MGP04100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer, with modification st/LALM for cell lysis as described in Wu et al. [27]. DNA of strain RQ-24T is available through the DNA Bank Network [29,30].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [31]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler version 2.1-PreRelease-4-28-2009-gcc-3.4.6-threads (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 75 contigs in five scaffolds was converted into a phrap [32] assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (230.2 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [33] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 268.9 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [32] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [31], Dupfinisher, or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI) [34]. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F.Chang, unpublished). A total of 336 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [35]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 153.1 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 736,380 pyrosequence and 6,393,275 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [36] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [37]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [38].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 3,260,398 bp long chromosome with a G+C content of 68.1% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 3,046 genes predicted, 2,994 were protein-coding genes, and 52 RNAs; 49 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (73.4%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Figure 3.

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 3.

Genome Statistics

Attribute

Value

% of Total

Genome size (bp)

3,260,398

100.00%

DNA coding region (bp)

2,862,171

87.79%

DNA G+C content (bp)

2,221,603

68.14%

Number of replicons

1

 

Extrachromosomal elements

0

 

Total genes

3,046

100.00%

RNA genes

52

1.71%

rRNA operons

2

 

Protein-coding genes

2,994

98.29%

Pseudo genes

49

1.61%

Genes with function prediction

2,235

73.37%

Genes in paralog clusters

370

12.15%

Genes assigned to COGs

2,272

74.59%

Genes assigned Pfam domains

2,385

78.30%

Genes with signal peptides

1,177

38.64%

Genes with transmembrane helices

709

23.28%

CRISPR repeats

9

 
Table 4.

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code

value

%age

Description

J

149

5.9

Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

A

0

0.0

RNA processing and modification

K

126

5.0

Transcription

L

135

5.4

Replication, recombination and repair

B

2

0.1

Chromatin structure and dynamics

D

29

1.2

Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning

Y

0

0.0

Nuclear structure

V

40

1.6

Defense mechanisms

T

93

3.7

Signal transduction mechanisms

M

128

5.1

Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis

N

14

0.6

Cell motility

Z

0

0.0

Cytoskeleton

W

0

0.0

Extracellular structures

U

34

1.4

Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport

O

82

3.3

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

C

148

5.9

Energy production and conversion

G

244

9.7

Carbohydrate transport and metabolism

E

271

10.7

Amino acid transport and metabolism

F

79

3.1

Nucleotide transport and metabolism

H

104

4.1

Coenzyme transport and metabolism

I

84

3.3

Lipid transport and metabolism

P

170

6.7

Inorganic ion transport and metabolism

Q

63

2.5

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

R

343

13.6

General function prediction only

S

187

7.4

Function unknown

-

774

25.4

Not in COGs

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of Helga Pomrenke (DSMZ) for growing T. radiovictrix cultures. This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research Program, and by the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-07NA27344, and Los Alamos National Laboratory under contract No. DE-AC02-06NA25396, UT-Battelle and Oak Ridge National Laboratory under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725, as well as German Research Foundation (DFG) INST 599/1-2.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
DOE Joint Genome Institute
(2)
DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH
(3)
Bioscience Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory
(4)
Biological Data Management and Technology Center, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
(5)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(6)
HZI - Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
(7)
University of California Davis Genome Center
(8)
Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland

References

  1. Albuquerque L, Simoes C, Nobre MF, Pino NM, Battista JR, Silva MT, Rainey FA, Da Costa MS. Truepera radiovictrix gen. nov., sp. nov., a new radiation resistant species and the proposal of Trueperaceae fam. nov. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2005; 247:161–169. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2005.05.002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Euzéby J. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1743–1745. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.63996-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540–552. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:452–464. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.452View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol 2008; 57:758–771. PubMed doi:10.1080/10635150802429642View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Lect Notes Comput Sci 2009; 5541:184–200. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02008-7_13View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:D346–D354. PubMed doi:10.1093/nar/gkp848PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. de Groot A, Dulermo R, Ortet P, Blanchard L, Guerin P, Fernandez B, Vacherie B, Dossat C, Jolivet E, Siguier P, et al. Alliance of proteomics and genomics to unravel the specificities of Sahara bacterium Deinococcus deserti. PLoS Genet 2009; 5:e1000434. PubMed doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000434PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Makarova KS, Omelchenko MV, Gaidamakova EK, Matrosova VY, Vasilenko A, Zhai M, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Kim E, Land M, et al. Deinococcus geothermalis: the pool of extreme radiation resistance genes shrinks. PLoS ONE 2007; 2:e955. PubMed doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000955PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pukall R, Zeytun A, Lucas A, Lapidus A, Hammon N, Deshpande S, Nolan M, Cheng JF, Pitluck S, Liolios K, et al. Complete genome sequence of Deinococcus maricopensis type strain (LB-34T). Stand Genomic Sci 2011; (next issue).Google Scholar
  11. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Lucas S, Goltsman E, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Tice H, Cheng JF, Han C, et al. Complete genome sequence of Meiothermus ruber type strain (21T). Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 3:26–36. PubMed doi:10.4056/sigs.1032748PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. White O, Eisen JA, Heidelberg JF, Hickey EK, Peterson JD, Dodson RJ, Haft DH, Gwinn ML, Nelson WC, Richardson DL, et al. Genome sequence of the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans R1. Science 1999; 286:1571–1577. PubMed doi:10.1126/science.286.5444.1571PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. White O, Eisen JA, Heidelberg JF, Hickey EK, Peterson JD, Dodson RJ, Haft DH, Gwinn ML, Nelson WC, Richardson DL, et al. Erratum: Genome sequence of the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans R1. Science 2004; 303:1571–1577.Google Scholar
  14. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen GL. Greengenes, a Chimera-checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006; 72:5069–5072. PubMed doi:10.1128/AEM.03006-05PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Porter MF. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program: electronic library and information systems 1980; 14:130–137. doi:10.1108/eb046814View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541–547. PubMed doi:10.1038/nbt1360PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576–4579. PubMed doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Weisburg WG, Giovannoni SJ, Woese CR. The Deinococcus-Thermus phylum and the effect of rRNA composition on phylogenetic tree construction. Syst Appl Microbiol 1989; 11:128–134. PubMedView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Garrity GM, Holt JG. 2001. Taxonomic outline of the Archaea and Bacteria, p. 155–166. In G. M. Garrity, D. R. Boone, and R. W. Castenholz (ed.), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd ed, vol. 1. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  20. List Editor. Validation List no. 85. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:685–690. PubMed doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02358-0Google Scholar
  21. Garrity GM, Holt JG. Class I. Deinococci class. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 395.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Rainey FA, Nobre MF, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E, da Costa MS. Phylogenetic diversity of the deinococci as determined by 16S ribosomal DNA sequence comparison. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:510–514. PubMed doi:10.1099/00207713-47-2-510View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Classification of bacteria and archaea in risk groups. http://www.baua.de TRBA 466.
  24. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25–29. PubMed doi:10.1038/75556PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ferreira AC, Nobre MF, Moore E, Rainey FA, Battista JR, da Costa MS. Characterization and radiation resistance of new isolates of Rubrobacter radiotolerans and Rubrobacter xylanophilus. Extremophiles 1999; 3:235–238. PubMed doi:10.1007/s007920050121View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Klenk HP, Göker M. En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria? Syst Appl Microbiol 2010; 33:175–182. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.syapm.2010.03.003View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K, Pukall R, Dalin E, Ivanova NN, Kunin V, Goodwin L, Wu M, Tindall BJ, et al. A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of Bacteria and Archaea. Nature 2009; 462:1056–1060. PubMed doi:10.1038/nature08656PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. List of growth media used at DSMZ: http://www.dsmz.de/microorganisms/media_list.php.
  29. Gemeinholzer B, Dröge G, Zetzsche H, Haszprunar G, Klenk HP, Güntsch A, Berendsohn WG, Wägele JW. The DNA Bank Network: the start from a German initiative. Biopreservation and Biobanking (In press).Google Scholar
  30. DNA bank Network. http://www.dnabank-network.org
  31. The DOE Joint Genome Institute. http://www.jgi.doe.gov
  32. Phrap and Phred for Windows, MacOS, Linux, and Unix. http://www.phrap.com
  33. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 2008; 18:821–829. PubMed doi:10.1101/gr.074492.107PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sims D, Brettin T, Detter JC, Han C, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Nolan M, Chen F, Lucas S, et al. Complete genome sequence of Kytococcus sedentarius type strain (541T). Stand Genomic Sci 2009; 1:12–20. PubMed doi:10.4056/sigs.761PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lapidus A, LaButti K, Foster B, Lowry S, Trong S, Goltsman E. POLISHER: An effective tool for using ultra short reads in microbial genome assembly and finishing. AGBT, Marco Island, FL, 2008.Google Scholar
  36. Hyatt D, Chen GL, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119. PubMed doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-119PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods 2010; 7:455–457. PubMed doi:10.1038/nmeth.1457View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Markowitz VM, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:2271–2278. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2011